CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00565643Updated May 14, 2024Results posted

Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier and Cesarean Delivery

A Phase 4 interventional study of modified sodium hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose and Placebo in Adhesions, Cesarean Section and Delivery, Obstetric, sponsored by Winthrop University Hospital. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-14.

Sponsored by Winthrop University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
753
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A multicenter, randomized, controlled, single blinded study to evaluate the effectiveness of Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier in reducing adhesion formation in cesarean deliveries. Primary outcome will be measurement of the extent and severity of adhesions at the time of subsequent cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes will include measures of safety, operative times (ex., incision-delivery; total operative time).

Read the detailed description

Patients presenting to labor and delivery for delivery will be screened for eligibility. If a patient meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria, she will be offered enrollment in the study. After the project and informed consent are reviewed with the patient and all questions are answered, she will be asked to sign the informed consent. At this point, she will be considered a candidate for randomization.

If the patient subsequently undergoes a cesarean delivery, she will be randomized to either:

  1. Group A - Placement of Seprafilm® prior to abdominal closure
  2. Group B - Routine closure without placement of Seprafilm® The chances of being assigned to either group will be equal (i.e., 1:1 randomization). The patient will be blinded with regard to Seprafilm placement.

The investigators will collect additional data about the patient, her antepartum course, intra-operative events, and post-operative course. There are no additional tests or procedures ordered or performed during the hospital stay as part of this protocol. Enrollment in this study is not expected to alter the patient's length of stay.

The antepartum, operative, and post-operative care of the patient will as directed by the patient's physician and participating institutions's standard policies and procedures. This study in no way changes or directs the care the patient would receive, except with regard to the placement of Seprafilm® Adhesion Barrier.

A short-term telephone follow-up will be conducted approximately 6-8 weeks following randomization to assess for immediate post-operative complications.

If a patient becomes pregnant again and undergoes a repeat cesarean delivery at a participating institution, the location and severity of adhesions (if any) would be assessed at the time of repeat cesarean delivery. The investigators will extract additional data from the chart including operative times, blood loss, and complications. An evaluation of adhesions would conclude the patient's participation in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adhesions
  • Cesarean Section
  • Delivery, Obstetric

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Adhesion
  • Seprafilm
  • Cesarean section
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women who are planning or have the potential to undergo cesarean delivery
  • Age over 18
  • Able to consent to study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned tubal ligation
  • Known allergy to hyaluronic acid
  • Medical or other serious condition which will interfere with compliance and/or ability to complete study protocol
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
753 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HA-CMC Group

    Hyaluronic Acid-Carboxymethylcellulose placed as an adhesion barrier

    Device: modified sodium hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose

  • Placebo comparator
    Routine Closure Group

    Routine Closure without placement of an adhesion barrier

    Device: Placebo

Interventions

  • Devicemodified sodium hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose

    Adhesion barrier applied at the time of initial cesarean delivery

    Also known as: Seprafilm Adhesion Barrier

  • DevicePlacebo

    Routine abdominal closure without placement of adhesion barrier

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Adhesions

    The Percentage of participants with one or more adhesions, regardless of the extent or severity

    Time frame: 3 to 5 years

  2. Adhesion Score

    Adhesion score. Derived by assigning 1 point for filmy adhesion and 2 points for dense adhesions at each of 6 possible sites in the abdomen. Thus the score can range from 0 (i.e., no adhesions at any location) to 12 (dense adhesions at each site).

    Time frame: 3 to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-operative Hemoglobin

    Hemoglobin level following randomization delivery - used to determine if there was a difference in blood loss between the two groups

    Time frame: 1 to 5 years

  2. Post-operative White Blood Cell Count

    Post-operative White blood cell count following randomization delivery - used to determine if there was difference in immune response or infection between the groups

    Time frame: 1 to 5 years

  3. Post-Operative Complications

    Percentage of patients experiencing any of the predefined post-operative complications following randomization

    Time frame: 1 to 5 years

  4. Post-operative Maximum Temperature Following Randomization

    Maximum temperature of patient, \>24 hours following randomization delivery

    Time frame: 1 to 5 years

  5. Operative Times at Subsequent Delivery

    Amount of time spent at the time of the subsequent delivery

    Time frame: 3 to 5 years

06

Results

Posted Apr 22, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Started380373
Safety data380373
Primary outcome (subsequent cesarean)8092
Completed380373
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence of Adhesions

The Percentage of participants with one or more adhesions, regardless of the extent or severity

Time frame:
3 to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients with adhesions
Incidence of Adhesions
percentage of patients with adhesionsHA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Incidence of Adhesions75.675.9
SecondaryPost-operative Hemoglobin

Hemoglobin level following randomization delivery - used to determine if there was a difference in blood loss between the two groups

Time frame:
1 to 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · % of blood that is red blood cells
Post-operative Hemoglobin
% of blood that is red blood cellsHA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Post-operative Hemoglobin29.9 ± 4.130.2 ± 3.6
PrimaryAdhesion Score

Adhesion score. Derived by assigning 1 point for filmy adhesion and 2 points for dense adhesions at each of 6 possible sites in the abdomen. Thus the score can range from 0 (i.e., no adhesions at any location) to 12 (dense adhesions at each site).

Time frame:
3 to 5 years
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Adhesion Score
units on a scaleHA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Adhesion Score2 (0 to 10)2 (0 to 8)
SecondaryPost-operative White Blood Cell Count

Post-operative White blood cell count following randomization delivery - used to determine if there was difference in immune response or infection between the groups

Time frame:
1 to 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · cells/mm^3
Post-operative White Blood Cell Count
cells/mm^3HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Post-operative White Blood Cell Count11.3 ± 6.411.0 ± 3.3
SecondaryPost-Operative Complications

Percentage of patients experiencing any of the predefined post-operative complications following randomization

Time frame:
1 to 5 years
Reported as:
Number · % of patients experiencing complication
Post-Operative Complications
% of patients experiencing complicationHA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Any complication6.34.0
Fever4.53.0
Ileus or bowel obstruction00
Any wound complication2.10.8
Venous thromboembolism00.3
Readmission (<=6 weeks postpartum)1.30.5
SecondaryPost-operative Maximum Temperature Following Randomization

Maximum temperature of patient, \>24 hours following randomization delivery

Time frame:
1 to 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · degrees Fahrenheit
Post-operative Maximum Temperature Following Randomization
degrees FahrenheitHA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Post-operative Maximum Temperature Following Randomization98.2 ± 1.098.2 ± 0.9
SecondaryOperative Times at Subsequent Delivery

Amount of time spent at the time of the subsequent delivery

Time frame:
3 to 5 years
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Operative Times at Subsequent Delivery
minutesHA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Skin-to-delivery13 (3 to 70)13 (4 to 55)
Total operative time51 (23 to 175)54 (26 to 157)

Adverse events

Collected over From time of enrollment through 8 weeks following randomization. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
HA-CMC Group—5/380 (1.3%)0/380 (0%)
Routine Closure Group—2/373 (0.5%)0/373 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventHA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure Group
Readmission for InfectionInfections and infestations2/3801/373
Readmission for Intra-abdominal complicationGastrointestinal disorders2/3800/373
Readmission for Central nervous system problemNervous system disorders0/3801/373
Readmission for obstetrical complicationsPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/3800/373

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure GroupTotal
Mean30.4 ± 5.130.9 ± 5.3NA ± NA
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure GroupTotal
Female380373753
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure GroupTotal
United States380373753
Gravid
Gravid(pregnancies)HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure GroupTotal
Mean2 (1 to 20)2 (1 to 11)NA (NA to NA)
Parity
Parity(pregnancies)HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure GroupTotal
Median1 (0 to 4)1 (0 to 4)NA (NA to NA)
Gestational age (weeks)
Gestational age (weeks)(weeks)HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure GroupTotal
Mean38.7 ± 1.938.1 ± 3.9NA ± NA
Body Mass Index (BMI), kg/m^2
Body Mass Index (BMI), kg/m^2(kg/m^2)HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure GroupTotal
Mean33.3 ± 6.633.2 ± 7.8NA ± NA
# of previous cesarean births
# of previous cesarean births(births)HA-CMC GroupRoutine Closure GroupTotal
Median1 (0 to 3)1 (0 to 3)NA (NA to NA)

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Winthrop University Hospital
    Mineola, New York 11501, United States
  • SUNY Stony Brook University Hospital
    Stony Brook, New York 11501, United States
  • Lehigh Valley Hospital
    Allentown, Pennsylvania 18103, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00565643
Lead sponsor
Winthrop University Hospital
Collaborators
Stony Brook University, Lehigh Valley Hospital
Responsible party
Daniel Kiefer (Principal Investigator, Winthrop University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 30, 2007
Start date
Nov 2007
Primary completion
Oct 2014
Completion
Oct 2014
Results posted
Apr 22, 2016
Last update
May 14, 2024

Study contacts

Daniel G Kiefer, M.D.
principal investigator · Lehigh Valley Health Network

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion