ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05801991Updated Apr 22, 2025Results posted

Neurolens and Contact Lens Discomfort

An interventional study of Neurolens and Placebo spectacle lens in Contact Lens Discomfort, sponsored by Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-22.

Sponsored by Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to determine how neurolens® influences contact lens discomfort in uncomfortable myopic soft contact lenses wearers. It is hypothesized that uncomfortable soft contact lens wearers are experiencing some level of discomfort associated with increased vergence demand when looking at near targets and will experience discomfort relief when wearing neurolens® over their habitual soft contact lenses. Uncomfortable, myopic soft contact lens wearers will be recruited. Each participant will be masked and randomly assigned a placebo pair of spectacles or a neurolens® spectacle pair for approximately one month. A prospective, randomized clinical trial will be performed. Participants and investigators will be masked to the treatment.

Read the detailed description

Discomfort is the primary reason for contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Symptoms of contact lens discomfort are often attributed to dryness; however, severity of dry eye and discomfort symptoms is not correlated with clinical dry eye severity. When clinical signs of contact lens discomfort and dryness misalign with symptom severity, the possibility of an under-recognized etiology must be considered.

Symptoms associated with contact lens discomfort are similar to symptoms reported with binocular vision disorders and accommodative and vergence strain. Eyestrain, fatigue, and increased/more frequent end-of-day symptoms are noted by patients in both groups of conditions. It has been reported that uncomfortable contact lens wearers have an unusually high prevalence of binocular vision disorders and clinical signs. Basic optical calculations show that myopes must converge and accommodate more when corrected with contact lenses versus spectacles, so it is reasonable to hypothesize that a myopic contact lens wearer may experience eyestrain and discomfort associated with vergence fatigue while wearing contact lenses, but not while wearing single vision spectacles.

neurolens® is a type of spectacle lens that uses contoured prism to alleviate vergence demands and fatigue at near and, therefore, encourages comfortable vision. This spectacle design uses the neurolens® Measurement Device (nMD) to measure eye alignment and determine the spectacle lenses that are uniquely designed for each wearer. Acknowledging that some amount of contact lens discomfort may be caused by vergence fatigue, it is possible that uncomfortable contact lens wearers who wear neurolens® over their contact lenses will achieve discomfort relief.

The objective of this study is to determine how neurolens® influences contact lens discomfort in uncomfortable myopic soft contact lenses wearers. Investigators hypothesize that uncomfortable soft contact lens wearers are experiencing some level of discomfort associated with increased vergence demand when looking at near targets and will experience discomfort relief when wearing neurolens® over their habitual soft contact lenses. Uncomfortable, myopic soft contact lens wearers will be recruited. Each participant will be masked and randomly assigned a placebo pair of spectacles or a neurolens® spectacle pair for approximately one month. A prospective, randomized clinical trial will be performed. Participants and investigators will be masked to the treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Contact Lens Discomfort
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Uncomfortable soft contact lens wearers (CLDEQ-8 ≥ 17 points)
  • Adult, pre-presbyopic age range (18 - 35 years)
  • Visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye with habitual contact lenses
  • Soft, spherical or low toric, single vision soft contact lens wearer:

    • Habitual contact lens sphere power -0.75 D or more myopic
    • Habitual contact lens are spherical design or have 1.75 D or less of cylinder correction
    • Habitual soft contact lenses are single vision design
    • Valid contact lens prescription at the date of the baseline
    • No significant subjective over-refraction in either eye with habitual soft contact lenses
  • No significant subjective over-refraction in either eye with habitual soft contact lenses

    • Sphere: ≤ 0.50 D myopia, ≤ 0.50 D hyperopia
    • Cylinder: ≤ 0.75 D
  • Valid measurement on the neurolens® Measurement Device (nMD2)

    • A numerical neurolens value
    • No low Measurement Quality Index (MQI) \< 0.8 or convergence excess

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ocular surgery
  • History of ocular disease, amblyopia, strabismus, or vision therapy
  • History of neurolens or prism spectacle correction
  • History of significant vertical phoria or vertical phoria correction
  • Current ocular medication use
  • Significant signs of dry eye:

    • > Grad 1 ocular surface staining
    • Schirmer scores \< 7 mm
    • Tear break up time \< 7 seconds
  • Signs of inappropriate fit or surface of soft contact lenses

    • Insufficient movement centration, and/or coverage
    • Significant lens deposits
    • Signs of corneal or conjunctival contact-lens related complications
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Neurolens Treatment

    Participants will receive Neurolens lenses (measured with the Neurolens device while wearing their habitual contact lenses) in their study spectacles

    Device: Neurolens

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Lens

    Participants will receive plano (no power) lenses in their study spectacles

    Device: Placebo spectacle lens

Interventions

  • DeviceNeurolens

    neurolens® is a type of spectacle lens that uses contoured prism to alleviate vergence demands and fatigue at near and, therefore, encourages comfortable vision.8 This spectacle design uses the neurolens® Measurement Device (nMD) to measure eye alignment and determine the spectacle lenses that are uniquely designed for each wearer.

  • DevicePlacebo spectacle lens

    Plano (no power) spectacle lenses will be assigned to the placebo group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Contact Lens Discomfort

    Change in contact lens discomfort measured by the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8), Score range: 0 - 37 points, Higher scores indicate worse symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline and 30-35 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms

    Change in convergence insufficiency symptoms measured by the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS), Score range 0 - 60 points, Higher scores indicate worse symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline and 30-35 days

  2. Change in Headache Symptoms

    Change in headache symptoms measured by the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Score range: 36 - 78 points, Higher scores indicate worse symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline and 30-35 days

  3. Change in Dry Eye Symptoms

    Change in dry eye symptoms measured by the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) survey, Score range: 0 - 28 points, Higher scores indicated worse symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline and 30-35 days

07

Results

Posted Apr 22, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNeurolens TreatmentPlacebo Lens
Started1515
Completed1415
Not completed10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Contact Lens Discomfort

Change in contact lens discomfort measured by the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8), Score range: 0 - 37 points, Higher scores indicate worse symptoms

Time frame:
Baseline and 30-35 days
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change in Contact Lens Discomfort
Scores on a scaleNeurolens TreatmentPlacebo Lens
Change in Contact Lens Discomfort-4.94 ± 3.84-8.67 ± 5.03
SecondaryChange in Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms

Change in convergence insufficiency symptoms measured by the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS), Score range 0 - 60 points, Higher scores indicate worse symptoms

Time frame:
Baseline and 30-35 days
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change in Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms
Scores on a scaleNeurolens TreatmentPlacebo Lens
Change in Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms-8.86 ± 7.63-8.93 ± 9.58
SecondaryChange in Headache Symptoms

Change in headache symptoms measured by the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Score range: 36 - 78 points, Higher scores indicate worse symptoms

Time frame:
Baseline and 30-35 days
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change in Headache Symptoms
Scores on a scaleNeurolens TreatmentPlacebo Lens
Change in Headache Symptoms-3.14 ± 9.69-9.73 ± 9.63
SecondaryChange in Dry Eye Symptoms

Change in dry eye symptoms measured by the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) survey, Score range: 0 - 28 points, Higher scores indicated worse symptoms

Time frame:
Baseline and 30-35 days
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change in Dry Eye Symptoms
Scores on a scaleNeurolens TreatmentPlacebo Lens
Change in Dry Eye Symptoms-4.29 ± 4.30-6.67 ± 4.47

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline and 30-35 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Neurolens Treatment0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
Placebo Lens0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Neurolens TreatmentPlacebo LensTotal
Mean24.57 ± 2.1426.20 ± 3.2625.41 ± 2.85
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Neurolens TreatmentPlacebo LensTotal
Gender — Male101323
Gender — Female224
Gender — Chose not to declare202
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Neurolens TreatmentPlacebo LensTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Neurolens TreatmentPlacebo LensTotal
United States141529
Mean Contact Lens Wear Time (hours/day)
Mean Contact Lens Wear Time (hours/day)(hours/day)Neurolens TreatmentPlacebo LensTotal
Mean10.79 ± 3.5810.80 ± 3.6310.79 ± 3.48
Mean Contact Lens Wear Time (days/week)
Mean Contact Lens Wear Time (days/week)(days/week)Neurolens TreatmentPlacebo LensTotal
Mean5.79 ± 1.255.53 ± 1.465.66 ± 1.32
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University
    Fullerton, California 92831, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers at this time.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05801991
Lead sponsor
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall B. Ketchum University
Collaborators
Neurolens Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 6, 2023
Start date
May 1, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2024
Completion
Mar 5, 2024
Results posted
Apr 22, 2025
Last update
Apr 22, 2025

Study contacts

Erin Rueff, OD, PhD
principal investigator · Marshall B. Ketchum University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion