ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07878169SOARUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Supporting Older Adults Remotely

An interventional study of Supporting Older Adults Remotely (SOAR) and Peer support as usual in Severe Mental Illness, sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 21, 2026Primary outcomes revisedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Supporting Older Adults Remotely (SOAR) study is a randomized controlled trial evaluating a 12-week, telephone-delivered peer support intervention for adults age 50 and older with serious mental illness who live in supportive housing. SOAR is designed to support aging in place and improve independent living skills through structured peer support focused on medication adherence, medical and psychiatric self-management, coping, goal setting, healthcare navigation, social relationships, self-advocacy, and connection to community resources. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either SOAR or Peer Support as Usual. Participants will complete assessments at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. The study will also examine factors that may help or hinder implementation and sustainability of SOAR in supportive housing.

Read the detailed description

Supporting Older Adults Remotely (SOAR) is a Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, telephonic, peer-delivered intervention to support aging in place among older adults with serious mental illness (SMI) residing in supportive housing.

Older adults with SMI experience high rates of medical comorbidity, earlier onset of disease, and premature mortality. Existing integrated medical and psychiatric self-management interventions may be difficult to implement because of their operating costs, long intervention duration, and workforce requirements. SOAR was developed in partnership with Certified Older Adult Peer Specialists to address these barriers through a structured intervention delivered remotely by telephone.

The study will evaluate whether SOAR improves independent living skills compared with Peer Support as Usual. The study will also examine medication adherence, medical self-management, and psychiatric self-management as potential mechanisms of change. Implementation research will identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainability of SOAR in supportive housing, including factors related to peer-delivered telephonic care and reimbursement.

The randomized trial uses two levels of randomization. First, Peer Specialists will be randomized to receive SOAR training or no additional training beyond their foundational peer certification. Second, study participants will be individually randomized to an interventionist delivering either SOAR or Peer Support as Usual using a computerized permuted block design to ensure equal allocation. Interventionists will deliver only one model of care, and supervisors will provide arm-specific supervision to reduce contamination between conditions.

SOAR is a manualized 12-week intervention delivered one-on-one by Certified Older Adult Peer Specialists by telephone. The intervention incorporates evidence-based strategies and peer lived experience and focuses on areas including medication management, medical and psychiatric self-management, coping, goal setting, values clarification, healthcare navigation, social relationships, self-advocacy, and connection to community resources. Participants may participate using a landline, flip phone, or smartphone; an app-based interface is not required.

Peer Support as Usual consists of routine peer support delivered by Peer Specialists who do not receive SOAR training. Peer support includes listening, sharing lived experience, role modeling, goal support, discussion of progress, and referral consistent with usual peer services.

Quantitative assessments will be conducted longitudinally. Analyses will compare the two randomized conditions using mixed-effects models appropriate to the outcome distribution and repeated assessments and will account for clustering of participants within interventionists and site variation. Covariates will include psychiatric symptom severity, cognitive functioning, poverty level, psychiatric diagnosis, medical comorbidity, and frequency of health service utilization.

Mechanism analyses will evaluate whether changes in medication adherence, medical self-management, and psychiatric self-management are associated with subsequent independent living skills. Longitudinal mediation models will account for clustering of participants within interventionists. Clinically meaningful change in independent living skills will also be examined using the prespecified range described in the protocol.

The implementation component will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to examine barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainability. Qualitative interviews will include Peer Specialists, trial participants, administrators, and policymakers. Stratified purposive sampling will support representation across stakeholder groups and characteristics relevant to implementation, including race/ethnicity, cognitive functioning, and language preference. Interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research together with emergent themes.

Intervention fidelity will be monitored throughout the study. The fidelity team will review the first three weekly SOAR meetings for each Peer Specialist and subsequently review a randomly selected sample of SOAR meetings. Peer Support as Usual will also be assessed for the presence of SOAR strategies as an additional contamination check. Booster training will be provided as specified in the protocol to minimize interventionist drift.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Mental Illness

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • peer support
  • aging in place
  • SMI
  • severe mental illness
  • telephonic intervention
03

In context

Mental Disorders

2,148 studies on the registry are indexed under Mental Disorders; 425 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 96 across 1,607 interventional studies indexed under Mental Disorders.

Browse Mental Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 486 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants will be eligible for Peer study participation if they:

  1. are trained and accredited as Medicaid Certified Peer Specialist in the state of New York
  2. be aged 50+
  3. ability to speak, read, and write in English; and
  4. have the ability to provide voluntary informed consent.

Participants will be eligible for resident participation if they:

  1. are residing in the Bridge;
  2. are aged 50 years or older;
  3. can provide voluntary informed consent;
  4. in need of independent living skills training as determined by a score of \< 40 on the Independent Living Skills Survey

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Peer Specialists will be excluded for:

  1. chart diagnosis of dementia or documented cognitive impairment as indicated by the Mini Mental State Examination score \<24;
  2. have two or more emergency room or hospitalizations in the last 6 months or as determined by the clinical team to be psychiatrically unstable.

Participants will be excluded for:

  1. have a major visual or motor impairment as evidenced by turning a smartphone on and reporting they cannot clearly see the screen; and
  2. have a chart diagnosis of dementia, or evidence of significant cognitive impairment as indicated by a Mini Mental Status Examination score of less than 24.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SOAR

    Participants receive SOAR, a structured, manualized 12-week, one-on-one peer support intervention delivered by telephone. SOAR is delivered by Certified Older Adult Peer Specialists and incorporates evidence-based aging-in-place strategies and peer lived experience. The intervention focuses on medication management, medical and psychiatric self-management, psychoeducation, coping, goal setting and values clarification, healthcare navigation, social relationships, self-advocacy, and connection to community resources. Participants may use a landline, flip phone, or smartphone; an app is not required. Participants complete study assessments at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months.

    Behavioral: Supporting Older Adults Remotely (SOAR)

  • Active comparator
    Peer Support As Usual

    Participants receive Peer Support as Usual, consisting of 12 weekly peer support meetings delivered by telephone. Peer Support as Usual is provided by Certified Older Adult Peer Specialists who have foundational peer support training and do not receive SOAR training. Sessions do not require a structured agenda and include routine peer support services such as action planning, person-centered support, communication, recovery support, advocacy, and trauma-informed peer support. Participants have up to 5 months to complete the 12 sessions. Participants complete study assessments at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months.

    Behavioral: Peer support as usual

Interventions

  • BehavioralSupporting Older Adults Remotely (SOAR)

    SOAR is a structured, manualized, 12-week telephonic intervention delivered by Certified Older Adult Peer Specialists through 12 weekly, one-hour individual sessions. The intervention is designed to promote aging in place among older adults with serious mental illness. SOAR uses evidence-based strategies including goal setting, life review, psychoeducation, social skills training, coping skills training, patient education, peer support, self-advocacy, problem solving, medication management techniques, independent living skills training, and sharing lived experience of aging with mental health challenges. Participants have up to 5 months to complete the 12 sessions.

  • BehavioralPeer support as usual

    Peer Support as Usual consists of 12 weekly peer support meetings delivered by telephone by Certified Older Adult Peer Specialists. The intervention does not require a structured agenda and provides routine peer support services. Peer Specialists are already trained in foundational peer support, including action planning for prevention and recovery, person-centered service planning, communication skills, human and patient rights, recovery, advocacy, and trauma-informed peer support. Participants have up to 5 months to complete the 12 sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Independent Living Skills Survey (ILSS) Score

    Independent living skills will be measured using the Independent Living Skills Survey (ILSS), a measure of community functioning and independent living skills among individuals with serious mental illness. The study will evaluate differences in ILSS scores between participants assigned to SOAR and Peer Support as Usual over time. Scores range from 0 to 70 for the standard self-report version, with higher scores indicating better independent living skills and functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Medical self-management

    Medical self-management will be assessed using the Self-Rated Abilities for Health Practices Scale (SRAHPS), a 28-item measure of self-perceived ability to perform health-promoting behaviors. Total scores range from 0 to 112, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy and ability to perform health practices. . The study will compare changes in medical self-management between participants assigned to SOAR and Peer Support as Usual.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

  2. Psychiatric self-management

    Psychiatric self-management will be assessed using the Illness Management and Recovery Scale (IMRS), a 15-item measure of illness self-management and recovery among individuals with serious mental illness. Total scores range from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating better illness management and recovery. The study will compare changes in psychiatric self-management between participants assigned to SOAR and Peer Support as Usual.

    Time frame: baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months

  3. Medication adherence

    Medication adherence will be assessed using the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS),a 10-item self-report measure of medication-taking behavior and attitudes toward medication. Total scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater medication adherence. Bridge on-site pharmacy records reporting pharmacy pick-up and pharmacist in-person administration will also be utilized. The study will compare changes in medication adherence between participants assigned to SOAR and Peer Support as Usual.

    Time frame: baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Bridge
    New York, New York 10027, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2028, 24 months later.

Of 841 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Mental Disorders, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 856 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 45.

Mental Disorders covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 10, 2026
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2028
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Also revised
primary outcomes
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Primary outcomes Revised (1 change)
    + 1 other change: secondary outcomes
  2. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07878169
Responsible party
Karen L. Fortuna (Principal Investigator, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Karen L Fortuna, PhD, LICSW
Contact
Karen.L.Fortuna@dartmouth.edu
603-722-5727

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion