CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01331005Updated Mar 10, 2025Results posted

NSAID Phase II for Non-central Involved Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)

A Phase 2 interventional study of nepafenac 0.1% drops and Nepafenac Vehicle in Diabetic Macular Edema, sponsored by Jaeb Center for Health Research. Completed at 32 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-10.

Sponsored by Jaeb Center for Health Research · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
125
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being conducted to assess the effects of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) on macular retinal volume compared with placebo in eyes with non-central diabetic macular edema (DME). A secondary objective of this study is to assess the effects of topical NSAIDs on central subfield thickness and to compare the progression of non-central DME to central DME as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and stereoscopic fundus photographs. Furthermore, this phase II study is being conducted (1) to determine whether the conduct of a phase III trial has merit based on an anatomic outcome, (2) to estimate recruitment potential of a phase III investigation, and (3) to provide information on outcome measures needed to design a phase III trial. The study is not designed to establish the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of non- central DME.

Read the detailed description

There is strong evidence to indicate that prevention of non-central involved DME from progression into the central subfield of the macula is a good anatomic surrogate for preventing visual acuity loss. Furthermore, the prevalence of macular edema is estimated to be high among patients with diabetes, and it is likely that approximately 25% of non-central involved cases of DME extend into the central subfield of the macula within one year. Thus, if a relatively safe and economical treatment could be identified that reduced the progression of non-central involved edema to central-involved edema by at least 50%, this treatment could have a major public health impact.

There is also evidence that inflammation has a role in DME, and that a topical NSAID might have an effect on retinal edema. Topical NSAIDs are in current widespread clinical use and appear to be well tolerated and safe when administered chronically, making them a potentially attractive alternative treatment for DME in patients who would like to delay or avoid laser photocoagulation or intravitreal injections (for example, patients who are willing to use daily eye drops to avoid ocular procedures or patients for whom access to experienced retinal specialists to apply laser photocoagulation or other treatments is limited).

This phase II trial may provide proof of concept evidence that topical NSAID treatment can have a beneficial effect on DME and possibly prevent increases in retinal volume or progression of non central-involved DME into the central subfield of the macula. Furthermore, it could determine the correlation between OCT and fundus photographic documentation of progression of DME into the central subfield in this clinical trial setting. Since effective treatments, including laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injections, already exist for DME treatment, topical NSAIDs would have to demonstrate a substantial effect on DME progression in order to be of sufficient clinical interest for further investigation. If a beneficial effect is apparent in this trial, which utilizes a relatively small sample size and short follow-up period, results from this phase II study might be utilized in planning future phase III trials. These future phase III trials could definitively answer whether or not NSAIDs are an efficacious novel therapeutic approach to the treatment of DME or preventing the progression of DME from extending into the central subfield of the macula.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Macular Edema

Keywords

  • Macular Edema
  • Non steroidal anti-inflammatories
03

In context

Macular Edema

841 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Edema; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is above the median of 50 across 619 interventional studies indexed under Macular Edema.

Browse Macular Edema studies →

Lead sponsor

Jaeb Center for Health Research is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18 years
  • Type 1 or type 2 diabetes
  • Only one study eye per subject may be enrolled. The study eye must meet the following:

    • Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥ 74 (i.e., 20/32 or better) within 8 days of enrollment.
    • On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to DME within 3000 μm of the center of the macula but not involving the central subfield.
    • Thickened non-central macular subfields on DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT macular map.
    • Central subfield thickness within threshold definition for normal central subfield thickness on DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machine.
    • No focal/grid laser within the last 6 months or other treatment for DME within the last 4 months.
    • No anticipated need to treat DME during the course of the study, unless the eye meets the criteria for treatment (Central subfield retinal thickness increases to 310 μm or more in spectral domain OCT machine from baseline).
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:

    • Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes.
    • Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes.
    • Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or the World Health Organization criteria.
  • At least one eye meets the study eye criteria.
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent.
  • Successful completion of the run-in phase during which level of compliance is more than 80%

Study Eye Inclusion Criteria

  • Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity letter score ≥74 (i.e.20/32 or better) within 8 days of randomization.
  • On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to DME within 3000 μm of the center of the macula but not involving the central subfield.
  • Thickened non-central macular subfields on spectral domain OCT macular map that meet either of the following criteria:

    • At least two non-central macular subfields with OCT thickness above threshold (average normal + 2 SD) from DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines- see below.
    • At least one non-central macular subfield with OCT thickness at least 15 μm above threshold (average normal + 2 SD) from DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines-see DRCR.net procedures manual for threshold details.
  • Central subfield thickness \<250 microns obtained by one of the following DRCR.net approved spectral domain OCT machines:

    • Zeiss Cirrus
    • Heidelberg Spectralis
    • Optovue RTVue
  • Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and study participant cooperation sufficient for adequate OCT and fundus photographs.
  • If the study participant is on multiple ocular drops, investigator believes that study participant can be compliant with a multi-drop regimen.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

A study participant is not eligible for the run-in phase or the randomized trial if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:

  • A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
  • Subjects in poor glycemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled.
  • Use of systemic corticosteroids or anti-VEGF therapy.
  • Current use of prescription systemic NSAIDs.
  • History of auto-immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Participation in an investigational trial that involved treatment with any drug within 30 days of randomization that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.
  • Note: study participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study.
  • Known allergy to any component of the study drug.
  • Blood pressure > 180/110 mmHg (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110 mmHg)
  • If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, study participant can become eligible.
  • Participant is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 12 months of the study.
  • For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
  • Women who are potential study participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.

Study Eye Exclusion Criteria

  • History of focal/grid laser within the last 6 months or other treatment for DME within the last 4 months

    -Note: Throughout the study, the distribution of subjects with prior treatment for DME will be evaluated, and eligibility criteria may be tailored to add balance between subjects with prior treatment and subjects without prior treatment for DME.

  • Anticipated need to treat DME during the course of the study (Any DME treatment during the study should follow criteria in section 4.3).
  • History of use of NSAID eye drops within the last 30 days or anticipated need for such drops during the study due to other ocular condition
  • History of panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization
  • Anticipated need for PRP in the 6 months following randomization
  • Anticipated need for cataract extraction surgery in the study eye during the study period
  • Lipid in the fovea (center of the macula)
  • History of major ocular surgery (including scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or major ocular surgery anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization
  • An ocular condition, other than diabetic macular edema, is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity might be affected now (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, non-retinal condition, epiretinal membrane or vitreo-macular traction) or during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.)
  • History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization
  • Exam evidence of severe external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or substantial blepharitis
  • Aphakia
  • History of vitrectomy for any reason
  • History of cataract surgery within the prior 1 year
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo will be given three times per day for one year

    Other: Nepafenac Vehicle

  • Active comparator
    nepafenac 0.1% drops

    Nepafenac drops will be given three times per day for one year

    Drug: nepafenac 0.1% drops

Interventions

  • Drugnepafenac 0.1% drops

    One drop three times per day for one year

  • OtherNepafenac Vehicle

    Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Measure Retinal Volume, mm3

    Time frame: From Baseline to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Visual Acuity

    Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

  2. Change in OCT Central Subfield Thickness

    95% CI will be obtained in each treatment group and compared between treatment groups at 1 year. For eyes that have received treatment for DME before 1 year, visual acuity and OCT measurements obtained at time of failure will be used instead of measurements at 1 year.

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 16, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboNepafenac 0.1% Drops
Started6461
Completed6057
Not completed44
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up21
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject23

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Measure Retinal Volume, mm3
Time frame:
From Baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · mm3
Mean Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Measure Retinal Volume, mm3
mm3PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% Drops
Mean Change in Optical Coherence Tomography Measure Retinal Volume, mm30.02 (-0.19 to 0.16)-0.03 (-0.21 to 0.14)
SecondaryMean Change in Visual Acuity

Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test. Unit of measure is based on the E-ETDRS letter score scale, 0-97, where 0 = worst and 97 = best.

Time frame:
baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Letter Score
Mean Change in Visual Acuity
Letter ScorePlaceboNepafenac 0.1% Drops
Mean Change in Visual Acuity-0.3 ± 6.20.2 ± 5.7
SecondaryChange in OCT Central Subfield Thickness

95% CI will be obtained in each treatment group and compared between treatment groups at 1 year. For eyes that have received treatment for DME before 1 year, visual acuity and OCT measurements obtained at time of failure will be used instead of measurements at 1 year.

Time frame:
baseline to 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · microns
Change in OCT Central Subfield Thickness
micronsPlaceboNepafenac 0.1% Drops
Change in OCT Central Subfield Thickness7 ± 359 ± 45

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—12/64 (18.8%)37/64 (57.8%)
Nepafenac 0.1% Drops—16/61 (26.2%)30/61 (49.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboNepafenac 0.1% Drops
Chest PainCardiac disorders2/641/61
Burning EyesEye disorders0/641/61
Corneal MeltEye disorders0/641/61
Vision DecreasedEye disorders0/641/61
HyperglycemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/641/61
Bowl ObstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/641/61
Rectal BleedingGastrointestinal disorders0/641/61
Gallbladder StonesGastrointestinal disorders1/641/61
Hip FractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/641/61
Tendon disorderMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/641/61
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboNepafenac 0.1% Drops
Blurred VisionEye disorders6/646/61
Eye PainEye disorders5/641/61
FloatersEye disorders4/644/61
Vitreous HemorrhageEye disorders1/644/61
CataractEye disorders3/643/61
Stomach VirusGastrointestinal disorders2/643/61
Vision DecreasedEye disorders3/643/61
Visual Acuity DecreasedEye disorders1/643/61
Chest PainCardiac disorders3/642/61
Eye ItchingEye disorders3/640/61

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% DropsTotal
Median59 (51 to 66)60 (52 to 68)60 (51 to 67)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% DropsTotal
Female282351
Male363874
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% DropsTotal
White384482
African American13720
Hispanic or Latino12517
American Indian/Alaskan Native101
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander022
Asian022
More than one race011
Type of Diabetes
Type of Diabetes(participants)PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% DropsTotal
Type 15510
Type 25653109
Uncertain336
Duration of Diabetes
Duration of Diabetes(years)PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% DropsTotal
Mean17 ± 1119 ± 1118 ± 11
Hemoglobin A1c
Hemoglobin A1c(Percent HbA1c)PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% DropsTotal
Median7.9 (7.2 to 10)8.1 (7.1 to 8.7)7.9 (7.1 to 9.0)
Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score
Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Visual Acuity Letter Score(units on a scale)PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% DropsTotal
Mean83 ± 782 ± 683 ± 7
History of Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment
History of Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment(participants)PlaceboNepafenac 0.1% DropsTotal
yes283058
no363167

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

32 sites
  • Loma Linda University Health Care, Dept. of Ophthalmology
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
  • Southern California Desert Retina Consultants, MC
    Palm Springs, California 92262, United States
  • California Retina Consultants
    Santa Barbara, California 93103, United States
  • Bay Area Retina Associates
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • Retinal Consultants of Southern California Medical Group, Inc.
    Westlake Village, California 91361, United States
  • Retina Consultants of Southwest Florida
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912, United States
  • Central Florida Retina Institute
    Lakeland, Florida 33805, United States
  • Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
    Augusta, Georgia 30909, United States
  • Retina Associates of Hawaii, Inc.
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • Raj K. Maturi, M.D., P.C.
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46290, United States
  • American Eye Institute
    New Albany, Indiana 47150, United States
  • Wolfe Eye Clinic
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50266, United States
  • Retina and Vitreous Associates of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40509-1802, United States
  • Paducah Retinal Center
    Paducah, Kentucky 42001, United States
  • Elman Retina Group, P.A.
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237, United States
  • Joslin Diabetes Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Vitreo-Retinal Associates
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49525, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Eyesight Ophthalmic Services, PA
    Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801, United States
  • Eye Care for the Adirondacks
    Plattsburgh, New York 12901, United States
  • Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
    Syracuse, New York 13224, United States
  • Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat Assoc, PA
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28210, United States
  • Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
    Beachwood, Ohio 44122, United States
  • Retina Northwest, PC
    Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • Family Eye Group
    Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17601-2644, United States
  • Southeastern Retina Associates, PC
    Kingsport, Tennessee 37660, United States
  • Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37909, United States
  • Texas Retina Associates
    Lubbock, Texas 79424, United States
  • Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78240, United States
  • University of Washington Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Friedman SM, Almukhtar TH, Baker CW, Glassman AR, Elman MJ, Bressler NM, Maker MP, Jampol LM, Melia M; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Topical nepafenec in eyes with noncentral diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2015 May;35(5):944-56. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000403. PubMed 25602634 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01331005
Lead sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 7, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Results posted
Jan 16, 2015
Last update
Mar 10, 2025

Study contacts

Scott M Friedman, MD
principal investigator · Florida Retina Consultants

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion