An interventional study of HPV-HIV integration training and Audit & Feedback support in HPV, Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and HPV Vaccination, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Zambia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-13.
Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
HPV vaccination can prevent up to 90% of cervical cancer cases, but adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) require additional doses for sufficient protection beyond the single dose recommended for adolescent girls in Zambia. There are challenges to ensuring ALHIV receive all necessary doses without increasing burden and stigma on the girls. Integrating HPV vaccination into ART clinics can be an effective approach to doing so but requires a multi-pronged strategy for successful implementation.
Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,805 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.
Of its 329 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 216 (66%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
- No involvement in , adolescent or vaccination services
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants in this arm will complete the multi-component training that aims at improving healthcare worker competencies around HPV and HPV vaccines. Participants will complete pre- and post- training questionnaires, as well as quantitative surveys administered at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months that measure implementation outcomes.
Behavioral: HPV-HIV integration training and Audit & Feedback support
The HPV-HIV integration training covers six core modules. The six core modules include HPV epidemiology and vaccine indications, identification of eligible adolescents, adolescent-centered communication, workflow integration procedures, documentation and reporting systems, and strategies to reduce missed opportunities. The training will occur over a period of 3 days. Participants will receive facilitator manuals, screening tools, referral algorithms, and job aids. Audit \& Feedback of vaccination data will support integration and documentation.
Tertiary Care Cohort: Changes in HPV knowledge
Changes in HPV knowledge will be assessed by changes in the HPV knowledge portion of the pre/post training questionnaire. This portion of the questionnaire is composed of 10 questions that are answered True/False/Don't Know. Correct answers are scored as 1 point. The total score is calculated by the number of questions answered correctly with a total score range of 0-10. A higher score represents higher knowledge.
Time frame: At time of pre-training assessment (day 1) and at time of post-training assessment (day 3) (total estimated time: 3 days)
Tertiary Care Cohort: Changes in HPV vaccine knowledge
Changes in HPV vaccine knowledge will be assessed by changes in the HPV vaccine knowledge portion of the pre/post training questionnaire. This portion of the questionnaire is composed of 6 questions with one question being open ended, three questions answered as True/False/Don't Know, and two questions answered as Strongly disagree, Disagree, Agree, Strongly agree, or Don't Know. Correct answers are scored as 1 point. The total score is calculated by the number of questions answered correctly with a total score range of 0-6. A higher score represents higher knowledge.
Time frame: At time of pre-training assessment (day 1) and at time of post-training assessment (day 3) (total estimated time: 3 days)
Tertiary Care Cohort: Changes in Self-Efficacy and Provider Confidence score
Changes in Self-Efficacy and Provider Confidence score will be assessed by changes in the Self-Efficacy and Provider Confidence portion of the Post Training Survey. This portion of the questionnaire is composed of 4 questions answered as either Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, or Strongly agree. Correct answers are scored as 1 point. The total score is calculated by the number of questions answered correctly with a total score range of 0-4. A higher score represents greater self-efficacy/confidence.
Time frame: At time of pre-training assessment (day 1) and at time of post-training assessment (day 3) (total estimated time: 3 days)
Tertiary Care Cohort: Proportion of eligible/invited staff that attended training
Time frame: At start of training through completion of training (total estimated time: 3 days)
Tertiary Care Cohort: Feasibility as assessed by training attendance
Time frame: At start of training through completion of training (total estimated time: 3 days)
Tertiary Care Cohort: Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) score
FIM will be assessed by implementation champions' response to the 4 items in from the FIM measure on the follow up survey. FIM is measured by a 5-point Likert scale: 1-Completely disagree, 2-Disagree, 3-Neither agree nor Disagree, 4-Agree, or 5-Completely agree. A higher score indicates greater feasibility of the intervention in practice. Scores above 3.0 are typically viewed as favorable/positive.
Time frame: At time of post-session survey completion on day 3 (total estimated time: 1 day)
Tertiary Care Cohort: Adoption measured as rate of HPV vaccination
Rate of HPV vaccination will be assessed through vaccination records.
Time frame: Through 12 months post training (total estimated time: 12 months 3 days)
Tertiary Care Cohort: Acceptability measured as Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score
AIM will be assessed by implementation champions' response to the 4 items of the AIM measure on the follow up survey. AIM is 5-point Likert scale question measured as follows: 1-Completely disagree, 2-Disagree, 3-Neither agree nor Disagree, 4-Agree, or 5-Completely agree. A higher score indicates greater acceptability. Scores above 3.0 are typically viewed as favorable/positive.
Time frame: At time of post-session survey completion on day 3 (total estimated time: 1 day)
Tertiary Care Cohort: Appropriateness measured as Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) score
IAM will be assessed by implementation champions' response to 4 items from the IAM measure on the follow up survey. IAM is measured by a 5-point Likert scale: 1-Completely disagree, 2-Disagree, 3-Neither agree nor Disagree, 4-Agree, or 5-Completely agree. A higher score indicates greater appropriateness of the intervention. Scores above 3.0 are typically viewed as favorable/positive.
Time frame: At time of post-session survey completion on day 3 (total estimated time: 1 day)
Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual participant data that support publication findings will be shared upon request following publication. Requests for any additional data must include a proposal for use of the requested data.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form
Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 8 months later.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Washington University School of Medicine →