CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01771991SodermixUpdated Apr 5, 2019Results posted

Study of Topical Superoxide Dismutase to Treat Radiation Induced Fibrosis

An interventional study of Topical Sodermix Dismutase in the form of Sodermix (SOD) and Placebo in Radiation Induced Fibrosis to the Head and Neck, sponsored by Sanford Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-05.

Sponsored by Sanford Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if topical superoxide dismutase is an effective treatment of radiation related neck fibrosis, and to determine the quality of life impact from radiation related fibrosis in the head and neck cancer patients at Sanford Health.

Read the detailed description

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of topical Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) on the radiation induced fibrosis in head and neck cancer patients. A prospective, blinded, two group control design will be used with pretest and post test quality of life as well as objective fibrosis assessment. Patients will be randomized to alternatively receive topical SOD or placebo as instructed on twice daily use for 3 months. Pre and post treatment quality of life surveys and objective assessment will determine if the topical SOD improves neck fibrosis/function and global quality of life.

This study will increase clinical trial awareness and participation while potentially improving the long term functional outcomes of head and neck cancer patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Radiation Induced Fibrosis to the Head and Neck

Keywords

  • fibrosis
  • radiation
  • neck
  • cancer
  • Sodermix
03

In context

Radiation Pneumonitis

36 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiation Pneumonitis; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 74 is close to the median of 70 across 21 interventional studies indexed under Radiation Pneumonitis.

Browse Radiation Pneumonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanford Health is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • must have evidence of neck fibrosis
  • previous radiation treatment to the neck for cancer
  • age greater than or equal to 18 years
  • life expectancy of greater than 12 weeks
  • ability to understand the purpose of the study and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to SOD or Cetaphil cram.
  • any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical conditions that do not permit medical follow-up and compliance with the study protocol.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Topical Sodermix Dismutase

    Patients with measurable radiation induced fibrosis of the neck. Patients will be randomized to applying Topical Sodermix Dismutase in the form of Sodermix(SOD) to the area of neck skin fibrosis twice a day for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Topical Sodermix Dismutase in the form of Sodermix (SOD)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    Cetaphil cream

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugTopical Sodermix Dismutase in the form of Sodermix (SOD)

    Topical Sodermix Dismutase in the form of Sodermix (SOD) will be applied twice daily, of half dollar application for 12 weeks to fibrosed area.

    Also known as: Sodermix, SOD

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo or cetaphil cream will be applied twice daily, of half dollar size for 12 weeks to fibrosed area.

    Also known as: Cetaphil cream

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Neck Fibrosis

    Number of participants with improvement in fibrosis as defined as a one point improvement on the fibrosis scale using the grading scale outlined in CTCAE 4.03, page 46.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Determine the Quality of Life Impact From Radiation Related Fibrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

    Metrics are measured via analysis of Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer (FACT H\&N) questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life in patient receiving treatment of head and neck cancer. Sub-categories of Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Head \& Neck Additional Concerns are included. Each category used a 5-point Likert scale ranged from 0 to 4 with 0= Not at all (no affect on daily activities) to 4=Very much (significant affect on daily activities). Sub-categories were not analyzed individually. All were summed together for total score. Analysis was done comparing baseline scores and end of treatment scores. Maximum scale total = 156 (answer of 4 to all items) Minimum scale total = 0 (answer of 0 to all items)

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Determine the Pain From Radiation Related Fibrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

    Subjects use the numeric verbal pain rating scale (0-10 scale specified for neck region with "0" being no pain and "10" extreme pain). 0 - Pain free 1. - Very minor annoyance-occasional minor twinges 2. - Minor annoyance-occasional, does not interfere with activities 3. - Annoying enough to be distracting 4. - Can be ignored if you are really involved in your work, but still distracting, 5. - Can't be ignored for more than 30 minutes. Interrupts some activities. 6. - Can't be ignored for any length of time, but you can still go to work and participate in social activities. 7. - Make it difficult to concentrate, interferes with sleep, you can still function with effort, prevents doing daily activities 8. - Physical activity severely limited. You can read and converse with effort. Hard to do anything 9. - Unable to do anything, Can't bear the pain 10. - Bad as it could be, nothing else matters Differences between baseline scores and 3 month score

    Time frame: From baseline to 3 months.

  3. Cervical Spine Range of Motion

    Determine the effect of the treatment on Range of Motion over time. Cervical spine rotation was measured by a physical therapist using a goniometer. A goniometer is an instrument that either measures an angle or allows an object to be rotated to a precise angular position. Results are documented in degrees. Baseline measurements were compared with post-treatment measurements. A larger post-treatment measure when compared to the baseline measurement would indicate an increase of the cervical spine range of motion.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 24, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTopical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo Group
Started3836
Started treatment3734
Completed3030
Not completed86

Outcome measures

PrimaryImprovement in Neck Fibrosis

Number of participants with improvement in fibrosis as defined as a one point improvement on the fibrosis scale using the grading scale outlined in CTCAE 4.03, page 46.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Improvement in Neck Fibrosis
participantsTopical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo Group
Improvement in Neck Fibrosis1313
SecondaryDetermine the Quality of Life Impact From Radiation Related Fibrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Metrics are measured via analysis of Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer (FACT H\&N) questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life in patient receiving treatment of head and neck cancer. Sub-categories of Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Head \& Neck Additional Concerns are included. Each category used a 5-point Likert scale ranged from 0 to 4 with 0= Not at all (no affect on daily activities) to 4=Very much (significant affect on daily activities). Sub-categories were not analyzed individually. All were summed together for total score. Analysis was done comparing baseline scores and end of treatment scores. Maximum scale total = 156 (answer of 4 to all items) Minimum scale total = 0 (answer of 0 to all items)

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Determine the Quality of Life Impact From Radiation Related Fibrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
score on a scaleTopical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo Group
Determine the Quality of Life Impact From Radiation Related Fibrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients2.30 ± 6.600.44 ± 9.17
Statistical analysis
  • Topical Sodermix Dismutase vs Placebo Group · Wilcoxon Rank-Sum · p = 0.57 · Sum of scores: 453Standard Deviation under the Null hypothesis for each group.
SecondaryDetermine the Pain From Radiation Related Fibrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Subjects use the numeric verbal pain rating scale (0-10 scale specified for neck region with "0" being no pain and "10" extreme pain). 0 - Pain free 1. - Very minor annoyance-occasional minor twinges 2. - Minor annoyance-occasional, does not interfere with activities 3. - Annoying enough to be distracting 4. - Can be ignored if you are really involved in your work, but still distracting, 5. - Can't be ignored for more than 30 minutes. Interrupts some activities. 6. - Can't be ignored for any length of time, but you can still go to work and participate in social activities. 7. - Make it difficult to concentrate, interferes with sleep, you can still function with effort, prevents doing daily activities 8. - Physical activity severely limited. You can read and converse with effort. Hard to do anything 9. - Unable to do anything, Can't bear the pain 10. - Bad as it could be, nothing else matters Differences between baseline scores and 3 month score

Time frame:
From baseline to 3 months.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Determine the Pain From Radiation Related Fibrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
score on a scaleTopical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo Group
Determine the Pain From Radiation Related Fibrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients0.31 ± 1.010.13 ± 1.81
Statistical analysis
  • Topical Sodermix Dismutase vs Placebo Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.65 · Mean difference (final values): 0.17 · 95% CI -0.60 to 0.95
SecondaryCervical Spine Range of Motion

Determine the effect of the treatment on Range of Motion over time. Cervical spine rotation was measured by a physical therapist using a goniometer. A goniometer is an instrument that either measures an angle or allows an object to be rotated to a precise angular position. Results are documented in degrees. Baseline measurements were compared with post-treatment measurements. A larger post-treatment measure when compared to the baseline measurement would indicate an increase of the cervical spine range of motion.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · degrees
Cervical Spine Range of Motion
degreesTopical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo Group
Cervical Spine Range of Motion-7.14 ± 14.27-9.77 ± 20.63
Statistical analysis
  • Topical Sodermix Dismutase vs Placebo Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.57 · Mean difference (final values): 2.63 · 95% CI -6.65 to 11.91

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Topical Sodermix Dismutase—0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)
Placebo Group—0/36 (0%)0/36 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Topical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years282654
>=65 years101020
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Topical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo GroupTotal
Mean60.98 ± 9.6461.64 ± 9.7361.3 ± 9.62
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Topical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo GroupTotal
Female8715
Male302959
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Topical Sodermix DismutasePlacebo GroupTotal
United States383674
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Sanford Health
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57105, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01771991
Lead sponsor
Sanford Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2013
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2013
Completion
Jun 2013
Results posted
Apr 24, 2015
Last update
Apr 5, 2019

Study contacts

William C Spanos, MD
principal investigator · Sanford Health/Sanford Clinic ENT

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion