CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04171531MUSAUpdated Jun 3, 2025Results posted

Sling vs Botox for Mixed Incontinence

A Phase 3 interventional study of Botox® injection and Mid-urethral sling in Urinary Incontinence, Stress and Urinary Incontinence, Urge, sponsored by NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Completed at 8 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-03.

Sponsored by NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary aim is to compare the effectiveness of intradetrusor injection of 100 unit injection of Botulinum toxin A to mid-urethral sling for change in MUI symptoms 6 months following treatment.

Read the detailed description

Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), defined as the presence of both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), is a challenging condition for which clinicians frequently use multiple sequential treatments that have undergone limited evaluation in rigorous clinical trials. The Mixed Urinary Incontinence: Mid-urethral Sling vs. Botox A (MUSA) trial will estimate the effect of Botulinum toxin A (Botox A ®) compared to mid-urethral sling for the treatment of MUI symptoms in 146 women. MUSA is a randomized 2-arm clinical trial.

The purpose of MUSA is to:

  • compare treatment with either Botulinum toxin A (Botox A ®) or mid-urethral sling for women with MUI
  • characterize patient characteristics associated with treatment response

The primary objective is to estimate the effect of intradetrusor injections Botulinum toxin A (Botox A ®) compared to mid-urethral sling for treatment of MUI in 146 women 6 months after treatment. The change in severity of MUI symptoms will be measured using the Urogenital Distress Inventory.

Secondary outcomes include:

  • Urogenital Distress Inventory Stress and Irritative subscales

Other outcomes include:

  • Urogenital Distress Inventory Obstructive subscale
  • Patient bladder diary metrics including numbers of daily incontinence episodes and voids and voiding frequency
  • Other patient reported outcomes/validated instruments and associated scales and subscales: EQ-5D, IIQ-LF, OABq-LF, OAB-SATq, PISQ-IR, PGI-I, PGI-S, PGSC, and SF-36
  • Physical measures of effectiveness: Postvoid Residual Volume

The study will continue with an additional 6 month observational period until 12 months post treatment.

A supplemental study will characterize baseline putative proteins/protein pathways in women with MUI associated with change in UDI after treatment with MUS or onabotulinum toxin A. Those results are not reported with this record.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress
  • Urinary Incontinence, Urge

Keywords

  • urinary incontinence
  • midurethral sling
  • Botulinum toxin A (Botox A ®)
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

1,363 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 228 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 150 is above the median of 66 across 1,011 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Reporting at least "moderate bother" from UUI item on UDI

    * "Do you experience urine leakage associated with a feeling of urgency?"

  2. Reporting at least "moderate bother" from SUI item on UDI

    * "Do you experience urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing?"

  3. Diagnosis of SUI defined by a positive cough stress test (CST) or UDE within the past 18 months
  4. Presence of UUI on bladder diary with > 4 Urgency IE/3-day diary
  5. Urinary symptoms >3 months
  6. Persistent symptoms despite at least one or more conservative treatments (e.g. supervised behavioral therapy, physical therapy) as determined adequate by the physician.
  7. Inadequate response to oral overactive bladder medications (including anti-cholinergic and/or beta-mimetic medication) unless patient is

    1. intolerant of oral overactive bladder medications, or
    2. oral overactive bladder medications are contraindicated as determined by the treating provider.
  8. Urodynamics within past 18 months
  9. Demonstrates ability (or have caregiver demonstrate ability) to perform clean intermittent self-catheterization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anterior or apical compartment prolapse at or beyond the hymen (>0 on POPQ), regardless if patient is symptomatic

    * Women with anterior or apical prolapse above the hymen (\<0) who do not report vaginal bulge symptoms will be eligible

  2. Planned concomitant surgery for anterior vaginal wall or apical prolapse > 0

    * Women undergoing only rectocele repair or other repair unrelated to anterior or apical compartment are eligible

  3. Women undergoing hysterectomy for any indication will be excluded
  4. Active pelvic organ malignancy
  5. Age \<21 years
  6. Pregnant or plans for future pregnancy in next 6 months, or within 12 months post-partum
  7. Post-void residual >150 cc on 2 occasions within the past 6 months, or current catheter use
  8. Participation in other trial that may influence results of this study
  9. Unevaluated hematuria
  10. Prior sling, synthetic mesh for prolapse, implanted nerve stimulator for urinary incontinence
  11. Spinal cord injury or advanced/severe neurologic conditions including Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinsons, Myasthenia Gravis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth
  12. Women on overactive bladder medication/therapy will be eligible after 3 week wash-out period
  13. Non-ambulatory
  14. History of serious adverse reaction to synthetic mesh
  15. Not able to complete study assessments per clinician judgment, or not available for 6 month follow-up
  16. Diagnosis of and/or history of bladder pain or chronic pelvic pain
  17. Women who had intravesical Botox injection within the past 12 months
  18. Women who have undergone anterior or apical pelvic organ prolapse repair within the past 6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Botox A® injection

    A dose of 100 units of Botulinum toxin A will be injected into the bladder. Follow up visits at 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months post intervention to collect clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

    Drug: Botox® injection

  • Active comparator
    Mid-urethral sling

    Mid-urethral Sling Procedure includes retropubic as well as transobturator full length slings. Follow up visits at 2 weeks, 3 and 6 months post intervention to collect clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

    Device: Mid-urethral sling

Interventions

  • DrugBotox® injection

    Botulinum toxin A will be prepared by dissolving 100 units of botulinum toxin A into 10 ml of injectable saline. Indigo carmine or methylene blue 0.1 ml will be added to each syringe of botulinum toxin A. The treating physician will inject a total of 10 ml of the Botox A® into approximately 15 to 20 different detrusor muscle sites under direct visualization.

  • DeviceMid-urethral sling

    Mid-urethral Sling Procedure includes retropubic as well as transobturator full length slings. "Mini-sling" and "single-incision" sling will not be allowed due to potential risk for higher failure rate.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. UDI-LF Total Score Change From Baseline

    The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI scale has a range from 0 to 300 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. UDI-LF Stress Score Change From Baseline

    The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Stress subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  2. UDI-LF Irritative Score Change From Baseline

    The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Irritative subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Other outcomes

  1. UDI-LF Obstructive Score Change From Baseline

    The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Obstructive subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  2. Average Daily Frequency of Combined Mixed Stress/Urge and Non-categorized Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline

    Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of combined mixed stress/urge and non-categorized incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 Months

  3. Average Daily Frequency of All Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline

    Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 Months

  4. Average Daily Frequency of Diurnal Voids Change From Baseline

    Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of diurnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 Months

  5. Average Daily Frequency of Nocturnal Voids Change From Baseline

    Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of nocturnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 Months

  6. Average Daily Frequency of All Voids Change From Baseline

    Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 Months

  7. Normalization of Voiding Frequency

    Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, for participants with \>8 voids at baseline, the outcome is calculated as Yes=no more than 8 voids noted at the time point, No=Otherwise

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 Months

  8. Improvement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline

    Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=at least 50% reduction in the number of voids between the timepoint and baseline, No=Otherwise

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 Months

  9. Worsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline

    Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=greater than baseline number of voids at the time point or with greater than 8 voids at the time point, No=Otherwise

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 Months

  10. Change From Baseline EQ-5D Visual Analog Score

    EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The visual analog scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, and 12 Months

  11. Change From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score

    EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The index score ranges from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, and 12 Months

  12. Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Physical Activity Score

    The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Physical Activity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  13. Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Travel Score

    The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Travel score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  14. Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Social/Relationships Score

    The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Social Relationship score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  15. Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Emotional Health Score

    The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Emotional Health score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  16. Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Total Score

    The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Total score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  17. Change From Baseline OABq-LF Symptom Severity Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Symptom Severity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating worse quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  18. Change From Baseline OABq-LF Coping Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Coping score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  19. Change From Baseline OABq-LF Concern Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Concern score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  20. Change From Baseline OABq-LF Sleep Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Sleep score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  21. Change From Baseline OABq-LF Social Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Social score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  22. Change From Baseline OABq-LF HRQL Total Score

    The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF HRQL score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  23. OAB-SATq-LF Satisfaction Score

    The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Satisfaction score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  24. OAB-SATq-LF Side Effects Score

    The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Side Effect score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer side effects.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  25. OAB-SATq-LF Endorsement Score

    The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Endorsement score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater endorsement.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  26. OAB-SATq-LF Convenience Score

    The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Convenience score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater convenience.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  27. OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator

    The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The preference score is a binary \[yes/no\] indicator as to whether a subject indicated slight or definite preference for the treatment among women that have had previous treatment for overactive bladder. The outcome is the percentage of participants that prefer the current treatment to previous treatments.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  28. PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator

    The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better).

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  29. PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator

    The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a patient-reported measure of perceived severity of condition, as assessed on a scale of 1 (Normal) to 4 (Severe). Included here are participants who reported Normal or Mild severity as indicated by a rating of 1 or 2.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  30. PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator

    Patient GLobal Impression of Symptom Control(PGSC) is a patient-reported measure of perceived adequate symptom control, as assessed on a scale of 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly). Included here are participants who had adequate control as indicated by a rating of 5 (agree strongly) or 4 (agree).

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

  31. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-PR Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Partner Related (NSA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  32. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CS Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Specific (NSA-CS) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  33. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-GQA Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (NSA-GQA) ranges from 1 to 4.5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  34. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CI Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Impact (NSA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  35. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-AO Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Arousal Orgasm (SA-AO) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  36. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-PR Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Partner Related (SA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  37. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CS Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Condition Specific (SA-CS) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  38. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-GQR Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (SA-GQR) ranges from 1 to 4.75 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  39. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CI Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Condition Impact (SA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  40. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-D Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Desire (SA-D) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  41. Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA Average Score

    The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Average (SA-AVG) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  42. SF-36 Physical Functioning Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for physical function domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  43. SF-36 Role Physical Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for physical role limitations domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  44. SF-36 Bodily Pain Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for bodily pain domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  45. SF-36 General Health Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for general health domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  46. SF-36 Vitality Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for vitality domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  47. SF-36 Social Functioning Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for social functioning domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  48. SF-36 Emotional Role Limitations Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for emotional role limitation domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  49. SF-36 Mental Health Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for social functioning domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  50. SF-36 Physical Composite Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The physical composite score is a normalized t-score which combines the all 8 domains with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores indicate greater physical function). A t-score below 50 is a good all-around cutoff for detecting physical condition (per the Ware manual). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 2 weeks and 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  51. SF-36 Mental Composite Score

    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The mental composite score is a normalized t-score which combines the all 8 domains with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores indicate greater mental health). A t-score below 52 is a well-documented cutoff for detecting depression (per the Ware manual). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

    Time frame: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  52. Postvoid Residual Volume

    Postvoid Residual Volume

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 Months

07

Results

Posted Mar 20, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
Started7278
Received treatment7169
Provided follow-up data7166
Completed6663
Not completed615
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up45
Withdrew: Consent only through 6 months11
Withdrew: Insurance did not cover procedure01
Withdrew: Physician decision03
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject15

Outcome measures

PrimaryUDI-LF Total Score Change From Baseline

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI scale has a range from 0 to 300 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
UDI-LF Total Score Change From Baseline
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-82.2 (-100 to -64.4)-84.6 (-101 to -68.3)
6.0-74.9 (-93.6 to -56.1)-89.1 (-104.7 to -73.5)
9.0-63.1 (-81.8 to -44.5)-85.6 (-102.7 to -68.6)
12.0-67.7 (-85.7 to -49.8)-89.2 (-107.5 to -70.9)
SecondaryUDI-LF Stress Score Change From Baseline

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Stress subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
UDI-LF Stress Score Change From Baseline
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-27.9 (-37.7 to -18.1)-46.4 (-55.4 to -37.3)
6.0-30.2 (-39.6 to -20.9)-45.1 (-53.6 to -36.7)
9.0-20.2 (-30.1 to -10.4)-42.3 (-53.1 to -31.4)
12.0-24.3 (-34.6 to -14.1)-44.4 (-53.8 to -35.1)
SecondaryUDI-LF Irritative Score Change From Baseline

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Irritative subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
UDI-LF Irritative Score Change From Baseline
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-40.8 (-47.3 to -34.2)-28.1 (-35.6 to -20.6)
6.0-35.8 (-43.3 to -28.3)-30.6 (-37.4 to -23.8)
9.0-32.7 (-40.5 to -25)-30.8 (-38.8 to -22.7)
12.0-31.6 (-39 to -24.2)-33 (-41.4 to -24.6)
Other pre-specifiedUDI-LF Obstructive Score Change From Baseline

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Obstructive subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
UDI-LF Obstructive Score Change From Baseline
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-13.5 (-18.8 to -8.1)-10.1 (-14.6 to -5.7)
6.0-8.9 (-13.8 to -4)-13.4 (-17.5 to -9.3)
9.0-10.2 (-15.7 to -4.7)-12.6 (-17 to -8.2)
12.0-11.8 (-16.4 to -7.2)-11.7 (-16.5 to -6.9)
Other pre-specifiedAverage Daily Frequency of Combined Mixed Stress/Urge and Non-categorized Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of combined mixed stress/urge and non-categorized incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · incontinence episodes/day
Average Daily Frequency of Combined Mixed Stress/Urge and Non-categorized Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline
incontinence episodes/dayBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-0.4 (-0.90 to 0.00)-0.4 (-0.90 to 0.10)
6.0-0.2 (-0.50 to 0.10)-0.7 (-1.10 to -0.30)
12.0-0.2 (-0.60 to 0.20)-0.7 (-1.30 to -0.20)
Other pre-specifiedAverage Daily Frequency of All Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · incontinence episodes/day
Average Daily Frequency of All Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline
incontinence episodes/dayBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-4 (-4.90 to -3.20)-3.9 (-5.00 to -2.80)
6.0-3.2 (-3.90 to -2.40)-4.1 (-5.20 to -3.10)
12.0-3.6 (-4.70 to -2.60)-4.5 (-5.80 to -3.20)
Other pre-specifiedAverage Daily Frequency of Diurnal Voids Change From Baseline

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of diurnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · diurnal voids/day
Average Daily Frequency of Diurnal Voids Change From Baseline
diurnal voids/dayBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-1.2 (-1.70 to -0.70)0 (-0.60 to 0.60)
6.0-0.8 (-1.30 to -0.20)-0.2 (-0.90 to 0.60)
12.0-0.8 (-1.50 to -0.20)-0.3 (-1.00 to 0.40)
Other pre-specifiedAverage Daily Frequency of Nocturnal Voids Change From Baseline

