ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07934901Updated Nov 13, 2026

Intranasal Esketamine-dexmedetomidine Combination in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intranasal DEX-ESK combination and Intranasal ESK alone in Postherpetic Neuralgia, Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine, sponsored by Peking University First Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-13.

Sponsored by Peking University First Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 13, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 31 studies in Neuralgia, Postherpetic with a site in China — 12 open to participants now, 13 under way, none of them phase 3. Neuralgia, Postherpetic · China.

Planned enrollment
18th of 24
80 · median 141
Started
2026
with 4 others
Phase 4
5 of 31
2 open now
Primary completion
2027-11
later than 12 of 12 live
Registered
31st of 31
by date

Among the 31 studies in Neuralgia, Postherpetic with a site in China, this one is the 18th largest by planned enrollment of the 24 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 5 in phase 4, reaches primary completion later than 12 of the 12 other live ones, and was the 31st registered.

Neuralgia, Postherpetic

197 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia, Postherpetic; 29 are open to participants now.

Browse Neuralgia, Postherpetic studies →

Open to participants now

12 of the 31 studies in Neuralgia, Postherpetic with a site in China are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

6 more — sign in →

All 12 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in China have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in China →

Who these studies take

Of the 18 Neuralgia, Postherpetic studies recruiting now, 8 (44%) set no upper age limit and 5 (28%) stop at 75 or younger; none take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 50 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 31 studies in Neuralgia, Postherpetic with a site in China, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a chronic neuropathic pain syndrome suffered by patients with herpes zoster and often adversely affect patients' normal lives, leading to declines in sleep and quality of life. Ketamine/esketamine has been used for treatment of chronic pain but may produce adverse psychiatric reactions at slightly higher doses, including dissociative symptoms, hallucinations, and nightmares; the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine helps mitigate its psychiatric side effects. A previous study in orthopedic surgery patients also showed that dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine can significantly improve perioperative analgesia and sleep quality. The investigators hypothesize that intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine in patients with postherpetic neuralgia can improve analgesic efficacy.

Read the detailed description

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a chronic neuropathic pain syndrome suffered by patients with herpes zoster. The typical feature of PHN is deep burning pain in the affected unilateral dermatome, often accompanied by stabbing pain and itching, persisting for more than 3 months after the initial onset of herpes zoster. The incidence of PHN among patients with herpes zoster is approximately 10-20%. The chronic pain symptoms of PHN often adversely affect patients' normal lives, leading to declines in sleep and quality of life. Approximately 50% of PHN patients have sleep disturbances. These ultimately affect cognitive function and mental health.

Ketamine is a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and has long been used as a dissociative anesthetic. At subanesthetic doses, ketamine exhibits analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects. Guidelines recommend low-dose ketamine infusion for the treatment of chronic pain. Esketamine is the more potent right-handed enantiomer of ketamine, with stronger affinity for the NMDA receptor; its potency is approximately twice that of ketamine, and the incidence of adverse psychiatric reactions is lower in clinical use. Intranasal esketamine has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of adults with treatment-resistant depression and represents a more non-invasive route of administration.

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic effects. Dexmedetomidine acts on the locus coeruleus, inhibiting the release of norepinephrine from neurons in the locus coeruleus and the activity of the medullary-spinal descending neural pathways, thereby producing sedative and analgesic effects. In perioperative management, dexmedetomidine is widely used for postoperative adjuvant analgesia; it can also improve patients' sleep, producing a state resembling non-rapid eye movement sleep. Intranasal dexmedetomidine can be safely used in adults and children and is currently widely used for pediatric procedural sedation and preoperative medication.

Ketamine/esketamine can produce adverse psychiatric reactions at slightly higher doses, including dissociative symptoms, hallucinations, and nightmares; the sedative effect of dexmedetomidine helps mitigate its psychiatric side effects. A previous study in orthopedic surgery patients also showed that dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine can significantly improve perioperative analgesia and sleep quality. The investigators hypothesize that intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine combined with esketamine in patients with postherpetic neuralgia can improve analgesic efficacy.

03

Conditions studied

  • Postherpetic Neuralgia
  • Esketamine
  • Dexmedetomidine
  • Intranasal Administration
  • Analgesic Efficacy

Keywords

  • postherpetic neuralgia
  • esketamine
  • dexmedetomidine
  • intranasal administration
  • analgesic efficacy
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 50 years.
  • Diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) requiring pharmacological analgesia, with a pain score ≥ 4 on the numerical rating scale (NRS).
  • Provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unsuitability for intranasal administration due to nasal disorders (e.g., rhinitis, nasal polyps, or nasal obstruction from any cause).
  • Inability to communicate owing to severe dementia, coma, or a language barrier.
  • History of schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, or myasthenia gravis.
  • Previous diagnosis of sleep apnoea, or high risk of moderate-to-severe sleep apnoea on the STOP-Bang assessment, or > 30 kg/m².
  • History of hyperthyroidism or phaeochromocytoma.
  • (LVEF) \< 30%; or sick sinus syndrome, severe sinus bradycardia (heart rate \< 50 bpm), or second-degree or higher atrioventricular block without an implanted pacemaker; or systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg before enrolment.
  • Severe hepatic impairment ( class C); severe renal impairment requiring dialysis; or any ongoing life-threatening condition (e.g., myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, , or coronary stenting within the previous 3 months; active myocardial ischaemia; severe valvular disease; or end-stage renal disease not receiving dialysis).
  • to dexmedetomidine and/or esketamine.
  • Participation in another clinical trial, or any other condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DEX-ESK group

    For each administration: dexmedetomidine (1 spray = 0.05 ml = 25 μg) is administered as one spray into each nostril; after 1 minute, esketamine (1 spray = 0.05 ml = 1.25 mg) is administered alternately into each nostril, 4 sprays per nostril. Esketamine administration is repeated every 5 minutes until a total dose of 0.3 mg/kg is reached (using the number of sprays closest to the predetermined dose). If a dose is not tolerated, one administration may be omitted. Administer once daily for 4 consecutive days, with the same administration method as above.

    Drug: Intranasal DEX-ESK combination

  • Active comparator
    ESK group

    For each administration: placebo (0.9% saline; 1 spray = 0.05 ml) is administered as one spray into each nostril; after 1 minute, esketamine (1 spray = 0.05 ml = 1.25 mg) is administered alternately into each nostril, 4 sprays per nostril. Esketamine administration is repeated every 5 minutes until a total dose of 0.3 mg/kg is reached (using the number of sprays closest to the predetermined dose). If a dose is not tolerated, one administration may be omitted. Administer once daily for 4 consecutive days, with the same administration method as above.

    Drug: Intranasal ESK alone

Interventions

  • DrugIntranasal DEX-ESK combination

    For each administration: dexmedetomidine (1 spray = 0.05 ml = 25 μg) is administered as one spray into each nostril; after 1 minute, esketamine (1 spray = 0.05 ml = 1.25 mg) is administered alternately into each nostril, 4 sprays per nostril. Esketamine administration is repeated every 5 minutes until a total dose of 0.3 mg/kg is reached (using the number of sprays closest to the predetermined dose). If a dose is not tolerated, one administration may be omitted. Administer once daily for 4 consecutive days, with the same administration method as above.

    Also known as: Intranasal dexmedetomidine and esketamine

  • DrugIntranasal ESK alone

    For each administration: placebo (0.9% saline; 1 spray = 0.05 ml) is administered as one spray into each nostril; after 1 minute, esketamine (1 spray = 0.05 ml = 1.25 mg) is administered alternately into each nostril, 4 sprays per nostril. Esketamine administration is repeated every 5 minutes until a total dose of 0.3 mg/kg is reached (using the number of sprays closest to the predetermined dose). If a dose is not tolerated, one administration may be omitted. Administer once daily for 4 consecutive days, with the same administration method as above.

    Also known as: Intranasal placebo (normal saline) and esketamine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) within 7 days after the first administration

    Follow-up time points: before each administration (Days 1, 2, 3, and 4 of enrollment; face-to-face follow-up); on Days 1, 2, and 3 after the last administration (Days 5, 6, and 7 of enrollment; telephone follow-up at the same time of day as drug administration). Pain intensity: the patient's NRS pain score over the past 24 hours is recorded (0-10; 0 = no pain at all, 10 = the worst pain imaginable). Sum of pain intensity difference (SPID): calculated as the sum of (baseline NRS score - NRS score at each scheduled daily follow-up) within 7 days after the first administration (i.e., 3 days after the last treatment).

    Time frame: Within 7 days after the first administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sum of pain intensity difference (SPID) during Weeks 2 to 12 after the first administration

    Follow-up time points: once weekly after the last administration until Week 12 of enrollment (Days 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 77, and 84 of enrollment; telephone follow-up). Pain intensity: the patient's NRS pain score over the past 24 hours is recorded (0-10; 0 = no pain at all, 10 = the worst pain imaginable). Sum of pain intensity difference (SPID): calculated as the sum of (baseline NRS score - NRS score at each scheduled weekly follow-up) during Weeks 2 to 12 after the first administration.

    Time frame: During Weeks 2 to 12 after the first administration

  2. Change from baseline in ZBPI chronic pain and impact scores within 3 months after treatment

    Follow-up time points: Days 7 and 14 after the first administration (telephone follow-up); Months 1, 2, and 3 after the first administration (Days 28, 56, and 84 of enrollment; telephone follow-up). Severity of chronic pain and its impact on patients: assessed using the Zoster Brief Pain Inventory (ZBPI, Appendix 7). Pain severity is rated from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity; pain interference is rated from 0 to 10 across 7 domains, with higher scores indicating greater interference with daily functioning. Within 3 months after the first dose

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after the first administration

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dworkin RH, Gnann JW Jr, Oaklander AL, Raja SN, Schmader KE, Whitley RJ. Diagnosis and assessment of pain associated with herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. J Pain. 2008 Jan;9(1 Suppl 1):S37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.10.008. PubMed 18166464 ↗
  • Johnson RW, Rice AS. Clinical practice. Postherpetic neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1526-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1403062. No abstract available. PubMed 25317872 ↗
  • Gabutti G, Valente N, Kuhdari P, Lupi S, Stefanati A. Prevention of herpes zoster and its complications: from the clinic to the real-life experience with the vaccine. J Med Microbiol. 2016 Dec;65(12):1363-1369. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000386. Epub 2016 Nov 4. PubMed 27902409 ↗
  • Gauthier A, Breuer J, Carrington D, Martin M, Remy V. Epidemiology and cost of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in the United Kingdom. Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Jan;137(1):38-47. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808000678. Epub 2008 May 9. PubMed 18466661 ↗
  • Drolet M, Brisson M, Schmader KE, Levin MJ, Johnson R, Oxman MN, Patrick D, Blanchette C, Mansi JA. The impact of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia on health-related quality of life: a prospective study. CMAJ. 2010 Nov 9;182(16):1731-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091711. Epub 2010 Oct 4. PubMed 20921251 ↗
  • Volpi A, Gatti A, Pica F, Bellino S, Marsella LT, Sabato AF. Clinical and psychosocial correlates of post-herpetic neuralgia. J Med Virol. 2008 Sep;80(9):1646-52. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21254. PubMed 18649332 ↗
  • Mizukami A, Sato K, Adachi K, Matthews S, Holl K, Matsuki T, Kaise T, Curran D. Impact of Herpes Zoster and Post-Herpetic Neuralgia on Health-Related Quality of Life in Japanese Adults Aged 60 Years or Older: Results from a Prospective, Observational Cohort Study. Clin Drug Investig. 2018 Jan;38(1):29-37. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0581-5. PubMed 29086340 ↗
  • Lee DH, Park JE, Yoon DM, Yoon KB, Kim K, Kim SH. Factors Associated with Increased Risk for Clinical Insomnia in Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Pain Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):1917-1922. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw066. Epub 2016 Apr 12. PubMed 27073226 ↗
  • Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Chen MJ, Liao Y, Thiyagarajan M, O'Donnell J, Christensen DJ, Nicholson C, Iliff JJ, Takano T, Deane R, Nedergaard M. Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science. 2013 Oct 18;342(6156):373-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1241224. PubMed 24136970 ↗
  • Ratner V, Gao Y, Lee H, Elkin R, Nedergaard M, Benveniste H, Tannenbaum A. Cerebrospinal and interstitial fluid transport via the glymphatic pathway modeled by optimal mass transport. Neuroimage. 2017 May 15;152:530-537. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Mar 18. PubMed 28323163 ↗
  • Irwin MR. Sleep and inflammation: partners in sickness and in health. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019 Nov;19(11):702-715. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0190-z. PubMed 31289370 ↗
  • Yu J, Rawtaer I, Fam J, Jiang MJ, Feng L, Kua EH, Mahendran R. Sleep correlates of depression and anxiety in an elderly Asian population. Psychogeriatrics. 2016 May;16(3):191-5. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12138. Epub 2015 Jul 16. PubMed 26179204 ↗
  • Dzierzewski JM, Dautovich N, Ravyts S. Sleep and Cognition in Older Adults. Sleep Med Clin. 2018 Mar;13(1):93-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Dec 8. PubMed 29412987 ↗
  • Fang H, Tu S, Sheng J, Shao A. Depression in sleep disturbance: A review on a bidirectional relationship, mechanisms and treatment. J Cell Mol Med. 2019 Apr;23(4):2324-2332. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14170. Epub 2019 Feb 7. PubMed 30734486 ↗
  • Wolff K, Winstock AR. Ketamine : from medicine to misuse. CNS Drugs. 2006;20(3):199-218. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200620030-00003. PubMed 16529526 ↗
  • De Kock MF, Lavand'homme PM. The clinical role of NMDA receptor antagonists for the treatment of postoperative pain. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007 Mar;21(1):85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2006.12.006. PubMed 17489221 ↗
  • Rabben T, Skjelbred P, Oye I. Prolonged analgesic effect of ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor inhibitor, in patients with chronic pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 May;289(2):1060-6. PubMed 10215688 ↗
  • Cohen SP, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Schwenk ES, Wasan AD, Hurley RW, Viscusi ER, Narouze S, Davis FN, Ritchie EC, Lubenow TR, Hooten WM. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):521-546. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000808. PubMed 29870458 ↗
  • Bartova L, Papageorgiou K, Milenkovic I, Dold M, Weidenauer A, Willeit M, Winkler D, Kasper S. Rapid antidepressant effect of S-ketamine in schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Aug;28(8):980-982. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jul 2. PubMed 30041987 ↗
  • Molero P, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Martin-Santos R, Calvo-Sanchez E, Gutierrez-Rojas L, Meana JJ. Antidepressant Efficacy and Tolerability of Ketamine and Esketamine: A Critical Review. CNS Drugs. 2018 May;32(5):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0519-3. PubMed 29736744 ↗
  • Canuso CM, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Alphs L, Lane R, Lim P, Pinter C, Hough D, Sanacora G, Manji H, Drevets WC. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;175(7):620-630. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17060720. Epub 2018 Apr 16. PubMed 29656663 ↗
  • Segmiller F, Ruther T, Linhardt A, Padberg F, Berger M, Pogarell O, Moller HJ, Kohler C, Schule C. Repeated S-ketamine infusions in therapy resistant depression: a case series. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;53(9):996-8. doi: 10.1002/jcph.122. Epub 2013 Jul 24. No abstract available. PubMed 23893490 ↗
  • Persson J, Hasselstrom J, Maurset A, Oye I, Svensson JO, Almqvist O, Scheinin H, Gustafsson LL, Almqvist O. Pharmacokinetics and non-analgesic effects of S- and R-ketamines in healthy volunteers with normal and reduced metabolic capacity. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;57(12):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s002280100353. PubMed 11936706 ↗
  • Sapkota A, Khurshid H, Qureshi IA, Jahan N, Went TR, Sultan W, Alfonso M. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2021 Aug 21;13(8):e17352. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17352. eCollection 2021 Aug. PubMed 34447651 ↗
  • Grewal A. Dexmedetomidine: New avenues. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jul;27(3):297-302. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.83670. No abstract available. PubMed 21897496 ↗
  • Guo TZ, Jiang JY, Buttermann AE, Maze M. Dexmedetomidine injection into the locus ceruleus produces antinociception. Anesthesiology. 1996 Apr;84(4):873-81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199604000-00015. PubMed 8638842 ↗
  • Gabriel RA, Swisher MW, Sztain JF, Furnish TJ, Ilfeld BM, Said ET. State of the art opioid-sparing strategies for post-operative pain in adult surgical patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Jun;20(8):949-961. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1583743. Epub 2019 Feb 27. PubMed 30810425 ↗
  • Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):428-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00024. PubMed 12552203 ↗
  • Jun JH, Kim KN, Kim JY, Song SM. The effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Sep;64(9):947-961. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0917-x. Epub 2017 Jun 21. PubMed 28639236 ↗
  • Bornemann-Cimenti H, Wejbora M, Michaeli K, Edler A, Sandner-Kiesling A. The effects of minimal-dose versus low-dose S-ketamine on opioid consumption, hyperalgesia, and postoperative delirium: a triple-blinded, randomized, active- and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Oct;82(10):1069-1076. Epub 2016 Jun 21. PubMed 27327855 ↗
  • Hu ZC, Xu G, Zhang XW, Ma K, Jin JJ, Li PS. [Meta-analysis of the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with ketamine during dressing changes in burn patients]. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 20;36(6):458-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190327-00145. Chinese. PubMed 32594705 ↗
  • Lee KH, Lee SJ, Park JH, Kim SH, Lee H, Oh DS, Kim YH, Park YH, Kim H, Lee SE. Analgesia for spinal anesthesia positioning in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures: Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine-fentanyl. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20001. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020001. PubMed 32443302 ↗
  • Zhang Y, Cui F, Ma JH, Wang DX. Mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination to supplement analgesia for patients after scoliosis correction surgery: a double-blind randomised trial. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Aug;131(2):385-396. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jun 9. PubMed 37302963 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 8, 2026
First posted
Nov 13, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2028
Last update
Nov 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 13, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07934901
Responsible party
Dong-Xin Wang (Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 13, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 13, 2026

Study contacts

Zeng-Mao Lin
Contact
linzengmao@163.com
+86 010-83572784
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Peking University First Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion