CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01737398Updated Jul 17, 2019Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Inotersen in Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Inotersen and Placebo in FAP, Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy and TTR, sponsored by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 24 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 82 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-17.

Sponsored by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
173
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 82 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inotersen given for 65 weeks in participants with Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy (FAP).

Read the detailed description

FAP is a rare, hereditary disease caused by mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) protein. TTR is made by the liver and secreted into the blood. TTR mutations cause it to misfold and deposit in multiple organs causing FAP.

Inotersen (also known as ISIS 420915) is an antisense drug that was designed to decrease the amount of mutant and normal TTR made by the liver. It is predicted that decreasing the amount of TTR protein would result in a decrease in the formation of TTR deposits, and thus slow or stop disease progression.

The purpose of this study is to determine if inotersen can slow or stop the nerve damage caused by TTR deposits. This study will enroll late Stage 1 and early Stage 2 FAP participants. Participants will receive either inotersen or placebo for 65 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • FAP
  • Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy
  • TTR
  • Transthyretin
  • Amyloidosis

Keywords

  • FAP
  • Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy
  • TTR
  • Transthyretin
  • Amyloidosis
03

In context

Polyneuropathies

256 studies on the registry are indexed under Polyneuropathies; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 173 is above the median of 75 across 162 interventional studies indexed under Polyneuropathies.

Browse Polyneuropathies studies →

Lead sponsor

Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 116 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Of its 48 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 82 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 FAP participants with the following:

    1. NIS score within protocol criteria
    2. Documented transthyretin variant by genotyping
    3. Documented amyloid deposit by biopsy
  • Females of child-bearing potential must use appropriate contraception and be non-pregnant and non-lactating. Males engaging in relations of child-bearing potential are to use appropriate contraception

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Low Retinol level at screen
  • Karnofsky performance status ≤50
  • Poor Renal function
  • Known type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Other causes of sensorimotor or autonomic neuropathy (for example, autoimmune disease)
  • If previously treated with Vyndaqel®, will need to have discontinued treatment for 2 weeks prior to Study Day 1. If previously treated with Diflunisal, will need to have discontinued treatment for 3 days prior to Study Day 1
  • Previous treatment with any oligonucleotide or siRNA within 12 months of screening
  • Prior liver transplant or anticipated liver transplant within 1 year of screening
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of ≥3
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome or major surgery within 3 months of screening
  • Known Primary or Leptomeningeal Amyloidosis
  • Anticipated survival less than 2 years
  • Any other conditions in the opinion of the investigator which interfere with the participant participating in or completing the study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
173 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Inotersen

    300 mg inotersen administered subcutaneously (SC) 3 times on alternate days in the first week and then once-weekly for 64 weeks

    Drug: Inotersen

  • Active comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo administered SC 3 times on alternate days in the first week and then once-weekly for 64 weeks

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugInotersen

    Also known as: TEGSEDI, IONIS-TTR Rx, ISIS 420915

  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline In The Modified Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) +7 Composite Score at Week 66

    The mNIS+7 composite score is a measure of neurologic impairment that evaluates muscle weakness, sensation, reflexes, nerve conduction, and autonomic function. The mNIS+7 Composite Score has a range of -22.32 to 346.32 and a higher mNIS+7 composite score indicates lower function.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 66

  2. Change From Baseline In The Norfolk Quality Of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) Questionnaire at Week 66

    The Norfolk QoL-DN score is a measure of physical function/large fiber neuropathy, symptoms, activities of daily living, small fiber neuropathy, and autonomic neuropathy. The Norfolk QoL-DN total score has a range of -4 to 136, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN score indicates poorer QoL.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 66

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Symptoms Domain Score at Week 66

    The Norfolk QoL-DN symptoms score is a sub-score of the total Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire. The Norfolk QoL-DN symptoms domain score has a range of 0-32, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN score indicates poorer QoL.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 66

  2. Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Physical Functioning/Large Fiber Neuropathy Domain Score at Week 66

    The Norfolk QoL-DN physical functioning/large fiber neuropathy domain score is a sub-score of the total Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire. The Norfolk QoL-DN physical function/large fiber neuropathy domain score has a range of -4 to 56, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN domain score indicates poorer QoL.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 66

  3. Change From Baseline In Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 65

    The mBMI is the BMI multiplied by the serum albumin g/L

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 65

  4. Change From Baseline In Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 65

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 65

  5. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 66

    The NIS score is a measure of neurologic impairment. The NIS Score has a range of 0 to 244 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 66

  6. Change From Baseline in Modified +7 at Week 66

    The Modified +7 score is a version of the NIS score that is a measure of neurologic impairment. The Modified +7 Score has a range of -22.32 to 102.32 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 66

  7. Change From Baseline in NIS+7 at Week 66

    The NIS+7 score is a version of the NIS score that is a measure of neurologic impairment. The NIS+7 Score has a range of -26.04 to 270.04 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 66

  8. Change From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram (ECHO) at Week 65 in the CM-ECHO Set

    GLS by ECHO is a measure of cardiac systolic function

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 65

  9. Change From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram ECHO at Week 65 in the ECHO Subgroup

    GLS by ECHO is a measure of cardiac systolic function

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 65

  10. Change From Baseline in Transthyretin (TTR) Level at Week 65

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 65

  11. Change From Baseline in Retinol Binding Protein 4 (RBP4) Level at Week 65

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 65

  12. Maximum Measured Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Inotersen At Week 65

    Time frame: Week 65

  13. Time To The Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) Of Inotersen At Week 65

    Time frame: Week 65

  14. Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 To 24 Hours (AUC[0-24hr]) Of Inotersen At Week 65

    Time frame: Week 65

  15. Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 To 168 Hours (AUC[0-168hr]) Of Inotersen At Week 65

    Time frame: Week 65

  16. Plasma Clearance From 0 To 24 Hours (CL[0-24hr]/F) Of Inotersen At Week 65

    Time frame: Week 65

  17. Inotersen Plasma Clearance At Steady State (CLss/F) At Week 65

    Time frame: Week 65

07

Results

Posted Jan 23, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInotersenPlacebo
Started11360
Received at least 1 dose of study drug11260
Safety set11260
Completed8752
Not completed268
Withdrew: Adverse event or sae161
Withdrew: Stopping rule met21
Withdrew: Voluntary withdrawal23
Withdrew: Ineligibility10
Withdrew: Liver transplant10
Withdrew: Disease progression23
Withdrew: Sponsor's decision20

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline In The Modified Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) +7 Composite Score at Week 66

The mNIS+7 composite score is a measure of neurologic impairment that evaluates muscle weakness, sensation, reflexes, nerve conduction, and autonomic function. The mNIS+7 Composite Score has a range of -22.32 to 346.32 and a higher mNIS+7 composite score indicates lower function.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 66
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Modified Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) +7 Composite Score at Week 66
Scores on a ScaleInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline In The Modified Neuropathy Impairment Score (mNIS) +7 Composite Score at Week 664.16 ± 15.67223.89 ± 24.190
Statistical analysis
  • Inotersen vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.00000004 · Least square mean difference: -19.73 · 95% CI -26.43 to -13.03
PrimaryChange From Baseline In The Norfolk Quality Of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) Questionnaire at Week 66

The Norfolk QoL-DN score is a measure of physical function/large fiber neuropathy, symptoms, activities of daily living, small fiber neuropathy, and autonomic neuropathy. The Norfolk QoL-DN total score has a range of -4 to 136, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN score indicates poorer QoL.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 66
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk Quality Of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) Questionnaire at Week 66
Scores on a ScaleInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk Quality Of Life Diabetic Neuropathy (QoL-DN) Questionnaire at Week 66-0.08 ± 18.96710.77 ± 21.134
Statistical analysis
  • Inotersen vs Placebo · MMRM · p = 0.0006 · Least square mean difference: -11.68 · 95% CI -18.29 to -5.06
SecondaryChange From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Symptoms Domain Score at Week 66

The Norfolk QoL-DN symptoms score is a sub-score of the total Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire. The Norfolk QoL-DN symptoms domain score has a range of 0-32, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN score indicates poorer QoL.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 66
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Symptoms Domain Score at Week 66
Scores on a ScaleInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Symptoms Domain Score at Week 66-1.40 ± 4.7631.18 ± 5.270
SecondaryChange From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Physical Functioning/Large Fiber Neuropathy Domain Score at Week 66

The Norfolk QoL-DN physical functioning/large fiber neuropathy domain score is a sub-score of the total Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire. The Norfolk QoL-DN physical function/large fiber neuropathy domain score has a range of -4 to 56, and a higher Norfolk QoL-DN domain score indicates poorer QoL.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 66
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Physical Functioning/Large Fiber Neuropathy Domain Score at Week 66
Scores on a ScaleInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline In The Norfolk QoL-DN Questionnaire Physical Functioning/Large Fiber Neuropathy Domain Score at Week 661.05 ± 11.9248.74 ± 9.689
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 65

The mBMI is the BMI multiplied by the serum albumin g/L

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m^2*g/L
Change From Baseline In Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 65
kg/m^2*g/LInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline In Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Week 65-73.32 ± 96.311-85.21 ± 91.259
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 65
Time frame:
Baseline and Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m^2
Change From Baseline In Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 65
kg/m^2InotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline In Body Mass Index (BMI) at Week 65-0.24 ± 1.521-0.87 ± 1.202
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 66

The NIS score is a measure of neurologic impairment. The NIS Score has a range of 0 to 244 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 66
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 66
Scores on a ScaleInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 664.47 ± 10.32917.29 ± 16.986
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified +7 at Week 66

The Modified +7 score is a version of the NIS score that is a measure of neurologic impairment. The Modified +7 Score has a range of -22.32 to 102.32 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 66
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Modified +7 at Week 66
Scores on a ScaleInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Modified +7 at Week 66-0.31 ± 11.1346.60 ± 12.770
SecondaryChange From Baseline in NIS+7 at Week 66

The NIS+7 score is a version of the NIS score that is a measure of neurologic impairment. The NIS+7 Score has a range of -26.04 to 270.04 and a higher NIS score indicates lower function.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 66
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in NIS+7 at Week 66
Scores on a ScaleInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline in NIS+7 at Week 665.10 ± 10.70919.00 ± 16.824
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram (ECHO) at Week 65 in the CM-ECHO Set

GLS by ECHO is a measure of cardiac systolic function

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · Percent Change
Change From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram (ECHO) at Week 65 in the CM-ECHO Set
Percent ChangeInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram (ECHO) at Week 65 in the CM-ECHO Set0.69 ± 3.1340.46 ± 2.702
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram ECHO at Week 65 in the ECHO Subgroup

GLS by ECHO is a measure of cardiac systolic function

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · Percent Change
Change From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram ECHO at Week 65 in the ECHO Subgroup
Percent ChangeInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) by Echocardiogram ECHO at Week 65 in the ECHO Subgroup0.25 ± 3.1631.05 ± 2.745
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Transthyretin (TTR) Level at Week 65
Time frame:
Baseline and Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · g/L
Change From Baseline in Transthyretin (TTR) Level at Week 65
g/LInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Transthyretin (TTR) Level at Week 65-0.1570 ± 0.0619-0.0146 ± 0.0402
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Retinol Binding Protein 4 (RBP4) Level at Week 65
Time frame:
Baseline and Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · ug/L
Change From Baseline in Retinol Binding Protein 4 (RBP4) Level at Week 65
ug/LInotersenPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Retinol Binding Protein 4 (RBP4) Level at Week 65-21725.9 ± 9884.04-1768.7 ± 8027.78
SecondaryMaximum Measured Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Inotersen At Week 65
Time frame:
Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · ug/mL
Maximum Measured Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Inotersen At Week 65
ug/mLInotersen 300 mg IM NegativeInotersen 300 mg IM Positive
Maximum Measured Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Inotersen At Week 656.76 ± 1.8811.1 ± 4.80
SecondaryTime To The Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) Of Inotersen At Week 65
Time frame:
Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Time To The Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) Of Inotersen At Week 65
hoursInotersen 300 mg IM NegativeInotersen 300 mg IM Positive
Time To The Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) Of Inotersen At Week 654.14 ± 1.883.48 ± 0.68
SecondaryArea Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 To 24 Hours (AUC[0-24hr]) Of Inotersen At Week 65
Time frame:
Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · ug*hr/mL
Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 To 24 Hours (AUC[0-24hr]) Of Inotersen At Week 65
ug*hr/mLInotersen 300 mg IM NegativeInotersen 300 mg IM Positive
Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 To 24 Hours (AUC[0-24hr]) Of Inotersen At Week 6593.1 ± 30.792.4 ± 77.3
SecondaryArea Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 To 168 Hours (AUC[0-168hr]) Of Inotersen At Week 65
Time frame:
Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · ug*hr/mL
Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 To 168 Hours (AUC[0-168hr]) Of Inotersen At Week 65
ug*hr/mLInotersen 300 mg IM NegativeInotersen 300 mg IM Positive
Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve From 0 To 168 Hours (AUC[0-168hr]) Of Inotersen At Week 6598.9 ± 33.5103.0 ± 88.2
SecondaryPlasma Clearance From 0 To 24 Hours (CL[0-24hr]/F) Of Inotersen At Week 65
Time frame:
Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · L/hr
Plasma Clearance From 0 To 24 Hours (CL[0-24hr]/F) Of Inotersen At Week 65
L/hrInotersen 300 mg IM NegativeInotersen 300 mg IM Positive
Plasma Clearance From 0 To 24 Hours (CL[0-24hr]/F) Of Inotersen At Week 653.57 ± 1.326.14 ± 5.92
SecondaryInotersen Plasma Clearance At Steady State (CLss/F) At Week 65
Time frame:
Week 65
Reported as:
Mean · L/hr
Inotersen Plasma Clearance At Steady State (CLss/F) At Week 65
L/hrInotersen 300 mg IM NegativeInotersen 300 mg IM Positive
Inotersen Plasma Clearance At Steady State (CLss/F) At Week 653.33 ± 1.215.46 ± 5.13

Adverse events

Collected over Week 1 to Week 91. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Inotersen5/112 (4.5%)36/112 (32.1%)110/112 (98.2%)
Placebo0/60 (0%)13/60 (21.7%)60/60 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 60
Most frequent serious events
EventInotersenPlacebo
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders4/1122/60
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/1122/60
Ankle fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1122/60
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/1120/60
BronchitisInfections and infestations2/1120/60
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders2/1121/60
Cardiac failure acuteCardiac disorders2/1120/60
Sinus arrestCardiac disorders2/1120/60
CachexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/1120/60
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders2/1120/60
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 70
Most frequent other events
EventInotersenPlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders35/1127/60
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders35/1120/60
FatigueGeneral disorders28/11212/60
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders27/11212/60
HeadacheNervous system disorders26/1127/60
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications19/11213/60
Injection site painGeneral disorders23/1124/60
PyrexiaGeneral disorders22/1125/60
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders21/1126/60
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations21/11211/60

Baseline characteristics

Safety Set: Participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug (inotersen or placebo). The Safety Set is the population used for the analyses of all safety measures.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)InotersenPlaceboTotal
Mean59.0 ± 12.5359.5 ± 14.0559.2 ± 13.04
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)InotersenPlaceboTotal
Female351954
Male7741118
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)InotersenPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino17724
Not Hispanic or Latino9553148
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)InotersenPlaceboTotal
Asian134
Black314
White10553158
White & Grayish-Brown011
Other325
Participants diagnosed with hATTR-CM
Participants diagnosed with hATTR-CM(Participants)InotersenPlaceboTotal
Yes452267
No6738105
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • University of California, Irvine
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Indiana University School of Medicine
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University Bayview Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Boston University School of Medicine - Amyloid Treatment & Research Program
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center - The Neurological Institute
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • FLENI
    Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - University Hospital
    Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21941913, Brazil
  • AACD
    Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • UNIFESP
    Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • CHU Henri Mondor - Department of Neurology
    Creteil, 94000, France
  • CHU Bicetre Aphp French Referral Center for FAP/Cornamyl Network
    Le Kremlin Bicetre, 94275, France
  • UKM; Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Transplantationsmedizin
    Munster, 48149, Germany
  • Universita Degli Studi Di Messina - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Gaetano Martino"
    Messina, Sicily 98124, Italy
  • Centro per lo Studio e la Cura delle Amiloidosi Sistemiche - Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Auckland City Hospital
    Auckland, New Zealand
  • CHLN - Hospital de Santa Maria
    Lisbon, 1649-035, Portugal
  • CHP-HGSA, Unidade Clinica de Paramiloidose
    Porto, 4099-001, Portugal
  • Hospital Universitari Vall D' Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Clínic
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • University College London - National Amyloidosis Centre
    London, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Benson MD, Waddington-Cruz M, Berk JL, Polydefkis M, Dyck PJ, Wang AK, Plante-Bordeneuve V, Barroso FA, Merlini G, Obici L, Scheinberg M, Brannagan TH 3rd, Litchy WJ, Whelan C, Drachman BM, Adams D, Heitner SB, Conceicao I, Schmidt HH, Vita G, Campistol JM, Gamez J, Gorevic PD, Gane E, Shah AM, Solomon SD, Monia BP, Hughes SG, Kwoh TJ, McEvoy BW, Jung SW, Baker BF, Ackermann EJ, Gertz MA, Coelho T. Inotersen Treatment for Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 5;379(1):22-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716793. PubMed 29972757 ↗
  • Karam C, Brown D, Yang M, Done N, Zhu JJ, Greatsinger A, Bozas A, Vera-Llonch M, Signorovitch J. Long-term treatment effects of inotersen on health-related quality of life in patients with hATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy: Analysis of the open-label extension of the NEURO-TTR trial. Muscle Nerve. 2022 Oct;66(4):438-446. doi: 10.1002/mus.27675. Epub 2022 Aug 4. PubMed 35799473 ↗
  • Karam C, Brown D, Yang M, Done N, Dieye I, Bozas A, Vera Llonch M, Signorovitch J. Factors associated with increased health-related quality-of-life benefits in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy patients treated with inotersen. Muscle Nerve. 2022 Sep;66(3):319-328. doi: 10.1002/mus.27668. Epub 2022 Jul 15. PubMed 35766224 ↗
  • Yarlas A, Lovley A, McCausland K, Brown D, Vera-Llonch M, Conceicao I, Karam C, Khella S, Obici L, Waddington-Cruz M. Early Data on Long-term Impact of Inotersen on Quality-of-Life in Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis Polyneuropathy: Open-Label Extension of NEURO-TTR. Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):865-886. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00268-x. Epub 2021 Aug 5. PubMed 34355354 ↗
  • Yarlas A, Lovley A, Brown D, Kosinski M, Vera-Llonch M. Responder analysis for neuropathic impairment and quality-of-life assessment in patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in the NEURO-TTR study. J Neurol. 2022 Jan;269(1):323-335. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10635-1. Epub 2021 Jun 14. PubMed 34125267 ↗
  • Yu RZ, Wang Y, Norris DA, Kim TW, Narayanan P, Geary RS, Monia BP, Henry SP. Immunogenicity Assessment of Inotersen, a 2'-O-(2-Methoxyethyl) Antisense Oligonucleotide in Animals and Humans: Effect on Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2020 Oct;30(5):265-275. doi: 10.1089/nat.2020.0867. Epub 2020 Aug 19. PubMed 32833564 ↗
  • Dyck PJB, Kincaid JC, Wiesman JF, Polydefkis M, Litchy WJ, Mauermann ML, Ackermann EJ, Guthrie S, Pollock M, Jung SW, Baker BF, Dyck PJ. mNIS+7 and lower limb function in inotersen treatment of hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis. Muscle Nerve. 2020 Oct;62(4):502-508. doi: 10.1002/mus.27022. Epub 2020 Aug 13. PubMed 32654212 ↗
  • Dyck PJB, Coelho T, Waddington Cruz M, Brannagan TH 3rd, Khella S, Karam C, Berk JL, Polydefkis MJ, Kincaid JC, Wiesman JF, Litchy WJ, Mauermann ML, Ackermann EJ, Baker BF, Jung SW, Guthrie S, Pollock M, Dyck PJ. Neuropathy symptom and change: Inotersen treatment of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. Muscle Nerve. 2020 Oct;62(4):509-515. doi: 10.1002/mus.27023. Epub 2020 Aug 7. PubMed 32654156 ↗
  • Coelho T, Yarlas A, Waddington-Cruz M, White MK, Sikora Kessler A, Lovley A, Pollock M, Guthrie S, Ackermann EJ, Hughes SG, Karam C, Khella S, Gertz M, Merlini G, Obici L, Schmidt HH, Polydefkis M, Dyck PJB, Brannagan Iii TH, Conceicao I, Benson MD, Berk JL. Inotersen preserves or improves quality of life in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. J Neurol. 2020 Apr;267(4):1070-1079. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09671-9. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PubMed 31853709 ↗
  • Pinto MV, Dyck PJB, Gove LE, McCauley BM, Ackermann EJ, Hughes SG, Waddington-Cruz M, Dyck PJ. Kind and distribution of cutaneous sensation loss in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. J Neurol Sci. 2018 Nov 15;394:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.08.031. Epub 2018 Aug 30. PubMed 30219500 ↗
  • Waddington-Cruz M, Ackermann EJ, Polydefkis M, Heitner SB, Dyck PJ, Barroso FA, Wang AK, Berk JL, Dyck PJB, Monia BP, Hughes SG, Tai L, Jesse Kwoh T, Jung SW, Coelho T, Benson MD, Gertz MA. Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: baseline characteristics of patients in the NEURO-TTR trial. Amyloid. 2018 Sep;25(3):180-188. doi: 10.1080/13506129.2018.1503593. Epub 2018 Aug 31. PubMed 30169969 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 13, 2016
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 21, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01737398
Lead sponsor
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 29, 2012
Start date
Mar 15, 2013
Primary completion
Mar 3, 2017
Completion
Nov 7, 2017
Results posted
Jan 23, 2019
Last update
Jul 17, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion