CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01171625Updated Apr 17, 2020Results posted

Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 3300TFX

An interventional study of Implantation of CEP Magna Ease Model 3300TFX in Coronary Artery Disease, Aortic Valve Disorder and Heart Failure, sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences. Completed at 13 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-17.

Sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2007, registered Jul 2010).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
283
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the long term safety and effectiveness of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease Valves in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, interventional study to be conducted in the US and outside the US (OUS). This study will enroll a minimum of 225 patients implanted with the study valve in order to achieve 101 aortic valve replacement subjects each followed for a minimum of 8 years. The study will include male and female patients, 18 years or older, requiring replacement for a diseased, damaged or malfunctioning natural or prosthetic aortic valve. Patients will be followed and assessed after implant at discharge, 6 months, one year, and annually for a minimum of 8 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Aortic Valve Disorder
  • Heart Failure
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency

Keywords

  • PERIMOUNT, Aortic valve replacement/regurgitation
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 283 is above the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Edwards Lifesciences is the lead sponsor of 124 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 34 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 32 (94%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. The patient requires, as indicated in the preoperative evaluation, a replacement aortic valve.
  2. The patient is an average or better operative risk.
  3. The patient is geographically stable and agrees to attend follow-up assessments at the hospital of surgical services for at least 8 years.
  4. The patient is 18 years or older.
  5. The patient has signed and dated the subject informed consent form prior to surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has any known non-cardiac life-threatening disease, which will limit the patient's life expectancy below 1 year.
  2. The patient presents with active endocarditis within the last 3 months.
  3. The patient has an abnormal calcium metabolism (e.g., chronic renal failure, hyperparathyroidism).
  4. The patient has an aneurismal aortic degenerative condition (e.g., cystic medial necrosis, Marfan's syndrome).
  5. The patient is pregnant or lactating.
  6. The patient is an intravenous drug abuser.
  7. The patient is currently a prison inmate.
  8. The patient is currently participating in a study of an investigational drug or device.
  9. The patient requires replacement of a native or prosthetic mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve.
  10. The patient requires a repair of the mitral or tricuspid valve with the use of an annuloplasty device.
  11. The patient was previously enrolled in the study.
  12. The patient had a prior mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve, mechanical valve, or annuloplasty ring that will remain in situ.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
283 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    CEP Aortic Bioprothesis, model 3300TFX

    Device: Implantation of CEP Magna Ease Model 3300TFX

Interventions

  • DeviceImplantation of CEP Magna Ease Model 3300TFX

    Heart Valve Surgery

    Also known as: CEP Magna Ease MOdel 3300TFX

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Subject's Percentage of Long Term Safety Performance

    Long term safety performance will be evaluated by comparing the linearized yearly rates to the objective performance criteria (OPC) referenced in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1994 Draft Heart Valve Guidance. Expressed as the Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).

    Time frame: 31 days through 8 years post-implant

  2. Number of Subject's in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 8 Year Post-Implant

    The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  3. Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 8 Years Post-Implant Compared to Baseline

    The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

    Time frame: 8 Years post-implant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent of Early Adverse Events

    Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100.

    Time frame: Events occurring within 30 days of procedure

  2. Percentage of Late Adverse Events

    Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).

    Time frame: Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 8 years post-implant

  3. Percent of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days

    Subject's freedom from Serious Adverse Events at \> 30 days post-implant. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, 5 Years, 6 Years, 7 Years, and 8 Years post-implant

  4. Subject's Average Peak Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant

    Peak systolic gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the aortic valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  5. Subject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

    Mean systolic gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  6. Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

    Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  7. Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

    Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve divided by the person's body surface area. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  8. Subject's Average Performance Index Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

    Performance index is defined as the subject's effective orifice area (the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve) divided by the subject's native orifice area. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  9. Subject's Average Cardiac Output Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

    The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  10. Subject's Average Cardiac Index Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

    Cardiac index is an assessment that divides the cardiac output from left ventricle in one minute by the person's body surface area (BSA), thus relating heart performance to the size of the individual. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  11. Subject's Amount of Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 8 Years Post-Implant.

    Aortic valvular regurgitation occurs when the aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Aortic valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.

    Time frame: 8 years post-implant

  12. Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count Measurement Over Time.

    Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.

    Time frame: 6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant

  13. Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.

    Time frame: 6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant

  14. Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the fluid component (plasma) in the blood.

    Time frame: 6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant

  15. Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.

    Time frame: 6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant

  16. Subject's Average Platelet Count Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.

    Time frame: 6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant

  17. Subject's Average Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase on blood drawn from subjects; The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) test looks for signs of damage to the body's tissues.

    Time frame: 6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant

  18. Subject's Average Haptoglobin Measurement Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of haptoglobin on blood drawn from subjects; haptoglobin is a protein produced by the liver.

    Time frame: 6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant

  19. Subject's Average Reticulocytes Percentage Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of reticulocytes on blood drawn from subjects. Reticulocytes are newly produced immature red blood cells; a reticulocyte blood test measures the amount of these cells in the blood.

    Time frame: 6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant

  20. Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire at Baseline and 6 Months Post-Implant.

    The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale ranges from a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100 where zero is the 'worst state imaginable' and 100 is the 'best state imaginable'.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 Months Post-Implant

07

Results

Posted Apr 17, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Started283
Subjects implanted with device258
Completed103
Not completed180
Withdrew: On-protocol67
Withdrew: Death38
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject31
Withdrew: Explanted10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5
Withdrew: Patient received valve-in-valve3
Withdrew: Other1
Withdrew: Consented but did not receive device25

Outcome measures

PrimarySubject's Percentage of Long Term Safety Performance

Long term safety performance will be evaluated by comparing the linearized yearly rates to the objective performance criteria (OPC) referenced in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1994 Draft Heart Valve Guidance. Expressed as the Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).

Time frame:
31 days through 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of events/late patient years
Subject's Percentage of Long Term Safety Performance
Percentage of events/late patient yearsCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Thromboembolism1.5
All Hemorrhage2.7
All Perivalvular Leak0.2
Endocarditis0.4
PrimaryNumber of Subject's in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 8 Year Post-Implant

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subject's in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 8 Year Post-Implant
ParticipantsCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Class I57
Class II35
PrimarySubject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 8 Years Post-Implant Compared to Baseline

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

Time frame:
8 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 8 Years Post-Implant Compared to Baseline
ParticipantsCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Improve60
Same31
Worse6
SecondaryPercent of Early Adverse Events

Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100.

Time frame:
Events occurring within 30 days of procedure
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Early Adverse Events
Percent of Early Adverse Events
Percentage of Early Adverse EventsCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Bleeding Event6.2
Major Bleeding Event5.0
Thromboembolism1.9
Endocarditis0.0
Structural Valve Deterioration0.0
Reoperation Due to SVD0.0
Hemolysis0.0
Non-Structural Valve Deterioration0.4
Perivalvular Leak0.4
Major Perivalvular Leak0.4
Valve Thrombosis0.0
Explant1.2
Death0.4
Valve-related death0.0
SecondaryPercentage of Late Adverse Events

Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).

Time frame:
Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of events/late patient years
Percentage of Late Adverse Events
Percentage of events/late patient yearsCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Bleeding Event2.7
Major Bleeding Event1.3
Thromboembolism1.5
Endocarditis0.4
Structural Valve Deterioration1.0
Reoperation Due to SVD0.6
Hemolysis0.1
Non-Structural Valve Deterioration0.3
Perivalvular Leak0.2
Major Perivalvular Leak0.1
Valve Thrombosis0.0
Explant0.5
Death2.3
Valve-related death0.5
SecondaryPercent of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days

Subject's freedom from Serious Adverse Events at \> 30 days post-implant. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, 5 Years, 6 Years, 7 Years, and 8 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percent of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days
percentage of subjectsMagna Ease™, Model 3300TFX - 1 Year Post-ImplantMagna Ease™, Model 3300TFX - 2 Year Post-ImplantMagna Ease™, Model 3300TFX - 3 Year Post-ImplantMagna Ease™, Model 3300TFX - 4 Year Post-ImplantMagna Ease™, Model 3300TFX - 5 Year Post-ImplantMagna Ease™, Model 3300TFX - 6 Year Post-ImplantMagna Ease™, Model 3300TFX - 7 Year Post-ImplantMagna Ease™, Model 3300TFX - 8 Year Post-Implant
Death97.60 (95.71 to 99.50)97.19 (95.14 to 99.24)95.50 (92.89 to 98.10)93.76 (90.70 to 96.82)91.54 (87.98 to 95.09)89.20 (85.18 to 93.21)85.16 (80.34 to 89.98)80.69 (74.94 to 86.43)
Valve-related death99.60 (98.83 to 100.0)99.60 (98.83 to 100.0)98.74 (97.32 to 100.0)98.28 (96.61 to 99.95)97.81 (95.91 to 99.71)97.31 (95.18 to 99.44)96.66 (94.19 to 99.13)95.79 (92.81 to 98.77)
Reoperation97.63 (95.76 to 99.51)97.21 (95.18 to 99.25)96.78 (94.59 to 98.98)95.89 (93.39 to 98.39)95.89 (93.39 to 98.39)95.37 (92.69 to 98.06)94.07 (90.87 to 97.27)89.83 (85.09 to 94.58)
Explant98.04 (96.34 to 99.74)97.62 (95.74 to 99.50)97.19 (95.14 to 99.25)96.30 (93.92 to 98.68)96.30 (93.92 to 98.68)96.30 (93.92 to 98.68)95.65 (92.96 to 98.33)94.81 (91.70 to 97.93)
Bleeding Event88.44 (84.48 to 92.40)86.76 (82.55 to 90.98)84.13 (79.55 to 88.71)83.22 (78.51 to 87.92)81.79 (76.90 to 86.69)81.29 (76.33 to 86.25)80.63 (75.54 to 85.72)77.95 (72.20 to 83.70)
Major Bleeding Event92.51 (89.26 to 95.75)92.09 (88.75 to 95.42)90.33 (86.64 to 94.02)90.33 (86.64 to 94.02)88.91 (84.95 to 92.87)88.40 (84.34 to 92.47)87.75 (83.52 to 91.98)85.08 (80.02 to 90.15)
Thromboembolism96.03 (93.61 to 98.44)94.32 (91.43 to 97.22)92.56 (89.25 to 95.88)92.11 (88.69 to 95.52)90.70 (86.98 to 94.41)89.68 (85.75 to 93.62)88.39 (84.13 to 92.66)86.68 (81.88 to 91.47)
Endocarditis98.81 (97.47 to 100.0)98.39 (96.83 to 99.96)98.39 (96.83 to 99.96)97.94 (96.15 to 99.73)97.94 (96.15 to 99.73)97.94 (96.15 to 99.73)97.27 (95.07 to 99.48)97.27 (95.07 to 99.48)
Perivalvular leak98.78 (97.41 to 100.0)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)
Major perivalvular leak99.20 (98.09 to 100.0)99.20 (98.09 to 100.0)99.20 (98.09 to 100.0)99.20 (98.09 to 100.0)99.20 (98.09 to 100.0)99.20 (98.09 to 100.0)99.20 (98.09 to 100.0)99.20 (98.09 to 100.0)
Hemolysis99.18 (98.04 to 100.0)99.18 (98.04 to 100.0)99.18 (98.04 to 100.0)99.18 (98.04 to 100.0)99.18 (98.04 to 100.0)99.18 (98.04 to 100.0)99.18 (98.04 to 100.0)99.18 (98.04 to 100.0)
Non-structural valve dysfunction98.78 (97.41 to 100.0)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)98.36 (96.77 to 99.95)97.91 (96.09 to 99.73)97.91 (96.09 to 99.73)97.91 (96.09 to 99.73)97.91 (96.09 to 99.73)97.91 (96.09 to 99.73)
Structural valve deterioration100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)99.57 (98.74 to 100.0)99.13 (97.94 to 100.0)99.13 (97.94 to 100.0)99.13 (97.94 to 100.0)97.07 (94.75 to 99.39)95.74 (92.81 to 98.67)90.08 (84.74 to 95.42)
Valve thrombosis100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)
SecondarySubject's Average Peak Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant

Peak systolic gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the aortic valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Subject's Average Peak Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant
mmHgCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
19 mm24.6 ± 17.94
21 mm24.7 ± 23.52
23 mm26.3 ± 21.41
25 mm21.6 ± 8.94
27 mm22.1 ± 8.81
29 mm23.1 ± 15.41
SecondarySubject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

Mean systolic gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Subject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.
mmHgCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
19 mm17.7 ± 6.38
21 mm17.2 ± 10.82
23 mm16.2 ± 10.46
25 mm12.7 ± 4.56
27 mm12.2 ± 4.51
29 mm13.3 ± 9.48
SecondarySubject's Average Effective Orifice Area Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · Centimeters Squared
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.
Centimeters SquaredCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
19 mm1.0 ± 0.15
21 mm1.4 ± 0.40
23 mm1.4 ± 0.53
25 mm1.7 ± 0.47
27 mm2.1 ± 0.32
29 mm1.9 ± 0.44
SecondarySubject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve divided by the person's body surface area. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · centimeters squared/meters squared
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.
centimeters squared/meters squaredCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
19 mm0.6 ± 0.11
21 mm0.7 ± 0.20
23 mm0.8 ± 0.32
25 mm0.8 ± 0.21
27 mm1.1 ± 0.10
29 mm0.9 ± 0.24
SecondarySubject's Average Performance Index Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

Performance index is defined as the subject's effective orifice area (the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve) divided by the subject's native orifice area. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · cm^2/cm^2
Subject's Average Performance Index Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.
cm^2/cm^2Carpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
19 mm0.5 ± 0.09
21 mm0.5 ± 0.14
23 mm0.4 ± 0.18
25 mm0.4 ± 0.10
27 mm0.4 ± 0.04
29 mm0.3 ± 0.09
SecondarySubject's Average Cardiac Output Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · Liters per minute
Subject's Average Cardiac Output Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.
Liters per minuteCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
19 mm3.6 ± 0.32
21 mm5.2 ± 1.23
23 mm5.0 ± 1.10
25 mm5.1 ± 1.28
27 mm6.3 ± 2.10
29 mm5.3 ± 0.78
SecondarySubject's Average Cardiac Index Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

Cardiac index is an assessment that divides the cardiac output from left ventricle in one minute by the person's body surface area (BSA), thus relating heart performance to the size of the individual. The data summary will be stratified by valve size.

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · L/min/m^2
Subject's Average Cardiac Index Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.
L/min/m^2Carpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
19 mm2.3 ± 0.22
21 mm2.9 ± 0.55
23 mm2.7 ± 0.60
25 mm2.6 ± 0.60
27 mm3.1 ± 0.91
29 mm2.6 ± 0.32
SecondarySubject's Amount of Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 8 Years Post-Implant.

Aortic valvular regurgitation occurs when the aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Aortic valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.

Time frame:
8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subject's Amount of Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 8 Years Post-Implant.
ParticipantsCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
0 None58
+1 Trivial20
+2 Mild9
+3 Moderate1
+4 Severe0
SecondarySubject's Average White Blood Cell Count Measurement Over Time.

Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.

Time frame:
6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · 10^3 cells/microliters
Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count Measurement Over Time.
10^3 cells/microlitersCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
6 Months7.0 ± 2.0
1 Year6.8 ± 1.7
2 Years6.9 ± 1.7
3 Years6.9 ± 2.1
4 Years6.9 ± 2.1
5 Years6.9 ± 1.7
6 Years7.1 ± 2.3
7 Years7.2 ± 1.6
8 Years7.4 ± 2.3
SecondarySubject's Average Red Blood Cells Count Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.

Time frame:
6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · 10^6 cells/microliters
Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count Over Time.
10^6 cells/microlitersCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
6 Months4.7 ± 0.6
1 Year4.7 ± 0.6
2 Years4.7 ± 0.5
3 Years4.6 ± 0.5
4 Years4.6 ± 0.5
5 Years4.6 ± 0.6
6 Years4.6 ± 0.5
7 Years4.7 ± 0.6
8 Years4.7 ± 0.5
SecondarySubject's Average Hematocrit Percentage Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the fluid component (plasma) in the blood.

Time frame:
6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of red blood cells
Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage Over Time.
percentage of red blood cellsCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
6 Months40.6 ± 4.0
1 Year41.2 ± 4.0
2 Years41.7 ± 4.0
3 Years41.4 ± 3.9
4 Years41.8 ± 4.1
5 Years41.6 ± 7.9
6 Years41.2 ± 5.3
7 Years41.4 ± 4.6
8 Years42.6 ± 6.6
SecondarySubject's Average Hemoglobin Count Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.

Time frame:
6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · g/dl
Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count Over Time.
g/dlCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
6 Months13.7 ± 1.6
1 Year14.0 ± 1.6
2 Years14.1 ± 1.6
3 Years14.0 ± 1.5
4 Years14.1 ± 1.5
5 Years14.0 ± 1.6
6 Years14.0 ± 1.7
7 Years14.0 ± 1.8
8 Years14.3 ± 1.4
SecondarySubject's Average Platelet Count Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.

Time frame:
6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · 10^3 platelets per microliter
Subject's Average Platelet Count Over Time.
10^3 platelets per microliterCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
6 Months207.9 ± 64.4
1 Year202.5 ± 50.1
2 Years204.7 ± 56.3
3 Years195.6 ± 50.9
4 Years198.6 ± 57.1
5 Years198.3 ± 74.7
6 Years196.9 ± 54.7
7 Years199.1 ± 58.3
8 Years190.7 ± 51.1
SecondarySubject's Average Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase on blood drawn from subjects; The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) test looks for signs of damage to the body's tissues.

Time frame:
6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Subject's Average Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Over Time.
U/LCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
6 Months240.8 ± 112.6
1 Year235.5 ± 103.3
2 Years234.6 ± 106.5
3 Years236.1 ± 102.3
4 Years243.9 ± 107.1
5 Years236.7 ± 94.3
6 Years255.3 ± 162.2
7 Years238.2 ± 88.5
8 Years263.0 ± 117.9
SecondarySubject's Average Haptoglobin Measurement Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of haptoglobin on blood drawn from subjects; haptoglobin is a protein produced by the liver.

Time frame:
6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Subject's Average Haptoglobin Measurement Over Time.
mg/dlCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
6 Months118.4 ± 66.9
1 Year114.7 ± 70.7
2 Years115.6 ± 61.4
3 Years116.3 ± 58.9
4 Years112.8 ± 62.3
5 Years127.1 ± 104.0
6 Years115.6 ± 58.9
7 Years125.0 ± 87.4
8 Years109.8 ± 53.7
SecondarySubject's Average Reticulocytes Percentage Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of reticulocytes on blood drawn from subjects. Reticulocytes are newly produced immature red blood cells; a reticulocyte blood test measures the amount of these cells in the blood.

Time frame:
6 months and annually for 8 years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of reticulocytes
Subject's Average Reticulocytes Percentage Over Time.
percentage of reticulocytesCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
6 Months1.2 ± 1.5
1 Year1.2 ± 0.5
2 Years1.2 ± 0.5
3 Years1.2 ± 0.5
4 Years1.4 ± 1.3
5 Years1.8 ± 6.2
6 Years4.4 ± 13.4
7 Years5.4 ± 16.5
8 Years4.5 ± 14.8
SecondarySubject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire at Baseline and 6 Months Post-Implant.

The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale ranges from a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100 where zero is the 'worst state imaginable' and 100 is the 'best state imaginable'.

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 Months Post-Implant
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire at Baseline and 6 Months Post-Implant.
units on a scaleCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Baseline75.8 ± 15.1
6 Months Follow-up84.3 ± 13.6

Adverse events

Collected over Events occurring from baseline through eight years post implant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Carpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX38/258 (14.7%)211/258 (81.8%)184/258 (71.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 50
Most frequent serious events
EventCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders87/258
OtherGeneral disorders63/258
Infection / InflammationInfections and infestations40/258
Pleural EffusionCardiac disorders37/258
Bleeding - MajorBlood and lymphatic system disorders32/258
CancerGeneral disorders27/258
Respiratory ComplicationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders27/258
Gastro-Intestinal ComplicationGastrointestinal disorders26/258
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders20/258
Pericardial EffusionCardiac disorders20/258
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 43
Most frequent other events
EventCarpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
OtherGeneral disorders84/258
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders58/258
Infection / InflammationInfections and infestations42/258
Pleural EffusionCardiac disorders36/258
Pericardial EffusionCardiac disorders17/258
Cardiac Conduction DisturbanceCardiac disorders15/258
Respiratory ComplicationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders15/258
Bleeding - MinorBlood and lymphatic system disorders12/258
Vision DisorderEye disorders11/258
Gastro-Intestinal ComplicationGastrointestinal disorders10/258

Baseline characteristics

The outcome is reported for subjects who received the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease, Model 3300TFX, device where data is available.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Carpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Mean68.5 ± 8.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Carpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
Female91
Male167
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Carpentier-Edwards® PERIMOUNT® Magna Ease™, Model 3300TFX
08

Study locations

13 sites
  • Mercy General Hospital
    Sacramento, California 95819, United States
  • Cooper University Hospital
    Camden, New Jersey 08103, United States
  • Morristown Memorial Hospital
    Morristown, New Jersey 09762, United States
  • Providence Heart & Vascular Institute
    Portland, Oregon 97225, United States
  • St. Marks Hospital
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84124, United States
  • Universitatslinik fur Chirurgie
    Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • St. Paul's Hospital
    Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
  • Liknik fur Herz und BefaBchirurgie Im Deuschen Herzzentrum
    Munich, Lazarettstr 36, Germany
  • Klinik fur Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefabchirurgie
    Hannover, D-30625, Germany
  • Hospital Peutra de Hierro
    San Martin de Porres 4, Madrid CP-28035, Spain
  • Papworth Hospital NHS foundation Trust
    Papworth Everard, Cambridge CV23 3RE, United Kingdom
  • Blackpool Victoria Hospital
    Blackpool, Lancashire FY8 8NR, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wahlers TCW, Andreas M, Rahmanian P, Candolfi P, Zemanova B, Giot C, Ferrari E, Laufer G. Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2018 May/Jun;13(3):177-183. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000509. PubMed 29912142 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 15, 2009

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01171625
Lead sponsor
Edwards Lifesciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 28, 2010
Start date
Oct 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2018
Completion
Sep 2018
Results posted
Apr 17, 2020
Last update
Apr 17, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion