ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06480227BASISUpdated Jun 8, 2026

Trial of Transurethral Bulking Agent Injection Versus Single-Incision Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

An interventional study of Solyx Single-incision Sling and Bulkamid Transurethral Bulking Agent in Stress Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence and Mixed Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Recruiting at 7 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Sponsored by NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
358
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 189 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Stress with a site in United States — 27 open to participants now, 40 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Urinary Incontinence, Stress · United States.

Planned enrollment
23rd of 163
358 · median 98
Started
2024
with 6 others
No phase
109 of 189
18 open now
Primary completion
2028-12
later than 31 of 39 live
Registered
172nd of 189
by date
Lead sponsor
5 of 189
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

Among the 189 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Stress with a site in United States, this one is the 23rd largest by planned enrollment of the 163 interventional ones, is one of 7 that started in 2024, is one of 109 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 31 of the 39 other live ones, and was the 172nd registered.

By phase

189 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study109 · 18 open
Observational26 · 4 open
Phase 320 · 1 open
Phase 415 · 3 open
Phase 212 · 1 open
Phase 1/23 · 0 open
Phase 2/33 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2001; this study’s year is marked. 7 started in 2024.

Size and results

Median enrollment 98 across the 163 interventional studies, 98 across the 26 observational. Of the 129 that completed or were terminated, 56 (43%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 189 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Stress with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a multicentered, double-blind, randomized controlled, surgical trial of 358 women with inadequate symptom relief of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) after conservative care.

The Primary Aim is to determine the comparative effectiveness (as defined by "much" or "very much" better on PGI-I) of transurethral bulking agent (TBA) [for 1 or 2 injections in 12 months] vs. single-incision sling (SIS) 12 months after treatment intervention in women with predominant stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Read the detailed description

The BASIS trial is a multicentered, double-blind, randomized controlled, surgical trial with two active interventions, 1) a transurethral bulking agent (TBA) or 2) a single-incision sling (SIS). Both interventions are FDA-approved treatment options for urinary incontinence and will be used in line with their approved use. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the interventions. A total of 358 women will be randomized 1:1 to TBA or SIS.

All participants will have data including demographics, medical history, and quality of life assessments as they relate to urinary incontinence collected at baseline. After undergoing treatment (either transurethral bulking agent or single-incision sling), participants will be asked to return to the clinic at 2-4 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months with additional follow-ups at 6 months, 24 months, and 36 months done over the phone.

The primary outcome of the BASIS trial is subjective success measured by PGI-I for TBA vs. SIS at 12 months.

Secondary outcomes include assessments of 1) retreatment rates within 12 months; 2) validated, objective measures of condition improvement through 36 months; 3) objective success at 3 and 12 months as measured by standardized cough stress test; 4) functional outcomes (activity level, perceived recover, sexual function, etc.); 5) quality of life assessments; 6) operative procedure data and adverse events; 7) pain and functional activity, need for sedation and anesthesia, de novo or worsening symptoms; 8) medical resource use (additional medications, procedures, or therapies); and 9) healthy utility measures.

03

Conditions studied

  • Stress Urinary Incontinence
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Mixed Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Single Incision Sling
  • Transurethral Bulking Agent
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women ≥ 21 years
  • For > 3 months, bothersome SUI (response of somewhat, moderately, or quite a bit) without UUI or stress-predominant MUI. For those with equal bother of UUI and SUI, clinician determination that SUI is more severe/significant than UUI is required.
  • A positive cough stress test on standardized non-invasive testing or urodynamic SUI within the past 18 months.
  • Normal PVR \< 150 mL
  • Candidate for either study procedure as determined by treating surgeon
  • Available for up to 3 years.
  • Agrees to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anterior/apical vaginal prolapse beyond the hymen (>0 on POPQ)
  • Urge-predominant mixed UI despite stable therapy
  • Advanced UUI/OAB therapy treatment within 1 year of enrollment.
  • Planned hysterectomy, urethral or anterior/apical surgeries s requiring general anesthesia at the time of SUI treatment, during the last 6 months, or planned within the next 12 months.
  • or history of radiation of the pelvis
  • Pregnant, post-partum, breast feeding or plans for pregnancy within 1 year
  • Incomplete emptying (PVR > 150mL)
  • Prior anti-incontinence procedure
  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Unwilling to continue current UUI treatment until completion of primary outcome at 12 months
  • Prior adverse reaction to synthetic mesh or urethral bulking material
  • Chronic bladder or pelvic pain conditions (e.g., Interstitial cystitis, painful bladder syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pelvic pain, etc.)
  • Active treatment for SUI with a pessary. For those using a pessary or other SUI support device, a 3-week should occur prior to assessing baseline measures.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
358 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Solyx Single-incision Sling

    Solyx Single-incision Sling

    Device: Solyx Single-incision Sling

  • Active comparator
    Bulkamid Transurethral Bulking Agent

    Bulkamid Transurethral Bulking Agent

    Device: Bulkamid Transurethral Bulking Agent

Interventions

  • DeviceSolyx Single-incision Sling

    Minimally invasive mesh device placed to treat stress urinary incontinence.

  • DeviceBulkamid Transurethral Bulking Agent

    Minimally invasive bulking agent injections used to bulk up the tissue surrounding the urethra to treat stress urinary incontinence. Up to 2 treatments within 12 months are allowed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Subjective success measured by Patient Global Impression-Improvement [PGI-I] (>2) for TBA vs. SIS at 12 months.

    The PGI-I is used to compare condition improvement, defined as (1) = very much better, (2) = much better, (3) = a little better, (4) = no change, (5) = a little worse, (6) much worse, (7) very much worse. Determine the comparative effectiveness (as defined by "much" or "very much" improved on PGI-I) of transurethral bulking agent \[for 1 or 2 injections in 12 months\] vs. single-incision sling 12 months after treatment intervention in women with predominant stress urinary incontinence.

    Time frame: At 12 months post-intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rates of retreatment

    Rates of additional, non-protocol treatments (including other medications, therapies, or medical procedures) for stress urinary incontinence within 12 months after the initial TBA vs. SIS including success rates after 1 vs 2 TBA injections.

    Time frame: From intervention to 12 months post-intervention.

  2. Change in Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form [ICIQ-SF] score

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) consists of 3 scorable questions measuring frequency of leakage, volume of leakage, and associated bother with leakage, for a range of scores from 0 (no leakage or bother) to 21 (worst leakage, most bothersome). A fourth question asks which type(s) of leakage are occurring. The ICIQ-SF score is collected at baseline and each follow-up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From intervention to 36 months post-intervention.

  3. Subjective success measured by Patient Global Impression-Improvement [PGI-I] (>2) for TBA vs. SIS

    The PGI-I is used to compare condition improvement, defined as (1) = very much better, (2) = much better, (3) = a little better, (4) = no change, (5) = a little worse, (6) much worse, (7) very much worse. Determine the comparative effectiveness (as defined by "much" or "very much" improved on PGI-I) of transurethral bulking agent \[for 1 or 2 injections in 12 months\] vs. single-incision sling 12 months after treatment intervention in women with predominant stress urinary incontinence. PGI-I at each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From 3 months to 36 months post-intervention.

  4. Condition improvement measured by Patient Global Symptom Control [PGSC] for TBA vs. SIS

    The Patient Global Symptom Control (PGSC) is a patient-reported measure of perceived agreement that symptoms are under control, as assessed on a scale of 1 (Disagree Strongly) to 5 (Agree Strongly). Included here are participants who had reported disagreements as indicated by a rating of 1 (Disagree Strongly) or 2 (Disagree) PGSC is collected at baseline and each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From interventions to 36 months post-intervention.

  5. Condition improvement measured by Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGI-S] for TBA vs. SIS

    The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a patient-reported measure of perceived severity of condition, as assessed on a scale of 1 (Normal) to 4 (Severe). The outcomes is calculated as those that reported Normal or Mild severity as indicated by a rating of 1 or 2. PGI-S at baseline and each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From intervention to 36 months post-intervention.

  6. Condition improvement measured by Urogenital Distress Inventory - Long Form [UDI-LF] for TBA vs. SIS

    The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI scale has a range from 0 to 300 with higher scores indicating greater distress. UDI-LF is collected at baseline and each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From intervention to 36 months post-intervention.

  7. Objective success by standardized cough testing

    Objective success at 3 and 12 months after TBA (1 or 2 injections) vs. SIS by standardized cough testing with a minimum 300 mL bladder volume. (Note, objective failure may be present below 300 mL)

    Time frame: From 3 to 12 months post-intervention.

  8. New or worsening urge incontinence function

    Number of participants with new or worsening onset urge urinary incontinence (UUI) (including need for additional or change in UUI treatment in those on UUI therapy at baseline)

    Time frame: From intervention to 36 months post-intervention.

  9. Sexual functional measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised [PISQ-IR] for TBA vs. SIS

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Average (SA-AVG) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. PISQ-IR is collected at baseline and each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From intervention to 36 months post-intervention.

  10. Quality of life improvement measured by Incontinence Impact Questionnaire - Long Form [IIQ-LF] for TBA vs. SIS

    The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIQ-LF Total score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating worse impact. IIQ-LF is collected at baseline and each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From baseline to 36 months post-intervention.

  11. Quality of life improvement measured by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36] for TBA vs. SIS

    The SF-36 determines participants' overall quality of life by assessing 1. limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2. limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3. bodily pain; 4. general health perceptions; 5. vitality; 6. limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7. limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8. general mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. SF-36 is collected at baseline and each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From baseline to 36 months post-intervention.

  12. Quality of life improvement measured by Decision Regret Scale- Satisfaction with Decision Scale [DRS-SDS] for TBA vs. SIS

    The DRS-SDS is a standardized assessment of treatment satisfaction. It asks subjects to reflect on a particular decision and then rate each item on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Higher scores are worse. DRS-SDS at baseline and each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From baseline to 36 months post-intervention.

  13. Blood Loss

    Estimated quantity of blood lost during protocol procedures.

    Time frame: At intervention

  14. Operative time

    Estimated total time of operative procedure

    Time frame: At intervention

  15. Operative Procedure-related adverse events

    Number of participants with intra- and post-operative complications requiring treatment or any treatment for voiding dysfunction or pain, categorized using a modification of the Dindo Classification.

    Time frame: At intervention

  16. Post-op pain

    Number of participants with de novo or worsening pelvic floor muscle tenderness or de novo or worsening dyspareunia or surgical pain between 3 and 12 months

    Time frame: Between 3 and 12 months post-intervention

  17. Intraoperative Pain management

    Number of participants with intraoperative need for additional sedation or anesthesia beyond local injection.

    Time frame: At intervention

  18. Functional activity measured by Activity Assessment Scale [AAS] for TBA vs. SIS

    The AAS is a is a standardized a measure of impact of incontinence on normal and more strenuous activities. The score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater functional activity. AAS is collected at at baseline and each follow up time point up to 36 months according to treatment assignment and as treated.

    Time frame: From intervention to 36 months post-intervention.

  19. Medical resource use

    The number of participants with new medications, new symptoms or complaints, life events, and intercurrent therapies for incontinence and other urinary symptoms, intercurrent complications from treatment, intercurrent therapies for complications.

    Time frame: From intervention to 36 months post-intervention.

  20. Medical Resource Cost

    The estimated direct and indirect cost of the intervention, new medications, new symptoms or complaints, life events, and intercurrent therapies for incontinence and other urinary symptoms, intercurrent complications from treatment, intercurrent therapies for complications.

    Time frame: From intervention to 36 months post-intervention.

  21. Health utility measure measured by the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L)

    European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L has 5 attributes (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). EQ-5D descriptive system is divided into five levels of perceived problems: LEVEL 1: indicating no problem LEVEL 2: indicating slight problems LEVEL 3: indicating moderate problems LEVEL 4: indicating severe problems LEVEL 5: indicating unable to/extreme problems

    Time frame: From baseline to 36 months post-intervention.

07

Study locations

7 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lukacz ES, Menefee SA, Carper B, Collins S, McMillian K, Florian-Rodriguez M, Rardin C, Weidner AC, Harvie HS, Alexander B, Mazloomdoost D; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Design of Transurethral Bulking Agent Injection Versus Single-Incision Sling Trial. Urogynecology (Phila). 2026 Feb 1;32(2):131-141. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001702. PubMed 41428458 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study data will be made available through DASH

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Plan to submit full study dataset before the end of the award period.

Access criteria: Access is managed by DASH.

Data sharing details ↗ · dash.nichd.nih.gov

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2028, 52 months after the start.

Of 225 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Urinary Incontinence, Stress, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 52 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 266 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 14, 2024
First posted
Jun 28, 2024
StartActual
Aug 28, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Jun 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06480227
Lead sponsor
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 28, 2024
Start date
Aug 28, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Emily Lukacz, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Diego
Marie Gantz, MD
principal investigator · RTI International

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion