ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01725113ECRIPUpdated Nov 7, 2023Results posted

Management of Mineral and Bone Disease in Hemodialysis-Calcitriol vs. Paricalcitol

A Phase 4 interventional study of Calcitriol and Paricalcitol in Kidney Failure, Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Hyperphosphatemia, sponsored by Winthrop University Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-07.

Sponsored by Winthrop University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Nationwide shortage of study meds in 2013 loss of funding \& competing studies
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this non-inferiority study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of a mineral and bone disease treatment protocol based on calcitriol to one based on paricalcitol in hemodialysis patients using revised Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) parathyroid hormone targets.

Read the detailed description

Active vitamin D analogs have been the mainstay of treatment for patients on hemodialysis with mineral and bone disease (MBD) for the past decade. Intravenous calcitriol is an active vitamin D analog which is nearly identical to natural 1, 25 Vitamin D3. Calcitriol results from the hydroxylation of previtamin D3 in the liver and kidney. Paricalcitol, 19-nor-1 , 25-dihydroxyvitamin D2, is a newer agent vitamin D analog. This agent is believed to have an effect more specific to the parathyroid gland, and less specific to absorption of calcium and phosphorus from the gut. Although both formulations appear equally effective in suppressing parathyroid hormone (PTH), studies have suggested a greater calcemic effect with intravenous calcitriol as compared to paricalcitol (1). Due to this, paricalcitol is the predominant active vitamin D analog used in hemodialysis patients in the United States. Two recent changes in the management of hemodialysis patients will likely reduce the amount of active vitamin D analogs used in the near future: the liberalization of PTH goals according to international guidelines, (2) and the implementation of bundled payments for dialysis by Medicare. These changes challenge previous studies that have analyzed the safety and efficacy of these medications. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, cross-over study will be to determine whether calcitriol is as safe and effective as paricalcitol in the treatment of MBD in hemodialysis patients using the revised KDIGO parathyroid hormone targets. Our hypothesis is that calcitriol will be as equally safe and effective as paricalcitol in the treatment of MBD in hemodialysis patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Failure
  • Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
  • Hyperphosphatemia
  • Hypercalcemia
03

In context

Renal Insufficiency

1,409 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency; 143 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 40 across 1,058 interventional studies indexed under Renal Insufficiency.

Browse Renal Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Winthrop University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All subjects will have been treated for at least three months on hemodialysis with IV paricalcitol. These subjects must have a most recent calcium level within the normal range, most recent phosphorus level \< 8 mg/dL and a most recent PTH between 130-585 pg/mL

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if:

  1. age greater than 18
  2. active
  3. expected survival greater than 6 months
  4. high likelihood of renal transplant during the study period.
  5. Low calcium bath
  6. prior parathyroidectomy
  7. use of calcimimetics
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Calcitriol, then Paricalcitol

    Patients randomized to an active vitamin D treatment protocol based on IV calcitriol. After 14 weeks, patients cross-over to an active vitamin D protocol based on IV paricalcitol for 14 weeks.

    Drug: Calcitriol · Drug: Paricalcitol

  • Active comparator
    Paricalcitol, then Calcitriol

    Patients randomized to an active vitamin D treatment protocol based on IV paricalcitol. After 14 weeks, patients cross-over to an active vitamin D protocol based on IV calcitriol for 14 weeks.

    Drug: Calcitriol · Drug: Paricalcitol

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Calcium Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  2. Calcium Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. PTH Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  2. PTH Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  3. Phosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  4. Phosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  5. Amount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

  6. Amount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation

    Time frame: Up to Month 6

07

Results

Posted Nov 7, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCalcitriol, Then ParicalcitolParicalcitol, Then Calcitriol
Started66
Completed54
Not completed12
Withdrew: Kidney transplant11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryCalcium Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Calcium Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation
mg/dlCalcitriol
Calcium Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation8.78 ± 0.332
PrimaryCalcium Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Calcium Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation
mg/dlParicalcitol
Calcium Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation8.6 ± 0.3
SecondaryPTH Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · pg/dl
PTH Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation
pg/dlCalcitriol
PTH Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Treatment Initiation309.58 ± 183.33
SecondaryPTH Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · pg/dl
PTH Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation
pg/dlParicalcitol
PTH Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Treatment Initiation332.83 ± 146.9
SecondaryPhosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Phosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation
mg/dlCalcitriol
Phosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation4.09 ± 0.71
SecondaryPhosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Phosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation
mg/dlParicalcitol
Phosphorus Levels at Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation4.45 ± 1.18
SecondaryAmount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · mcg
Amount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation
mcgCalcitriol
Amount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Calcitriol Initiation36.9 ± 34.18
SecondaryAmount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation
Time frame:
Up to Month 6
Reported as:
Mean · mcg
Amount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation
mcgParicalcitol
Amount of Active Vitamin D Analog Used Through Month 3 Post Paricalcitol Initiation134.6 ± 87.35

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Calcitriol0/9 (0%)1/9 (11.1%)0/9 (0%)
Paricalcitol0/9 (0%)2/9 (22.2%)0/9 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCalcitriolParicalcitol
HematuriaRenal and urinary disorders1/91/9
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/91/9

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics are only available among participants who completed the trial.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Total Participants Who Completed Trial
Mean74.11 ± 5.57
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Total Participants Who Completed Trial
Female2
Male7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Total Participants Who Completed Trial
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino7
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Total Participants Who Completed Trial
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American4
White4
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Total Participants Who Completed Trial
United States9
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Winthrop University Hospital
    Mineola, New York 11501, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2012, a primary completion of Dec 2013 and a completion of Oct 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Nov 2023, 9 years 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 7, 2012
First posted
Nov 12, 2012
Start
Nov 2012
Primary completionActual
Dec 2013
CompletionActual
Oct 2015
Results first posted
Nov 7, 2023
Last update
Nov 7, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01725113
Lead sponsor
Winthrop University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 12, 2012
Start date
Nov 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Oct 2015
Results posted
Nov 7, 2023
Last update
Nov 7, 2023

Study contacts

Shayan Shirazian, MD
principal investigator · Winthrop University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Calcitriol · Paricalcitol

Start the discussion