CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01051960Updated Nov 2, 2020Results posted

Exercise Induced Pulmonary Hypertension in Systemic Sclerosis and Treatment With Ambrisentan

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ambrisentan in Systemic Sclerosis, Shortness of Breath and Pulmonary Hypertension, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-02.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2009, registered Jan 2010).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical characteristics and hemodynamic profiles that predict exercise induced pulmonary hypertension in 15 patients with systemic sclerosis. The study also aims to determine the effectiveness of Ambrisentan for subjects with exercise induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) with scleroderma

Read the detailed description

The current literature addresses therapies for patients with resting PAH only, diagnosed by right heart catheterization. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) also recognizes and defines exercise induced pulmonary arterial hypertension (ex-PAH), which may precede the development of resting PAH. The natural progression of PAH, especially during exercise, has not been well delineated. An exercise hemodynamic study previously showed that in normal healthy subjects the mean pulmonary pressure does not exceed 30mmHg even at maximal cardiac outputs. A prior study evaluated exercise Doppler echocardiography systemic sclerosis patients with normal resting echocardiograms, finding an abnormal response which was defined as an estimated right ventricular systolic pressure greater than 40 mmHg. In the same study, 6.6% of the patients progressed to resting PAH over the followup period of 12 months. Limited data is available regarding the prevalence of ex-PAH in systemic sclerosis using right heart catheterization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Sclerosis
  • Shortness of Breath
  • Pulmonary Hypertension

Keywords

  • Systemic Sclerosis
  • connective tissue disease
  • Shortness of breath
  • Pulmonary Hypertension
03

In context

Hypertension, Pulmonary

1,105 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension, Pulmonary; 234 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 35 across 649 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension, Pulmonary.

Browse Hypertension, Pulmonary studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Systemic Sclerosis diagnosed by the American College of Rheumatology consensus statement including any of the following:

    • Limited
    • Diffuse
    • Sine Scleroderma
  2. Patients must be willing and able to undergo right heart catheterization with lower extremity cycle ergometry
  3. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 30mmHg with exercise; PCWP ≤ 15mmHg on RHC at rest
  4. Men and women, ages 18 years of age or older
  5. Standard adjunctive medications will be allowed concurrently in this study at the discretion of the treating pulmonologist and rheumatologist, including digoxin, diuretics, anticoagulants (e.g. warfarin), stable immunosuppression or other anti-fibrotic therapy for at least one month prior to enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Resting PAH (mPAP > 25mmHg) on right heart catheterization
  2. Other known causes of PAH including prior venous thromboembolism, HIV infection, chronic liver disease with portal hypertension, left ventricular systolic dysfunction (e.g. LVEF \< 40%), and congenital causes of PAH
  3. Severe hepatic disease precluding the use of ambrisentan (AST/ALT ≥3x ULN).
  4. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  5. Concurrent therapy with a prostanoid or prostanoid analogue, PDE5 inhibitors, or enrolled in another active clinical study.
  6. Use of any prostacyclin or endothelial receptor antagonist (ERA) within 30 days before study entry.
  7. Bed or wheel chair bound or a baseline 6-Minute Walk distance (6MWD) less than 150 meters.
  8. Childbearing capable women who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period.
  9. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification: Class IV
  10. Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine >2.5mg/dL).
  11. Uncontrolled sleep apnea.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ambrisentan

    ambrisentan dosed at either 5mg or 10mg orally once per day

    Drug: Ambrisentan

Interventions

  • DrugAmbrisentan

    Ambrisentan 5mg or 10mg once daily

    Also known as: Letairis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Exercise Pulmonary Hemodynamics From Baseline to Week 24

    We defined ePH (exercise PH) as an mPAP of 30 mmHg, PCWP of 18 mm Hg, and a transpulmonary gradient (TPG) of 15 mm Hg, where TPG equals mPAP minus PCWP. We defined ePVH (exercise pulmonary venous hypertension) as an mPAP of 30 mm Hg, PCWP of 18 mm Hg, and a TPG of 15 mm Hg. We defined eoPH (exercise out of proportion) as an mPAP of 30 mm Hg, PCWP of 18 mm Hg, and a TPG of 15 mm Hg (4). Our hypothesis was that SSc patients with normal exercise physiology and ePVH have a different patho-physiology compared to patients with pulmonary vascular disease (ePH and eoPH).

    Time frame: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Distance Walked in Six Minutes From Baseline to 24 Week

    ATS guideline based assessment with known minimally clinically important difference

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  2. Quality of Life (QOL) Based on SF36 and HAQ-DI

    Number of participants exceeding minimally important difference estimates on changes in quality of life as assessed by SF-36 (short form 36) quality of life index with mental and physical component scores, or by HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire disability index) limitations that may be related to musculoskeletal limitations

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  3. HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index)

    Assessing limitations that may be related to musculoskeletal limitations, the HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a participant has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items in which level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The 8 domain scores are averaged into a total HAQ-DI score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled).

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  4. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire

    To assess overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in patients with underlying lung disease, the SGRQ is a health-related quality of life questionnaire divided into 3 components : symptoms, activity and impact. The total score (summed weights) can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Nov 2, 2020

Participant flow

15 participants were screened, and 12 were eligible and enrolled in the study

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAmbrisentan
Started12
Completed11
Not completed1
Withdrew: Adverse event1

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Exercise Pulmonary Hemodynamics From Baseline to Week 24

We defined ePH (exercise PH) as an mPAP of 30 mmHg, PCWP of 18 mm Hg, and a transpulmonary gradient (TPG) of 15 mm Hg, where TPG equals mPAP minus PCWP. We defined ePVH (exercise pulmonary venous hypertension) as an mPAP of 30 mm Hg, PCWP of 18 mm Hg, and a TPG of 15 mm Hg. We defined eoPH (exercise out of proportion) as an mPAP of 30 mm Hg, PCWP of 18 mm Hg, and a TPG of 15 mm Hg (4). Our hypothesis was that SSc patients with normal exercise physiology and ePVH have a different patho-physiology compared to patients with pulmonary vascular disease (ePH and eoPH).

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Exercise Pulmonary Hemodynamics From Baseline to Week 24
mmHgAmbrisentan
Change in Exercise Pulmonary Hemodynamics From Baseline to Week 2437.4 ± 8.3
Statistical analysis
  • Ambrisentan · t-test, 2 sided · p = .0008 (significant at p\<0.05) · Mean difference (final values): -93.0
SecondaryChange in Distance Walked in Six Minutes From Baseline to 24 Week

ATS guideline based assessment with known minimally clinically important difference

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Change in Distance Walked in Six Minutes From Baseline to 24 Week
metersAmbrisentan
Change in Distance Walked in Six Minutes From Baseline to 24 Week44.5 ± 10.3
Statistical analysis
  • Ambrisentan · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.00007 · Mean difference (final values): 44.5
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) Based on SF36 and HAQ-DI

Number of participants exceeding minimally important difference estimates on changes in quality of life as assessed by SF-36 (short form 36) quality of life index with mental and physical component scores, or by HAQ-DI (health assessment questionnaire disability index) limitations that may be related to musculoskeletal limitations

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Quality of Life (QOL) Based on SF36 and HAQ-DI
ParticipantsAmbrisentan
Quality of Life (QOL) Based on SF36 and HAQ-DI0
SecondaryHAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index)

Assessing limitations that may be related to musculoskeletal limitations, the HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a participant has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items in which level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The 8 domain scores are averaged into a total HAQ-DI score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled).

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index)
score on a scaleAmbrisentan
HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index)1.12 ± 0.02
SecondarySt. George's Respiratory Questionnaire

To assess overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in patients with underlying lung disease, the SGRQ is a health-related quality of life questionnaire divided into 3 components : symptoms, activity and impact. The total score (summed weights) can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
score on a scaleAmbrisentan
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire13.2 ± 11.7

Adverse events

Collected over 24 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ambrisentan0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)12/12 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAmbrisentan
edemaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/12
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventAmbrisentan
Nasal CongestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/12
EdemaBlood and lymphatic system disorders5/12
Upper respiratory symptomsRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/12
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/12
Joint and body painGeneral disorders1/12
Elevated liver function testsHepatobiliary disorders1/12
HeadacheGeneral disorders1/12
Tinea CorporisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/12
Allergic reactionImmune system disorders1/12
Bronchoalveolar carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Ambrisentan
Mean47.6 ± 19.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ambrisentan
Female11
Male1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Ambrisentan
United States12
08

Study locations

1 site
  • David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Saggar R, Khanna D, Shapiro S, Furst DE, Maranian P, Clements P, Abtin F, Dua S, Belperio J, Saggar R. Brief report: effect of ambrisentan treatment on exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis: a prospective single-center, open-label pilot study. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Dec;64(12):4072-7. doi: 10.1002/art.34614. PubMed 22777623 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01051960
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
Gilead Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 20, 2010
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Jun 2010
Completion
Jan 2011
Results posted
Nov 2, 2020
Last update
Nov 2, 2020

Study contacts

Rajeev Saggar, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles
Dinesh Khanna, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion