CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01166373E-OPTIMALUpdated Sep 28, 2020Results posted

The Extended Operations And Pelvic Muscle Training In The Management Of Apical Support Loss Study

An interventional study of Enrollment video and SSLF in Pelvic Organ Prolapse, sponsored by NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-28.

Sponsored by NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
285
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Women will be invited to participate in E-OPTIMAL at their last clinical follow-up visit for OPTIMAL (at 24 months post surgery). E-OPTIMAL is an extension of the ongoing OPTIMAL study and no new study treatment interventions will be given. Rather an enrollment intervention will be investigated with potential E-OPTIMAL participants randomly assigned to watch a standardized video prior to consent or undergo the standard informed consent process. The standardized video will review the rationale for women's health research, the importance of long-term follow-up and a detailed invitation to participate in E-OPTIMAL. The video has undergone review by potential subjects, coordinators and physician researchers to ensure that the relevance and importance of issues potentially impacting on long-term participation in studies such as E-OPTIMAL are covered. Participation in E-OPTIMAL will occur up to three additional years. Women will be strongly encouraged to participate in annual examinations and annual telephone surveys but may participate in only one of these study parts if needed.

We propose to test the following null hypotheses:

  1. There will be no difference in time to surgical failure between uterosacral vaginal vault ligament suspension (ULS) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) up to 5 years after surgery.
  2. The addition of a standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for POP to the informed consent process will not improve enrollment or retention in E-OPTIMAL.
Read the detailed description

The goal of this long-term follow-up study is to extend the follow-up of women in the OPTIMAL study up to 5 years from the time of surgery and to compare the success and complication rates of the two surgical treatment groups over this extended time period. The Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss (OPTIMAL) study is a randomized trial designed to compare sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) to uterosacral vaginal vault ligament suspension (ULS) and to assess the role of perioperative behavioral therapy/pelvic muscle training (PMT) in women undergoing vaginal surgery for apical or uterine prolapse and stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

The OPTIMAL study includes a two-year follow up from the time of surgery, which is too short to evaluate the long-term sequelae of the surgical procedures. A further goal of E-OPTIMAL is to investigate a strategy for improving enrollment and retention in long-term studies of women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and SUI, by randomizing subjects to two different recruitment methods.

The primary aims of this extension study are to compare SSLF and ULS for the following outcomes up to 5 years after surgery in women with Stage 2-4 prolapse involving the vaginal apex or uterus and stress urinary incontinence:

  1. time to surgical failure;
  2. the long-term functional and health-related quality of life (QOL), adjusted for PMT treatment group;
  3. the annual and cumulative incidence, resolution, and persistence of pelvic floor symptoms (urinary, bowel, and prolapse), adjusted for PMT treatment group.

An additional primary aim (aim 4) is to determine whether exposure to a standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for pelvic organ prolapse prior to the informed consent process will improve enrollment and/or retention in E-OPTIMAL. We will utilize a conceptual framework that assesses three concepts (motivation, barriers and pragmatic issues) at two levels (study level and personal/individual level). This conceptual framework was developed following a review of the scant available literature on the topic, as well as during discussions with investigators who are experienced in recruiting and retaining participants in pelvic floor disorders studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

  • prolapse
  • urinary incontinence
  • uterosacral vaginal vault ligament suspension
  • sacrospinous ligament fixation
  • behavioral therapy
  • pelvic muscle training
03

In context

Prolapse

676 studies on the registry are indexed under Prolapse; 79 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 285 is above the median of 74 across 435 interventional studies indexed under Prolapse.

Browse Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Completion of the Year 2 OPTIMAL in-person visit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent.
  2. Subjects who are long-term residents of a skilled nursing facility (that is, residency is not limited to short-term rehabilitation) at the time of enrollment into E-OPTIMAL. Note: Subjects unable to return for annual visits are not excluded as they can participate in the telephone interview. However, every attempt will be made to encourage in-person participation.

Criteria for termination of participation:

(Due to evidence or likelihood that the subject can no longer consent for herself)

  1. Subjects 75 years and older that fail the telephone mini-mental status examination. If the participant gets 5 or more of the 10 items "incorrect" the interviewer says "thank you very much for your time, that completes the interview for today." In other words, the interviewer in no way implies to the participant that they did not "pass" a test to continue. The interviewer contacts the appropriate site coordinator immediately after the interview to let them know of the outcome.
  2. Subjects younger than 75 who appear to have cognitive deficits during the quality of life telephone interview will be administered the mini-mental status examination; those who fail will be excluded from further participation. (Proxy respondents will not be used.) Subjects who appear to have cognitive deficits during the in-person visit or site telephone interview will be withdrawn from the study by the study coordinator.
  3. Subjects who become long-term residents of a skilled nursing facility.
  4. Withdrawal of consent. Verbal assent will be obtained prior to each telephone interview and each in-person visit.

Note: Subjects that are unable to complete telephone interviews (for example, because of hearing loss) may complete the interview portion of the survey in person, either at the site or in the home.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
285 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Enrollment video arm

    Arm of subjects that will be shown a standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for pelvic organ prolapse prior to the informed consent process.

    Behavioral: Enrollment video

  • No intervention
    No video intervention arm

    This group of subjects will not view a standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for pelvic organ prolapse prior to the informed consent process.

  • Experimental
    ULS

    Uterosacral Ligament Suspension was one of the randomized surgical treatments in the OPTIMAL study

    Procedure: ULS

  • Experimental
    SSLF

    Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation was one of the randomized surgical treatments in the OPTIMAL study.

    Procedure: SSLF

  • Experimental
    PMT

    Perioperative Behavioral Therapy/Pelvic Muscle Training was one of the randomized non-surgical (behavioral) interventions in the OPTIMAL study.

    Behavioral: PMT

  • Other
    Usual Care

    No Perioperative Behavioral Therapy/Pelvic Muscle Training (i.e., usual care) was one of the randomized non-surgical (behavioral) interventions in the OPTIMAL study.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralEnrollment video

    Standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies for pelvic organ prolapse prior to the informed consent process

  • ProcedureSSLF

    sacrospinous ligament fixation to suspend the vaginal apex

  • ProcedureULS

    uterosacral ligament suspension to suspend the vaginal apex

  • BehavioralPMT

    perioperative behavioral therapy / pelvic muscle training with formal individualized PMT program that begins two to four weeks prior to surgery and continues for three months after surgery

  • OtherUsual Care

    usual care both before and after prolapse surgery with respect to pelvic muscle training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical Failure

    Surgical failure was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C descended more than one-third of total vaginal length; POPQ points Aa, Ba, Ap, or Bp were beyond the hymen; bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms were reported by the participant; or the participant received retreatment. The apex is point C (cervix), and posteriorly is point D (pouch of Douglas). In women after hysterectomy, point C is the vaginal cuff and point D is omitted. This outcome measure is cumulatively across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)

    Time frame: 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  2. Recruitment Into E-OPTIMAL

    Eligible OPTIMAL participants were to receive a video (or no video) about the importance of follow-up in clinical trials. The outcome is measured as the number of OPTIMAL participants that consented to participate in E-OPTIMAL.

    Time frame: At 24 Months post OPTIMAL Treatment

  3. Retention in E-OPTIMAL

    Retention is defined as those participants who consented to participate in E-OPTIMAL that remained in the E-OPTIMAL study (i.e. completed follow-up visits and were not otherwise dropped from the study).

    Time frame: 3, 4, and 5 Years Post OPTIMAL Treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anatomic Failure

    Anatomic failure was defined as POPQ system point C descended more than one-third of total vaginal length; POPQ points Aa, Ba, Ap, or Bp were beyond the hymen; or the participant received retreatment during follow-up. This outcome measure is cumulative across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)

    Time frame: 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  2. Bothersome Bulge Symptoms

    Bothersome bulge symptoms were reported by the participant in response to the questions, 'Do you usually have a sensation of bulging or protrusion from the vaginal area?' or 'Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area?' on the Pelvic Floor Disorders Inventory. An answer of "Yes" to either question indicates a failure while an answer to "No" for both questions indicates a non-failure.This outcome measure is cumulative across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)

    Time frame: 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  3. Retreatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

    Retreatment is defined as any additional POP surgery or the use of pessary. This outcome measure is cumulative across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-retreatments tracked either until retreatment or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)

    Time frame: 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Granulation Tissue

    Cumulative number of participants with granulation tissue. Granulation tissue was reported on the adverse event log.

    Time frame: 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  2. Number of Participants With Suture Exposure

    Cumulative number of participants with suture exposure. Suture exposure was reported on the adverse event log.

    Time frame: 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  3. Number of Participants With Midurethral Sling Erosion or Exposure

    Cumulative number of participants with mesh erosion or exposure. Mesh erosion and exposure was reported on the adverse event log.

    Time frame: 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  4. Number of Participants With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

    Cumulative number of participants with pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse was reported on the adverse event log.

    Time frame: 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  5. PGI-I

    The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).This outcome measure is shows results from the original OPTIMAL trial as well as results from the E-OPTIMAL trial (for those that consented to the extended follow-up)

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  6. Change From Baseline CRAIQ Score

    The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a subscale by 100 divided by 3. The subscales are then added together. The range of responses is: 0-400 with 0 (least negative impact) to 400 (most negative impact). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  7. Change From Baseline POPIQ Score

    The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a subscale by 100 divided by 3. The subscales are then added together. The range of responses is: 0-400 with 0 (least negative impact) to 400 (most negative impact). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  8. Change From Baseline UIQ Score

    The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a subscale by 100 divided by 3. The subscales are then added together. The range of responses is: 0-400 with 0 (least negative impact) to 400 (most negative impact). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  9. Change From Baseline CRADI Score

    The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of 3 scales: 1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales), 2. Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (with 4 subscales), and 3. Urinary Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the subscales and then adding the subscales. The range of responses for the CRADI is: 0-400 with 0 (least distress) to 400 (most distress). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  10. Change From Baseline POPDI Score

    The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of 3 scales: 1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales), 2. Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (with 4 subscales), and 3. Urinary Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the subscales and then adding the subscales. The range of POPDI responses is: 0-300 with 0 (least distress) to 300 (most distress). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  11. Change From Baseline UDI Score

    The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of 3 scales: 1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales), 2. Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (with 4 subscales), and 3. Urinary Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the subscales and then adding the subscales. The range of UDI responses is: 0-300 with 0 (least distress) to 300 (most distress). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  12. Change From Baseline Hunskaar Score

    The Hunskaar Urinary Incontinence assessment measures the severity of a participant's urinary incontinence. Scores range from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating more severe incontinence. Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score).

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  13. Change From Baseline SF-36 Physical Health Score

    The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1. limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2. limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3. bodily pain; 4. general health perceptions; 5. vitality; 6. limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7. limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8. general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst" - 100 "best"). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score).

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  14. Change From Baseline SF-36 Mental Health Score

    The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1. limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2. limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3. bodily pain; 4. general health perceptions; 5. vitality; 6. limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7. limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8. general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst" - 100 "best"). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score).

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  15. Change From Baseline Brink Score

    The Brink scale considers three pelvic floor muscle contraction variables: vaginal pressure or muscle force, elevation or vertical displacement of the examiner fingers, and duration of contraction. The score ranges from 3 to 12 with higher scores indicating greater PFM function. Change = (Year \[0.5, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score).

    Time frame: 6 months, and 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  16. POP-Q Point Ba

    POPQ Point Ba represents the most distal (i.e. most dependent) position of any part of the upper anterior vaginal wall (between the vaginal cuff or anterior vaginal fornix and Point Aa). The range for point Ba is -3 to total vaginal length (TVL). Point Ba coincides with Point Aa (-3 cm) in a woman who has no anterior POP. In a woman with severe POP, Ba coincides with Point C. For Point Ba, better vaginal support is assigned a negative value (ie, if there is no prolapse, point Ba is -3 cm by definition). Vaginal prolapse beyond the hymen, indicating worse vaginal support, is assigned a positive value (this may be equal to the total vaginal length at the maximum).

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  17. POP-Q Point Bp

    POP-Q Point Bp represents the most distal position of any part of the upper posterior vaginal wall (between the vaginal cuff or posterior vaginal fornix and Point Ap). It ranges from -3 to total vaginal length (TVL). Negative values indicate vaginal support above the hymen, so the more negative number the closer to normal/perfect support; positive values show prolapse beyond the hymen, so larger positive numbers are worse prolapse.

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

  18. POP-Q Point C

    POP-Q Point C is measured in cm relative to the hymen with negative values being proximal to the hymen and positive values distal to the hymen. Point C represents either the most distal edge of the cervix or the leading edge of the vaginal cuff after total hysterectomy. It ranges from -TVL to +TVL. Negative values indicate vaginal support above the hymen, so the more negative number the closer to normal/perfect support; positive values show prolapse beyond the hymen, so larger positive numbers are worse prolapse.

    Time frame: 6 months, and 1 2, 3, 4, and 5 years

07

Results

Posted Sep 28, 2020

Participant flow

The goal of the video/no video intervention was to gauge differences in recruitment for and retention in E-OPTIMAL, thus the video/no video randomization occurred before E-OPTIMAL consent.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
Started95919197
Completed optimal year 2 visit81807987
Randomized to video32433840
Randomized to no video45303442
Consented to participate e-optimal72666978
Completed e-optimal year 3 visit70666677
Completed e-optimal year 4 visit67616368
Completed e-optimal year 5 visit62566264
Completed90878792
Not completed5445
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3222
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1223
Withdrew: Physician decision1000

Outcome measures

PrimarySurgical Failure

Surgical failure was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) point C descended more than one-third of total vaginal length; POPQ points Aa, Ba, Ap, or Bp were beyond the hymen; bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms were reported by the participant; or the participant received retreatment. The apex is point C (cervix), and posteriorly is point D (pouch of Douglas). In women after hysterectomy, point C is the vaginal cuff and point D is omitted. This outcome measure is cumulatively across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)

Time frame:
6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Surgical Failure
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years — Failure17222014
0.5 years — Non-failure73656677
1 years — Failure28353029
1 years — Non-failure58515662
2 years — Failure31453937
2 years — Non-failure51394452
3 years — Failure37524641
3 years — Non-failure39263140
4 years — Failure41554943
4 years — Non-failure30222632
5 years — Failure47574945
5 years — Non-failure22202625
PrimaryRecruitment Into E-OPTIMAL

Eligible OPTIMAL participants were to receive a video (or no video) about the importance of follow-up in clinical trials. The outcome is measured as the number of OPTIMAL participants that consented to participate in E-OPTIMAL.

Time frame:
At 24 Months post OPTIMAL Treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Recruitment Into E-OPTIMAL
ParticipantsEnrollment Video ArmNo Video Intervention Arm
Consented to E-OPTIMAL142143
Did not Consent to E-OPTIMAL118
PrimaryRetention in E-OPTIMAL

Retention is defined as those participants who consented to participate in E-OPTIMAL that remained in the E-OPTIMAL study (i.e. completed follow-up visits and were not otherwise dropped from the study).

Time frame:
3, 4, and 5 Years Post OPTIMAL Treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Retention in E-OPTIMAL
ParticipantsEnrollment Video ArmNo Video Intervention Arm
3-Year Follow-up — Retained139135
3-Year Follow-up — Not Retained38
4-Year Follow-up — Retained131124
4-Year Follow-up — Not Retained1119
5-Year Follow-up — Retained124120
5-Year Follow-up — Not Retained1823
SecondaryAnatomic Failure

Anatomic failure was defined as POPQ system point C descended more than one-third of total vaginal length; POPQ points Aa, Ba, Ap, or Bp were beyond the hymen; or the participant received retreatment during follow-up. This outcome measure is cumulative across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)

Time frame:
6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Anatomic Failure
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years — Failure10121311
0.5 years — Non-failure80747280
1 years — Failure18231925
1 years — Non-failure67616566
2 years — Failure23312529
2 years — Non-failure59505558
3 years — Failure29373131
3 years — Non-failure46334047
4 years — Failure33403233
4 years — Non-failure36293638
5 years — Failure38423335
5 years — Non-failure28263431
SecondaryBothersome Bulge Symptoms

Bothersome bulge symptoms were reported by the participant in response to the questions, 'Do you usually have a sensation of bulging or protrusion from the vaginal area?' or 'Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area?' on the Pelvic Floor Disorders Inventory. An answer of "Yes" to either question indicates a failure while an answer to "No" for both questions indicates a non-failure.This outcome measure is cumulative across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-failures tracked either until failure or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)

Time frame:
6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Bothersome Bulge Symptoms
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years — Failure101285
0.5 years — Non-failure80737688
1 years — Failure2119159
1 years — Non-failure68646781
2 years — Failure24272117
2 years — Non-failure61565869
3 years — Failure27292820
3 years — Non-failure47454355
4 years — Failure27323122
4 years — Non-failure45403946
5 years — Failure30343323
5 years — Non-failure36343542
SecondaryRetreatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Retreatment is defined as any additional POP surgery or the use of pessary. This outcome measure is cumulative across the original OPTIMAL trial and continued through the E-OPTIMAL follow-up with non-retreatments tracked either until retreatment or until study completion/dropping out of the study (lost to follow-up, withdrawal, etc.)

Time frame:
6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Retreatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years — Retreated1010
0.5 years — Not retreated90868292
1 years — Retreated2322
1 years — Not retreated83827987
2 years — Retreated5362
2 years — Not retreated76777385
3 years — Retreated73102
3 years — Not retreated61595568
4 years — Retreated74105
4 years — Not retreated52515252
5 years — Retreated84106
5 years — Not retreated52505153
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Granulation Tissue

Cumulative number of participants with granulation tissue. Granulation tissue was reported on the adverse event log.

Time frame:
2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Granulation Tissue
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
2 years — No58605263
2 years — Yes1461715
3 years — No54544856
3 years — Yes1461715
4 years — No49494350
4 years — Yes1461816
5 years — No43484145
5 years — Yes1561916
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Suture Exposure

Cumulative number of participants with suture exposure. Suture exposure was reported on the adverse event log.

Time frame:
2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Suture Exposure
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
2 years — No57556060
2 years — Yes1511918
3 years — No53505752
3 years — Yes1611919
4 years — No49445146
4 years — Yes17121020
5 years — No42424940
5 years — Yes17121120
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Midurethral Sling Erosion or Exposure

Cumulative number of participants with mesh erosion or exposure. Mesh erosion and exposure was reported on the adverse event log.

Time frame:
2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Midurethral Sling Erosion or Exposure
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
2 years — No70666878
2 years — Yes1010
3 years — No65596370
3 years — Yes2110
4 years — No60535863
4 years — Yes3110
5 years — No53515457
5 years — Yes3120
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

Cumulative number of participants with pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse was reported on the adverse event log.

Time frame:
2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
2 years — No72646776
2 years — Yes0222
3 years — No64595868
3 years — Yes1252
4 years — No55515553
4 years — Yes1354
5 years — No55505454
5 years — Yes2355
Other pre-specifiedPGI-I

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).This outcome measure is shows results from the original OPTIMAL trial as well as results from the E-OPTIMAL trial (for those that consented to the extended follow-up)

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PGI-I
ParticipantsSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years — A little better12111012
0.5 years — A little worse5255
0.5 years — Much better23221720
0.5 years — Much worse1111
0.5 years — No change2123
0.5 years — Very much better26262931
0.5 years — Very much worse0112
1 years — A little better131066
1 years — A little worse4126
1 years — Much better22241828
1 years — Much worse0010
1 years — No change4254
1 years — Very much better26253027
1 years — Very much worse1021
2 years — A little better1414913
2 years — A little worse3563
2 years — Much better20202025
2 years — Much worse3001
2 years — No change4134
2 years — Very much better21212523
2 years — Very much worse1021
3 years — A little better5191013
3 years — A little worse7356
3 years — Much better18241723
3 years — Much worse6203
3 years — No change5241
3 years — Very much better23102121
3 years — Very much worse0031
4 years — A little better914716
4 years — A little worse4612
4 years — Much better21191419
4 years — Much worse4141
4 years — No change3242
4 years — Very much better13121919
4 years — Very much worse2031
5 years — A little better13161311
5 years — A little worse2445
5 years — Much better17191221
5 years — Much worse4062
5 years — No change4533
5 years — Very much better12111815
5 years — Very much worse2012
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline CRAIQ Score

The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a subscale by 100 divided by 3. The subscales are then added together. The range of responses is: 0-400 with 0 (least negative impact) to 400 (most negative impact). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline CRAIQ Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-71.3 (-95.5 to -47.1)-45.5 (-65.8 to -25.2)-35 (-55.6 to -14.4)-66.8 (-89.3 to -44.3)
1 years-73.3 (-98.3 to -48.3)-43.4 (-63.1 to -23.7)-37.6 (-63.5 to -11.7)-60.5 (-83.4 to -37.6)
2 years-47.5 (-77.7 to -17.3)-25.1 (-49 to -1.2)-19.2 (-45.8 to 7.4)-38.9 (-57.7 to -20.1)
3 years-54.6 (-81.7 to -27.5)-20.9 (-38.2 to -3.5)-12.9 (-39.3 to 13.5)-36.1 (-56.7 to -15.6)
4 years-40 (-71.7 to -8.2)-16.6 (-42.4 to 9.2)-8.5 (-39.7 to 22.7)-39.1 (-61.1 to -17)
5 years-35.7 (-62.9 to -8.5)-14.8 (-39.2 to 9.7)7.4 (-21.8 to 36.5)-22.7 (-51 to 5.7)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline POPIQ Score

The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a subscale by 100 divided by 3. The subscales are then added together. The range of responses is: 0-400 with 0 (least negative impact) to 400 (most negative impact). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline POPIQ Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-95 (-123.3 to -66.7)-61.3 (-85.6 to -37)-55.2 (-79.5 to -30.9)-98.6 (-122.9 to -74.4)
1 years-100.2 (-130.5 to -70)-68.8 (-91 to -46.6)-58.9 (-86 to -31.8)-95.9 (-122.1 to -69.7)
2 years-68.9 (-102.5 to -35.3)-56.6 (-77.9 to -35.3)-42.8 (-71.1 to -14.4)-79.3 (-101.4 to -57.2)
3 years-82.6 (-112 to -53.2)-48.7 (-66.6 to -30.8)-29.3 (-57.3 to -1.3)-76.9 (-99.2 to -54.6)
4 years-84.5 (-121.8 to -47.2)-42.3 (-64.1 to -20.6)-32.9 (-61.7 to -4.1)-73 (-98.6 to -47.5)
5 years-72.1 (-103.2 to -41.1)-50.3 (-71.8 to -28.8)-16.8 (-43.7 to 10.2)-71.9 (-98.2 to -45.5)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline UIQ Score

The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; 4 subscales, range 0-400). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a subscale by 100 divided by 3. The subscales are then added together. The range of responses is: 0-400 with 0 (least negative impact) to 400 (most negative impact). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline UIQ Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-107.7 (-133.9 to -81.6)-85.4 (-108.7 to -62.1)-77.3 (-102.1 to -52.4)-116.4 (-138.6 to -94.2)
1 years-116.3 (-143.3 to -89.3)-92 (-113 to -71)-84.3 (-110.2 to -58.3)-121.8 (-146.2 to -97.4)
2 years-90.3 (-122.8 to -57.8)-80.4 (-102.1 to -58.6)-67.7 (-95.7 to -39.8)-99.1 (-121.4 to -76.8)
3 years-94.3 (-120.7 to -67.9)-69.1 (-87.6 to -50.7)-59 (-84 to -34)-92.3 (-116.4 to -68.2)
4 years-89.5 (-124.7 to -54.3)-68.3 (-89.8 to -46.7)-59.2 (-87 to -31.3)-90.3 (-117.2 to -63.4)
5 years-75.9 (-106 to -45.7)-72.1 (-95.2 to -49)-47.8 (-74 to -21.7)-84.8 (-113 to -56.6)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline CRADI Score

The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of 3 scales: 1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales), 2. Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (with 4 subscales), and 3. Urinary Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the subscales and then adding the subscales. The range of responses for the CRADI is: 0-400 with 0 (least distress) to 400 (most distress). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline CRADI Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-72.3 (-88.2 to -56.4)-71.8 (-88.7 to -54.8)-69.6 (-87.8 to -51.4)-56.3 (-73.7 to -38.9)
1 years-64.1 (-81 to -47.2)-67.5 (-85.6 to -49.5)-77.7 (-95.7 to -59.7)-63.3 (-81.3 to -45.4)
2 years-46.2 (-68.8 to -23.6)-49.1 (-70.5 to -27.6)-62 (-81.3 to -42.8)-50.4 (-68.9 to -31.8)
3 years-45.3 (-68.4 to -22.2)-53.1 (-73.6 to -32.6)-48.7 (-69.1 to -28.3)-44.7 (-63.4 to -26.1)
4 years-35.1 (-58 to -12.2)-54.1 (-75.8 to -32.3)-44.8 (-69.6 to -19.9)-48.8 (-71.2 to -26.4)
5 years-37.4 (-61.1 to -13.7)-43.1 (-61 to -25.2)-39.1 (-60.5 to -17.6)-39.8 (-58.7 to -20.9)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline POPDI Score

The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of 3 scales: 1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales), 2. Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (with 4 subscales), and 3. Urinary Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the subscales and then adding the subscales. The range of POPDI responses is: 0-300 with 0 (least distress) to 300 (most distress). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline POPDI Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-95.1 (-108.9 to -81.4)-90.2 (-106.3 to -74.1)-92.3 (-110.5 to -74.1)-72.6 (-88.3 to -57)
1 years-90.6 (-106 to -75.2)-96 (-112.6 to -79.5)-91.9 (-110.7 to -73.1)-81.1 (-93.7 to -68.4)
2 years-76 (-94.5 to -57.5)-79.1 (-97.2 to -61.1)-76.9 (-96.2 to -57.7)-65.9 (-80.5 to -51.2)
3 years-69.5 (-86.2 to -52.8)-77.7 (-93.9 to -61.6)-66.9 (-87.3 to -46.5)-61.7 (-77.6 to -45.9)
4 years-70.7 (-87.3 to -54.1)-78.3 (-97.8 to -58.8)-65.1 (-88.4 to -41.9)-62.8 (-79.5 to -46.1)
5 years-64.8 (-83.7 to -45.9)-75.8 (-91.9 to -59.6)-63.7 (-82.3 to -45.1)-61.1 (-76.6 to -45.5)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline UDI Score

The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of 3 scales: 1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales), 2. Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (with 4 subscales), and 3. Urinary Distress Inventory (with 3 subscales). Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the subscales and then adding the subscales. The range of UDI responses is: 0-300 with 0 (least distress) to 300 (most distress). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms.

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline UDI Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-105.7 (-119.3 to -92.2)-96 (-110 to -82)-95 (-109.9 to -80.2)-88.9 (-103.4 to -74.4)
1 years-102.9 (-118.4 to -87.4)-95.9 (-110.9 to -80.8)-94 (-110.3 to -77.7)-96.8 (-111.3 to -82.3)
2 years-90.8 (-109 to -72.6)-89.1 (-104 to -74.2)-81.2 (-98.6 to -63.9)-81.3 (-95.4 to -67.2)
3 years-84.9 (-102 to -67.8)-75 (-90.3 to -59.7)-70.5 (-88.2 to -52.8)-72 (-87.6 to -56.5)
4 years-81.7 (-101.9 to -61.6)-76.2 (-93.2 to -59.2)-70.8 (-89.5 to -52.1)-75.3 (-91.2 to -59.5)
5 years-73.9 (-93.3 to -54.6)-77.9 (-94.2 to -61.5)-69 (-85.4 to -52.7)-74.4 (-90.1 to -58.7)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline Hunskaar Score

The Hunskaar Urinary Incontinence assessment measures the severity of a participant's urinary incontinence. Scores range from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating more severe incontinence. Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score).

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline Hunskaar Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-3.6 (-4.3 to -2.8)-2.9 (-3.9 to -2)-3.2 (-4.3 to -2.2)-3.5 (-4.5 to -2.6)
1 years-3.6 (-4.5 to -2.6)-3.3 (-4.2 to -2.4)-3.4 (-4.5 to -2.4)-3.2 (-4.1 to -2.3)
2 years-3 (-4.1 to -2)-3.2 (-4.1 to -2.2)-2.8 (-3.8 to -1.8)-2.7 (-3.7 to -1.8)
3 years-2.5 (-3.5 to -1.5)-2.6 (-3.3 to -1.9)-2.5 (-3.6 to -1.4)-2.8 (-3.8 to -1.9)
4 years-2.5 (-3.4 to -1.6)-2.5 (-3.4 to -1.6)-2.4 (-3.7 to -1.1)-2.6 (-3.6 to -1.6)
5 years-1.6 (-2.8 to -0.4)-2.6 (-3.4 to -1.8)-2 (-3.2 to -0.7)-2.4 (-3.5 to -1.3)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline SF-36 Physical Health Score

The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1. limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2. limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3. bodily pain; 4. general health perceptions; 5. vitality; 6. limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7. limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8. general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst" - 100 "best"). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score).

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline SF-36 Physical Health Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years7.1 (4.9 to 9.3)4.3 (1.4 to 7.2)5.6 (3.4 to 7.7)7.7 (5.6 to 9.7)
1 years8 (5.5 to 10.5)5.6 (2.8 to 8.3)6.6 (3.9 to 9.3)6.8 (4.2 to 9.5)
2 years7.6 (5 to 10.3)5.2 (2.6 to 7.8)4.9 (2.9 to 6.9)6.1 (4.1 to 8.1)
3 years4.3 (1.8 to 6.9)1.1 (-1.8 to 4)3.5 (1 to 6)3.1 (0.5 to 5.7)
4 years4.8 (2 to 7.6)0.3 (-2.9 to 3.5)2.9 (0 to 5.7)2.9 (0.1 to 5.6)
5 years3.2 (0.5 to 5.9)0.9 (-2.1 to 3.8)2.5 (-0.2 to 5.1)2.7 (0.2 to 5.2)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline SF-36 Mental Health Score

The health assessment questionnaire Short Form 36 Version (SF-36) determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1. limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2. limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3. bodily pain; 4. general health perceptions; 5. vitality; 6. limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7. limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8. general mental health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-36. Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst" - 100 "best"). Change = (Year \[0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score).

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline SF-36 Mental Health Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years2.5 (0 to 5)3.1 (0.5 to 5.8)2.6 (0.1 to 5.2)1.3 (-1.6 to 4.2)
1 years4.1 (1.5 to 6.7)3.4 (0.9 to 6)0.6 (-2.4 to 3.6)2.7 (-0.6 to 5.9)
2 years0.8 (-2 to 3.7)2 (-0.5 to 4.4)3.1 (0.7 to 5.5)1.6 (-1.2 to 4.5)
3 years3 (0 to 6)2.4 (-0.9 to 5.8)1.6 (-1.3 to 4.5)2.3 (-0.9 to 5.5)
4 years1.4 (-1.2 to 4.1)1.7 (-1.3 to 4.6)0.5 (-2.2 to 3.1)1.2 (-2 to 4.5)
5 years3.1 (-0.3 to 6.4)1.8 (-2 to 5.5)0.8 (-1.9 to 3.4)1.2 (-2 to 4.4)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline Brink Score

The Brink scale considers three pelvic floor muscle contraction variables: vaginal pressure or muscle force, elevation or vertical displacement of the examiner fingers, and duration of contraction. The score ranges from 3 to 12 with higher scores indicating greater PFM function. Change = (Year \[0.5, 2, 3, 4, 5\] Score - Baseline Score).

Time frame:
6 months, and 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline Brink Score
units on a scaleSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years0.2 (-0.3 to 0.8)0 (-0.5 to 0.5)0.6 (0.1 to 1.1)0.4 (-0.1 to 0.9)
2 years-0.1 (-0.6 to 0.4)0.1 (-0.5 to 0.6)0.4 (0 to 0.8)0 (-0.4 to 0.5)
3 years0 (-0.6 to 0.6)-0.3 (-1 to 0.4)0.3 (-0.2 to 0.8)-0.5 (-1 to 0.1)
4 years0.1 (-0.5 to 0.8)-0.5 (-1.1 to 0.2)0.2 (-0.3 to 0.8)-0.5 (-1.1 to 0.1)
5 years0.2 (-0.5 to 0.9)-0.6 (-1.3 to 0.1)0.4 (-0.2 to 1)-0.3 (-0.9 to 0.3)
Other pre-specifiedPOP-Q Point Ba

POPQ Point Ba represents the most distal (i.e. most dependent) position of any part of the upper anterior vaginal wall (between the vaginal cuff or anterior vaginal fornix and Point Aa). The range for point Ba is -3 to total vaginal length (TVL). Point Ba coincides with Point Aa (-3 cm) in a woman who has no anterior POP. In a woman with severe POP, Ba coincides with Point C. For Point Ba, better vaginal support is assigned a negative value (ie, if there is no prolapse, point Ba is -3 cm by definition). Vaginal prolapse beyond the hymen, indicating worse vaginal support, is assigned a positive value (this may be equal to the total vaginal length at the maximum).

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · cm
POP-Q Point Ba
cmSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-1.2 (-1.5 to -0.9)-1.2 (-1.5 to -0.9)-1.4 (-1.7 to -1)-1.3 (-1.6 to -1)
1 years-0.9 (-1.3 to -0.5)-1.2 (-1.6 to -0.8)-1 (-1.3 to -0.7)-1.2 (-1.5 to -0.9)
2 years-0.9 (-1.2 to -0.5)-0.8 (-1.1 to -0.6)-1.1 (-1.5 to -0.8)-1.1 (-1.4 to -0.8)
3 years-1.1 (-1.4 to -0.7)-0.7 (-1.1 to -0.4)-0.8 (-1.2 to -0.4)-1.1 (-1.4 to -0.7)
4 years-0.8 (-1.2 to -0.3)-0.9 (-1.3 to -0.6)-0.8 (-1.3 to -0.3)-1.1 (-1.5 to -0.7)
5 years-0.8 (-1.2 to -0.3)-1 (-1.3 to -0.6)-0.7 (-1.2 to -0.2)-0.9 (-1.3 to -0.4)
Other pre-specifiedPOP-Q Point Bp

POP-Q Point Bp represents the most distal position of any part of the upper posterior vaginal wall (between the vaginal cuff or posterior vaginal fornix and Point Ap). It ranges from -3 to total vaginal length (TVL). Negative values indicate vaginal support above the hymen, so the more negative number the closer to normal/perfect support; positive values show prolapse beyond the hymen, so larger positive numbers are worse prolapse.

Time frame:
6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · cm
POP-Q Point Bp
cmSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-2.3 (-2.5 to -2)-2.5 (-2.7 to -2.3)-2.2 (-2.5 to -2)-2.2 (-2.4 to -1.9)
1 years-2.2 (-2.4 to -2)-2.4 (-2.6 to -2.2)-2.2 (-2.4 to -2)-2.2 (-2.5 to -2)
2 years-2 (-2.2 to -1.7)-2.3 (-2.5 to -2.1)-2.2 (-2.4 to -2)-2 (-2.3 to -1.8)
3 years-2.3 (-2.5 to -2)-2.4 (-2.6 to -2.2)-2.1 (-2.3 to -1.9)-2.2 (-2.5 to -1.9)
4 years-2.2 (-2.4 to -1.9)-2.3 (-2.5 to -2.1)-2.2 (-2.4 to -1.9)-2 (-2.3 to -1.7)
5 years-2.2 (-2.4 to -2)-2.3 (-2.5 to -2.1)-1.9 (-2.4 to -1.4)-1.9 (-2.2 to -1.6)
Other pre-specifiedPOP-Q Point C

POP-Q Point C is measured in cm relative to the hymen with negative values being proximal to the hymen and positive values distal to the hymen. Point C represents either the most distal edge of the cervix or the leading edge of the vaginal cuff after total hysterectomy. It ranges from -TVL to +TVL. Negative values indicate vaginal support above the hymen, so the more negative number the closer to normal/perfect support; positive values show prolapse beyond the hymen, so larger positive numbers are worse prolapse.

Time frame:
6 months, and 1 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Reported as:
Mean · cm
POP-Q Point C
cmSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
0.5 years-7.2 (-7.5 to -6.9)-7.3 (-7.7 to -7)-6.5 (-7.3 to -5.7)-7 (-7.4 to -6.7)
1 years-7 (-7.5 to -6.5)-6.5 (-7.2 to -5.8)-6.6 (-7 to -6.2)-6.8 (-7.2 to -6.3)
2 years-6.8 (-7.3 to -6.3)-6.6 (-6.9 to -6.2)-6.5 (-6.9 to -6)-6.8 (-7.1 to -6.5)
3 years-6.9 (-7.2 to -6.5)-6.4 (-6.7 to -6.1)-6.3 (-6.9 to -5.8)-6.3 (-6.6 to -5.9)
4 years-6.3 (-6.7 to -5.9)-6.2 (-6.5 to -5.8)-6.4 (-7 to -5.8)-6.6 (-7 to -6.2)
5 years-6.5 (-7.1 to -6)-6.4 (-6.8 to -6)-5.8 (-6.5 to -5.1)-6.6 (-7.1 to -6.2)

Adverse events

Collected over 2 years through 5 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SSLF+BPMT1/72 (1.4%)0/72 (0%)29/72 (40.3%)
SSLF+USUAL0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)17/66 (25.8%)
ULS+BPMT2/69 (2.9%)0/69 (0%)27/69 (39.1%)
ULS+USUAL1/78 (1.3%)0/78 (0%)34/78 (43.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUAL
Granulation tissueSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders15/726/6619/6916/78
Suture exposureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications17/7212/6611/6920/78
Pelvic organ prolapse surgerySurgical and medical procedures2/723/665/695/78
Midurethral sling erosion and exposureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/721/662/690/78

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUALTotal
Mean55.4 ± 10.858.6 ± 10.658.7 ± 10.556.3 ± 11.257.2 ± 10.8
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)SSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUALTotal
Female72666978285
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)SSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUALTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native11002
Asian02002
Black or African American737421
Other554822
White59555866238
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)SSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUALTotal
Hispanic/Latina1510131856
Not Hispanic/Latina57565660229
Insurance: Private/HMO
Insurance: Private/HMO(Participants)SSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUALTotal
No70656876279
Yes21126
Insurance: Medicare or Medicaid
Insurance: Medicare or Medicaid(Participants)SSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUALTotal
No55464756204
Yes1720222281
Insurance: Self-pay
Insurance: Self-pay(Participants)SSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUALTotal
No70656876279
Yes21126
Insurance: Other
Insurance: Other(Participants)SSLF+BPMTSSLF+USUALULS+BPMTULS+USUALTotal
No57555960231
Yes1511101854

13 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

7 sites
  • University of Alabama
    Birmingham, Alabama 35249, United States
  • University of California, San Diego Medical Center
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
  • Duke University
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Jakus-Waldman S, Brubaker L, Jelovsek JE, Schaffer JI, Ellington DR, Mazloomdoost D, Whitworth R, Gantz MG; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN). Risk Factors for Surgical Failure and Worsening Pelvic Floor Symptoms Within 5 Years After Vaginal Prolapse Repair. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;136(5):933-941. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004092. PubMed 33030871 ↗
  • Meyer I, Whitworth RE, Lukacz ES, Smith AL, Sung VW, Visco AG, Ackenbom MF, Wai CY, Mazloomdoost D, Gantz MG, Richter HE; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2155-2164. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04271-y. Epub 2020 Mar 7. PubMed 32146521 ↗
  • Brubaker L, Jelovsek JE, Lukacz ES, Balgobin S, Ballard A, Weidner AC, Gantz MG, Whitworth R, Mazloomdoost D; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Recruitment and retention: A randomized controlled trial of video-enhanced versus standard consent processes within the E-OPTIMAL study. Clin Trials. 2019 Oct;16(5):481-489. doi: 10.1177/1740774519865541. Epub 2019 Jul 26. PubMed 31347384 ↗
  • Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE, Weidner A, Menefee S, Schaffer J, Pugh N, Meikle S; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827. PubMed 29677302 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01166373
Lead sponsor
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 21, 2010
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Results posted
Sep 28, 2020
Last update
Sep 28, 2020

Study contacts

Matthew D. Barber, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic
Eric Jelovsek, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion