ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00415545REMOTE-HFUpdated Jun 7, 2013

Educational Program to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes in Adults Living in Rural Areas

A Phase 3 interventional study of Fluid Watchers LITE Educational Intervention and Fluid Watchers PLUS Educational Intervention in Heart Failure, Congestive, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-06-07.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 3, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
614
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Heart failure patients living in rural areas usually do not have adequate access to formal heart failure management programs. This study will compare two versions of an educational intervention aimed at improving self-care management techniques among individuals with heart failure who are living in rural areas.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure is a life-threatening condition in which the heart can no longer pump enough blood to the rest of the body. It is important for individuals with heart failure to closely monitor their symptoms and seek out medical attention when appropriate. Swelling and weight gain are common heart failure symptoms that indicate excess fluid buildup in the body and worsening heart function. Closely monitoring and responding to these symptoms can be a strategic way to prevent heart failure exacerbations. However, many patients ignore symptoms and are reluctant to seek care. Specialized monitoring programs can help heart failure patients to respond more appropriately to their symptoms.

Traditionally, heart failure patients living in rural areas have had limited access to formal monitoring programs. Fluid Watchers is a program designed to help heart failure patients living in rural areas improve self-management of symptoms, specifically excess fluid buildup. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two versions of Fluid Watchers at improving the hospitalization and death rates of individuals with heart failure who live in rural areas.

In this 2-year study, 710 participants will be randomly assigned to either the Fluid Watchers LITE program, the Fluid Watchers PLUS program, or a usual care control group. Individuals in both Fluid Watchers groups will attend a one-on-one educational session that will include heart failure counseling and information on self-monitoring and care-seeking strategies. Participants in the PLUS program will receive additional counseling, audio tapes, and follow-up telephone calls on a biweekly basis. All participants will record self-monitoring adherence and contact with healthcare providers. Outcome measures will be assessed during either clinic or home visits at study entry and Months 3, 12, and 24, and will include number of emergency department visits, number of physician visits, heart failure severity, and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure, Congestive

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Heart Failure
  • Patient Education
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,803 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 614 is above the median of 72 across 3,790 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,164 studies on the registry; 368 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 199 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hospitalized for heart failure in the 6 months prior to study entry
  • Able to read and write English
  • Lives independently

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current participation in a heart failure management program
  • Impaired cognition
  • Serious co-morbidity
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
614 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Fluid Watchers LITE program

    Behavioral: Fluid Watchers LITE Educational Intervention

  • Experimental
    2

    Fluid Watchers PLUS program

    Behavioral: Fluid Watchers PLUS Educational Intervention

  • No intervention
    3

    Usual care control group

Interventions

  • BehavioralFluid Watchers LITE Educational Intervention

    Patients in Fluid Watchers LITE will receive counseling about HF and self-monitoring, and coaching on seeking care. They will receive written material, a diary, a scale and a telephone follow-up to answer any questions they might have about the educational session.

  • BehavioralFluid Watchers PLUS Educational Intervention

    Patients in Fluid Watchers PLUS will receive counseling about HF and self-monitoring, and coaching on seeking care. They will receive written materials, a diary, a scale, an audio tape of the session and telephone followup. Participants in the PLUS program will receive additional counseling, audio tapes, and follow-up telephone calls on a biweekly basis, as compared to participants in the LITE program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospitalization for heart failure and cardiac mortality

    Time frame: Measured at Year 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Heart failure-related emergency department visits (without hospitalization)

    Time frame: Measured at Year 2

  2. Unplanned physician visits

    Time frame: Measured at Year 2

  3. Heart failure severity (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class and brain natriuretic peptide)

    Time frame: Measured at Year 2

  4. Quality of life

    Time frame: Measured at Year 2

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • University of California, Davis
    Davis, California 95817, United States
  • University of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40526, United States
  • Washoe Health Care System
    Reno, Nevada 89523, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Caldwell MA, Peters KJ, Dracup KA. A simplified education program improves knowledge, self-care behavior, and disease severity in heart failure patients in rural settings. Am Heart J. 2005 Nov;150(5):983. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.005. PubMed 16290977 ↗
  • Park LG, Dracup K, Whooley MA, McCulloch C, Lai S, Howie-Esquivel J. Sedentary lifestyle associated with mortality in rural patients with heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Apr;18(4):318-324. doi: 10.1177/1474515118822967. Epub 2019 Jan 21. PubMed 30663898 ↗
  • Howie-Esquivel J, Dracup K, Whooley MA, McCulloch C, Jin C, Moser DK, Clark RA, Pelter MM, Biddle M, Park LG. Rapid 5 lb weight gain is not associated with readmission in patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;6(1):131-137. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12370. Epub 2018 Oct 24. PubMed 30353706 ↗
  • Park LG, Dracup K, Whooley MA, McCulloch C, Jin C, Moser DK, Clark RA, Pelter MM, Biddle M, Howie Esquivel J. Symptom Diary Use and Improved Survival for Patients With Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;10(11):e003874. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003874. PubMed 29158435 ↗
  • Wu JR, Moser DK, DeWalt DA, Rayens MK, Dracup K. Health Literacy Mediates the Relationship Between Age and Health Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jan;9(1):e002250. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002250. PubMed 26721913 ↗
  • Hwang B, Moser DK, Pelter MM, Nesbitt TS, Dracup K. Changes in Depressive Symptoms and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure: Effects of Cognitive-Affective and Somatic Symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2015 Sep;77(7):798-807. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000221. PubMed 26230482 ↗
  • Nesbitt T, Doctorvaladan S, Southard JA, Singh S, Fekete A, Marie K, Moser DK, Pelter MM, Robinson S, Wilson MD, Cooper L, Dracup K. Correlates of quality of life in rural patients with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;7(6):882-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000577. Epub 2014 Aug 21. PubMed 25146960 ↗
  • Dracup K, Moser DK, Pelter MM, Nesbitt TS, Southard J, Paul SM, Robinson S, Cooper LS. Randomized, controlled trial to improve self-care in patients with heart failure living in rural areas. Circulation. 2014 Jul 15;130(3):256-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003542. Epub 2014 May 9. PubMed 24815499 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2007, a primary completion of Jan 2012 and a completion of Jan 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 21, 2006
First posted
Dec 25, 2006
Start
Jan 2007
Primary completionActual
Jan 2012
CompletionActual
Jan 2013
Last update
Jun 7, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 7, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00415545
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 25, 2006
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
Jan 2012
Completion
Jan 2013
Last update
Jun 7, 2013

Study contacts

Kathleen A. Dracup, DNSc
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion