ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01551264FAB24Updated Nov 30, 2021Results posted

Duration of Brace Wear in Clubfoot Treatment - A Prospective Randomized Trial

An interventional study of Foot Abduction Brace (FAB) in Isolated Clubfoot, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 1 Year. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-30.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
139
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 1 Year
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 10 studies in Clubfoot with a site in United States — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Clubfoot · United States.

Started
2012
the only one that year
No phase
3 of 10
1 open now
Registered
4th of 10
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 10
Washington University School of Medicine

Among the 10 studies in Clubfoot with a site in United States, this one is the only one that started in 2012, is one of 3 with no phase, and was the 4th registered.

Clubfoot

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Clubfoot; 15 are open to participants now.

Browse Clubfoot studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 10 studies in Clubfoot with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 2 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 10 Clubfoot studies recruiting now, none (0%) set no upper age limit and 10 (100%) stop at 75 or younger; 9 take children under 18; none take healthy volunteers.

This study: Up to 1 Year · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 10 studies in Clubfoot with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this multi-center, randomized, controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2 year versus 4 year bracing protocol in preventing isolated clubfoot recurrence within the first year post-treatment, and to evaluate factors associated with recurrence in isolated clubfoot.

Read the detailed description

The study is based on the hypothesis that prolonged bracing will reduce clubfoot recurrence. In addition to bracing length, the study will determine if other factors in addition to duration of brace wear are associated with recurrence.

03

Conditions studied

  • Isolated Clubfoot

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 1 Year
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject \< 1 year of age when treatment initiated at local site
  • Confirmed diagnosis of Isolated Clubfoot
  • At least one foot demonstrates fixation of the foot in equinus, forefoot adduction, cavus and hindfoot varus
  • Deformity was present at birth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous foot abduction bracing
  • Previous surgical correction (excluding Tenotomy)
  • Dysmorphic features, additional anomalies (i.e. congenital heart disease, hypospadias, a genetic syndrome), or developmental delay
  • Neurologic cause for clubfoot (i.e. myelomeningocele or sacral agenesis)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
139 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    4-Year Bracing Arm

    This group has been randomized to 4 years of bracing after correction of clubfoot using the Ponseti Method.

    Device: Foot Abduction Brace (FAB)

  • Other
    2-Year Bracing Arm

    This group has been randomized to 2 years of bracing after correction of clubfoot using the Ponseti Method.

    Device: Foot Abduction Brace (FAB)

Interventions

  • DeviceFoot Abduction Brace (FAB)

    After clubfoot correction, the participants will wear the FAB 23 hours/day for 3 months and then wean to naps and nighttime (8-12 hours/day) for either 2 or 4 years depending on which arm they are in.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Kaplan-Meier Recurrence-Free Survival Probability for Clubfoot Affected Limbs

    Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival probability for each limb affected by clubfoot up to 1 year after bracing is discontinued. For patients with bilateral clubfoot, each limb was assessed. Bilateral patients contribute data for both limbs and unilateral patients contribute data for the affected limb. Recurrence is defined as the development of any of the following deformities in isolation or in combination that require repeat cast application or surgical intervention: hindfoot varus, ankle equinus, midfoot adduction, midfoot cavus, or forefoot pronation. Clubfoot recurrence was determined by the local Principal Investigator.

    Time frame: From end of bracing treatment until the earliest recurrence up to 1 year (allowing for per-protocol visit window of 1.2 years) after the assigned treatment (2- or 4-year bracing) is discontinued.

07

Results

Posted Nov 30, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing Arm
Started7069
Started bracing6967
Data for at least one follow-up after brace discontinuation ascertained4455
Completed3841
Not completed3228

Outcome measures

PrimaryKaplan-Meier Recurrence-Free Survival Probability for Clubfoot Affected Limbs

Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival probability for each limb affected by clubfoot up to 1 year after bracing is discontinued. For patients with bilateral clubfoot, each limb was assessed. Bilateral patients contribute data for both limbs and unilateral patients contribute data for the affected limb. Recurrence is defined as the development of any of the following deformities in isolation or in combination that require repeat cast application or surgical intervention: hindfoot varus, ankle equinus, midfoot adduction, midfoot cavus, or forefoot pronation. Clubfoot recurrence was determined by the local Principal Investigator.

Time frame:
From end of bracing treatment until the earliest recurrence up to 1 year (allowing for per-protocol visit window of 1.2 years) after the assigned treatment (2- or 4-year bracing) is discontinued.
Reported as:
Number · survival probability
Kaplan-Meier Recurrence-Free Survival Probability for Clubfoot Affected Limbs
survival probability4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing Arm
Kaplan-Meier Recurrence-Free Survival Probability for Clubfoot Affected Limbs0.81 (0.70 to 0.95)0.65 (0.52 to 0.80)
Statistical analysis
  • 4-Year Bracing Arm vs 2-Year Bracing Arm · Chi-squared · p = 0.03

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events for each participant were evaluated from participant randomization to the last study visit attended. For participants that completed the study, the last study visit is 60 months after brace fitting. For participants that did not complete the study, the last study visit is the final study visit that the participant attended.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
4-Year Bracing Arm0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)
2-Year Bracing Arm0/69 (0%)0/69 (0%)0/69 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Baseline participants represent the number of participants enrolled and randomized. However, participant could drop out of the study prior to starting the bracing treatment due to eligibility changes or site discontinuation.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing ArmTotal
<=18 years7069139
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Months)4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing ArmTotal
Mean1.8 ± 1.71.8 ± 1.51.8 ± 1.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing ArmTotal
Female182341
Male524698
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing ArmTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian415
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American448
White5759116
More than one race347
Unknown or Not Reported112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing ArmTotal
United States7069139
Measure Description: Laterality of isolated clubfoot at enrollment
Measure Description: Laterality of isolated clubfoot at enrollment(Participants)4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing ArmTotal
Unilateral353570
Bilateral353469
Family history of clubfoot in first-degree relative
Family history of clubfoot in first-degree relative(Participants)4-Year Bracing Arm2-Year Bracing ArmTotal
Presence91019
Absence6159120
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Shriners Hospital for Children
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Nemours Children's Hospital
    Orlando, Florida 32827, United States
  • Shriners Hospital for Children
    Lexington, Kentucky 40502, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Shriners Hospital for Children
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63131, United States
  • Shriners Hospital for Children
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Seattle Children's Hospital
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dobbs MB, Frick SL, Mosca VS, Raney E, VanBosse HJ, Lerman JA, Talwalkar VR, Steger-May K, Gurnett CA. Design and descriptive data of the randomized Clubfoot Foot Abduction Brace Length of Treatment Study (FAB24). J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017 Mar;26(2):101-107. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000387. PubMed 27632641 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2012 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 89 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2021, 2 years 1 month after primary completion.

Of 20 interventional studies with no phase under Clubfoot, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 37. This study's 89 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 7, 2012
First posted
Mar 12, 2012
StartActual
May 2012
Primary completionActual
Oct 15, 2019
CompletionActual
Oct 15, 2019
Results first posted
Nov 30, 2021
Last update
Nov 30, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01551264
Collaborators
Shriners Hospitals for Children
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 12, 2012
Start date
May 2012
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2019
Completion
Oct 15, 2019
Results posted
Nov 30, 2021
Last update
Nov 30, 2021

Study contacts

Matthew B Dobbs, MD
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion