ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06220474Updated Nov 9, 2026

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive RF Treatment in Refractory MGD

An interventional study of The Thermage FLX System and Sham treatment in Dry Eye Syndromes and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Recruiting at 2 sites in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Updated Nov 9, 20261 site added1 site removedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective, 24-week, double-masked, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trials to compare clinical efficacy and safety of RF and MGX with MGX alone in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease. The main question it aims to answer is whether radiofrequency treatment and meibomian gland expression is more effective in improving tear breakup time, as measured using non-invasive video keratography, compared with meibomian gland expression alone, in patients with refractory meibomian gland dysfunction-related dry eye disease.

Participants will be divided into two groups, one group will receive RF treatment followed with MGX and another will receive sham treatment with MGX.

Read the detailed description

Dry eye disease(DED) is a prevalent age-related ophthalmic condition. Depending on the population studied and the diagnostic criteria used, dry eye disease is estimated to have a high prevalence in most populations , with a female preponderance. In the latest 2017 Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop II (TFOS DEWS II) Epidemiology Report, which compiled dry eye prevalence data from studies worldwide, the reported the prevalence of DED ranged from 5 to 50%. The risk of dry eye disease increases with age, where with every increase in 10 years of age, the self-reported symptoms of DED increased by 2%. In one study in Asia, up to 70% of elderly patients greater than 60 years of age suffering from symptomatic dry eye disease. Dry eye disease causes gritty and painful eyes, with associated blurred vision. For sufferers, it poses a significant burden on quality of life and limitations activities on activities of daily living, resulting in considerable economic costs to society. A 2006 health-economics study in the United Kingdom estimated that the annual healthcare costs to the public sector for every 1000 dry eye patients was USD 1.1 million.

The causes of dry eye can be broadly classified into those with aqueous tear deficiency, excessive tear evaporation or a combination of both. The most common cause of excessive tear evaporation is meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). This is a common condition of the eyelids where there is a significant change in both the consistency and quantity of meibum, resulting in chronic inflammation of the eyelids and subsequent ocular surface dysfunction. MGD has a prevalence from 46.2% to 69.3% in several studies targeting Asian populations, with a trend of higher prevalence in the elderly. Insufficient lipid secretion from meibomian gland undermines tear film stability, producing dry eye symptoms despite normal tear secretion. In a recent study, up to 70.3% of dry eye patients were found to have concurrent MGD. Refractory MGD is defined by the failure to respond to more than at least three types of conventional therapy, including lubricating eyedrops, gels and ointments and topical or systemic anti-inflammatory treatment, in the past two years.

Currently heat-based therapies are the mainstay and most effective strategies against MGD. Eyelid warming, thermal pulsation and intense light therapy are three prevailing heat-based treatments for MGD- related dry eye disease. Eyelid warming usually involves the application of warm towels, commercialized eye masks (EyeGiene® or Blephasteam®) or eye bags (MGDRx Eye Bag) at least twice a day. Thermal pulsation (Lipiflow®) refers to the delivery of controlled heat together with gentle massage to the eyelids by the machine for 10-17 minutes. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy, which uses light energy on the skin surface, is widely used in dermatology to treat a variety of conditions including dermal vascular lesions, such as port wine stains and hemangiomas, facial rosacea, and acne. Each treatment strategy however carries significant limitations. Self-applied eyelid warm compress is cheap and easily available, but when used alone has limited efficacy. Furthermore, sustained patient adherence to treatment is difficult long term. A single treatment of thermal pulsation therapy has been shown to have sustained therapeutic effects up to 12 months after treatment. However, thermal pulsation is not effective in moderate to severe cases of MGD. From existing studies, IPL has greater clinical efficacy than thermal pulsation, but its therapeutic effects are maintained for a significantly shorter period. As such, monthly repeated treatments for up to 8 months may be required for sustained effects. It is also important to note that none of the existing treatments allow the eyelids to evacuate inspissated meibum effectively, with meibum expression by an ophthalmologist an important step in the treatment process. Thus, MGD is likely to recur long-term.

The Thermage FLX System (WA, USA) is a non-ablative radiofrequency (RF) energy-based device, which has been widely adopted in the cosmetic industry for radiofrequency tissue tightening. RF transfers high energy fluences through the skin to deep dermal layers uniformly while protecting the epidermis. It is postulated that RF stimulates subdermal collagen production for tissue tightening effect. There are several advantages of using non-invasive RF treatment over other currently available energy-based devices. Firstly, the Thermage FLX has a much more precise applicator directly targeting the meibomian glands. Thermage FLX addresses both the upper and lower eyelids as close as possible to the lid margin, which is directly where the meibomian glands are situated, it also addresses the tragus area as well, hence a more precise and direct treatment area can be achieved. Secondly, compared to other energy-based devices, Thermage FLX provides a higher accumulative heat transfer effect around the periocular region, due to its repeated application of at least 4-5 cycles around the periorbital region. With higher accumulative heat energy, we anticipate a better and more effective melting of the meibum, which aids in more effective meibum expression. Thirdly, as Thermage FLX has been widely adopted for radiofrequency tissue tightening due to its collagen resynthesis effect, there has been proven improvement of the elasticity of orbicularis and periocular skin tissue, this can promote better blinking effort and better apposition of lid margins. This may enhance the pumping effect of the orbicularis oculi in the long-term. RF treatment is potentially a safe and effective multimodal treatment for MGD-related dry eye disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye Syndromes
  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 207 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 112 is above the median of 60 across 1,129 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,292 studies on the registry; 348 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 18 or more
  2. Bilateral dry eye disease as confirmed by presence of both symptoms and signs 2.1 Symptoms: Abnormal result on the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire (SPEED) dry eye symptom questionnaire (≥5) 2.2 Signs: Abnormal result in at least one of the following three clinical tests - tear osmolarity, NIKBUT and corneal staining for punctate epithelial erosions and,
  3. Bilateral moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction - at least Grade 1 meibum quality (cloudy appearance) and Grade 2 meibum expressibility (moderate pressure required). And,
  4. MGD - The failure to respond to at least three types of conventional therapy, including artificial tears, topical or systemic antibiotics and anti-inflammatory treatments and the aforementioned heat-based therapies, over a period of at least 2 years
  5. Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV - Type V and VI skinned subjects are excluded from the study due to the high risk of pain and focal hypopigmentation
  6. Mentally fit to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Fitzpatrick skin type V-VI
  2. History of eyelid scarring
  3. Infrared meibography evidence of significant acinar gland atrophy (dropout of >30%) - these patients have been shown not to benefit from heat-based therapies due to end-stage disease
  4. Pregnancy or lactation
  5. Active corneal disease such as infectious keratitis, allergic keratoconjunctivitis, pterygium, exposure keratopathy, lagophthalmos, trichiasis or dellen
  6. Current systemic intake of photosensitive medications, including tetracycline group of drugs.
  7. History of corneal abnormality or surgery within 3 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
112 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiofrequency treatment (RF), followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX)

    Before treatment, a thermage return pad will be applied to subject's skin to help prevent electrical burns. The return pad is a rubber, non-active electrode that creates a return path for radiofrequency energy back to the thermage comfort pulse technology (CPT) system. The upper and lower lid of both eyes are marked with skin marking paper (Thermage ® Skin Marking Paper TK-3.00). Coupling fluid is then applied to the external surface of the upper and lower lids of both eyes. All subjects then receive 225 applications to each eye over the upper and lower eyelids. Immediately after treatment, meibomian gland expression will be performed on both upper and lower eyelids of each eye for both eyes of all subjects using meibum expression forceps. Pain is minimized during this procedure by topical application of 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride.

    Device: The Thermage FLX System

  • Sham comparator
    Sham treatment, followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX)

    The training mode is used in the Thermage FLX, which simulates treatment without dissipation of radiofrequency energy. Immediately after treatment, meibomian gland expression will be performed on both upper and lower eyelids of each eye for both eyes of all subjects using meibum expression forceps. Pain is minimized during this procedure by topical application of 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride.

    Device: Sham treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceThe Thermage FLX System

    The Thermage FLX System is tested for its therapeutic efficacy and safety on treating refractory Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

  • DeviceSham treatment

    Sham treatment acts as a control to test the therapeutic efficacy and safety of The Thermage FLX System

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in non-invasive keratographic tear breakup time (NIKBUT)

    NIKBUT is measured in seconds and average of 3 consecutive readings is taken. Higher values mean better outcomes.

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months post- treatment between study groups

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) symptom score

    One number was collected per patient, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

  2. Percentage of subjects with normal non-invasive keratographic tear breakup time (NIKBUT)

    \> 10 seconds, with lower scores meaning worse

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Percentage of subjects with normal SPEED

    \<5, with higher scores meaning worse

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Change in best corrected visual acuity

    from logmar(1.0 to -0.1)

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  5. Incidence of periorbital pain

    at least 3/10 and above, with higher scores meaning worse

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Incidence of ocular adverse events

    evidence of uveitis, conjunctivitis, scleritis/episcleritis, new lens opacities, new cornea opacities

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Incidence of non-ocular adverse events

    eyelid skin burn, eyelid redness, eyelid hyper/hypopigmentation

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change in cornea staining (National Eye Institute Grading System)

    This serves as an objective parameter for ocular surface damage, with higher scores meaning worse

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  2. Tear osmolarity

    This serves as an objective parameter for ocular surface damage

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  3. Change in Shirmer's I test reading

    In millimetres. Readings serve as objective parameters for tear volume

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  4. Tear meniscus height

    In millimetres. Readings serve as objective parameters for tear volume

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  5. Changes in meiboscore

    These readings serve as parameters for meibomian gland dysfunction

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

  6. Changes in meibum expressibility

    These readings serve as parameters for meibomian gland dysfunction, with higher scores meaning worse

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

  7. Changes in meibum quality

    These readings serve as parameters for meibomian gland dysfunction, with higher scores meaning worse

    Time frame: from baseline to 6 months post-treatment between study groups

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Grantham Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
    • Kendrick Co Shih · Contact
  • HKU Eye Centre
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, Stanislavsky YL, Taylor HR. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1998 Jun;105(6):1114-9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96016-X. PubMed 9627665 ↗
  • Lee AJ, Lee J, Saw SM, Gazzard G, Koh D, Widjaja D, Tan DT. Prevalence and risk factors associated with dry eye symptoms: a population based study in Indonesia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Dec;86(12):1347-51. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.12.1347. PubMed 12446361 ↗
  • Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Lee AJ, Maroun R, Wang JJ. Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;31(3):229-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00634.x. PubMed 12786773 ↗
  • Lin PY, Tsai SY, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Chou P, Hsu WM. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jun;110(6):1096-101. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00262-8. PubMed 12799232 ↗
  • Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20. PubMed 28736335 ↗
  • Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;118(9):1264-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.9.1264. PubMed 10980773 ↗
  • Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, Jalbert I, Lekhanont K, Malet F, Na KS, Schaumberg D, Uchino M, Vehof J, Viso E, Vitale S, Jones L. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):334-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jul 20. PubMed 28736337 ↗
  • Mathers WD, Lane JA, Zimmerman MB. Tear film changes associated with normal aging. Cornea. 1996 May;15(3):229-34. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199605000-00001. PubMed 8713923 ↗
  • Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Incidence of dry eye in an older population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;122(3):369-73. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.3.369. PubMed 15006852 ↗
  • The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007 Apr;5(2):93-107. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70082-4. PubMed 17508117 ↗
  • Miljanovic B, Dana R, Sullivan DA, Schaumberg DA. Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;143(3):409-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.11.060. Epub 2007 Jan 2. PubMed 17317388 ↗
  • Clegg JP, Guest JF, Lehman A, Smith AF. The annual cost of dry eye syndrome in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom among patients managed by ophthalmologists. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;13(4):263-74. doi: 10.1080/09286580600801044. PubMed 16877285 ↗
  • Foulks GN, Bron AJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: a clinical scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading. Ocul Surf. 2003 Jul;1(3):107-26. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70139-8. PubMed 17075643 ↗
  • Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, Tong L, Uchino M, Nichols KK. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1994-2005. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997e. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available. PubMed 21450917 ↗
  • Rabensteiner DF, Aminfar H, Boldin I, Schwantzer G, Horwath-Winter J. The prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction, tear film and ocular surface parameters in an Austrian dry eye clinic population. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;96(6):e707-e711. doi: 10.1111/aos.13732. Epub 2018 Apr 15. PubMed 29656524 ↗
  • Lam PY, Shih KC, Fong PY, Chan TCY, Ng AL, Jhanji V, Tong L. A Review on Evidence-Based Treatments for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Eye Contact Lens. 2020 Jan;46(1):3-16. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000680. PubMed 31834043 ↗
  • Toyos R, McGill W, Briscoe D. Intense pulsed light treatment for dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction; a 3-year retrospective study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Jan;33(1):41-6. doi: 10.1089/pho.2014.3819. PubMed 25594770 ↗
  • Wang MT, Jaitley Z, Lord SM, Craig JP. Comparison of Self-applied Heat Therapy for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Sep;92(9):e321-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000601. PubMed 25955642 ↗
  • Gupta PK, Vora GK, Matossian C, Kim M, Stinnett S. Outcomes of intense pulsed light therapy for treatment of evaporative dry eye disease. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;51(4):249-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jun 22. PubMed 27521662 ↗
  • Vegunta S, Patel D, Shen JF. Combination Therapy of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy and Meibomian Gland Expression (IPL/MGX) Can Improve Dry Eye Symptoms and Meibomian Gland Function in Patients With Refractory Dry Eye: A Retrospective Analysis. Cornea. 2016 Mar;35(3):318-22. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000735. PubMed 26785301 ↗
  • Hodgkinson DJ. Clinical applications of radiofrequency: nonsurgical skin tightening (thermage). Clin Plast Surg. 2009 Apr;36(2):261-8, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2008.11.006. PubMed 19309652 ↗
  • Sukal SA, Geronemus RG. Thermage: the nonablative radiofrequency for rejuvenation. Clin Dermatol. 2008 Nov-Dec;26(6):602-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.09.007. PubMed 18940540 ↗
  • Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(4):232-42. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10225. PubMed 14571447 ↗
09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
1 site added, 1 site removed
Show site
  • Grantham Hospital · Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Show 1 removed
  • Grantham Hospital · Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    1 site added, 1 site removed
    Show site
    • Grantham Hospital · Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Show 1 removed
    • Grantham Hospital · Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06220474
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 24, 2024
Start date
Oct 22, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Kendrick Co SHIH
Contact
kcshih@hku.hk
94326271
Kendrick Co SHIH
principal investigator · The University of Hong Kong, Grantham Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion