ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05836844APASUpdated Nov 17, 2025

Pragmatic Evaluation of Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment of Apical Prolapse in Women

An observational study in Prolapse; Female, Prolapse Uterovaginal and Prolapse; Cervix, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Recruiting at 4 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-17.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most common types of prolapse. Treatment for apical prolapse ranges from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. An anchoring device can reduce dissection and operative time and is meant to provide strong fixation whilst minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages must be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This cohort study will be on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.

Read the detailed description

Pelvic Organ Prolapse affects 50% of parous women, and apical prolapse is one of the most frequent. Treatment options for women with apical prolapse range from observation, non-surgical treatment or surgical repair. The use of an anchoring device reduces dissection and operative time and is supposed to provide a strong fixation while minimizing potential postoperative pain by avoiding neurovascular injuries. These potential advantages have to be evaluated in terms of performance and safety. This is a cohort study on patients undergoing sacrospinous fixation with the Anchorsure® system with a follow-up of 36 months.The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of the Anchorsure System® for sacrospinous suspension 12 months after surgical treatment of women with apical prolapse in real-life settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prolapse; Female
  • Prolapse Uterovaginal
  • Prolapse; Cervix

Keywords

  • pelvic organ prolapse
03

In context

Prolapse

93 studies on the registry are indexed under Prolapse; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is below the median of 150 across 27 observational studies indexed under Prolapse.

Browse Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment of The target population is the population of adult women, undergoing a surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse using Anchorsure System® in the participating centres: Nîmes University Hospital, Lille University Hospital, Sainte-Anne Clinic in Strasbourg, La Rochelle Hospital and Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with pelvic organ prolapse with leading edge at or beyond the hymen as confirmed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q), i.e. Ba ≥ -1 cm for the anterior compartment, and/or Bp ≥ -1 cm for the posterior compartment, and/or C ≥ -1 cm for the apical compartment including recurrence.
  • Women due for POP surgery using the Anchorsure System® for apical prolapse suspension with or without concomitant native tissue repair, with or without concomitant hysterectomy and with or without concomitant sling for stress urinary incontinence.
  • All women who have not indicated any objection to participating in the study.
  • All women who have been correctly informed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient taking part or having taken part in a device or drug interventional study within the last three months (except for VIGI-MESH national registry).
  • Patients due for pelvic organ prolapse repair without apical suspension or with anything other than native tissue repair and the Anchorsure System®.
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
  • Patients with active non-controlled or chronic gynaecologic or urinary tract infection and/or local tissue necrosis.
  • Patients with ongoing pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, cervix …).
  • Patients with a history of radiotherapy in the pelvic area.
  • Patients on therapy with or immunomodulatory treatment within the previous month.
  • patients under ongoing oral anticoagulant therapy.
  • Patients with stage 0 and 1 pelvic organ prolapse at the time of surgery
  • Patients with a preoperative infection contraindicating the surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceThe Anchorsure System®

    Sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Successful performance after sacrospinous fixation of the Anchorsure System®.

    YES /NO

    Time frame: 12 months after fixation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Device or procedure-related adverse events: Daily Pain score

    All procedure-related adverse events and complications will be recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system with a one-month pain diary (filled in once a day using a visual analog scale of 0 to 10 for buttock pain;

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 30

  2. Device or procedure-related adverse events: Anchor palpability

    The anchor palpability score will be recorded regularly for up to 36 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 36 months after surgery

  3. Device or procedure-related adverse events: Abnormal findings on clinical examination

    All abnormal findings on clinical examination will be reported including suture exposure, anchor extrusion into another organ, perforation, organ or vascular or nerve injury/damage, fistula, bleeding including hematoma (requiring transfusion or not), thrombotic event, neuromuscular problems (including pain), pelvic discomfort or pain, de novo dyspareunia, infection (e.g. vaginal, urinary tract infection), urinary tract complications including ureteric disorders, urinary retention requiring drainage \> 48h, urge symptoms or incontinence (worsening or de novo), de novo constipation or faecal incontinence. Incidences of adverse events will be determined overall, by type of adverse event, severity, compartment and type of sacrospinous suspension (uni versus bilateral and anterior versus posterior).

    Time frame: 36 months after surgery

  4. Type of sacrospinous fixation technique used

    The type of sacrospinous fixation technique used: uni/bilateral, anterior/posterior will be recorded

    Time frame: Day 0

  5. Success of the intervention

    Success is defined as per primary objective and assessed at 36 months after surgery; compartments treated: anterior, apical, posterior, total; type of prolapse: primary or recurrent prolapse.

    Time frame: 36 months after surgery

  6. Complications/adverse events

    Collection of all complications/adverse events up to 36 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 36 months after surgery

  7. Severity of adverse events

    Determination of the level of severity of the adverse event: mild, moderate, severe.

    Time frame: 36 months after surgery

  8. Compartments treated

    Compartments treated: anterior, apical, posterior, total; type of sacrospinous suspension: uni/bilateral, anterior/posterior.

    Time frame: 36 months after surgery

  9. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Age

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: The patient's age will be recorded

    Time frame: Day 0

  10. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Body Mass Index

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: the patient's Body Mass Index will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  11. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Previous history of pelvic surgery

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of pelvic surgery will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  12. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Chronic constipation

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of chronic constipation will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  13. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Chronic pulmonary conditions

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Any history of chronic pulmonary conditions will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  14. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Vaginal compartment

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Details of the patient's vaginal compartment will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  15. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Type of prolapse

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: The type of prolapse (recurrent or primary) will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  16. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Pelvic organ Prolapse Q grade

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: the patient's Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POPQ) grade will be recorded as follows : Stage 0 no prolapse is demonstrated Stage 1 the most distal portion of the prolapse is more than 1 cm above the level of the hymen Stage 2 the most distal portion of the prolapse is 1 cm or less proximal or distal to the hymenal plane Stage 3 the most distal portion of the prolapse protrudes more than 1 cm below the hymen but protrudes no farther than 2 cm less than the total vaginal length (for example., not all of the vagina has prolapsed) Stage 4 vaginal eversion is essentially complete

    Time frame: Day 0

  17. Potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: Concomitant surgery

    Collection of potential risk factors for the success/failure of the treatment at baseline: details of any concomitant surgery will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  18. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Age

    The patient's age will be recorded in years

    Time frame: Day 0

  19. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Body Mass Index

    The patient's body mass index (BMI) will be calculated and recorded. The formula is BMI = kg/m2 where kg is a person's weight in kilograms and m2 is their height in metres squared.

    Time frame: Day 0

  20. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Smoking.

    The patient's smoking status will be recorded (Regular smoker/Weaned/Number of cigarettes per day/week).

    Time frame: Day 0

  21. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: Sexual intercourse.

    The frequency of the patient's sexual intercourse will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  22. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of complications: concomitant surgery

    All details of any concomitant surgery in non-target compartment, other concomitant surgery i.e. hysterectomy, mid uretral sling for SUI, etc…will be recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0

  23. Evolution of the PFDI-20 quality of life score

    The Pelvic Floor Distress inventory (PFDI) includes 20 questions. Each question begins with a "yes" or "no" response. If "yes," the patient must indicate how much bowl, bladder, or pelvic symptoms have been bothering them in the past 3 months on a 4-point scale that ranges from "not at all" (0) to "quite a bit" (4). The scale scores are found individually by calculating the mean value of their corresponding questions and then multiplying by 25 to obtain a value that ranges from 0 to 100. The sum of the 3 scales are added together to get the PFDI-20 summary score, which ranges from 0 to 300.

    Time frame: Day 0

  24. Evolution of the PFDI-20 quality of life score

    The Pelvic Floor Distress inventory (PFDI) includes 20 questions. Each question begins with a "yes" or "no" response. If "yes," the patient must indicate how much bowl, bladder, or pelvic symptoms have been bothering them in the past 3 months on a 4-point scale that ranges from "not at all" (0) to "quite a bit" (4). The scale scores are found individually by calculating the mean value of their corresponding questions and then multiplying by 25 to obtain a value that ranges from 0 to 100. The sum of the 3 scales are added together to get the PFDI-20 summary score, which ranges from 0 to 300.

    Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery.

  25. Evolution of quality of life scores : PFIQ-7

    The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7), a shortened, less comprehensive version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), is a questionnaire about the social impact of the patient's pelvic floor disorders. It consistś of 7 questions and 3 columns, with each question addressing the impact of urinary symptoms, digestive symptoms, and symptoms directly related to prolapse.

    Time frame: Day 0

  26. Evolution of quality of life scores : PFIQ-7

    The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7), a shortened, less comprehensive version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ), is a questionnaire about the social impact of the patient's pelvic floor disorders. It consistś of 7 questions and 3 columns, with each question addressing the impact of urinary symptoms, digestive symptoms, and symptoms directly related to prolapse.

    Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery.

  27. Evolution of quality of life scores : PISQ-IR

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Revised by the International UroGynocological Association (PISQ-IR) is a disease-specific tool for evaluating the sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. It is useful in screening for sexual disorders in women with Urinary Incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and anal incontinence. It is used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders on female sexual activity and inactivity.

    Time frame: Day 0

  28. Evolution of quality of life scores : PISQ-IR

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Revised by the International UroGynocological Association (PISQ-IR) is a disease-specific tool for evaluating the sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. It is useful in screening for sexual disorders in women with Urinary Incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and anal incontinence. It is used to assess the impact of pelvic floor disorders on female sexual activity and inactivity.

    Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery.

  29. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be recorded on a Visual Analog Scale with scores ranging from 0= Extremely Dissatisfied to 6= Extremely Satisfied.

    Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery.

  30. Global impression of improvement (PGI-I)

    The Patient Global impression of improvement (PGI-I) is a scale to describes how the patient's post-operative condition is compared with how it was before surgery: Very much better = 1, Much better = 2, A little better = 3, No change = 4, A little worse = 5, Much worse = 6, Very much worse = 7

    Time frame: Up to 36 months after surgery

  31. Frequency of revision and/or surgical re-intervention

    The frequency of revision and/or surgical re-intervention including anti-incontinence surgery after sacrospinous suspension will be recorded

    Time frame: Up to 36 months

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • La Rochelle General Hospital
    La Rochelle, 17000, France
    Recruiting
    • Philippe Ferry, Doctor · Contact
  • Lille University Hospital
    Lille, 59000, France
    Recruiting
    • Michel Cosson, Professor · Contact
  • Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital
    Paris, 94270, France
    Recruiting
    • Hervé Pr H Fernandez, Professor · Contact
  • Clinique Sainte-Anne
    Strasbourg, 67000, France
    Recruiting
    • David Hamid, Dr. · Contact
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2023 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 16 months.

Of 14 observational studies under Prolapse, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 58. This study's 16 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 19, 2023
First posted
May 1, 2023
StartActual
May 11, 2023
Primary completionActual
Oct 1, 2024
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2028
Last update
Nov 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05836844
Collaborators
University Hospital, Lille, Kremlin-Bicetre Hospital, Paris, Clinique Sainte-Anne, Strasbourg, Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 1, 2023
Start date
May 11, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2024
Completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 17, 2025

Study contacts

Renaud de TAYRAC, Professor
Contact
renaud.detayrac@chu-nimes.fr
+334 66 68 32 16
Anissa MEGZARI
Contact
drc@chu-nimes.fr
+334 66 68 42 36

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion