CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06790095PM-003Updated Jul 29, 2026

TRACK-TBI Precision Medicine Part 3 - Option II

A Phase 2 interventional study of Cyclosporine (CsA) and Placebo in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Enrolling by invitation at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-29.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if experimental drug treatment improves recovery after TBI as compared to a control (placebo) group. Changes in recovery will be measured throughout the study. The study drug listed below is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but is being used "off-label" in this study. This means that the drug is not currently approved to treat TBI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
03

In context

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

1,775 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic; 448 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 26 is below the median of 56 across 1,133 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries, Traumatic.

Browse Brain Injuries, Traumatic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults (18-65 years of age, inclusive)
  2. Head injury warranting clinical evaluation with a non-contrast cranial CT based on American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clinical policy for TBI imaging.
  3. Able to receive investigational product within 24 hours of head injury.
  4. Closest, prior to randomization GCS score of 3 to 12 (motor score \< 6)
  5. Evidence of TBI on imaging, confirmed by:

    • Evidence of contusion and/or
    • Evidence of traumatic axonal microvascular injury (TAMVI)
  6. Initial Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) blood level ≥ 1000 pg/mL ≤ 15000 pg/mL determined using a for Research Use Only (RUO) assay(s) or an Investigation Use Only (IUO) assay(s)
  7. Participants able to undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, no contraindications
  8. Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) willing and able to provide informed consent
  9. Participant/LAR able to read, speak, and understand English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Isolated epidural hematoma
  2. Bilaterally fixed dilated pupils in the absence of paralytic medications, or evidence of herniation on cranial CT
  3. Pre-existing conditions including disabling developmental, neurologic, psychiatric, medical disorder that continues to produce functional disability up to the time of injury; or imminent death based on clinical judgement
  4. Order for comfort care placed prior to enrollment
  5. Current enrollment in another interventional study
  6. Currently pregnant or currently breastfeeding or planning on becoming pregnant in the next 6M
  7. Current incarceration or in custody
  8. On psychiatric hold (e.g. codes 5150, 5250)
  9. Ongoing pre-injury therapy with the Investigational Product (IP), currently receiving immunosuppressive therapy, chemotherapy, or any contraindicated medications (see CsA Drug contraindications/caution table in the Pharmacy Manual)
  10. Current or medical history of any allergic reactions and/or anaphylactic reactions towards cyclosporine (CsA) and cremophor (also known as kolliphor®)
  11. Severe polytrauma or previous conditions that would preclude conducting any study activities
  12. Any spinal cord injury of grade A to D on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale
  13. Primary diagnosis at the enrolling facility of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  14. Body Mass Index (BMI) >35
  15. Hemodynamic instability, per participating site physician investigator clinical judgement
  16. Current or medical history of nephrectomy, renal dysfunction, significant renal failure, or high-risk for renal failure, defined as:

    • Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) or estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (\<60 mL/minute/1.73 m2)
    • Major rhabdomyolysis with creatine kinase > 5,000 IU/L
  17. Current or medical history of hepatic disease (e.g., liver laceration at time of injury with Abbreviated Injury Scale for Liver Lacerations > 1); cirrhosis), or serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) value >3 times the upper limit of normal lab value at the screening/baseline visit.
  18. Current or medical history of serious chronic viral or fungal infection.
  19. Current or medical history of active mycobacterial infection or anti-tuberculous treatment.
  20. Medical history of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B surface antigen, or hepatitis C virus antibody.
  21. Any significant disease or disorder (including abnormal laboratory tests) which, in the opinion of the participating site investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the results of the study.
  22. Low likelihood of follow up or study compliance, or any other reason, in the opinion of the participating site investigator, the participants should not participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
26 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cyclosporine (CsA)

    Intravenous (IV) injection, 2.5 mg/kg loading dose given over 2 hours, followed by a 3-day (72-hour) constant IV infusion of 5 mg/kg/day.

    Drug: Cyclosporine (CsA)

  • Placebo comparator
    Matching Placebo

    Intravenous (IV) injection of 0.9% NaCl over 74 hours.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCyclosporine (CsA)

    Intravenous (IV) injection, loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg (diluted in 0.9% NaCl to a final volume of 50 ml) given over 2 hours, immediately followed by a continuous IV infusion of of 5 mg/kg/day (diluted in 0.9% NaCl to a final volume of 250 ml) for 3 days (72-hour).

    Also known as: Sandimmune®

  • DrugPlacebo

    Intravenous (IV) injection of 0.9% NaCl with the same dosing strategy as CsA: "loading dose" given over 2 hours, immediately followed by a continuous IV infusion for 3 days (72-hour).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Disability Rating Score (DRS)

    The primary outcome measure is to determine whether the intervention safely improves functional outcome in participants with TBI as compared to placebo, as measured by the change in the Disability Rating Score (DRS) score from Baseline to Week 4 post-injury.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 4 post-injury

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Blood-based biomarker (Neurofilament light chain)

    To determine whether the intervention lowers the rising plasma Neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels up to W2 post-injury in participants with TBI as compared to placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 2 post-injury

  2. Change in Blood-based biomarker (GFAP)

    To determine whether the intervention lowers the plasma GFAP levels up to W2 post-injury as compared to placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 2 post-injury

  3. Change in Blood-based biomarker (UCH-L1)

    To determine whether the intervention lowers the plasma UCH-L1 levels up to Week 2 post-injury in participants with TBI as completed to placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 2 post-injury

  4. Post-TBI symptom outcome (CRSR-FAST)

    To determine the effect of intervention on the change in the number of behavioral signs of consciousness present on the Coma Recovery Scale- Revised For Accelerated Standardized Testing (CRSR-FAST) from Baseline to W4 post-injury as compared to placebo.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 4 post-injury

  5. Imaging biomarkers

    To determine whether the intervention results in improved imaging biomarkers compared to placebo measured by: 1) the change in white matter tract using MRI diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and 2) change in total brain volumetrics using MRI T1 MPRAGE, from Week 2 to Month 6.

    Time frame: Week 2 to Month 6

  6. Post-TBI functional outcomes (DRS)

    To determine the effect of intervention on functional outcomes, as measured by: I. Change in the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) from Baseline to Month 3 and Baseline to Month 6

    Time frame: Baseline to Month 3 and Baseline to Month 6

  7. Post-TBI functional outcomes (FSE)

    To determine the effect of intervention on functional outcomes, as measured by: II. Functional Status Examination (FSE) score at Week 2, Week 4, Month 3 and Month 6

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Month 3 and Month 6

  8. Post-TBI functional outcomes (GOSE-TBI)

    To determine the effect of intervention on functional outcomes, as measured by: III. Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (TBI Version) (GOSE-TBI) score at Week 2, Week 4, Month 3 and Month 6.

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Month 3 and Month 6

  9. Post-TBI cognitive outcome (BTACT)

    To determine the effect of the intervention on cognitive outcome, as measured by the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) Composite z-score at Week 4, Month 3 and Month 6.

    Time frame: Week 4, Month 3, and Month 6

  10. Post-TBI quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (QOLIBRI)

    To determine the effect of intervention on quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PRO), as measured by the Quality of Life Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) at Month 3 and Month 6.

    Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

  11. Post-TBI quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (RPQ)

    To determine the effect of intervention on quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PRO), as measured by the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) at Month 3 and Month 6.

    Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

  12. Post-TBI quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (Caregiver Burden)

    To determine the effect of intervention on quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PRO), as measured by the Caregiver Burden at Week 2, Month 3, and Month 6.

    Time frame: Week 2, Month 3, and Month 6

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94110, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be made available through the Federal Interagency TBI Research (FITBIR) Database.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06790095
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2025
Start date
Jul 2, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2026

Study contacts

Geoffrey Manley, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion