An interventional study of RQP patient health education module in Diagnosis, Psychiatric, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-03.
Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
The purpose of this pilot project is to test the effectiveness of three 20 minute health education modules on patient empowerment, patient activation and retention in care.
Recent research has demonstrated positive outcomes for patients who take an active role in their mental health care (Linhorst \& Eckert, 2003). Patients who participate in the decision-making process are more satisfied with services, have a greater sense of self-efficacy and confidence, an increased ability to cope with daily life, and are more likely to achieve their treatment goals (Linhorst \& Eckert, 2003). As defined by Chamberlin and Schene (1997), empowerment in mental health care requires having access to information and resources, having a range of options from which to make choices, learning to think critically, and having the power to make decisions. Cooper-Patrick et al. (1999) indicate that minority patients are less likely to have a collaborative relationship with providers than are otherwise similar white patients. Thus, there is a need for minority patients to learn to take a more active role in their care. One way to address the need for increased empowerment and activation among minority mental health patients is to provide them with training to enhance their communication and decision-making skills. The Right Question Project (RQP) is a consumer educational technique designed for this purpose and developed for use in multiple settings. The proposed study will examine the effectiveness of RQP with a Latino population.
The Right Question Project (RQP) is a non-profit organization that works primarily with low- and moderate-income communities with a history of disengagement from education, health care, and other social services. The RQP approach differs from traditional models of client empowerment in that instead of supplying clients with solutions to problems, the RQP gives them a means to develop their own solutions. RQP teaches clients to identify important issues, formulate questions, and devise plans to communicate and act in effective ways that address factors impacting their health. The RQP methodology involves:
The RQP methodology is designed to build a permanent skill that clients can apply in health care, as well as in other contexts that involve self-advocacy (e.g., getting better child care). Thus far, implementation of the Right Question Project has shown that clients of any education or literacy level can easily participate and benefit from the methodology's three-step approach. RQP has been particularly successful in educational settings (Cohen, 1995).
The focus of the RQP health education module is to help patients learn how to formulate and ask questions of their health care providers, in order to improve the quality of their care. The Right Question Project, Inc. developed this protocol and trained staff at the Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) to conduct health education modules with psychiatry outpatients. The pilot study uses a pre-post test design with two groups of 100 patients each from two clinics that serve primarily Latino patients. The group at the CHA clinic will serve as the "treatment" group. This group will receive the training modules and will be interviewed about their experience in care. The group at the clinic at Massachusetts General Hospital will serve as the "control" group. This group will be interviewed without first receiving the training. Outcomes for the groups will be compared to look for an effect. If the RQP training appears to have a positive affect on patients at CHA, then MGH patients will be offered the RQP training. By testing the effectiveness of this educational module, we hope to establish its usefulness as a means for the Cambridge Health Alliance to become even more patient-centered and to assist in the integration and institutionalization of patient empowerment/activation.
2,148 studies on the registry are indexed under Mental Disorders; 425 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 231 is above the median of 96 across 1,607 interventional studies indexed under Mental Disorders.
Browse Mental Disorders studies →Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,582 studies on the registry; 451 are open to participants now.
Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
These participants receive the RQP-MH intervention
Behavioral: RQP patient health education module
Patient activation
Time frame: at 4, 6 and 8 weeks
Patient empowerment at 4, 6 and 8 weeks
Time frame: at 4, 6 and 8 weeks
Retention in care at one year
Time frame: at one year
The record gives a start of Aug 2004, a primary completion of Dec 2005 and a completion of Dec 2005. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Massachusetts General Hospital →