ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01207752Updated Apr 1, 2025Results posted

The Efficacy of an Ocular Emulsion in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

An interventional study of Systane Balance and Optive Lubricant Eye Drops in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, sponsored by Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-01.

Sponsored by Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study will be to determine the efficacy of this novel, lipid-containing artificial tear on the signs and symptoms of meibomian gland disease.

Read the detailed description

This investigation will involve approximately 90 MGD subjects, randomly assigned to either the Systane Balance treatment group or a control group using Optive™ Lubricant Eyedrops (Allergan), a low-viscosity artificial tear. Both arms will dose the drops four times per day and the treatment trial will be conducted for 6 months. The age range will be 18 years and older, with no upper age limit. Standard diagnostic tests for dry eye, as recommended by the NEI-Industry Workshop report,8 but with updated criteria in some instances, will be used to define clinical dry eye of the MGD sub-type. The three major tests will be: symptoms using a validated questionnaire (Schein), evidence of ocular surface damage, and demonstration of tear instability. The subjects will be enrolled if they consent and are confirmed as MGD subjects using the established clinical criteria used at SCCO of gland dropout Grade 1 per lower eyelid using meiboscopy,6, 9 or secretion quality Grade 1 in any of the three sectors (temporal, central, nasal) upon gland expression9, 10 using the recently developed Korb device.11 The principal outcome measure will be the tear film breakup time (TBUT), in seconds, at two hours post drop instillation. The two-hour TBUT value will be used to compare the control and test formulation at baseline and visits 3, 5 and 7. TBUT will be measured using 2.0 l of 1.0% NaFl. Exploratory outcome measures will include TBUT (seconds; change over time), corneal staining (change over time; 0 - 20 scale), symptoms (Schein and MGD-specific preliminary questionnaire score), drop comfort, Surface Regularity Index (a measure of surface disruption), lipid layer grade (1 - 5 Yokoi scale), meibum excreta quality, gland drop out and lid margin appearance all monitored as the change over time from baseline. Treatment comparisons will be made at each timepoint

02

Conditions studied

  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Keywords

  • dry eye, MGD, tear film break up time
03

In context

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

172 studies on the registry are indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 69 is above the median of 50 across 138 interventional studies indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Browse Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Schein symptom score (all 6 questions) of greater than 5,
  • evidence of MGD changes in both eyes (i.e.,
  • lower eyelid secretion quality score greater than 1.0 (0 - 3 scale) OR gland dropout score greater than 1.0 (i.e., greater than 25% of entire lower eyelid) as demonstrated by meiboscopy, and corneal staining of grade 4.0 or greater (0 - 20 scale).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contact lens wear, use of topical ocular medication other than artificial tears (use of Restasis is specifically excluded),
  • unstable systemic medication use (i.e., anti-histamines, , etc.), recent (within 6 months of study start) ocular trauma or surgery,
  • diabetes, aqueous deficient dry eye (defined as a Schirmer I value (without anesthetic) of \< 5 mm of wetting in 5 minutes in either eye), and use of punctal plugs.

-Subjects taking omega 3 fatty acid supplements for dry eye can be included so long as their intake is stable for the prior six months and they meet the inclusion criteria above. -

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
69 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Systane Balance

    Artificial tear emulsion

    Drug: Systane Balance

  • Active comparator
    Optive Lubricant Eye Drops

    Artificial tear

    Drug: Optive Lubricant Eye Drops

Interventions

  • DrugSystane Balance

    Artificial tear emulsion drop

  • DrugOptive Lubricant Eye Drops

    Artificial tear eye drop

    Also known as: Refresh Optive

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tear Film Breakup Time

    time in seconds to observer a dark spot in the tear film

    Time frame: Measured 2 hours after in-office administration of a single drop of test solution

07

Results

Posted Apr 9, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSystane BalanceOptive Lubricant Eye Drops
Started3534
Completed3327
Not completed27

Outcome measures

PrimaryTear Film Breakup Time

time in seconds to observer a dark spot in the tear film

Time frame:
Measured 2 hours after in-office administration of a single drop of test solution
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Tear Film Breakup Time
secondsSystane BalanceOptive Lubricant Eye Drops
Tear Film Breakup Time4.65 ± 1.734.42 ± 1.14
Statistical analysis
  • Systane Balance vs Optive Lubricant Eye Drops · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.550

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Systane Balance—0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)
Optive Lubricant Eye Drops—0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Systane BalanceOptive Lubricant Eye DropsTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years353469
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Systane BalanceOptive Lubricant Eye DropsTotal
Mean50.7 ± 17.754.7 ± 17.552.7 ± 2.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Systane BalanceOptive Lubricant Eye DropsTotal
Female302454
Male51015
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Systane BalanceOptive Lubricant Eye DropsTotal
United States353469
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Eye Care Center
    Fullerton, California 92831, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2010, a primary completion of Jul 2011 and a completion of Jul 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Apr 2021, 9 years 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 21, 2010
First posted
Sep 23, 2010
Start
Sep 2010
Primary completionActual
Jul 2011
CompletionActual
Jul 2011
Results first posted
Apr 9, 2021
Last update
Apr 1, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01207752
Lead sponsor
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University
Collaborators
Alcon Research
Responsible party
Jerry Paugh (Professor Emeritus, Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2010
Start date
Sep 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2011
Completion
Jul 2011
Results posted
Apr 9, 2021
Last update
Apr 1, 2025

Study contacts

Jerry R Paugh, OD, PhD
principal investigator · Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion