ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01435577Updated Oct 28, 2019Results posted

Intravenous Tapentadol in Post-Bunionectomy Pain

A Phase 2 interventional study of Tapentadol and Matching Placebo in Bunion and Pain, sponsored by Grünenthal GmbH. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-28.

Sponsored by Grünenthal GmbH · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
177
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this trial is to established the safety and efficacy of multiple dose treatment with tapentadol IV in an adult population with moderate to severe pain following bunionectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bunion
  • Pain

Keywords

  • Bunionectomy
  • Postsurgical Pain
  • Acute Pain
03

In context

Bunion

86 studies on the registry are indexed under Bunion; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 177 is above the median of 60 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Bunion.

Browse Bunion studies →

Lead sponsor

Grünenthal GmbH is the lead sponsor of 68 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (62%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled to undergo primary unilateral first metatarsal bunionectomy
  • Female patients must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control if they are sexually active
  • Qualifying pain intensity (within a maximum of 5 hours after the last surgical stitch) and Baseline pain intensity (last pain score measured within 10 minutes before dosing) 5 on an 11-point (0 to 10) pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of malignancy within the past 2 years
  • Current or history of alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Clinically relevant pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic, neurological, psychiatric disorders (resulting in disorientation, memory impairment or inability to report accurately
  • History of seizure disorder, epilepsy, or any condition that would put the subject at risk of seizures
  • Severely impaired renal function
  • Moderately or severely impaired hepatic function
  • Contraindications, or a history of allergy or hypersensitivity, to tapentadol, ibuprofen, or excipients
  • Use of prohibited concomitant medication, or not allowed use of restricted concomitant medication
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
177 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tapentadol intravenous

    Tapentadol will be given by intravenous infusion. Tapentadol will be administered every 4 hours. Ibuprofen 600 mg orally may be given as rescue medication for pain not controlled by Tapentadol alone.

    Drug: Tapentadol

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching placebo intravenous

    Placebo (0.9% sodium chloride and water for injection). Ibuprofen 600 mg orally may be given as rescue medication for pain.

    Drug: Matching Placebo

Interventions

  • 30 mg per administration, maximum 12 administrations over 48 hours

    Also known as: Palexia, Nucynta

  • DrugMatching Placebo

    Maximum 12 administrations over 48 hours

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID 24)

    Pain Intensity assessed at predefined time points (at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours after first drug administration) over a 24 hour period using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of zero indicates "no pain" and a score of ten indicates "pain as bad as you can imagine". Pain Intensity Differences at each predefined time point (calculated as post-baseline NRS values - baseline NRS values) were analyzed. Negative SPID24 values indicate a decrease in pain intensity and positive values indicate an increase in pain intensity since baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline value; up to 24 hours after first study drug administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Pain Intensity Scores at Fixed Time Points

    The mean pain intensity at fixed time points in the trial for all participants is listed. The pain intensity was measured using the Pain Intensity (PI). Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

    Time frame: Baseline; up to 48 hours

  2. Pain Intensity Differences at Fixed Time Points

    Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between baseline pain intensity (prior to the first dose) and the pain intensity at the time. A negative number indicates a decrease in pain in the whole treatment group. The greater the negative pain intensity difference value the greater the pain relief in the treatment arm. A score of 0 indicates that there has been no change in pain in a treatment group. A positive value indicates an increase in pain in the treatment group.

    Time frame: Starting at 15 minutes and up to 48 hours after first drug administration

  3. Patient Global Impression of Change After 12 Hours of Treatment

    In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant verbally rated their impression of overall status with 1 of 7 possible responses (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse).

    Time frame: Baseline value to 12 hours after first study drug administration

  4. Patients Global Impression of Change After 24 Hours of Treatment

    In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant verbally rated their impression of overall status with 1 of 7 possible responses (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse).

    Time frame: Baseline value to 24 hours after study drug administration

  5. Patient Global Impression of Change After 48 Hours of Treatment

    In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant verbally rated their impression of overall status with 1 of 7 possible responses (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse).

    Time frame: Baseline value to 48 hours after first study drug administration

  6. Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 60 Minutes

    Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 60 minutes was calculated. If the value is negative then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing.

    Time frame: Baseline value to 60 minutes after first study drug administration

  7. Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 4 Hours

    Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 4 hours was calculated. If the values are negative (then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing).

    Time frame: Baseline value to 4 hours after first study drug intake

  8. Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 8 Hours

    Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 8 hours was calculated. If the values are negative (then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing).

    Time frame: Baseline value to 8 hours after first study drug administration

  9. Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 12 Hours

    Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 12 hours was calculated. If the values are negative (then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing).

    Time frame: Baseline value to 12 hours after first study drug administration

  10. Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 48 Hours

    Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 60 minutes was calculated. If the values are negative (then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing).

    Time frame: Baseline value to 48 hours after first study drug administration

  11. Number of Participants With 30% Response After 12 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

    Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 30% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 12 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 30% from their baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline value to 12 hours after first study drug administration

  12. Number of Participants With 30% Response After 24 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

    Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 30% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 24 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 30% from their baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline value to 24 hours after first study drug administration

  13. Number of Participants With 30% Response After 48 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

    Individual participants response. Number of participants that reported a 30% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 48 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 30% from their baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline value to 48 hours after first study drug administration

  14. Number of Participants With 50% Response After 12 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

    Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 50% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 12 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 50% from their baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline value to 12 hours after first study drug administration

  15. Number of Participants With 50% Response After 24 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

    Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 50% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 24 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 50% from their baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline value to 24 hours after first study drug administration

  16. Number of Participants With 50% Response After 48 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

    Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 50% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 48 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 50% from their baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline value to 48 hours after first study drug administration

  17. Time to First Rescue Medication

    The median time to first rescue medication intake (600 mg ibuprofen) in hours.

    Time frame: up to 48 hours

  18. Time to Perceptible Pain Relief

    When the participant began to feel any pain-relieving effect after the administration of the first dose they were requested to stop the first stopwatch. The time was noted. This measured when the participant first felt any difference in the pain.

    Time frame: up to 48 hours

  19. Time to Meaningful Pain Relief

    The participant was instructed to stop the stopwatch when they had meaningful pain relief. That is, when the pain relief made a real difference, after the first drug administration.

    Time frame: up to 48 hours

  20. Pharmacokinetic Concentrations of Tapentadol

    Tapentadol concentrations were measured in participants in the tapentadol treatment arm. Serum was analyzed by means of liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at 0.2 ng/mL.

    Time frame: 15 minutes to 20 hours after first drug administration

  21. Pharmacokinetic Concentrations of Tapentadol-O-glucuronide

    Tapentadol-O-glucuronide is the metabolite of tapentadol. Metabolites are sometimes referred to as "breakdown products". The body alters the administered medication to a metabolite so that can be more easily or quickly removed from the body. Tapentadol-O-glucuronide concentrations were measured in participants in the tapentadol treatment arm. Serum was analyzed by means of liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at 0.2 ng/mL.

    Time frame: 15 minutes to 20 hours after first drug administration

  22. Mean Pain Intensity Scores at Relative Time- Tapentadol Randomized Participants

    The pain intensity at the relative time points are the pain intensity before and one hour after study drug administration. The pain intensity was measured using the Pain Intensity (PI). Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

    Time frame: Baseline; for the first 6 administrations

  23. Mean Pain Intensity Scores at Relative Time - Matching Placebo Randomized Participants

    The pain intensity at the relative time points are the pain intensity before and one hour after study drug administration. The pain intensity was measured using the Pain Intensity (PI). Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

    Time frame: Baseline; for the first 6 administrations

07

Results

Posted Jun 24, 2013

Participant flow

The recruitment period for this trial was from the 26 September 2011 and was completed on the 14 Feb 2012.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Started6465
Completed4713
Not completed1752
Withdrew: Adverse event100
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy751
Withdrew: Alternative treatment started01

Outcome measures

PrimarySum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID 24)

Pain Intensity assessed at predefined time points (at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 hours after first drug administration) over a 24 hour period using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of zero indicates "no pain" and a score of ten indicates "pain as bad as you can imagine". Pain Intensity Differences at each predefined time point (calculated as post-baseline NRS values - baseline NRS values) were analyzed. Negative SPID24 values indicate a decrease in pain intensity and positive values indicate an increase in pain intensity since baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline value; up to 24 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID 24)
units on a scaleTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID 24)-51.23 (-59.93 to -42.52)25.46 (16.82 to 34.10)
SecondaryMean Pain Intensity Scores at Fixed Time Points

The mean pain intensity at fixed time points in the trial for all participants is listed. The pain intensity was measured using the Pain Intensity (PI). Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame:
Baseline; up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Pain Intensity Scores at Fixed Time Points
units on a scaleTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Baseline (before first study drug administration)7.2 ± 1.417.3 ± 1.54
0.25 hours after first dose3.7 ± 1.997.1 ± 1.57
0.5 hour after first dose3.1 ± 1.777.4 ± 1.63
1 hour after first dose3.6 ± 1.777.8 ± 1.76
2 hours after first dose5.8 ± 2.038.5 ± 1.5
4 hours after first dose6.1 ± 1.928.6 ± 1.46
6 hours after first dose6.3 ± 2.258.7 ± 1.47
8 hours after first dose6.5 ± 2.298.6 ± 1.61
12 hours after first dose5.2 ± 2.78.5 ± 1.67
16 hours after first dose3.8 ± 2.588.2 ± 2.12
20 hours after first dose3.7 ± 2.528.0 ± 2.24
24 hours after first dose4.1 ± 2.438.1 ± 2.08
36 hours after first dose3.9 ± 2.498.0 ± 2.39
48 hours after first dose4.3 ± 2.568.1 ± 2.21
SecondaryPain Intensity Differences at Fixed Time Points

Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between baseline pain intensity (prior to the first dose) and the pain intensity at the time. A negative number indicates a decrease in pain in the whole treatment group. The greater the negative pain intensity difference value the greater the pain relief in the treatment arm. A score of 0 indicates that there has been no change in pain in a treatment group. A positive value indicates an increase in pain in the treatment group.

Time frame:
Starting at 15 minutes and up to 48 hours after first drug administration
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Intensity Differences at Fixed Time Points
units on a scaleTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
0.25 hours after first administration-3.5 ± 2.22-0.2 ± 0.95
0.5 hours after first administration-4.1 ± 2.240.1 ± 1.18
1 hour after first administration-3.5 ± 2.070.5 ± 1.4
2 hours after first administration-1.3 ± 2.241.2 ± 1.39
4 hours after first dose administration-1.0 ± 2.091.4 ± 1.47
6 hours after first dose administration-0.9 ± 2.321.4 ± 1.51
8 hours after first dose administration-0.7 ± 2.51.3 ± 1.58
12 hours after first dose administration-2.0 ± 3.011.2 ± 1.57
16 hours after first dose administration-3.4 ± 2.900.9 ± 1.82
20 hours after first dose administration-3.5 ± 2.890.7 ± 2.08
24 hours after first dose administration-3.1 ± 2.650.9 ± 2.0
36 hours after first dose administration-3.2 ± 2.680.8 ± 2.26
48 hours after first dose administration-2.9 ± 2.760.8 ± 2.11
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change After 12 Hours of Treatment

In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant verbally rated their impression of overall status with 1 of 7 possible responses (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse).

Time frame:
Baseline value to 12 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Impression of Change After 12 Hours of Treatment
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Very Much Improved110
Much Improved201
Minimally Improved149
No Change54
Minimally Worse41
Much Worse00
Very Much Worse00
SecondaryPatients Global Impression of Change After 24 Hours of Treatment

In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant verbally rated their impression of overall status with 1 of 7 possible responses (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse).

Time frame:
Baseline value to 24 hours after study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patients Global Impression of Change After 24 Hours of Treatment
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Very Much Improved130
Much Improved265
Minimally Improved116
No Change12
Minimally Worse12
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change After 48 Hours of Treatment

In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant verbally rated their impression of overall status with 1 of 7 possible responses (very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse).

Time frame:
Baseline value to 48 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Patient Global Impression of Change After 48 Hours of Treatment
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Very Much Improved192
Much Improved248
Minimally Improved42
No Change01
Minimally Worse00
Much Worse00
Very Much Worse00
SecondarySum of Pain Intensity Differences After 60 Minutes

Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 60 minutes was calculated. If the value is negative then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing.

Time frame:
Baseline value to 60 minutes after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 60 Minutes
units on a scaleTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 60 Minutes-3.65 (-4.01 to -3.3)0.26 (-0.10 to 0.61)
SecondarySum of Pain Intensity Differences After 4 Hours

Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 4 hours was calculated. If the values are negative (then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing).

Time frame:
Baseline value to 4 hours after first study drug intake
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 4 Hours
units on a scaleTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 4 Hours-6.76 (-7.92 to -5.61)4.22 (3.07 to 5.37)
SecondarySum of Pain Intensity Differences After 8 Hours

Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 8 hours was calculated. If the values are negative (then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing).

Time frame:
Baseline value to 8 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 8 Hours
units on a scaleTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 8 Hours-9.9 (-12.5 to -7.31)9.74 (7.17 to 12.32)
SecondarySum of Pain Intensity Differences After 12 Hours

Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 12 hours was calculated. If the values are negative (then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing).

Time frame:
Baseline value to 12 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 12 Hours
units on a scaleTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 12 Hours-14.98 (-19.09 to -10.87)14.82 (10.74 to 18.90)
SecondarySum of Pain Intensity Differences After 48 Hours

Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain Intensity Difference (PID) was the difference between the PI after fixed times after first dose and the baseline PI (prior to the first dose). The Sum of Pain Intensity Differences over 60 minutes was calculated. If the values are negative (then the baseline pain intensity was greater than the pain intensity measured after dosing).

Time frame:
Baseline value to 48 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 48 Hours
units on a scaleTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Sum of Pain Intensity Differences After 48 Hours-122.93 (-143.73 to -102.13)45.86 (25.22 to 66.5)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 30% Response After 12 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 30% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 12 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 30% from their baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline value to 12 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With 30% Response After 12 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Number of Participants With 30% Response After 12 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores271
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 30% Response After 24 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 30% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 24 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 30% from their baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline value to 24 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With 30% Response After 24 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Number of Participants With 30% Response After 24 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores314
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 30% Response After 48 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

Individual participants response. Number of participants that reported a 30% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 48 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 30% from their baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline value to 48 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With 30% Response After 48 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Number of Participants With 30% Response After 48 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores81
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 50% Response After 12 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 50% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 12 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 50% from their baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline value to 12 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With 50% Response After 12 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Number of Participants With 50% Response After 12 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores181
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 50% Response After 24 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 50% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 24 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 50% from their baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline value to 24 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With 50% Response After 24 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Number of Participants With 50% Response After 24 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores241
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 50% Response After 48 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores

Individual participant response. Number of participants that reported a 50% or more reduction in pain intensity from the administration of the first dose to 48 hours after the first study drug administration are counted as having a response if their pain intensity decreased by 50% from their baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline value to 48 hours after first study drug administration
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With 50% Response After 48 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Number of Participants With 50% Response After 48 Hours, Based on Pain Intensity Scores60
SecondaryTime to First Rescue Medication

The median time to first rescue medication intake (600 mg ibuprofen) in hours.

Time frame:
up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time to First Rescue Medication
hoursTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Time to First Rescue Medication5.4 (4.7 to 7.1)2.1 (1.9 to 2.3)
SecondaryTime to Perceptible Pain Relief

When the participant began to feel any pain-relieving effect after the administration of the first dose they were requested to stop the first stopwatch. The time was noted. This measured when the participant first felt any difference in the pain.

Time frame:
up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time to Perceptible Pain Relief
hoursTapentadol Intravenous
Time to Perceptible Pain Relief0.2 (0.1 to 0.2)
SecondaryTime to Meaningful Pain Relief

The participant was instructed to stop the stopwatch when they had meaningful pain relief. That is, when the pain relief made a real difference, after the first drug administration.

Time frame:
up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief
hoursTapentadol Intravenous
Time to Meaningful Pain Relief0.3 (0.3 to 0.4)
SecondaryPharmacokinetic Concentrations of Tapentadol

Tapentadol concentrations were measured in participants in the tapentadol treatment arm. Serum was analyzed by means of liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at 0.2 ng/mL.

Time frame:
15 minutes to 20 hours after first drug administration
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pharmacokinetic Concentrations of Tapentadol
ng/mLTapentadol Intravenous
15 minutes after first infusion201.2 (69.5 to 593)
30 minutes after first infusion99.5 (59.8 to 164)
60 minutes after first infusion76.4 (43.3 to 103)
4 hours after end of first infusion38.2 (21.5 to 60.5)
3.5 hours after end of fifth infusion73.2 (39.4 to 106)
4 hours after end of fifth infusion70.3 (34.4 to 105)
Post-hocNumber of Participants Scored as a Responder Based on Patient Global Impression of Change

Responders are those participants with Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) values "Much improved", or "Very much improved". Participants with missing value are considered non-responders.

Time frame:
Fixed time points at 12, 24 and 48 hours after baseline
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Scored as a Responder Based on Patient Global Impression of Change
participantsTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
Responders 12 hours after first dose311
Responders 24 hours after first dose395
Responders 48 hours after first dose4310
SecondaryPharmacokinetic Concentrations of Tapentadol-O-glucuronide

Tapentadol-O-glucuronide is the metabolite of tapentadol. Metabolites are sometimes referred to as "breakdown products". The body alters the administered medication to a metabolite so that can be more easily or quickly removed from the body. Tapentadol-O-glucuronide concentrations were measured in participants in the tapentadol treatment arm. Serum was analyzed by means of liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at 0.2 ng/mL.

Time frame:
15 minutes to 20 hours after first drug administration
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pharmacokinetic Concentrations of Tapentadol-O-glucuronide
ng/mLTapentadol Intravenous
15 minutes after first infusion26.4 (11.6 to 88.2)
30 minutes after first infusion290.4 (111 to 515)
60 minutes after first infusion488.2 (287 to 666)
4 hours after end of first infusion452.4 (265 to 651)
3.5 hours after end of fifth infusion1048.7 (680 to 1410)
4 hours after end of fifth infusion945.1 (608 to 1200)
SecondaryMean Pain Intensity Scores at Relative Time- Tapentadol Randomized Participants

The pain intensity at the relative time points are the pain intensity before and one hour after study drug administration. The pain intensity was measured using the Pain Intensity (PI). Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame:
Baseline; for the first 6 administrations
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Pain Intensity Scores at Relative Time- Tapentadol Randomized Participants
units on a scaleTapentadol Intravenous
Prior to first dose (n = 64)7.2 ± 1.41
1 hour after first dose (n = 64)3.6 ± 1.77
prior to second dose7.3 ± 1.59
1 hour after second dose4.7 ± 2.09
prior to third dose7.2 ± 1.6
1 hour after third dose6.1 ± 2.71
prior to fourth dose6.6 ± 2.21
1 hour after fourth dose4.1 ± 2.96
prior to fifth dose4.9 ± 2.57
1 hour after fifth dose2.7 ± 2.47
prior to sixth dose4.5 ± 2.35
SecondaryMean Pain Intensity Scores at Relative Time - Matching Placebo Randomized Participants

The pain intensity at the relative time points are the pain intensity before and one hour after study drug administration. The pain intensity was measured using the Pain Intensity (PI). Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame:
Baseline; for the first 6 administrations
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Pain Intensity Scores at Relative Time - Matching Placebo Randomized Participants
units on a scaleMatching Placebo Intravenous
Prior to first dose7.3 ± 1.54
1 hour after first dose7.8 ± 1.76
prior to second dose8.4 ± 1.30
1 hour after second dose8.6 ± 1.53
prior to third dose7.9 ± 1.65
1 hour after third dose7.9 ± 1.77
prior to fourth dose7.3 ± 2.05
1 hour after fourth dose7.1 ± 2.07
prior to fifth dose5.8 ± 2.04
1 hour after fifth dose5.2 ± 2.24
prior to sixth dose5.7 ± 2.13
1 hour after sixth dose4.8 ± 1.76

Adverse events

Collected over From administration of first dose of study drug up to 4 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tapentadol Intravenous—0/64 (0%)63/64 (98.4%)
Matching Placebo Intravenous—0/65 (0%)37/65 (56.9%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 76
Most frequent other events
EventTapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo Intravenous
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders43/6427/65
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders29/6411/65
SomnolenceNervous system disorders27/642/65
DizzinessNervous system disorders25/648/65
Feeling hotGeneral disorders13/641/65
HyperhidrosisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders11/642/65
Oxygen saturation decreasedInvestigations11/640/65
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders10/644/65
HeadacheNervous system disorders9/642/65
Infusion site phlebitisGeneral disorders9/640/65

Baseline characteristics

The summary statistics provided for baseline was based on safety population that included 64 subjects in the tapentadol group and 65 in the placebo group. The safety population includes randomized participants that received at least one dose of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Tapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo IntravenousTotal
Mean41.2 ± 12.6135.8 ± 12.4138.5 ± 12.75
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo IntravenousTotal
Female5760117
Male7512
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Tapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo IntravenousTotal
United States6465129
Baseline pain intensity
Baseline pain intensity(units on a scale)Tapentadol IntravenousMatching Placebo IntravenousTotal
Mean7.2 ± 1.417.3 ± 1.547.2 ± 1.47
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Jean Brown Research
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84124, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2011, a primary completion of Feb 2012 and a completion of Feb 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2013, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2011
First posted
Sep 16, 2011
Start
Sep 2011
Primary completionActual
Feb 2012
CompletionActual
Feb 2012
Results first posted
Jun 24, 2013
Last update
Oct 28, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01435577
Lead sponsor
Grünenthal GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2011
Start date
Sep 2011
Primary completion
Feb 2012
Completion
Feb 2012
Results posted
Jun 24, 2013
Last update
Oct 28, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tapentadol

Start the discussion