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of nocturnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · nocturnal voids/day
Average Daily Frequency of Nocturnal Voids Change From Baseline
nocturnal voids/dayBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-0.5 (-0.70 to -0.20)-0.5 (-0.80 to -0.10)
6.0-0.3 (-0.60 to -0.10)-0.2 (-0.50 to 0.20)
12.0-0.4 (-0.70 to -0.10)-0.4 (-0.90 to 0.00)
Other pre-specifiedAverage Daily Frequency of All Voids Change From Baseline

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · voids/day
Average Daily Frequency of All Voids Change From Baseline
voids/dayBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-1.6 (-2.20 to -1.00)-0.4 (-1.10 to 0.20)
6.0-1.1 (-1.70 to -0.50)-0.4 (-1.10 to 0.40)
12.0-1.2 (-2.00 to -0.50)-0.7 (-1.60 to 0.10)
Other pre-specifiedNormalization of Voiding Frequency

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, for participants with \>8 voids at baseline, the outcome is calculated as Yes=no more than 8 voids noted at the time point, No=Otherwise

Time frame:
3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Normalization of Voiding Frequency
ParticipantsBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0 — No1724
3.0 — Yes2313
6.0 — No1725
6.0 — Yes1810
12.0 — No1321
12.0 — Yes2412
Other pre-specifiedImprovement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=at least 50% reduction in the number of voids between the timepoint and baseline, No=Otherwise

Time frame:
3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Improvement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
ParticipantsBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0 — No6061
3.0 — Yes10
6.0 — No5359
6.0 — Yes01
12.0 — No5054
12.0 — Yes32
Other pre-specifiedWorsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=greater than baseline number of voids at the time point or with greater than 8 voids at the time point, No=Otherwise

Time frame:
3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Worsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
ParticipantsBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0 — No4939
3.0 — Yes1222
6.0 — No3632
6.0 — Yes1728
12.0 — No3734
12.0 — Yes1622
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline EQ-5D Visual Analog Score

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The visual analog scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Visual Analog Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.53.1 (-0.6 to 6.8)9.3 (4.7 to 13.8)
3.02.2 (-2.1 to 6.5)6.7 (1.9 to 11.5)
6.01.5 (-2.9 to 5.9)7.1 (3 to 11.3)
9.01.4 (-3.6 to 6.4)6.9 (2.8 to 11.1)
12.01.6 (-2.7 to 5.8)7.4 (2.3 to 12.5)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The index score ranges from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.50 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
3.00 (0 to 0.1)0 (0 to 0.1)
6.00 (0 to 0.1)0 (0 to 0.1)
9.00 (-0.1 to 0)0 (0 to 0.1)
12.00 (0 to 0.1)0 (0 to 0.1)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline IIQ-LF Physical Activity Score

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Physical Activity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Physical Activity Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-19.5 (-27.1 to -12)-20.3 (-28 to -12.6)
6.0-20.7 (-26.2 to -15.2)-21.1 (-28.5 to -13.8)
9.0-16.9 (-23.2 to -10.6)-21.2 (-29 to -13.4)
12.0-18.1 (-24.5 to -11.7)-25.3 (-32.9 to -17.8)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline IIQ-LF Travel Score

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Travel score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Travel Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-19.6 (-27.6 to -11.7)-22.2 (-30.5 to -13.9)
6.0-23.3 (-29.4 to -17.1)-25.4 (-33.7 to -17.1)
9.0-14.3 (-21 to -7.7)-25.8 (-34.5 to -17)
12.0-19.7 (-26.2 to -13.3)-28.1 (-36.7 to -19.6)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline IIQ-LF Social/Relationships Score

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Social Relationship score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Social/Relationships Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-15.7 (-22.6 to -8.7)-18.9 (-26.8 to -11)
6.0-16.9 (-22.8 to -11)-20.3 (-27.8 to -12.8)
9.0-10.3 (-15.8 to -4.7)-19.9 (-27.8 to -12)
12.0-15.7 (-21.8 to -9.5)-22.3 (-30.7 to -13.9)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline IIQ-LF Emotional Health Score

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Emotional Health score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Emotional Health Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-17.7 (-24.8 to -10.6)-19.5 (-26 to -12.9)
6.0-20.2 (-26.5 to -13.9)-21.5 (-28.3 to -14.8)
9.0-12.5 (-19.4 to -5.6)-19.7 (-26 to -13.5)
12.0-17.5 (-24.5 to -10.5)-26.8 (-35.2 to -18.4)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline IIQ-LF Total Score

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Total score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Total Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-72.9 (-99.5 to -46.2)-80.8 (-108.4 to -53.2)
6.0-81.1 (-101.3 to -60.9)-88.4 (-115.4 to -61.4)
9.0-54 (-75.7 to -32.2)-86.6 (-113.9 to -59.3)
12.0-71 (-93.4 to -48.6)-102.5 (-133.1 to -71.9)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline OABq-LF Symptom Severity Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Symptom Severity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating worse quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Symptom Severity Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-41 (-47.9 to -34)-28.7 (-36.6 to -20.7)
6.0-34.3 (-41 to -27.6)-32 (-39.6 to -24.3)
9.0-26.7 (-33.9 to -19.4)-28.8 (-37.5 to -20.1)
12.0-30.6 (-38.3 to -22.8)-36.1 (-44.3 to -27.9)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline OABq-LF Coping Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Coping score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Coping Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.029.7 (21.7 to 37.8)29.5 (21.9 to 37.1)
6.024.3 (17.2 to 31.4)29.8 (22 to 37.5)
9.018.8 (11.8 to 25.8)26.4 (18 to 34.9)
12.024.7 (17.9 to 31.5)34.4 (25.6 to 43.2)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline OABq-LF Concern Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Concern score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Concern Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.032.3 (24.6 to 40)29.6 (22.3 to 36.9)
6.026.1 (19.7 to 32.5)31.2 (23.7 to 38.7)
9.016.7 (9.2 to 24.2)28.2 (20.3 to 36.1)
12.024.5 (16.8 to 32.2)35.6 (27.1 to 44.1)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline OABq-LF Sleep Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Sleep score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Sleep Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.023.8 (16.3 to 31.3)20.7 (12.4 to 29)
6.021.6 (14.4 to 28.8)18.4 (10.8 to 25.9)
9.015.6 (8.4 to 22.7)19 (11.4 to 26.7)
12.016.8 (9.3 to 24.3)19.8 (9.7 to 29.8)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline OABq-LF Social Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Social score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Social Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.015.1 (8.7 to 21.5)20 (13 to 27)
6.011.8 (5.5 to 18)19.6 (13.4 to 25.8)
9.04.8 (-0.5 to 10.1)18.4 (10.9 to 26)
12.011 (4.7 to 17.4)21 (13.6 to 28.4)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline OABq-LF HRQL Total Score

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF HRQL score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline OABq-LF HRQL Total Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.026.4 (19.8 to 33)25.9 (19.2 to 32.6)
6.021.8 (16 to 27.5)25.9 (19.4 to 32.3)
9.014.8 (9.2 to 20.4)23.9 (16.8 to 30.9)
12.020.3 (14.3 to 26.4)29.1 (21.4 to 36.9)
Other pre-specifiedOAB-SATq-LF Satisfaction Score

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Satisfaction score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
OAB-SATq-LF Satisfaction Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.065.7 (58.7 to 72.7)60.1 (51.9 to 68.3)
6.064.5 (57.6 to 71.3)60.3 (52.5 to 68.2)
9.064.4 (57.5 to 71.2)57.5 (48.8 to 66.2)
12.060.4 (53 to 67.8)56.3 (46.8 to 65.9)
Other pre-specifiedOAB-SATq-LF Side Effects Score

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Side Effect score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer side effects.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
OAB-SATq-LF Side Effects Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.091.9 (87.5 to 96.4)93.5 (89.7 to 97.3)
6.089 (83.5 to 94.5)87.4 (81.5 to 93.4)
9.090.2 (84.4 to 95.9)86.3 (79.7 to 92.9)
12.091.8 (87 to 96.6)88.5 (82.2 to 94.8)
Other pre-specifiedOAB-SATq-LF Endorsement Score

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Endorsement score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater endorsement.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
OAB-SATq-LF Endorsement Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.074.3 (67.8 to 80.9)67.9 (59.8 to 76)
6.072 (64.4 to 79.6)68.3 (60.5 to 76)
9.077.7 (70.5 to 84.9)73.6 (65.6 to 81.7)
12.071.7 (63.8 to 79.5)68.2 (59 to 77.3)
Other pre-specifiedOAB-SATq-LF Convenience Score

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Convenience score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater convenience.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
OAB-SATq-LF Convenience Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.064.2 (57.6 to 70.7)64.1 (56.7 to 71.4)
6.066.5 (59.3 to 73.6)66.8 (60 to 73.5)
9.067.6 (62.5 to 72.8)64.7 (58.1 to 71.3)
12.065.6 (59.7 to 71.4)66.3 (58.5 to 74.2)
Other pre-specifiedOAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The preference score is a binary \[yes/no\] indicator as to whether a subject indicated slight or definite preference for the treatment among women that have had previous treatment for overactive bladder. The outcome is the percentage of participants that prefer the current treatment to previous treatments.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
ParticipantsBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0 — Unknown1624
3.0 — No55
3.0 — Yes4735
6.0 — Unknown1721
6.0 — No68
6.0 — Yes4136
9.0 — Unknown1715
9.0 — No55
9.0 — Yes3336
12.0 — Unknown1519
12.0 — No107
12.0 — Yes3634
Other pre-specifiedPGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better).

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
ParticipantsBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0 — No2830
3.0 — Yes4034
6.0 — No2533
6.0 — Yes3932
9.0 — No2225
9.0 — Yes3431
12.0 — No3531
12.0 — Yes2629
Other pre-specifiedPGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator

The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a patient-reported measure of perceived severity of condition, as assessed on a scale of 1 (Normal) to 4 (Severe). Included here are participants who reported Normal or Mild severity as indicated by a rating of 1 or 2.

Time frame:
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
ParticipantsBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
Baseline — No5753
Baseline — Yes1310
3.0 — No2930
3.0 — Yes3934
6.0 — No2929
6.0 — Yes3536
9.0 — No2724
9.0 — Yes2932
12.0 — No2824
12.0 — Yes3336
Other pre-specifiedPGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator

Patient GLobal Impression of Symptom Control(PGSC) is a patient-reported measure of perceived adequate symptom control, as assessed on a scale of 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly). Included here are participants who had adequate control as indicated by a rating of 5 (agree strongly) or 4 (agree).

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
ParticipantsBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0 — No3228
3.0 — Yes3636
6.0 — No3033
6.0 — Yes3432
9.0 — No2827
9.0 — Yes2829
12.0 — No3324
12.0 — Yes2936
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-PR Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Partner Related (NSA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-PR Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.00.3 (-0.1 to 0.7)0.3 (0.1 to 0.5)
6.00 (-0.4 to 0.4)0.3 (0 to 0.6)
9.00.1 (-0.3 to 0.6)0.1 (-0.3 to 0.5)
12.00.3 (0 to 0.6)0.1 (-0.3 to 0.4)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CS Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Specific (NSA-CS) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CS Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-0.2 (-0.5 to 0)-0.1 (-0.5 to 0.2)
6.0-0.2 (-0.7 to 0.2)0 (-0.3 to 0.4)
9.0-0.2 (-0.4 to 0.1)-0.1 (-0.4 to 0.2)
12.00.2 (-0.1 to 0.6)-0.3 (-0.7 to 0.2)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-GQA Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (NSA-GQA) ranges from 1 to 4.5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-GQA Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-0.1 (-0.5 to 0.2)-0.3 (-0.6 to 0.1)
6.0-0.3 (-0.8 to 0.2)-0.3 (-0.8 to 0.1)
9.0-0.2 (-0.8 to 0.4)-0.4 (-0.8 to -0.1)
12.0-0.4 (-0.9 to 0.1)-0.2 (-0.7 to 0.2)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CI Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Impact (NSA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CI Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.0-0.3 (-0.6 to 0)-0.4 (-0.8 to 0)
6.0-0.3 (-0.7 to 0.1)-0.3 (-0.8 to 0.1)
9.0-0.3 (-0.8 to 0.1)-0.2 (-0.7 to 0.2)
12.0-0.2 (-0.5 to 0.1)-0.4 (-0.8 to 0)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-AO Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Arousal Orgasm (SA-AO) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-AO Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.00 (-0.1 to 0.2)-0.1 (-0.5 to 0.3)
6.00 (-0.2 to 0.2)0.1 (-0.2 to 0.3)
9.0-0.1 (-0.4 to 0.2)0.1 (-0.2 to 0.3)
12.00 (-0.3 to 0.3)0 (-0.3 to 0.2)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-PR Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Partner Related (SA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-PR Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.00 (-0.3 to 0.2)0 (-0.3 to 0.2)
6.00 (-0.2 to 0.3)0.1 (-0.2 to 0.5)
9.0-0.1 (-0.3 to 0.2)-0.3 (-0.6 to 0)
12.0-0.1 (-0.5 to 0.2)-0.1 (-0.4 to 0.1)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CS Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Condition Specific (SA-CS) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CS Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.00.5 (0.2 to 0.7)0.5 (0.1 to 0.8)
6.00.3 (0 to 0.6)0.6 (0.1 to 1)
9.00.3 (-0.1 to 0.6)0.2 (-0.4 to 0.8)
12.00.3 (-0.1 to 0.6)0.4 (-0.2 to 1.1)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-GQR Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (SA-GQR) ranges from 1 to 4.75 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-GQR Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.00 (-0.4 to 0.3)0.3 (-0.1 to 0.7)
6.00 (-0.3 to 0.4)0.2 (-0.2 to 0.5)
9.0-0.1 (-0.6 to 0.3)-0.4 (-0.9 to 0.1)
12.0-0.1 (-0.4 to 0.3)-0.2 (-0.5 to 0.2)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CI Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Condition Impact (SA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CI Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.00.4 (0.1 to 0.7)0.6 (0.3 to 1)
6.00.2 (-0.1 to 0.5)0.8 (0.4 to 1.1)
9.00.3 (0 to 0.6)0.3 (-0.1 to 0.7)
12.00.3 (-0.1 to 0.6)0.9 (0.5 to 1.4)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-D Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Desire (SA-D) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-D Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.00.1 (-0.1 to 0.4)0.1 (-0.2 to 0.3)
6.00 (-0.2 to 0.1)-0.1 (-0.3 to 0.1)
9.00 (-0.3 to 0.2)0.1 (-0.2 to 0.4)
12.0-0.2 (-0.5 to 0.1)0 (-0.3 to 0.4)
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline PISQ-IR SA Average Score

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Average (SA-AVG) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA Average Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
3.00.2 (0 to 0.3)0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)
6.00.1 (-0.1 to 0.2)0.3 (0.1 to 0.5)
9.00 (-0.1 to 0.2)0 (-0.2 to 0.2)
12.00 (-0.2 to 0.2)0.2 (0 to 0.4)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Physical Functioning Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for physical function domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-36 Physical Functioning Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.512.9 (6.3 to 19.5)12.2 (6.3 to 18.1)
3.010.9 (4.8 to 17)13.9 (7.1 to 20.6)
6.010.5 (4.6 to 16.3)14 (7.1 to 20.9)
9.08.9 (1.8 to 15.9)9.7 (3.6 to 15.7)
12.010 (4.1 to 15.9)13.3 (6.5 to 20)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Role Physical Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for physical role limitations domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-36 Role Physical Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.514.1 (3.1 to 25.2)-1.2 (-12.7 to 10.3)
3.012.5 (2.2 to 22.8)11.3 (1.6 to 21.1)
6.012.3 (1.7 to 22.9)12.1 (2 to 22.2)
9.03.6 (-8.3 to 15.6)7.7 (-4.3 to 19.8)
12.08.6 (-1.2 to 18.4)4.9 (-7.3 to 17.1)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Bodily Pain Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for bodily pain domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-36 Bodily Pain Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.52.6 (-3 to 8.2)2.4 (-3.6 to 8.5)
3.05.1 (-0.6 to 10.9)0.6 (-5.4 to 6.5)
6.0-0.4 (-6.3 to 5.5)0.8 (-5.1 to 6.6)
9.0-1.6 (-8.1 to 5)4.2 (-1.8 to 10.2)
12.0-0.8 (-6.9 to 5.2)6.4 (0.1 to 12.7)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 General Health Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for general health domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-36 General Health Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.55.2 (1.9 to 8.4)2.5 (-1.2 to 6.3)
3.02.4 (-1.3 to 6)-1.7 (-5.8 to 2.5)
6.02.6 (-1.4 to 6.7)-0.6 (-4.4 to 3.2)
9.0-1.6 (-6 to 2.7)-2.2 (-6.5 to 2.2)
12.0-1.1 (-5.3 to 3.1)-0.3 (-4.8 to 4.1)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Vitality Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for vitality domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-36 Vitality Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.56.1 (1 to 11.1)6.5 (1.8 to 11.3)
3.03.5 (-1.7 to 8.6)5.3 (0.6 to 10.1)
6.04.7 (-0.1 to 9.5)3.4 (-1.2 to 8.1)
9.0-0.8 (-5.8 to 4.2)-1.3 (-6.5 to 4)
12.02.7 (-2.3 to 7.7)0.4 (-5.2 to 6.1)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Social Functioning Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for social functioning domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-36 Social Functioning Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.510.9 (5 to 16.7)9.1 (3.2 to 15)
3.011 (4.9 to 17.2)5.7 (-1.4 to 12.7)
6.011.5 (5.6 to 17.4)6.6 (0.1 to 13.2)
9.04.5 (-1.3 to 10.4)12.3 (5 to 19.5)
12.06.4 (-0.4 to 13.1)7.1 (0.3 to 13.8)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Emotional Role Limitations Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for emotional role limitation domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-36 Emotional Role Limitations Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.516.4 (5.8 to 27)12.2 (0.9 to 23.5)
3.019.9 (9.1 to 30.6)14.6 (3 to 26.2)
6.012.7 (4.7 to 20.7)12.5 (0.9 to 24.1)
9.013 (1.9 to 24.2)7.4 (-3.3 to 18.2)
12.09.8 (1.8 to 17.8)13.3 (2 to 24.7)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Mental Health Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for social functioning domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SF-36 Mental Health Score
units on a scaleBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.50.2 (-3.7 to 4.1)5 (1.3 to 8.7)
3.00.8 (-3.1 to 4.7)1.8 (-3.4 to 7)
6.0-2 (-6.4 to 2.5)1 (-3.5 to 5.6)
9.0-2.4 (-6.5 to 1.8)0.6 (-4.2 to 5.5)
12.0-0.7 (-4.8 to 3.3)1.3 (-3.7 to 6.2)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Physical Composite Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The physical composite score is a normalized t-score which combines the all 8 domains with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores indicate greater physical function). A t-score below 50 is a good all-around cutoff for detecting physical condition (per the Ware manual). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 2 weeks and 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
SF-36 Physical Composite Score
T-scoreBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.53.9 (1.7 to 6.2)1.5 (-0.6 to 3.6)
3.03.1 (0.8 to 5.3)2.6 (0.2 to 5)
6.03 (0.7 to 5.3)3.1 (0.7 to 5.4)
9.01.1 (-1.6 to 3.8)2.2 (-0.5 to 4.9)
12.02 (-0.2 to 4.2)2.8 (0.5 to 5.2)
Other pre-specifiedSF-36 Mental Composite Score

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The mental composite score is a normalized t-score which combines the all 8 domains with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores indicate greater mental health). A t-score below 52 is a well-documented cutoff for detecting depression (per the Ware manual). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Time frame:
0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
SF-36 Mental Composite Score
T-scoreBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
0.52.2 (0 to 4.5)3.5 (1.2 to 5.8)
3.02.7 (0.1 to 5.4)1.9 (-0.8 to 4.5)
6.01.6 (-0.8 to 3.9)1.2 (-1.2 to 3.6)
9.00.6 (-1.9 to 3.1)1 (-1.8 to 3.7)
12.00.9 (-1.3 to 3.1)1.2 (-1.7 to 4.1)
Other pre-specifiedPostvoid Residual Volume

Postvoid Residual Volume

Time frame:
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 Months
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Postvoid Residual Volume
mLBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
Baseline20.4 (14.6 to 26.3)22.7 (15.9 to 29.5)
0.549.4 (33.8 to 65.1)26.5 (19.5 to 33.5)
3.039.4 (25.0 to 53.7)27.2 (19.2 to 35.3)
6.031.7 (19.2 to 44.2)37.1 (23.9 to 50.3)

Adverse events

Collected over 12 Months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0.00% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Botox A0/71 (0%)3/71 (4.2%)40/71 (56.3%)
Mid-Urethral Sling0/69 (0%)8/69 (11.6%)41/69 (59.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders0/711/69
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/711/69
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations0/711/69
ObesityMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/711/69
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/711/69
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/711/69
Spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/711/69
Ischaemic strokeNervous system disorders0/711/69
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/711/69
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders1/710/69
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 74
Most frequent other events
EventBotox AMid-Urethral Sling
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations24/7126/69
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders3/716/69
Coronavirus infectionInfections and infestations4/710/69
Residual urine volumeInvestigations3/710/69
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/712/69
Medical device site erosionGeneral disorders0/712/69
Suprapubic painGeneral disorders0/712/69
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/712/69
Ear infectionInfections and infestations0/712/69
Vulvovaginal mycotic infectionInfections and infestations0/712/69

Baseline characteristics

Baseline analysis is limited to those participants that were randomized, received treatment, and provided at least one post-baseline measurement.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Botox AMid-Urethral SlingTotal
Mean59.1 ± 11.459 ± 11.759 ± 11.5
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Botox AMid-Urethral SlingTotal
Female7166137
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Botox AMid-Urethral SlingTotal
Asian202
Black/African American101020
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander112
Other314
White5554109
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Botox AMid-Urethral SlingTotal
Hispanic/Latina15621
Not Hispanic/Not Latina5659115
Unknown/Not Reported011
Menopausal Status, Customized
Menopausal Status, Customized(Participants)Botox AMid-Urethral SlingTotal
Not sure8311
Post-menopausal5649105
Pre-menopausal71421
Education
Education(Participants)Botox AMid-Urethral SlingTotal
4-Year College Degree211132
Associate College Degree171330
Graduate Degree8816
High School/GED192948
Less than High School325
Unknown/Not Reported336
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Birmingham, Alabama 35249, United States
  • University of California at San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92037-0974, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente
    San Diego, California 92110, United States
  • Duke University, Duke Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
    Durham, North Carolina 27707, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Magee-Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Brown/ Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Center for Women's Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Harvie HS, Sung VW, Neuwahl SJ, Honeycutt AA, Meyer I, Chermansky CJ, Menefee S, Hendrickson WK, Dunivan GC, Mazloomdoost D, Bass SJ, Gantz MG; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Cost-effectiveness of behavioral and pelvic floor muscle therapy combined with midurethral sling surgery vs surgery alone among women with mixed urinary incontinence: results of the Effects of Surgical Treatment Enhanced With Exercise for Mixed Urinary Incontinence randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;225(6):651.e1-651.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.099. Epub 2021 Jul 6. PubMed 34242627 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 12, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 8, 2024
  • Informed consent form · Mar 15, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04171531
Lead sponsor
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Duke University, University of Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh, University of California, San Diego, Kaiser Permanente, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, RTI International
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 21, 2019
Start date
Jun 8, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 12, 2024
Completion
Feb 12, 2024
Results posted
Mar 20, 2025
Last update
Jun 3, 2025

Study contacts

Heidi S Harvey, MD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania
Marie Gantz, PhD
principal investigator · RTI International

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion