ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT00000327Updated May 4, 2017

Buprenorphine/Naloxone Treatment for Opioid Dependence-Experiment I(2) - 2

A Phase 2 interventional study of Heroin Dependence in Heroin Dependence and Opioid-Related Disorders, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 62 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-04.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years to 62 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of daily vs. 3-day (MWF) buprenorphine/naloxone combination tablet administration and determine whether outcomes are improved when using a 3-day schedule in which all doses are ingested at the clinic vs. one in which take-home doses are given on intervening days.

Read the detailed description

Mon/Wed/Fri dosing with the 8 mg buprenorphine/naloxone tablet is as safe and effective as daily dosing and is preferred by patients to daily dosing. Multiple doses of the combination tablet (e.g. 16mg, 24mg) are well tolerated by patients. A 3 day schedule with take-outs is as effective as a 3-day schedule in which all medication is ingested at the clinic

02

Conditions studied

  • Heroin Dependence
  • Opioid-Related Disorders

Keywords

  • drug dependence
03

In context

Heroin Dependence

90 studies on the registry are indexed under Heroin Dependence; 1 is open to participants now.

Browse Heroin Dependence studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,543 studies on the registry; 317 are open to participants now.

Of its 147 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 62 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Individual must be currently dependent and meet FDA criteria for narcotic maintenance treatment. Co-morbid substance abuse or dependence disorders may also be present. Individuals must be healthy despite drug dependency.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals with evidence of an active (DSM-IV) Axis I psychiatric disorder (e.g., psychosis, manic-depressive illness, organic psychiatric disorders), significant medical illness (e.g. liver or cardiovascular disease) or pregnant female subjects are excluded from study participation.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • DrugHeroin Dependence
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Drug use

  2. Retention

  3. Compliance

  4. Dosing schedule preferences

  5. Analog rating scale for dosing schedule effects

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Colorado Health Sciences Center
    Denver, Colorado 80206, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Amass, L., Kamien, J.H., and Mikulich, S.K. Efficacy of and preference for 3-day vs daily dosing with the buprenorphine-naloxone combination tablet. presented to the 1998 Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence. Scottsdate, AZ (6/13-18). Presenting at CPDD 1998
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 1997, a primary completion of Aug 1997 and a completion of Aug 1997. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 1999
First posted
Sep 21, 1999
Start
Jun 1997
Primary completionActual
Aug 1997
CompletionActual
Aug 1997
Last update
May 4, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00000327
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 1999
Start date
Jun 1997
Primary completion
Aug 1997
Completion
Aug 1997
Last update
May 4, 2017

Study contacts

Leslie Amass, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion