A Phase 2 interventional study of nepafenac 0.1% drops and Nepafenac Vehicle in Diabetic Macular Edema, sponsored by Jaeb Center for Health Research. Completed at 32 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-10.
Sponsored by Jaeb Center for Health Research · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This study is being conducted to assess the effects of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) on macular retinal volume compared with placebo in eyes with non-central diabetic macular edema (DME). A secondary objective of this study is to assess the effects of topical NSAIDs on central subfield thickness and to compare the progression of non-central DME to central DME as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and stereoscopic fundus photographs. Furthermore, this phase II study is being conducted (1) to determine whether the conduct of a phase III trial has merit based on an anatomic outcome, (2) to estimate recruitment potential of a phase III investigation, and (3) to provide information on outcome measures needed to design a phase III trial. The study is not designed to establish the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of non- central DME.
There is strong evidence to indicate that prevention of non-central involved DME from progression into the central subfield of the macula is a good anatomic surrogate for preventing visual acuity loss. Furthermore, the prevalence of macular edema is estimated to be high among patients with diabetes, and it is likely that approximately 25% of non-central involved cases of DME extend into the central subfield of the macula within one year. Thus, if a relatively safe and economical treatment could be identified that reduced the progression of non-central involved edema to central-involved edema by at least 50%, this treatment could have a major public health impact.
There is also evidence that inflammation has a role in DME, and that a topical NSAID might have an effect on retinal edema. Topical NSAIDs are in current widespread clinical use and appear to be well tolerated and safe when administered chronically, making them a potentially attractive alternative treatment for DME in patients who would like to delay or avoid laser photocoagulation or intravitreal injections (for example, patients who are willing to use daily eye drops to avoid ocular procedures or patients for whom access to experienced retinal specialists to apply laser photocoagulation or other treatments is limited).
This phase II trial may provide proof of concept evidence that topical NSAID treatment can have a beneficial effect on DME and possibly prevent increases in retinal volume or progression of non central-involved DME into the central subfield of the macula. Furthermore, it could determine the correlation between OCT and fundus photographic documentation of progression of DME into the central subfield in this clinical trial setting. Since effective treatments, including laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injections, already exist for DME treatment, topical NSAIDs would have to demonstrate a substantial effect on DME progression in order to be of sufficient clinical interest for further investigation. If a beneficial effect is apparent in this trial, which utilizes a relatively small sample size and short follow-up period, results from this phase II study might be utilized in planning future phase III trials. These future phase III trials could definitively answer whether or not NSAIDs are an efficacious novel therapeutic approach to the treatment of DME or preventing the progression of DME from extending into the central subfield of the macula.
841 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Edema; 56 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 125 is above the median of 50 across 619 interventional studies indexed under Macular Edema.
Browse Macular Edema studies →Jaeb Center for Health Research is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (88%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Only one study eye per subject may be enrolled. The study eye must meet the following:
Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
Study Eye Inclusion Criteria
Thickened non-central macular subfields on spectral domain OCT macular map that meet either of the following criteria:
Central subfield thickness \<250 microns obtained by one of the following DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines:
Exclusion Criteria:
A study participant is not eligible for the run-in phase or the randomized trial if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:
Study Eye Exclusion Criteria
History of focal/grid laser within the last 6 months or other treatment for DME within the last 4 months
-Note: Throughout the study, the distribution of subjects with prior treatment for DME will be evaluated, and eligibility criteria may be tailored to add balance between subjects with prior treatment and subjects without prior treatment for DME.
Placebo will be given three times per day for one year
Other: Nepafenac Vehicle
Nepafenac drops will be given three times per day for one year
Drug: nepafenac 0.1% drops
One drop three times per day for one year
Placebo
Mean Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Measure Retinal Volume, mm3
Time frame: From Baseline to 12 months
Mean Change in Visual Acuity
Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
Time frame: baseline to 12 months
Change in OCT Central Subfield Thickness
95% CI will be obtained in each treatment group and compared between treatment groups at 1 year. For eyes that have received treatment for DME before 1 year, visual acuity and OCT measurements obtained at time of failure will be used instead of measurements at 1 year.
Time frame: baseline to 12 months
| Milestone | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 64 | 61 |
| Completed | 60 | 57 |
| Not completed | 4 | 4 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 2 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 2 | 3 |
| mm3 | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Measure Retinal Volume, mm3 | 0.02 (-0.19 to 0.16) | -0.03 (-0.21 to 0.14) |
Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.
| Letter Score | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change in Visual Acuity | -0.3 ± 6.2 | 0.2 ± 5.7 |
95% CI will be obtained in each treatment group and compared between treatment groups at 1 year. For eyes that have received treatment for DME before 1 year, visual acuity and OCT measurements obtained at time of failure will be used instead of measurements at 1 year.
| microns | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops |
|---|---|---|
| Change in OCT Central Subfield Thickness | 7 ± 35 | 9 ± 45 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | — | 12/64 (18.8%) | 37/64 (57.8%) |
| Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | — | 16/61 (26.2%) | 30/61 (49.2%) |
| Event | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops |
|---|---|---|
| Chest PainCardiac disorders | 2/64 | 1/61 |
| Burning EyesEye disorders | 0/64 | 1/61 |
| Corneal MeltEye disorders | 0/64 | 1/61 |
| Vision DecreasedEye disorders | 0/64 | 1/61 |
| HyperglycemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/64 | 1/61 |
| Bowl ObstructionGastrointestinal disorders | 0/64 | 1/61 |
| Rectal BleedingGastrointestinal disorders | 0/64 | 1/61 |
| Gallbladder StonesGastrointestinal disorders | 1/64 | 1/61 |
| Hip FractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/64 | 1/61 |
| Tendon disorderMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/64 | 1/61 |
| Event | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops |
|---|---|---|
| Blurred VisionEye disorders | 6/64 | 6/61 |
| Eye PainEye disorders | 5/64 | 1/61 |
| FloatersEye disorders | 4/64 | 4/61 |
| Vitreous HemorrhageEye disorders | 1/64 | 4/61 |
| CataractEye disorders | 3/64 | 3/61 |
| Stomach VirusGastrointestinal disorders | 2/64 | 3/61 |
| Vision DecreasedEye disorders | 3/64 | 3/61 |
| Visual Acuity DecreasedEye disorders | 1/64 | 3/61 |
| Chest PainCardiac disorders | 3/64 | 2/61 |
| Eye ItchingEye disorders | 3/64 | 0/61 |
| Age, Customized(years) | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 59 (51 to 66) | 60 (52 to 68) | 60 (51 to 67) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 28 | 23 | 51 |
| Male | 36 | 38 | 74 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants) | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| White | 38 | 44 | 82 |
| African American | 13 | 7 | 20 |
| Hispanic or Latino | 12 | 5 | 17 |
| American Indian/Alaskan Native | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Asian | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| More than one race | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Type of Diabetes(participants) | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
| Type 2 | 56 | 53 | 109 |
| Uncertain | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Duration of Diabetes(years) | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 17 ± 11 | 19 ± 11 | 18 ± 11 |
| Hemoglobin A1c(Percent HbA1c) | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 7.9 (7.2 to 10) | 8.1 (7.1 to 8.7) | 7.9 (7.1 to 9.0) |
| Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score(units on a scale) | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 83 ± 7 | 82 ± 6 | 83 ± 7 |
| History of Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment(participants) | Placebo | Nepafenac 0.1% Drops | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| yes | 28 | 30 | 58 |
| no | 36 | 31 | 67 |
4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Jaeb Center for Health Research