CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00022633Updated Aug 11, 2016Results posted

S0028, Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Cancer of the Urinary Tract

A Phase 2 interventional study of gemcitabine hydrochloride and paclitaxel in Bladder Cancer, Transitional Cell Cancer of the Renal Pelvis and Ureter and Urethral Cancer, sponsored by SWOG Cancer Research Network. Terminated at 92 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-11.

Sponsored by SWOG Cancer Research Network · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Permanently Closed Due to Poor Accrual
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving more than one drug may kill more tumor cells.

PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combining gemcitabine and paclitaxel in treating patients who have advanced or recurrent cancer of the urinary tract.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Determine the feasibility of enrolling patients aged 70 years and older with advanced or recurrent urothelial cancer to a structured phase II study.
  • Determine the anticancer efficacy of gemcitabine and paclitaxel, in terms of objective response rate and 2-year survival, in these elderly patients.
  • Assess the toxicity and tolerability of this regimen in these elderly patients.
  • Determine the feasibility of using standardized self-report measures of comorbidity, depression, and functional status in these patients.
  • Determine the pharmacokinetics of this regimen in these elderly patients and validate this data against similar parameters in patients aged under 60 years.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (70 and over vs under 60).

Patients receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours on day 1 and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for a maximum of 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline.

Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for 2 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 80 patients (60 age 70 and over and 20 under age 60) will be accrued for this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer
  • Transitional Cell Cancer of the Renal Pelvis and Ureter
  • Urethral Cancer

Keywords

  • recurrent bladder cancer
  • stage IV bladder cancer
  • transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder
  • squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder
  • adenocarcinoma of the bladder
  • recurrent urethral cancer
  • anterior urethral cancer
  • posterior urethral cancer
  • urethral cancer associated with invasive bladder cancer
  • metastatic transitional cell cancer of the renal pelvis and ureter
  • regional transitional cell cancer of the renal pelvis and ureter
  • recurrent transitional cell cancer of the renal pelvis and ureter
03

In context

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

1,617 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; 422 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is close to the median of 60 across 1,163 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Urinary Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

SWOG Cancer Research Network is the lead sponsor of 328 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed urothelial cancer

    • Transitional cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or squamous carcinoma (bladder, renal pelvis, ureter, or urethra)
  • Previously untreated metastatic or locoregionally advanced (i.e., bulky pelvic nodes) disease OR
  • Locally recurrent carcinoma after radiotherapy or cystectomy and no longer eligible for further radiotherapy or surgery
  • Measurable disease

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

  • 70 and over OR
  • Under 60

Performance status:

  • Zubrod 0-2

Life expectancy:

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic:

  • Absolute granulocyte count at least 1,200/mm\^3
  • Platelet count at least 100,000/mm\^3

Hepatic:

  • Bilirubin no greater than upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT) or alanine aminotransferase (SGPT) no greater than 2 times ULN

Renal:

  • Creatinine no greater than ULN

Other:

  • HIV negative
  • No other concurrent life-threatening medical disorder that would preclude study participation
  • No other prior malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or adequately treated stage I or II cancer in complete remission
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy:

  • Prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed provided administered more than 10 years ago
  • No prior gemcitabine, taxanes, or platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • At least 28 days since prior radiotherapy and recovered

Surgery:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • At least 28 days since prior surgery and recovered
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    gemcitabine, paclitaxel

    Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride · Drug: paclitaxel

Interventions

  • Druggemcitabine hydrochloride
  • Drugpaclitaxel

    Also known as: Taxol

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine the Feasibility of Accruing Patients With Metastatic Bladder Cancer Who Are 70 and Older to Chemotherapy Protocols

    Sixty patients aged 70 years and older were to be accrued to the study. The feasibility of accrual was determined that accrual of 3 patients per month in the age 70 and older range would allow for an expeditiously conducted phase II trial. If, after a 3 month start-up period, 3 or more patients aged 70 years and older were accrued per month for the duration of the trial, it was deemed reasonable to consider further trials in this elderly population.

    Time frame: 66 months (protocol activated on 7/1/2001 and closed to accrual on 12/15/2006)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Confirmed Response Rate in the Patients Age 70 and Older (Complete and Partial Response)

    Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease. No new lesions. No disease related symptoms. Partial response (PR) applies only to patients with least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions.

    Time frame: every week for the first 4 weeks and then every 3 weeks for up to 19 weeks

  2. Progression-free Survival in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older

    Measured form date of registration to date of first observation of progression disease, death due to any cause, symptomatic deterioration, or early discontinuation of treatment.

    Time frame: 0-5 years

  3. Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older

    Measured from date of registration to date of death due to any cause.

    Time frame: 0-5 years

  4. Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug

    Adverse Events (AEs) are reported by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 2.0. For each patient, worst grade of each event type is reported. Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Fatal.

    Time frame: Patients were assessed for adverse events weekly after protocol treatment for cycle 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) and then weekly for the first 2 weeks of protocol treatment for cycle 2-6 and after completion of protocol treatment.

  5. Feasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: Form Submission Rate

    Patients were required to complete three self-administered questionnaires at entry, prior to the administration of any cytotoxic therapy: the Medical Conditions Questionnaire, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form that evaluates functional status, and the Feelings Questionnaire that evaluates depression status. Feasibility is defined in four ways: 1) submission rates for each of three patient self-administered questionnaires (\> 60%); 2) the number of items missing within each scale (\< 5%); 3) a description of the level of assistance required for self-administration of the questionnaires; and 4) the average amount of time it takes patients to complete each of the three questionnaires. Level of assistance is defined as the need to 1) read the questionnaire to the patient, 2) explain the meaning of items, 3) explain the response format, and 4) complete the questionnaire for the patient; an other category of assistance will be included.

    Time frame: at study entry (prior to administration of any treatment)

  6. Feasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: Median Time of Complete Forms

    Patients were required to complete three self-administered questionnaires at entry, prior to the administration of any cytotoxic therapy: the Medical Conditions Questionnaire, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form that evaluates functional status, and the Feelings Questionnaire that evaluates depression status. Feasibility is defined in four ways: 1) submission rates for the each of three patient self-administered questionnaires (\> 60%); 2) the number of items missing within each scale (\< 5%); 3) a description of the level of assistance required for self-administration of the questionnaires; and 4) the average amount of time it takes patients to complete each of the three questionnaires. Level of assistance is defined as the need to 1) read the questionnaire to the patient, 2) explain the meaning of items, 3) explain the response format, and 4) complete the questionnaire for the patient; an other category of assistance will be included.

    Time frame: at study entry (prior to administration of any treatment)

  7. Assess the Feasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: at Least One Type of Assistance Required

    Patients were required to complete three self-administered questionnaires at entry, prior to the administration of any cytotoxic therapy: the Medical Conditions Questionnaire, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form that evaluates functional status, and the Feelings Questionnaire that evaluates depression status. Feasibility is defined in four ways: 1) submission rates for the three patient self-administered questionnaires (\> 60%); 2) the number of items missing within each scale (\< 5%); 3) a description of the level of assistance required for self-administration of the questionnaires; and 4) the average amount of time it takes patients to complete each of the three questionnaires. Level of assistance is defined as the need to 1) read the questionnaire to the patient, 2) explain the meaning of items, 3) explain the response format, and 4) complete the questionnaire for the patient; an other category of assistance will be included.

    Time frame: at study entry (prior to administration of any treatment)

07

Results

Posted Feb 24, 2016

Participant flow

The purpose of the subset of patients who aged 60 years or younger was to serve as a younger reference group for the pharmacokinetic parameter estimation. Therefore, this younger cohort is not included in analyses of adverse event, efficacy, and feasibility assessment of patient-reported outcome measures.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePaclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Younger Cohort: Age < 60)
Started5510
Eligible5110
Completed235
Not completed325
Withdrew: Adverse event111
Withdrew: Refusal unrelated to adverse event10
Withdrew: Progression/relapse92
Withdrew: Death40
Withdrew: Other - not protocol specified32
Withdrew: Ineligible40

Outcome measures

SecondaryOverall Confirmed Response Rate in the Patients Age 70 and Older (Complete and Partial Response)

Complete response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease. No new lesions. No disease related symptoms. Partial response (PR) applies only to patients with least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions.

Time frame:
every week for the first 4 weeks and then every 3 weeks for up to 19 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Confirmed Response Rate in the Patients Age 70 and Older (Complete and Partial Response)
percentage of participantsPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)
Overall Confirmed Response Rate in the Patients Age 70 and Older (Complete and Partial Response)22 (11 to 35)
SecondaryProgression-free Survival in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older

Measured form date of registration to date of first observation of progression disease, death due to any cause, symptomatic deterioration, or early discontinuation of treatment.

Time frame:
0-5 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older
monthsPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)
Progression-free Survival in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older6 (4 to 7)
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older

Measured from date of registration to date of death due to any cause.

Time frame:
0-5 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older
monthsPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)
Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older11 (8 to 13)
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug

Adverse Events (AEs) are reported by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 2.0. For each patient, worst grade of each event type is reported. Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Fatal.

Time frame:
Patients were assessed for adverse events weekly after protocol treatment for cycle 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) and then weekly for the first 2 weeks of protocol treatment for cycle 2-6 and after completion of protocol treatment.
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
ParticipantsPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine
Abdominal pain/cramping2
Acidosis1
Allergic reaction1
Anemia6
Anorexia3
Bone pain1
Cardiac ischemia/infarction1
Chest pain,not cardio or pleur1
Confusion1
Constipation/bowel obstruction2
Creatinine increase1
Dehydration1
Diarrhea without colostomy1
Dizziness/light headedness1
Dyspepsia/heartburn1
Dyspnea6
Edema1
Fatigue/malaise/lethargy8
Febrile neutropenia1
Gastric ulcer1
Hyperglycemia3
Hyperkalemia2
Hypotension2
Infection w/o 3-4 neutropenia1
Infection with 3-4 neutropenia3
Infection, unk ANC1
Leukopenia6
Muscle weakness (not neuro)1
Myalgia/arthralgia, NOS1
Nausea3
Neuropathic pain1
Neutropenia/granulocytopenia26
PRBC transfusion10
Pain-other3
Pleural effusions1
Pneumonitis/infiltrates1
Renal failure1
Respiratory infect w/ neutrop1
SGOT (AST) increase1
Sensory neuropathy3
Supraventricular arrhythmia1
Thrombocytopenia2
Thrombosis/embolism2
Urinary tr infect w/ neutrop2
Urinary tr infect w/o neutrop2
Ventricular arrhythmia2
Vomiting1
Weakness (motor neuropathy)2
PrimaryDetermine the Feasibility of Accruing Patients With Metastatic Bladder Cancer Who Are 70 and Older to Chemotherapy Protocols

Sixty patients aged 70 years and older were to be accrued to the study. The feasibility of accrual was determined that accrual of 3 patients per month in the age 70 and older range would allow for an expeditiously conducted phase II trial. If, after a 3 month start-up period, 3 or more patients aged 70 years and older were accrued per month for the duration of the trial, it was deemed reasonable to consider further trials in this elderly population.

Time frame:
66 months (protocol activated on 7/1/2001 and closed to accrual on 12/15/2006)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Determine the Feasibility of Accruing Patients With Metastatic Bladder Cancer Who Are 70 and Older to Chemotherapy Protocols
participantsPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)
Determine the Feasibility of Accruing Patients With Metastatic Bladder Cancer Who Are 70 and Older to Chemotherapy Protocols55
SecondaryFeasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: Form Submission Rate

Patients were required to complete three self-administered questionnaires at entry, prior to the administration of any cytotoxic therapy: the Medical Conditions Questionnaire, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form that evaluates functional status, and the Feelings Questionnaire that evaluates depression status. Feasibility is defined in four ways: 1) submission rates for each of three patient self-administered questionnaires (\> 60%); 2) the number of items missing within each scale (\< 5%); 3) a description of the level of assistance required for self-administration of the questionnaires; and 4) the average amount of time it takes patients to complete each of the three questionnaires. Level of assistance is defined as the need to 1) read the questionnaire to the patient, 2) explain the meaning of items, 3) explain the response format, and 4) complete the questionnaire for the patient; an other category of assistance will be included.

Time frame:
at study entry (prior to administration of any treatment)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Feasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: Form Submission Rate
percentage of participantsPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)
Medical Conditions Questionnaire98
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form98
Feelings Questionnaire98
SecondaryFeasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: Median Time of Complete Forms

Patients were required to complete three self-administered questionnaires at entry, prior to the administration of any cytotoxic therapy: the Medical Conditions Questionnaire, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form that evaluates functional status, and the Feelings Questionnaire that evaluates depression status. Feasibility is defined in four ways: 1) submission rates for the each of three patient self-administered questionnaires (\> 60%); 2) the number of items missing within each scale (\< 5%); 3) a description of the level of assistance required for self-administration of the questionnaires; and 4) the average amount of time it takes patients to complete each of the three questionnaires. Level of assistance is defined as the need to 1) read the questionnaire to the patient, 2) explain the meaning of items, 3) explain the response format, and 4) complete the questionnaire for the patient; an other category of assistance will be included.

Time frame:
at study entry (prior to administration of any treatment)
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Feasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: Median Time of Complete Forms
minutesPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)
Medical Conditions Questionnaire5 (1 to 45)
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form3 (1 to 45)
Feelings Questionnaire2 (1 to 30)
SecondaryAssess the Feasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: at Least One Type of Assistance Required

Patients were required to complete three self-administered questionnaires at entry, prior to the administration of any cytotoxic therapy: the Medical Conditions Questionnaire, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form that evaluates functional status, and the Feelings Questionnaire that evaluates depression status. Feasibility is defined in four ways: 1) submission rates for the three patient self-administered questionnaires (\> 60%); 2) the number of items missing within each scale (\< 5%); 3) a description of the level of assistance required for self-administration of the questionnaires; and 4) the average amount of time it takes patients to complete each of the three questionnaires. Level of assistance is defined as the need to 1) read the questionnaire to the patient, 2) explain the meaning of items, 3) explain the response format, and 4) complete the questionnaire for the patient; an other category of assistance will be included.

Time frame:
at study entry (prior to administration of any treatment)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Assess the Feasibility of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Patients Aged 70 Years and Older: at Least One Type of Assistance Required
percentage of participantsPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)
Medical Conditions Questionnaire28
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Form42
Feelings Questionnaire34

Adverse events

Collected over Patients were assessed for adverse events weekly after protocol treatment for cycle 1 (1 cycle = 21 days) and then weekly for the first 2 weeks of protocol treatment for cycle 2-6 and after completion of protocol treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine—5/51 (9.8%)50/51 (98%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine
Reportable adverse event, NOSGeneral disorders2/51
Cardiovascular-otherCardiac disorders1/51
Supraventricular arrhythmiaCardiac disorders1/51
IleusGastrointestinal disorders1/51
Flu-like symptoms-otherGeneral disorders1/51
Respiratory infect w/ neutropInfections and infestations1/51
AcidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/51
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/51
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/51
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 50
Most frequent other events
EventPaclitaxel + Gemcitabine
Fatigue/malaise/lethargyGeneral disorders42/51
Neutropenia/granulocytopeniaInvestigations36/51
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders29/51
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders27/51
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders25/51
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders23/51
Sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders21/51
ThrombocytopeniaInvestigations20/51
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders20/51
DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders17/51

Baseline characteristics

All eligible patients who started treatment were included in the analysis

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Younger Cohort: Age < 60)Total
Median76.1 (70.1 to 85.2)53.8 (31.2 to 59.7)74.6 (31.2 to 85.2)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Younger Cohort: Age < 60)Total
Female14418
Male37643
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Younger Cohort: Age < 60)Total
Hispanic or Latino314
Not Hispanic or Latino47956
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Elderly Cohort: Age >= 70)Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine (Younger Cohort: Age < 60)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American415
White46753
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

92 sites
  • Mobile Infirmary Medical Center
    Mobile, Alabama 36652-2144, United States
  • Arkansas Cancer Research Center at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital
    Los Angeles, California 90089-9181, United States
  • Pearlman Comprehensive Cancer Center at South Georgia Medical Center
    Valdosta, Georgia 31603, United States
  • Regional Cancer Center at Memorial Medical Center
    Springfield, Illinois 62781-0001, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Chanute
    Chanute, Kansas 66720, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Dodge City
    Dodge City, Kansas 67801, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - El Dorado
    El Dorado, Kansas 67042, United States
  • Kansas Masonic Cancer Research Institute at the University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160-7357, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Kingman
    Kingman, Kansas 67068, United States
  • Southwest Medical Center
    Liberal, Kansas 67901, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Newton
    Newton, Kansas 67114, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Parsons
    Parsons, Kansas 67357, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Pratt
    Pratt, Kansas 67124, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Salina
    Salina, Kansas 67042, United States
  • Tammy Walker Cancer Center at Salina Regional Health Center
    Salina, Kansas 67401, United States
  • Stormont-Vail Cancer Center
    Topeka, Kansas 66604, United States
  • St. Francis Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Topeka, Kansas 66606, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Wellington
    Wellington, Kansas 67152, United States
  • Associates in Womens Health, PA - North Review
    Wichita, Kansas 67203, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Medical Arts Tower
    Wichita, Kansas 67208, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Wichita
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • CCOP - Wichita
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • Via Christi Cancer Center at Via Christi Regional Medical Center
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • Cancer Center of Kansas, PA - Winfield
    Winfield, Kansas 67156, United States
  • University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0942, United States
  • Battle Creek Health System Cancer Care Center
    Battle Creek, Michigan 49017, United States
  • Bay Regional Medical Center
    Bay City, Michigan 48708, United States
  • Mecosta County Medical Center
    Big Rapids, Michigan 49307, United States
  • CCOP - Grand Rapids
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Lacks Cancer Center at Saint Mary's Health Care
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Spectrum Health Hospital - Butterworth Campus
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Metropolitan Hospital
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49506, United States
  • Holland Community Hospital
    Holland, Michigan 49423, United States
  • Hackley Hospital
    Muskegon, Michigan 49443, United States
  • Mercy Regional Cancer Center at Mercy Hospital
    Port Huron, Michigan 48060, United States
  • Munson Medical Center
    Traverse City, Michigan 49684, United States
  • CCOP - Montana Cancer Consortium
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Hematology-Oncology Centers of the Northern Rockies - Billings
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Northern Rockies Radiation Oncology Center
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • St. Vincent Healthcare
    Billings, Montana 59101, United States
  • Deaconess Billings Clinic - Downtown
    Billings, Montana 59107-7000, United States
  • Bozeman Deaconess Hospital
    Bozeman, Montana 59715, United States
  • St. James Community Hospital
    Butte, Montana 59701, United States
  • Big Sky Oncology
    Great Falls, Montana 59405, United States
  • Sletten Regional Cancer Institute at Benefis Healthcare
    Great Falls, Montana 59405, United States
  • St. Peter's Hospital
    Helena, Montana 59601, United States
  • Glacier Oncology, PLLC
    Kalispell, Montana 59901, United States
  • Kalispell Medical Oncology
    Kalispell, Montana 59901, United States
  • Kalispell Regional Medical Center
    Kalispell, Montana 59901, United States
  • Community Medical Center
    Missoula, Montana 59801, United States
  • Clinic of Dr. Judy L. Schmidt
    Missoula, Montana 59804, United States
  • Montana Cancer Specialists at Montana Cancer Center
    Missoula, Montana 59807-7877, United States
  • Montana Cancer Center at St. Patrick Hospital and Health Sciences Center
    Missoula, Montana 59807, United States
  • Good Samaritan Cancer Center at Good Samaritan Hospital
    Kearney, Nebraska 68848-1990, United States
  • Finger Lakes Hematology and Oncology
    Clifton Springs, New York 14432, United States
  • Tucker Center for Cancer Care at Orange Regional Medical Center
    Middletown, New York 10940-4199, United States
  • Interlakes Oncology/Hematology PC
    Rochester, New York 14623, United States
  • James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Wayne Memorial Hospital, Incorporated
    Goldsboro, North Carolina 27534, United States
  • Wayne Radiation Oncology
    Goldsboro, North Carolina 27534, United States
  • Rutherford Hospital
    Rutherfordton, North Carolina 28139, United States
  • Wilson Medical Center
    Wilson, North Carolina 27893-3428, United States
  • McDowell Cancer Center at Akron General Medical Center
    Akron, Ohio 44307, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Community Oncology Group at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center
    Independence, Ohio 44131, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic - Wooster
    Wooster, Ohio 44691, United States
  • AnMed Health Cancer Center
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • CCOP - Upstate Carolina
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • Gibbs Regional Cancer Center at Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • Medical City Dallas Hospital
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Brooke Army Medical Center
    Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234, United States
  • Wilford Hall Medical Center
    Lackland AFB, Texas 78236, United States
  • Veterans Affairs Medical Center - San Antonio (Murphy)
    San Antonio, Texas 78209, United States
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, United States
  • Cancer Therapy and Research Center
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • University Hospital - San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • CCOP - Scott and White Hospital
    Temple, Texas 76508, United States
  • Danville Regional Medical Center
    Danville, Virginia 24541, United States
  • St. Joseph Cancer Center
    Bellingham, Washington 98225, United States
  • Olympic Hematology and Oncology
    Bremerton, Washington 98310, United States
  • Skagit Valley Hospital Cancer Care Center
    Mt. Vernon, Washington 98273, United States
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Harborview Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Minor and James Medical, PLLC
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Swedish Cancer Institute at Swedish Medical Center - First Hill Campus
    Seattle, Washington 98122-4307, United States
  • Polyclinic First Hill
    Seattle, Washington 98122, United States
  • University Cancer Center at University of Washington Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98195-6043, United States
  • North Puget Oncology at United General Hospital
    Sedro-Wooley, Washington 98284, United States
  • Cancer Care Northwest - Spokane South
    Spokane, Washington 99202, United States
  • Wenatchee Valley Medical Center
    Wenatchee, Washington 98801-2028, United States
  • Welch Cancer Center at Sheridan Memorial Hospital
    Sheridan, Wyoming 82801, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00022633
Lead sponsor
SWOG Cancer Research Network
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2003
Start date
Jul 2001
Primary completion
Jun 2008
Completion
Jul 2011
Results posted
Feb 24, 2016
Last update
Aug 11, 2016

Study contacts

Derek Raghavan, MD, PhD, FRACP, FACP
study chair · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion