CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT00463853STARUpdated Jun 11, 2014

Stem Cell Therapy as Adjunct to Revascularization

A Phase 1 interventional study of Autologous stem cell therapy and CABG in Coronary Arteriosclerosis, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Myocardial Revascularization, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-11.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
inability to recruit due to administrative difficulties at the site
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether it is safe to receive an injection of your own bone marrow adult stem cells (autologous BM-MNC) to your heart wall during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

Read the detailed description

The experimental design will be a Phase I safety trial in which all subjects from the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System presenting with CAD and associated depressed LV function requiring myocardial surgical revascularization will be eligible for enrollment. Patients enrolled in the study will receive autologous BM-MNC as adjunct to CABG. The primary outcome measure will be safety as measured by the incidence of postoperative Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Adverse Events (AE). The secondary outcome measures will be LV function, myocardial perfusion, and clinical improvement. The trial will have one experiment with one patient group. Group 1 (n=15) will follow standard Phase I dose escalation curve on a magnitude of 0.5 log increase after every third patient. Dose escalation will continue until a dosage of 1 x108 cells/pt is reached or maximum tolerated dose equivalent (MTDE) is identified. Cellular therapeutic products such as BM-MNCS do not possess the same pharmacologic profile as small molecule drugs, and thus, do not possess predictable metabolic activity and metabolite production, as do traditional pharmaceuticals. This can make the identity of a maximum tolerated dose somewhat difficult. We are therefore using the term MTDE instead of MTD to indicate a cell dosage that is consistent with clinical morbidity beyond obvious clinical benefit. The characteristics identifying a MTDE could be any adverse event felt to be related to the actual cell dosage or its escalation. Although unlikely, MTDE events could include microembolic phenomena, hematoma at the injection site, obvious myocardial congestion or ischemia at the injection site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Arteriosclerosis
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
  • Myocardial Revascularization

Keywords

  • Bone Marrow Cells
  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
  • Phase I Study
  • Stem Cells
03

In context

Arteriosclerosis

317 studies on the registry are indexed under Arteriosclerosis; 33 are open to participants now.

Browse Arteriosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Veteran
  • Age 18 or older
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Have documented CAD and depressed LV function (EF \<40%) that is felt to be appropriately treated with surgical revascularization by the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Cardiothoracic Surgery team and in accordance with the published 2004 ACC/AHA Guideline Update for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery; specifically, in accordance with the described indication for CABG in patients with Poor LV Function (see below).

Class I

  1. CABG should be performed in patients with poor LV function who have significant left main coronary artery stenosis. (Level of Evidence: B)
  2. CABG should be performed in patients with poor LV function who have left main equivalent:

    significant (greater than or equal to 70%) stenosis of the proximal LAD and proximal left circumflex artery. (Level of Evidence: B)

  3. CABG should be performed in patients with poor LV function who have proximal LAD stenosis with 2- or 3-vessel disease. (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIa

CABG may be performed in patients with poor LV function with significant viable noncontracting, revascularizable myocardium and without any of the above anatomic patterns. (Level of Evidence: B)

  • NHYA/CCA Class I or higher
  • Abnormal cardiac wall segment on preoperative data
  • Acutely stable myocardium without evidence of cardiogenic shock or evolving myocardial infarction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • EF 40%
  • CAD not amenable to CABG
  • ACC/AHA Poor LV Function Class III - CABG should not be performed in patients with poor LV function without evidence of intermittent ischemia and without evidence of significant revascularizable viable myocardium. (Level of Evidence: B) Evidence of intermittent ischemia is defined clinically by Cardiovascular Disease Classification (see chart above). Objectively, this can be demonstrated by various modalities that can demonstrate ischemic myocardium. Such modalities include SCA, Echo, CMRI, and radionucleotide imaging.
  • Patients undergoing cardiac re-operation
  • Patients with operable valvular disease
  • Patients with preexisting malignant arrhythmia
  • Patients with preexisting systemic malignancy
  • Patients with a contraindication to MRI
  • Presence of ongoing local or systemic infection
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • Emergency operation
  • Preoperative cardiogenic shock or evolving myocardial infarction
  • ASA Class V or contraindication to general anesthesia
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoner
  • Active history of alcohol or substance abuse
  • Active psychiatric history leading to potential for poor study participation and follow-up
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1

    direct intramyocardial injection of cells as adjunct to CABG

    Procedure: Autologous stem cell therapy · Procedure: CABG · Radiation: CMRI

Interventions

  • ProcedureAutologous stem cell therapy
  • ProcedureCABG
  • RadiationCMRI
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome measure will be safety as measured by the incidence of postoperative serious adverse events (SAE) and adverse events (AE).

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ejection fraction measured by CMRI

    Time frame: at baseline, 3 & 6 months

  2. Echo

    Time frame: at baseline, intervention, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year

  3. Myocardial perfusion measured by gadolinium CMRI

    Time frame: at baseline, 3 & 6 months

  4. Exercise tolerance testing

    Time frame: at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84148, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00463853
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Collaborators
University of Utah
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 20, 2007
Start date
Aug 2007
Primary completion
Jul 2009
Completion
Oct 2009
Last update
Jun 11, 2014

Study contacts

G. Russell Reiss, MD
study chair · VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion