CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00369915Updated Nov 10, 2016Results posted

The Antidepressant Efficacy of the Anticholinergic Scopolamine

A Phase 2 interventional study of Scopolamine and Scopolamine in Unipolar Depression and Bipolar Depression, sponsored by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-10.

Sponsored by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A previous study showed that the intravenous administration of scopolamine produces antidepressant effects. This study is designed to determine if other routes of administration of scopolamine produce antidepressant effects.

Read the detailed description

Despite the availability of a wide range of antidepressant drugs, clinical trials indicate that 30% to 40% of patients with major depression fail to respond to first-line antidepressant treatment, despite adequate dosage, duration, and compliance. Moreover, in those patients who do experience symptomatic relief following conventional anti-depressant treatment, clinical improvement is not evident for 3-4 weeks. Thus, there is a clear need to develop novel and improved therapeutics for unipolar and bipolar depression.

The cholinergic system is one of the neurotransmitter systems implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Evidence suggests that during major depressive episodes, the cholinergic system is hypersensitive to acetylcholine. Agents that enhance muscarinic cholinergic receptor function increase depressive symptoms in depressed subjects, and can produce symptoms of depression in healthy individuals. The preclinical literature more specifically implicates the muscarinic receptors and indicates that the use of muscarinic antagonists, in the context of animal models of depression, results in improvement in the behavioral analogs of depression.

Preliminary results obtained under protocol 3-M-0108 provide strong evidence for the potential effectiveness of the anticholinergic scopolamine in rapidly producing clinically significant antidepressant effects. We observed large reductions in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores that occurred over hours/days following i.v. infusion of scopolamine, which stood in marked contrast to the 3-4 week period generally required for conventional therapies. Moreover, these improvements were observed in subjects who had been nonresponsive or incompletely responsive to conventional antidepressant therapies, highlighting the potential for this treatment to benefit a larger percentage of individuals with depression. The goal of this research project is to perform a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of the muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist scopolamine administered via transdermal patch on clinical symptoms of depression.

02

Conditions studied

  • Unipolar Depression
  • Bipolar Depression

Keywords

  • Cholinergic
  • Unipolar
  • Bipolar
  • Depression
  • Muscarinic
  • Scopolamine
  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • MDD
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • BP
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is the lead sponsor of 359 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (96%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Two groups of subjects will be recruited for studies under this protocol: unipolar depressives and bipolar depressives. Subjects with unipolar or bipolar depression appear to exhibit abnormal cholinergic function during the depressed phase, and no differences are hypothesized to exist between MDD and BD depressives herein. However, while BD subjects are more difficult to recruit, the evidence for cholinergic abnormalities has been particularly compelling for BD. Moreover, observations from our pilot study suggest that scopolamine will improve symptoms in both MDD and BD, a particularly persuasive observation given BD notoriously has been difficult to treat. Thus, the magnitude of this serious clinical problem justifies the inclusion of BD subjects. Therefore both groups will be recruited. However, BD Type I subjects will be included only if they are currently stable on lithium or valproate to reduce the risks associated with possible precipitation of mania.

The presence of inclusion and exclusion criteria will be established using both an unstructured clinical interview with a psychiatrist and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Family history of mental illness will be obtained from the subject using the Family Interview of Genetic Studies. We will recruit 24 subjects per group.

DEPRESSED SAMPLES: Subjects (ages 18-55) currently suffering from a major depressive episode falling into one of the following subgroups:

  1. . MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER (MDD): Subjects will be selected with primary MDD and are currently depressed as defined by DSM-IV criteria for recurrent MDD and current MADRS score in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (greater than or equal to 20). The duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks.
  2. . BIPOLAR DISORDER TYPE II (BD): Subjects will be selected who meet DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder Type I or II and are currently depressed, with MADRS score in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (greater than or equal to 20). The duration of the index episode is greater than or equal to four weeks.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Subjects will be recruited who are drug-naive or who have not received psychotropic drugs for at least 3 weeks (8 weeks for fluoxetine) prior to screening. Subjects also will be excluded if they have: a) serious suicidal ideation or behavior, or current delusions or hallucinations, b) inability to provide informed consent, c) serious, unstable illnesses including hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, cardiovascular (including ischemic heart disease, endocrinologic, neurologic, immunologic, or hematologic disease, d) a history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months or alcohol or drug dependence in the last five years (DSM IV criteria), e) not using a medically accepted means of contraception and are a woman of childbearing potential, f) current pregnancy (documented by pregnancy testing prior to each brain scan to avoid exposing a fetus to radiation or to a research MRI scan that is not medically necessary), g) current breast feeding, h) history of ulcerative colitis or toxic megacolon, i) vision and/or hearing problems severe enough to interfere with testing, j) electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia, arrhythmia, conduction defect, or myocardial infarction, k) current blood pressure of greater than 160 mm Hg or less than 90 mm Hg systolic, or greater than 90 mm Hg diastolic, l) clinically significant cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease, hypertension, congestive heart disease, angina pectoris, clinic evidence of cerebrovascular disease, gross neurological impairment, hyperthyroidism, known hypersensitivity or idiosyncracy to anticholinergic agents (e.g. skin rashes), glaucoma, renal or hepatic impairment, m) current nicotine use or nicotine dependence within last six months (due to the effects of nicotine on the cholinergic system) n) narrow angle glaucoma (due to the possibility of exacerbation of this condition by scopolamine) o) age greater than 55 years (to reduce the biological heterogeneity encompassed by the MDD and BD criteria, since subjects with a late age-at onset for depression have a far greater likelihood of having MRI correlates of cerebrovascular disease than age-matched, healthy controls or age-matched, early-onset depressives), p) exposure within two weeks to medications likely to affect mood or cognition or likely to interact with scopolamine (e.g. narcotics or anti-cholinergic agents)- as verified by history and urine drug screen, q) HIV positive status, r) history of gastric or intestinal obstructions, s) history of urinary retention or bladder obstruction. During the course of this study, participants will be unable to take some medications, including antidepressant or antianxiety agents, sleep aids, diphenhydramine (e.g. Benedryl) or cough/cold preparations that contain diphenhydramine or antihistamines. A detailed list of allowed and not allowed medications is provided in Appendix B in the protocol.

We are not excluding comorbid anxiety disorders. Exclusion of patients with comorbid anxiety disorders would affect the generalizability of our findings since a substantial percentage of patients with major depression have these comorbid diagnoses. Instead, we will exclude patients with this comorbid diagnosis only if it is believed to be of clinical significance. Allowing participation by patients with histories of comorbid anxiety disorders broadens the inclusion criteria to more closely approximate patients seen in real world settings.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Plac/Scop

    Placebo then scopolamine

    Drug: Scopolamine

  • Experimental
    Scop/Plac

    Scopolamine then placebo

    Drug: Scopolamine

Interventions

  • DrugScopolamine
  • DrugScopolamine
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Depression Severity

    The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has a range of scores from 0 to 60 where the highest values indicate the most depression.

    Time frame: Outcome measures obtained at each of 12 sessions

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

    The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) has a range of scores from 0 to 56 where the highest values indicate the most anxiety.

    Time frame: Each of 12 sessions.

07

Results

Posted Apr 29, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlac/ScopScop/Plac
Started107
Completed44
Not completed63
Withdrew: Expected side effects21
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject41
Withdrew: W/drawl by investigators01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Depression Severity

The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) has a range of scores from 0 to 60 where the highest values indicate the most depression.

Time frame:
Outcome measures obtained at each of 12 sessions
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Depression Severity
units on a scalePlac/ScopScop/Plac
Block 1 - Session 129.5 ± 2.530.5 ± 4.2
Block 1 - Session 226.5 ± 8.229.8 ± 1.5
Block 1 - Session 324.5 ± 3.731.0 ± 2.9
Block 1 - Session 419.5 ± 6.627.0 ± 5.5
Block 1 - Session 519.3 ± 7.427.8 ± 5.6
Block 1 - Session 620.8 ± 4.528.5 ± 6.2
Block 2 - Session 123.3 ± 3.727.5 ± 7.9
Block 2 - Session 218.0 ± 3.823.8 ± 6.7
Block 2 - Session 319.8 ± 8.320.0 ± 6.5
Block 2 - Session 418 ± 9.117.3 ± 9.1
Block 2 - Session 516.3 ± 7.916.8 ± 9.7
Block 2 - Session 615.5 ± 8.820.3 ± 9.3
SecondaryHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) has a range of scores from 0 to 56 where the highest values indicate the most anxiety.

Time frame:
Each of 12 sessions.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
units on a scalePlac/ScopScop/Plac
Block 1 - Session 117.0 ± 6.220.3 ± 9.0
Block 1 - Session 216.8 ± 6.214.5 ± 2.7
Block 1 - Session 314.5 ± 8.414.3 ± 4.7
Block 1 - Session 414.3 ± 6.513.0 ± 2.8
Block 1 - Session 512.8 ± 5.012.0 ± 4.7
Block 1 - Session 617.8 ± 7.111.5 ± 5.3
Block 2 - Session 114.8 ± 2.213.5 ± 7.9
Block 2 - Session 213.3 ± 3.812.0 ± 7.6
Block 2 - Session 314.3 ± 4.013.3 ± 5.6
Block 2 - Session 410.5 ± 2.714.3 ± 9.0
Block 2 - Session 59.8 ± 2.110.3 ± 6.0
Block 2 - Session 611.8 ± 3.211.8 ± 6.9

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Plac/Scop—0/10 (0%)2/10 (20%)
Scop/Plac—0/7 (0%)1/7 (14.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlac/ScopScop/Plac
dry mouthPsychiatric disorders2/101/7
mild confusionPsychiatric disorders1/101/7

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Plac/ScopScop/PlacTotal
Mean31 ± 6.633 ± 10.431.9 ± 8.2
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Plac/ScopScop/PlacTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years10717
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Plac/ScopScop/PlacTotal
Female6612
Male415
08

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Janowsky DS, el-Yousef MK, Davis JM. Acetylcholine and depression. Psychosom Med. 1974 May-Jun;36(3):248-57. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197405000-00008. No abstract available. PubMed 4829619 ↗
  • Janowsky DS, el-Yousef MK, Davis JM, Hubbard B, Sekerke HJ. Cholinergic reversal of manic symptoms. Lancet. 1972 Jun 3;1(7762):1236-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)90956-7. No abstract available. PubMed 4113219 ↗
  • Janowsky EC, Risch C, Janowsky DS. Effects of anesthesia on patients taking psychotropic drugs. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1981 Jan;1(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/00004714-198101000-00004. PubMed 6117578 ↗
  • Park L, Furey M, Nugent AC, Farmer C, Ellis J, Szczepanik J, Lener MS, Zarate CA Jr. Neurophysiological Changes Associated with Antidepressant Response to Ketamine Not Observed in a Negative Trial of Scopolamine in Major Depressive Disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Jan 1;22(1):10-18. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy051. PubMed 30184133 ↗
  • Szczepanik J, Nugent AC, Drevets WC, Khanna A, Zarate CA Jr, Furey ML. Amygdala response to explicit sad face stimuli at baseline predicts antidepressant treatment response to scopolamine in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2016 Aug 30;254:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 20. PubMed 27366831 ↗
  • Drevets WC, Furey ML. Replication of scopolamine's antidepressant efficacy in major depressive disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar 1;67(5):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.021. Epub 2010 Jan 15. PubMed 20074703 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 10, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00369915
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2006
Start date
Aug 2006
Primary completion
Jan 2013
Completion
Jan 2013
Results posted
Apr 29, 2016
Last update
Nov 10, 2016

Study contacts

Maura L Furey, Ph.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion