A Phase 4 interventional study of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction (BLVR) in Emphysema and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by LudwLudwig Boltzmann Institute for COPD and Respiratory Epidemiology. Status unknown at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-08-08.
Sponsored by LudwLudwig Boltzmann Institute for COPD and Respiratory Epidemiology · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of a new treatment algorithm for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) in patients with emphysema based on the information of emphysema heterogeneity, destruction score, and fissure analysis.
Emphysema is a progressive pulmonary disease characterized by abnormal and permanent enlargement of air spaces distal to terminal bronchioles accompanied by the destruction of pulmonary parenchyma. Treatment includes inhaled bronchodilator therapy, rehabilitation and/or oxygen treatment. In addition to the above, patients with severe emphysema may benefit from surgical lung volume reduction and/or lung transplantation. The rationale for lung volume reduction surgery is that reducing lung size would restore elastic recoil of the lung and improve chest wall and diaphragm mechanics. It has previously been shown that particularly patients with heterogeneous emphysema seem to benefit most from surgical lung volume reduction.
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) has recently been introduced as a less invasive potential alternative to surgical lung volume reduction. BLVR attempts to achieve the effects of surgery, by placing bronchial prostheses using a fibreoptic bronchoscope to selectively occlude the airways supplying the most affected hyperinflated regions of the emphysematous lung, while permitting exhaled gas to escape. This attempts to achieve segmental or lobar volume reduction, simulating the effects of surgical LVR. Recent trials of BLVR using endobronchial one-way valves demonstrated significant improvements in lung function parameters, exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with end-stage emphysema. The treatment algorithm for valve implantations to achieve BLVR, however, varied considerably in these reports as well as clinical and functional response rates. Subset analysis of these studies revealed that particularly, but not exclusively, patients with radiological signs of lung volume reduction treated unilaterally showed significant clinical improvements, whereas most patients without signs of lung volume reduction did not experience these benefits. The present study investigates the response to BLVR based on a new treatment algorithm including lung function criteria and computed tomography of the thorax.
3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.
Browse Lung Diseases studies →LudwLudwig Boltzmann Institute for COPD and Respiratory Epidemiology is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Procedure under general anesthesia.
Also known as: ZephyrTM Endobronchial Valve (EBV) (Emphasys Medical, Inc., Redwood City, CA)
Mean % change in lung function (FEV1)
Time frame: 90 days post index bronchoscopic lung volume reduction
Mean % change in target lobe Residual Volume and Total Lung Capacity. Mean absolute change in dyspnea (mMRC-Score), Quality of life using St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and SF-36.
Time frame: 90 days post-index bronchoscopic lung volume reduction
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
LudwLudwig Boltzmann Institute for COPD and Respiratory Epidemiology