ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07757113Updated Aug 11, 2026

Comparative Study of Embolic Agents in Patients With Subdural Hemorrhage Undergoing Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) Embolization

An interventional study of Particles (polyvinyl alcohol or similar microspheres) and Liquid Embolics (Onyx, n-BCA, or equivalent) in Chronic Subdural Hematoma, Stroke and Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization, sponsored by Sanford Health. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.

Sponsored by Sanford Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Single site, prospective, comparative effectiveness pilot trial comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of three embolic materials (particles, liquid embolics, and Wallaby Phenox coils) in MMA embolication for cSDH.

Read the detailed description

Participants will be sequentially enrolled into one of three treatment arms based on the embolic material used during their MMA embolization:

Cohort/Arm 1: Particles (polyvinyl alcohol or similar microspheres) Cohort/Arm 2: Liquid embolics (Onyx, n-BCA, or equivalent) Cohort/Arm 3: Phenox coils (Avenir UNO Helical Coil) Participants will remain on study through their standard 30- and 90-day follow-up visits.

With a target of 30 patients (10 per arm), the study will provide preliminary data on radiographic efficacy (primary: hematoma resolution/thickness reduction), safety (complications, recurrence, adverse events, reinterventions), and exploratory outcomes (symptom/functional improvement, procedural metrics, influence of comorbidities/antithrombotics).

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Subdural Hematoma
  • Stroke
  • Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization
03

In context

Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

112 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 185 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic.

Browse Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanford Health is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥ 18 years)
  • Undergoing Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH)
  • Able to provide or have a legally authorized representative (LAR) do so

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ineligible for MMAE procedure, as deemed by the treating physician, for any indication (e.g. pregnancy)
  • Non-chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) indications for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization (MMAE), including acute subdural hematoma with symptom onset \< 72 hours or mixed acute/chronic without predominant chronic features
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Known severe allergy or to embolic materials (e.g. particles, liquids like Onyx/n-BCA, or coils)
  • Inability to undergo angiography (e.g. severe renal impairment contraindicating contrast)
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete follow-up visits at 30 and 90 days
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MMA Embolization

    Participants will be sequentially assigned one of three MMAE treatment strategies (particles, liquid embolics, or coils) in the order they become eligible and agree to participate. Radiographic and clinical outcomes will be compared.

    Device: Particles (polyvinyl alcohol or similar microspheres) · Device: Liquid Embolics (Onyx, n-BCA, or equivalent) · Device: Phenox Coils (Avenir UNO Helical Coil)

Interventions

  • DeviceParticles (polyvinyl alcohol or similar microspheres)

    Participants will be sequentially enrolled into one of three clinically accepted MMAE treatment strategies (interventions) to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes.

  • DeviceLiquid Embolics (Onyx, n-BCA, or equivalent)

    Participants will be sequentially enrolled into one of three clinically accepted MMAE treatment strategies (interventions) to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes.

  • DevicePhenox Coils (Avenir UNO Helical Coil)

    Participants will be sequentially enrolled into one of three clinically accepted MMAE treatment strategies (interventions) to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in hematoma size

    The primary objective aims to compare the radiographic efficacy of three embolic materials (particles, liquid embolics, Phenox coils) in MMA embolization for cSDH to evaluate change in hematoma size.

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complications

    The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the safety profile of the embolic materials, to support overall comparative effectiveness.

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days

  2. Recurrence Rates

    The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the the safety profile of the embolic materials, to support overall comparative effectiveness.

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days

  3. Adverse Events

    The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the the safety profile of the embolic materials, to support overall comparative effectiveness.

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days

  4. Re-Intervention Rates

    The secondary objectives aim to evaluate the the safety profile of the embolic materials, to support overall comparative effectiveness.

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07757113
Lead sponsor
Sanford Health
Collaborators
phenox Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2026

Study contacts

Alycia Abler Clinical Research Project Manager
Contact
alycia.abler@sanfordhealth.org
(701) 417-2002
Divyajot Sandhu, MD, MBBS
principal investigator · Sanford Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion