ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00830193Updated Jan 27, 2009

N-Acetylcysteine in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of N-acetylcysteine and D5W Placebo in Contrast Induced Nephropathy and Critically Ill, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-01-27.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Critically ill patients frequently undergo contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) to establish diagnoses and direct management. Contrast agents can disturb kidney function and result in kidney dysfunction. The investigators investigated the effects of high dose N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or placebo, in addition to hydration, in preventing kidney dysfunction following contrast enhanced CT) in critically ill adults in the intensive care units of two teaching hospitals.

Read the detailed description

Potential participants were identified by staff intensivists or resident physicians following admission to participating ICUs. We included critically ill adult patients at least 18 years of age who consented to participate in the trial, had central venous access and a foley catheter, required a contrast-enhanced CT of any organ system(s), and were considered 'at risk' for the development of CIN. We defined 'at risk' to include patients with at least one of the following at the time of randomization (i) a serum creatinine of > 106 µmol/L and or urea > 6 mmol/L, (ii) urine output of \< 0.5 cc/kg over > 4 hrs or (iii) an increase in serum creatinine of > 50 µmol/L in \< 24 hours. We stratified based on the presence or absence of diabetes defined as a history of treatment with oral hypoglycemics or insulin.

We excluded patients with a (i) CK > 5,000 or the presence of myoglobinuria, (ii) a known allergy or hypersensitivity reaction to radiographic contrast dye or NAC, (iii) serious illness with imminent threat of dying (low likelihood of survival within 48-hours) or poor prognosis, (iv) pregnancy, (v) patients with cardiogenic shock (NYHA class 3 or 4 symptoms), (vi) known or suspected nephritic, nephrotic or pulmonary-renal syndromes, (vii) a post renal etiology of renal impairment, (viii) previous renal transplant, (ix) known solitary kidney, (x) serum creatinine > 200 µmol/L or (xi) recent exposure to radiographic contrast within 14 days of randomization.

The primary outcome for the study was the development of CIN defined as a rise in serum creatinine of > 50 µmol/L from the time of randomization up to day 5 following contrast exposure.

Secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital length of stay, ICU and hospital mortality and the requirement for renal replacement therapy. We recorded compliance with assigned treatment and assessed for development of severe unexpected adverse events defined as hypotension, bronchospasm and anaphylactic reactions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Contrast Induced Nephropathy
  • Critically Ill

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • N-acetylcysteine
  • prevention
  • contrast-induced nephropathy
  • critically ill adults
03

In context

Critical Illness

1,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 465 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 90 across 1,003 interventional studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 444 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The investigators included critically ill adult patients at least 18 years of age who consented to participate in the trial, had central venous access and a foley catheter, required a contrast-enhanced CT of any organ system(s), and were considered 'at risk' for the development of CIN.
  • The investigators defined 'at risk' to include patients with at least one of the following at the time of randomization (i) a serum creatinine of > 106 µmol/L and or urea > 6 mmol/L, (ii) urine output of \< 0.5 cc/kg over > 4 hrs or (iii) an increase in serum creatinine of > 50 µmol/L in \< 24 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The investigators excluded patients with a

    • CK > 5,000 or the presence of myoglobinuria
    • a known allergy or hypersensitivity reaction to radiographic contrast dye or NAC
    • serious illness with imminent threat of dying (low likelihood of survival within 48-hours) or poor prognosis
    • pregnancy
    • patients with cardiogenic shock (NYHA class 3 or 4 symptoms)
    • known or suspected nephritic, nephrotic or pulmonary-renal syndromes
    • a post renal etiology of renal impairment
    • previous renal transplant
    • known solitary kidney
    • serum creatinine > 200 µmol/L or (xi) recent exposure to radiographic contrast within 14 days of randomization.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    N-acetylcysteine

    Intravenous fluid administration was administered as soon as possible following randomization (not to exceed 12 hours prior to anticipated contrast exposure) and continued for 12 hours post CT. Patients randomized to the experimental arm received intravenous normal saline plus NAC 10 grams IV (5 g pre and 2.5 g at 6 and 12 hours post-exposure) for a total of 3 doses.

    Drug: N-acetylcysteine

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Intravenous fluid administration was administered as soon as possible following randomization (not to exceed 12 hours prior to anticipated contrast exposure) and continued for 12 hours post CT. Medication packages were prepared and dispensed by pharmacy and included three premixed and prepackaged minibags containing either 5 g in 100 cc D5W (pre-CT dose) or 2.5 g in 50 cc D5W (post-CT doses). The placebo was D5W and was colour and consistency matched by pharmacy. Patients randomized to placebo received intravenous normal saline plus 3 doses of placebo.

    Drug: D5W Placebo

Interventions

  • Medication packages were prepared and dispensed by pharmacy and included three premixed and prepackaged minibags containing either 5 g of NAC or placebo in 100 cc D5W (pre-CT dose) or 2.5 g of NAC or placebo in 50 cc D5W (post-CT doses).

    Also known as: Mucomyst

  • DrugD5W Placebo

    Medication packages were prepared and dispensed by pharmacy and included three premixed and prepackaged minibags containing either 5 g of NAC or placebo (D5W) in 100 cc D5W (pre-CT dose) or 2.5 g NAC or placebo in 50 cc D5W (post-CT doses).

    Also known as: D5W

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome for the study was the development of CIN defined as a rise in serum creatinine of > 50 µmol/L from the time of randomization up to day 5 following contrast exposure.

    Time frame: 5 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. ICU length of stay

    Time frame: ICU stay

  2. Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: Hospital stay

  3. ICU mortality

    Time frame: ICU stay

  4. Hospital Mortality

    Time frame: Hospital stay

  5. Requirement for Renal Replacement Therapy

    Time frame: ICU

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital
    London, Ontario N6A 4G5, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital Campus
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2002, a primary completion of May 2005 and a completion of May 2005. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 13, 2009
First posted
Jan 27, 2009
Start
Aug 2002
Primary completionActual
May 2005
CompletionActual
May 2005
Last update
Jan 27, 2009
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00830193
Collaborators
Martin, Claudio M., M.D., Fran Priestap
First posted
Jan 27, 2009
Start date
Aug 2002
Primary completion
May 2005
Completion
May 2005
Last update
Jan 27, 2009

Study contacts

Claudio M Martin, MD, FRCPC, MSc
study director · London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Acetylcysteine

Start the discussion