ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01789320Updated Feb 21, 2021Results posted

Safety Study of Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide Via Microneedle to Treat Uveitis

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of triamcinolone acetonide (Triesence®) in Uveitis, Intermediate Uveitis and Posterior Uveitis, sponsored by Clearside Biomedical, Inc.. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-21.

Sponsored by Clearside Biomedical, Inc. · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to determine the safety and tolerability of a single microinjection of triamcinolone acetonide (TRIESENCE®) into the suprachoroidal space (SCS) of patients who have non-infectious uveitis.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 1/2, open-label study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and procedure of a microneedle injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) into the SCS. The subjects enrolled in this study will be chosen from subjects with non-infectious intermediate, posterior and pan-uveitis. The injection will only be administered to a single eye via the Clearside Biomedical proprietary microneedle into the SCS. The dose of TA to be injected is 4 mg of currently approved TRIESENCE® (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension 40 mg/mL). The study design includes 10 clinic visits over 27 weeks. Subjects will be followed for 26 weeks following treatment with TRIESENCE®.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uveitis
  • Intermediate Uveitis
  • Posterior Uveitis
  • Panuveitis
  • Noninfectious Uveitis

Keywords

  • uveitis
  • intermediate uveitis
  • posterior uveitis
  • panuveitis
  • noninfectious uveitis
  • microneedle
  • suprachoroidal space
  • SCS
  • inflammation
  • ocular inflammatory conditions
  • triamcinolone acetonide
  • TA
  • Triesence
  • injection
  • IVT
  • intravitreal
  • corticosteroid
  • sympathetic ophthalmia
  • temporal arteritis
  • vitreous haze
03

In context

Uveitis

299 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveitis; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 30 across 175 interventional studies indexed under Uveitis.

Browse Uveitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Clearside Biomedical, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of non-infectious intermediate, posterior or pan-uveitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any ocular trauma within the past 6 months in the study eye
  • any injection of intraocular or steroid implant or the Ozurdex® implant in the 6 months prior to the study treatment, or any prior use of Retisert™ in the study eye
  • any uncontrolled systemic disease that would preclude participation in the study or put the subject at risk due to study treatment or procedures
  • have a known infection or other immunodeficiency disease for which corticosteroid therapy would be
  • are monocular
  • have ocular hypertension
  • history of any intraocular surgery in the study eye
  • presence of an anterior staphyloma in the study eye
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    triamcinolone acetonide (Triesence®)

    TRIESENCE® (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension 40 mg/mL) in a total volume of 100 uL administered via microneedle directly to the suprachoroidal space (SCS)

    Drug: triamcinolone acetonide (Triesence®)

Interventions

  • 4 mg of TRIESENCE® (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension 40 mg/mL) administered as a single injection to the suprachoroidal space

    Also known as: triamcinolone acetonide, TA, Triesence, corticosteroid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

    Intraocular pressure is the fluid pressure inside the eye. Intraocular pressure change from baseline at week 8 was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. Tonometry is the method eye care professionals use to determine this pressure. Intraocular pressure is typically measured in millimeters of mercury. A higher pressure inside the eye can be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression leading to optic nerve damage. A negative change indicates a reduction in intraocular pressure.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in IOP at 8 weeks

  2. Best Corrected Visual Acuity

    Visual acuity (VA) rates a person's ability to recognize small details with precision. Best corrected VA refers to this measurement when the best vision has be achieved following refraction. Visual acuity change from baseline at 8 and 26 weeks was measured following the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol using standardized lighting and lanes and an ETDRS eye chart. This eye chart comprises rows of letters, with 5 letters per row, and with the letter size from line to line varying logarithmically and is used to estimate visual acuity. Visual acuity is scored with reference to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or logMAR. Zero logMAR indicates standard vision, positive values indicate poor vision and negative values indicate good vision. A negative changes indicates an improvement in visual acuity.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 26 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Central Subfield Thickness Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

    Central subfield thickness (CST) is a measure of the thickness of the retina in the 1 mm diameter circle centered on the fovea or center of the macular where eyesight is the sharpest. CST change from baseline at 8 and 26 weeks was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCT is a diagnostic imaging technique used to capture 2 and 3 dimensional images within biological tissue, e.g., for determining the amount of edema contained in the retina. CST is typically measured in microns. A negative change represents a reduction in retinal thickness and an improvement in cases of retinal edema.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 26 weeks.

  2. Vitreous Haze Grade

    Vitreous haze scale (Nussenblatt 1985 as modified in Lowder 2011). Scores include value 0 (no inflammation), +0.5 (trace inflammation), +1 (mild blurring of the retinal vessels and optic nerve), +1.5 (optic nerve head and posterior retina view obscuration greater than +1 but less than +2), +2 (moderate blurring of the optic nerve head), +3 (marked blurring of the optic nerve head), and +4 (optic nerve head not visible) A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 26 weeks

07

Results

Posted Feb 21, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTriamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Started11
Completed9
Not completed2
Withdrew: Re-enrolled into study1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Intraocular pressure is the fluid pressure inside the eye. Intraocular pressure change from baseline at week 8 was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. Tonometry is the method eye care professionals use to determine this pressure. Intraocular pressure is typically measured in millimeters of mercury. A higher pressure inside the eye can be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression leading to optic nerve damage. A negative change indicates a reduction in intraocular pressure.

Time frame:
Change from baseline in IOP at 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mm Hg
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
mm HgTriamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)-0.1 ± 3.21
PrimaryBest Corrected Visual Acuity

Visual acuity (VA) rates a person's ability to recognize small details with precision. Best corrected VA refers to this measurement when the best vision has be achieved following refraction. Visual acuity change from baseline at 8 and 26 weeks was measured following the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol using standardized lighting and lanes and an ETDRS eye chart. This eye chart comprises rows of letters, with 5 letters per row, and with the letter size from line to line varying logarithmically and is used to estimate visual acuity. Visual acuity is scored with reference to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or logMAR. Zero logMAR indicates standard vision, positive values indicate poor vision and negative values indicate good vision. A negative changes indicates an improvement in visual acuity.

Time frame:
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 26 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
logMARTriamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Week 8-0.25 ± 0.107
Week 26-0.28 ± 0.096
SecondaryCentral Subfield Thickness Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Central subfield thickness (CST) is a measure of the thickness of the retina in the 1 mm diameter circle centered on the fovea or center of the macular where eyesight is the sharpest. CST change from baseline at 8 and 26 weeks was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCT is a diagnostic imaging technique used to capture 2 and 3 dimensional images within biological tissue, e.g., for determining the amount of edema contained in the retina. CST is typically measured in microns. A negative change represents a reduction in retinal thickness and an improvement in cases of retinal edema.

Time frame:
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 26 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · Microns
Central Subfield Thickness Using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
MicronsTriamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Week 8-153.7 ± 109.45
Week 26-107.0 ± 86.95
SecondaryVitreous Haze Grade

Vitreous haze scale (Nussenblatt 1985 as modified in Lowder 2011). Scores include value 0 (no inflammation), +0.5 (trace inflammation), +1 (mild blurring of the retinal vessels and optic nerve), +1.5 (optic nerve head and posterior retina view obscuration greater than +1 but less than +2), +2 (moderate blurring of the optic nerve head), +3 (marked blurring of the optic nerve head), and +4 (optic nerve head not visible) A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 26 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Vitreous Haze Grade
score on a scaleTriamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Week 8-0.75 ± 0.463
Week 26-0.75 ± 0.289

Adverse events

Collected over 26 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)0/11 (0%)1/11 (9.1%)11/11 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTriamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 26
Most frequent other events
EventTriamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Eye painEye disorders5/11
Cystoid macular oedemaEye disorders3/11
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders2/11
Localised infectionInfections and infestations2/11
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/11
CataractEye disorders1/11
Cystoid macular oedemaEye disorders1/11
Eye irritationEye disorders1/11
Eyelid margin crustingEye disorders1/11
Punctate keratitisEye disorders1/11

Baseline characteristics

All subjects who received at least one attempted dose of study drug.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years10
>=65 years1
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Mean57.3 ± 9.47
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Female8
Male3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino10
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American6
White4
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triesence®)
United States11
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Goldstein DA, Do D, Noronha G, Kissner JM, Srivastava SK, Nguyen QD. Suprachoroidal Corticosteroid Administration: A Novel Route for Local Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Dec 14;5(6):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.6.14. eCollection 2016 Dec. PubMed 27980877 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2013, a primary completion of Mar 2015 and a completion of Mar 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Feb 2021, 5 years 11 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jul 2016.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 5, 2013
First posted
Feb 12, 2013
Start
Feb 2013
Primary completionActual
Mar 2015
CompletionActual
Mar 2015
Results delay requested
Jul 25, 2016
Results first posted
Feb 21, 2021
Last update
Feb 21, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01789320
Lead sponsor
Clearside Biomedical, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2013
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Mar 2015
Completion
Mar 2015
Results posted
Feb 21, 2021
Last update
Feb 21, 2021

Study contacts

Thomas Ciulla, MD
study director · Clearside Biomedical, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Triamcinolone Acetonide

Start the discussion