CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00523978Stop-AFUpdated Oct 16, 2018Results posted

A Clinical Study of the Arctic Front Cryoablation Balloon for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

A Phase 3 interventional study of Arctic Front® Cryoablation Catheter and Flecainide or Sotalol or Propafenone in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure. Completed at 26 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-16.

Sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
245
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study (STOP AF) is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, pivotal clinical investigation conducted at 26 investigational sites in the United States and Canada. Subjects with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) referred for ablative intervention after efficacy failure of one or more Study Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Drugs (flecainide, propafenone or sotalol) were randomized 2:1 to cryoablation intervention (Experimental Subjects, ES) or to a Study AF Drug (Control Subjects, CS). Subjects were followed for 12 months with scheduled and symptom-driven assessments to detect recurrent atrial fibrillation by means of periodic electrocardiograms, weekly scheduled trans-telephonic monitoring, patient-initiated trans-telephonic monitoring, and 24-hour Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months. The first 90 days after study therapy was initiated was considered a blanked period for all subjects.

Read the detailed description

STOP AF (PS-023) is a randomized, controlled study of subjects 18 to 75 years old who had been referred for ablative intervention after failing one or two (but not all three) anti-arrhythmic drugs used in the treatment of AF (flecainide, propafenone and sotalol). Study subjects were randomized into two arms: the cryoablation (treatment) arm and the membrane-active antiarrhythmic drug (control) arm. A 90- day blanked follow-up period, including reablation and medication adjustments was applied in both arms to optimize therapies. All subjects underwent follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, weekly transtelephonic monitoring, 24-hour Holter monitoring and CT/MRI of the pulmonary veins(at 6 and 12 months) during the trial period. Control subjects who were confirmed to be chronic treatment failures were permitted to crossover to cryoablation in this trial.

Acute procedural success was defined for subjects that underwent cryoablation and demonstrated electrical isolation in ≥ 3 Pulmonary Veins (PVs) at the conclusion of the first protocol-defined cryoablation procedure using the Arctic Front® Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System.

The primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as having acute procedural success and freedom from chronic treatment failure (CTF) for experimental subjects, and freedom from CTF for control subjects. Freedom from (CTF) was defined for both groups as the occurrence of detectable AF during a non-blanked follow-up period, or an AF Intervention, or the use of a non-study AF drug at any time.

The co-primary safety outcome measures were Cryoablation Procedure Events (CPEs) in cryoablated subjects and Major Atrial Fibrillation Events (MAFEs) in both groups. CPEs were device- or procedure-related serious adverse events.

Other safety assessments were made during the course of the STOP AF trial specific to pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) and phrenic nerve injury.

02

Conditions studied

  • Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Atrial Fibrillation
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 245 is above the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure is the lead sponsor of 239 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Documented Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF): PAF diagnosis, 2 episodes of PAF within the last 2 months, at least 1 episode of PAF must be documented
  • Age 18-75
  • Documented Effectiveness Failure of one (1) AF drug
  • Willing to be randomized to either group and do full 12 month follow-up
  • Able to follow standardized AF drug protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any cardioversion within 3 months or more than 2 within 2 years
  • Amiodarone within 6 months
  • LA size > 5.0cm
  • Previous LA ablation/surgery, structural heart disease, heart failure class III or IV
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Mitral prosthesis
  • Unstable angina, uncontrolled hyperthyroidism
  • Stroke or TIA within 6 months, MI within 2 months, cardiac surgery within 3 months
  • Thrombocytosis, thrombocytopenia
  • Any condition contraindicating chronic anticoagulation
  • EF \<40%
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy \<1year
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
245 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    Experimental subjects received cryoablation intended to isolate the pulmonary veins and ablate arrhythmia foci. If necessary, experimental subjects were allowed a previously failed Study Atrial Fibrillation Drug (AF Drug).

    Device: Arctic Front® Cryoablation Catheter

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Control Subjects were treated with an AF Drug (flecainide, propafenone, or sotalol) that they had not previously failed.

    Drug: Flecainide or Sotalol or Propafenone

Interventions

  • DeviceArctic Front® Cryoablation Catheter

    Experimental Subjects received cryoablation intended to isolate the pulmonary veins and ablate arrhythmia foci with the cryoablation catheter system.

    Also known as: Arctic Front® Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System, Artic Front®

  • DrugFlecainide or Sotalol or Propafenone

    Flecainide 200 mg / day Propafenone 450 mg / day Propafenone-SR 650 mg / day Sotalol 240 mg / day

    Also known as: Tambocor, Sotalol, Propafenone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute Procedural Success (APS)

    Acute Procedural Success was defined as a demonstration of electrical isolation in ≥ 3 Pulmonary Veins (PVs) at the conclusion of the first protocol-defined cryoablation procedure. APS was decided at the end of the procedure the mean time was calculated for the time frame.

    Time frame: 371.4 Minutes (Average)

  2. Freedom From Chronic Treatment Failure (CTF)

    Subjects that did not have or were free of CTF. CTF was defined as the occurence of an Atrial Fibrillation (AF) intervention, use of non-study AF drug therapy, or the occurence of detectable AF which is is defined as an episode of AF, documented in a tracing, and lasting more than 30 seconds, occurring during a Non Blanked Follow-up Period.

    Time frame: 12 month follow up period

  3. Treatment Success

    Treatment Success was defined as Acute Procedure Success (APS) and freedom from Chronic Treatment Failure (CTF) for Experimental Subjects, and freedom from CTF for Control Subjects. Under this pre-specified definition of Treatment Success, Experimental Subjects must have had APS and remained free of CTF during the 12-month follow-up duration, while Control Subjects must have remained free of CTF during the 12-month follow-up duration.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Freedom From Major Atrial Fibrillation Events (MAFEs)

    Subjects that did not have or were free of MAFEs. MAFEs were serious adverse events categorized as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for AF recurrence/ablation, flutter ablation, embolic events, heart failure, hemorrhage or anti-arrhythmic drug treatment.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  5. Cryoablation Procedure Events (CPEs)

    Subjects that had CPEs. CPEs were device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE) categorized as access site complications, cardiac damage, pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, embolic complications, arrhythmias, unresolved phrenic nerve palsy and death.

    Time frame: To end of ablation procedure

07

Results

Posted Aug 28, 2012

Participant flow

Investigators at 26 sites in the United States and Canada, enrolled and randomized a total of 245 study subjects, during the 21 months trial period, between 10 October 2006 and 30 June 2008.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs Only
Started17187
Completed16279
Not completed98
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject37
Withdrew: Screen failures51
Withdrew: Death10

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcute Procedural Success (APS)

Acute Procedural Success was defined as a demonstration of electrical isolation in ≥ 3 Pulmonary Veins (PVs) at the conclusion of the first protocol-defined cryoablation procedure. APS was decided at the end of the procedure the mean time was calculated for the time frame.

Time frame:
371.4 Minutes (Average)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Acute Procedural Success (APS)
participantsCryoablation
Acute Procedural Success (APS)160
PrimaryFreedom From Chronic Treatment Failure (CTF)

Subjects that did not have or were free of CTF. CTF was defined as the occurence of an Atrial Fibrillation (AF) intervention, use of non-study AF drug therapy, or the occurence of detectable AF which is is defined as an episode of AF, documented in a tracing, and lasting more than 30 seconds, occurring during a Non Blanked Follow-up Period.

Time frame:
12 month follow up period
Reported as:
Number · participants
Freedom From Chronic Treatment Failure (CTF)
participantsCryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs Only
Freedom From Chronic Treatment Failure (CTF)1176
PrimaryTreatment Success

Treatment Success was defined as Acute Procedure Success (APS) and freedom from Chronic Treatment Failure (CTF) for Experimental Subjects, and freedom from CTF for Control Subjects. Under this pre-specified definition of Treatment Success, Experimental Subjects must have had APS and remained free of CTF during the 12-month follow-up duration, while Control Subjects must have remained free of CTF during the 12-month follow-up duration.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Treatment Success
participantsCryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs Only
Treatment Success114 (62.3 to 76.9)6 (2.7 to 15.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Cryoablation vs Standard Treatment With Drugs Only · Fisher Exact · p = <0.0001
PrimaryFreedom From Major Atrial Fibrillation Events (MAFEs)

Subjects that did not have or were free of MAFEs. MAFEs were serious adverse events categorized as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for AF recurrence/ablation, flutter ablation, embolic events, heart failure, hemorrhage or anti-arrhythmic drug treatment.

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Freedom From Major Atrial Fibrillation Events (MAFEs)
participantsCryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs Only
Freedom From Major Atrial Fibrillation Events (MAFEs)15875
Statistical analysis
  • Cryoablation vs Standard Treatment With Drugs Only · t-test, 1 sided · p = <0.001
PrimaryCryoablation Procedure Events (CPEs)

Subjects that had CPEs. CPEs were device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE) categorized as access site complications, cardiac damage, pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, embolic complications, arrhythmias, unresolved phrenic nerve palsy and death.

Time frame:
To end of ablation procedure
Reported as:
Number · participants
Cryoablation Procedure Events (CPEs)
participantsCryoablation
Cryoablation Procedure Events (CPEs)5
Statistical analysis
  • Cryoablation · Fisher Exact · p = <0.001

Adverse events

Collected over All pharmacologic and ablative treatments and arrhythmic disease adverse events on study subjects were followed through 12 months of follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cryoablation—20/163 (12.3%)19/163 (11.7%)
Standard Treatment With Drugs Only—12/82 (14.6%)16/65 (24.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 49
Most frequent serious events
EventCryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs Only
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/1630/82
Worsening AFCardiac disorders2/1631/82
A fib persistent-drug loadCardiac disorders0/1631/82
Acute renal failure requiring dialysisRenal and urinary disorders0/1631/82
Altered mental status S/P cardiac arrestPsychiatric disorders0/1631/82
AppendicitisGastrointestinal disorders0/1631/82
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders0/1631/82
Atrial flutter-recurrentCardiac disorders0/1631/82
Cardiac tamponadeCardiac disorders0/1631/82
Cardiopulmonary arrest with resuscitationCardiac disorders0/1631/82
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent other events
EventCryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs Only
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders14/16316/65
HeadacheNervous system disorders17/16311/65
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders18/16310/65
FatigueGeneral disorders12/1639/65
DizzinessNervous system disorders15/1639/65
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders9/1639/65
Chest DiscomfortGeneral disorders4/1638/65
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders19/1637/65
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/1637/65
HypotensionVascular disorders3/1635/65

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs OnlyTotal
Mean56.7 ± 0.7356.4 ± 1.0456.6 ± 0.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs OnlyTotal
Female381856
Male12564189
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CryoablationStandard Treatment With Drugs OnlyTotal
United States12363186
Canada401959
08

Study locations

26 sites
  • University of Alabama
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0007, United States
  • Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Cedar Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • UC Davis Medical Center
    Sacramento, California 98517, United States
  • Stanford Hospital
    Stanford, California 94305-5233, United States
  • Colorado Cardiac Alliance -- Memorial Hospital
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • Mayo Clinic- Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224, United States
  • BayHeart Group -- St-Joseph's Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33607, United States
  • Emery Crawford Long Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • Piedmont Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • Iowa Heart Center
    Des Moines, Iowa 50314, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55902, United States
  • New Mexico Heart Institute
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania Health
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4283, United States
  • Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
    Dallas, Texas 75226, United States
  • Inova Research Center
    Falls Church, Virginia 22042, United States
  • Sentara CV Research Institute
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Medical College of Virginia
    Richmond, Virginia 23219, United States
  • Cardiology Associates of Green Bay
    Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301-3596, United States
  • Arrhythmia Center of Southern WI
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53215, United States
  • London Medical Health Sciences
    London, Ontario N6A5A5, Canada
  • Montreal Heart Institute
    Montreal, Quebec H1T 1C8, Canada
  • Laval Hospital
    Ste-Foy, Quebec G1V 4G5, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, Irwin JM, Champagne J, Guerra PG, Dubuc M, Reddy V, Nelson L, Holcomb RG, Lehmann JW, Ruskin JN; STOP AF Cryoablation Investigators. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 23;61(16):1713-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.064. Epub 2013 Mar 21. PubMed 23500312 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00523978
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Collaborators
Medtronic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 3, 2007
Start date
Oct 2006
Primary completion
Aug 2010
Completion
Jul 2011
Results posted
Aug 28, 2012
Last update
Oct 16, 2018

Study contacts

Douglas L. Packer, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion