ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07275762Updated May 13, 2026

Y-4 to Treat the Postherpetic Neuralgia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Y-4 tables and Pregabalin in Postherpetic Neuralgia, Y-4 and Pregabalin, sponsored by Neurodawn Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-13.

Sponsored by Neurodawn Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of Y-4 in patients with postherpetic neuralgia(PHN).

The main questions it aims to answer are: The efficacy and safety of Y-4 to treat PHN compared with pregabalin.

Researchers will analyze data from different groups, includes Y-4 group and pregabalin group , to see efficacy of Y-4 and If drug Y-4 is safe and tolerate in the patients with PHN.

Participants will :

  • Take Y-4 (1w titration period: 75 mg pregabalin +18.75 mg riluzole, 12w fixed dose period: 150 mg pregabalin +37.5 mg riluzole, 1w drug withdraw period: 1w titration period: 75 mg pregabalin +18.75 mg riluzole) or pregabalin(75 mg for 1w titration period , 150 mg for 12w fixed dose period ,75 mg for 1w drug withdraw period) twice a day for 14 weeks after run-in period (placebo) lasting for 1 week.
  • Visit the hospital according to the follow-up schedule agreed upon with your doctor. contact the research staff as soon as possible to reschedule when unable to attend the scheduled study visit.
  • Use investigational products as directed by the doctor and undergo the related treatment.
  • Inform their investigators of any changes in their health, including any side effects or symptoms, whether or not they believe these changes are related to the trial medication, as well as any new medications they are using or wish to use, or any changes in the dosage of medications they have already taking.
  • Use reliable contraceptive methods , such as abstinence, intrauterine devices, double barrier methods (e.g., condom with spermicide or condom with a diaphragm containing spermicide), contraceptive implants, or oral contraceptives (except if the partner is infertile) during the study period and within one month after the study is completed.
  • Must inform investigators immediately if they or their partner become pregnant during the study.
  • Be sure to inform other doctors being consultant that you are participating in this clinical study.
  • Restrict medication use and treatment during the study.
02

Conditions studied

  • Postherpetic Neuralgia
  • Y-4
  • Pregabalin
03

In context

Neuralgia, Postherpetic

196 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia, Postherpetic; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 94 across 162 interventional studies indexed under Neuralgia, Postherpetic.

Browse Neuralgia, Postherpetic studies →

Lead sponsor

Neurodawn Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- 1. Able to understand and voluntarily sign the form. 2. Age ≥ 18 years, any gender. 3. Diagnosed with PHN, meaning pain persists for more than one month after the acute shingles rash has healed.

4. VAS score in SF-MPQ ≥ 40 mm of the last 24 hours during screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Known previous allergy to the products, rescue medication ingredients, other chemically similar drugs, or .

    2. During screening, individuals who have been clearly diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy or pain unrelated to PHN (including but not limited to those caused by cerebrovascular disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, cervical or lumbar spine disorders, osteoarticular or tendon lesions, chronic kidney disease or uremia, thyroid disease, intracranial tumors, trauma, etc.) and are judged by the investigator to potentially confound the assessment of PHN.

    3. During screen, suffer from a systemic disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect the patient's participation in the study or affect the evaluation of the efficacy of PHN, including but not limited to:

    1. Severe cardiopulmonary diseases, such as unstable angina, myocardial infarction, severe arrhythmia within 6 months prior to screening, cardiac function classification of grade III\~IV at screening, hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg at screening), recurrent asthma attacks, etc.;
    2. Chronic digestive diseases, such as liver fibrosis, chronic active hepatitis, peptic ulcer, etc.;
    3. Neuropsychiatric disorders, including epilepsy, recurrent dizziness or headache, cognitive impairment; Cerebrovascular disease (such as cerebral infarction) or recurrent within 6 months prior to screening;
    4. History of malignant tumors within 5 years prior to screening (excluding cured basal cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ and papillary thyroid carcinoma);
    5. Presence of active infection, which, in the opinion of the investigator, is not suitable for entry into this study;
    6. Diabetic patients with poor glycemic control (peritoneal venous blood glucose ≥11mmol/L at screening);
    7. Suffering from diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, immunosuppressant therapy for diseases.

    4. During screening, situations may exist that investigators believe could affect pain assessment, such as if the affected skin area has a skin condition that may influence sensation.

    5. Previously received nerve destruction for PHN, or underwent minimally invasive interventions (such as nerve blocks or neurostimulation), physical therapy (such as red light therapy), or traditional Chinese external treatments (such as acupuncture) within one week prior to screening.

    6. Use prohibited drugs within the first 5 half-lives, or change the restricted drug dosage within the first 14 days.

    7. Severe hematological, hepatatological, and renal function abnormalities at the time of screening, which meet any of the following laboratory test results: 1) Hematology: \< 1.5×109/L, or \< 90×109/L, or \<100g/L; 2) Liver function: or AST > 2.5 times ; or > 1.5 times ULN; 3) Renal function: CrCL\<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated based on Cockroft-Gault formula a); 4) Creatine kinase >2-fold ULN.

    8. Participants already diagnosed with sleep apnea, or those with severe snoring and daytime sleepiness, as well as intermittent hypoxia.

    9. Participants with a history of suicidal behavior, or those assessed to have suicidal tendencies using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).

    10. surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and HBV-DNA titer >lower limit of reference value, or virus antibody (HCV-Ab) positive and HCV-DNA titer >lower limit of reference value, or antibody (HIV-Ab) positive, or serum Treponema pallidum-specific antibodies (TP-Ab) positiv eand rapid plasma reagin/toluidine red unheated serum test (RPR or TRUST) positive at screening.

    11. Known drug abuse, or history of alcohol abuse within 1 year prior to screening, i.e., drinking more than 14 units of alcohol per week (1 unit = 360 mL of beer or 45 mL of spirits with 40% alcohol or 150 mL of wine).

    12. Pregnant or lactating females. 13.Male (or their partner) or female subjects have a fertility plan during the whole study period and within 1 month after the end of the study or are unwilling to take one or more non-drug measures (such as condoms, intrauterine devices, etc.) during the study period.

    14.Prior participation in any other clinical study of any other drug within 30 days prior to screening.

    15.Engaging in high-altitude work, driving motor vehicles, or operating heavy machinery with associated risks during the study period.

    16.Other conditions that are considered unsuitable by the investigator to participate in this clinical study.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Y-4 group

    Participants will take Y-4 tablets (1w titration period: 75 mg pregabalin +18.75 mg riluzole, 12w fixed dose period: 150 mg pregabalin +37.5 mg riluzole, 1w drug withdraw period: 1w titration period: 75 mg pregabalin +18.75 mg riluzole) , BID

    Drug: Y-4 tables

  • Other
    pregabalin group

    Participants will take pregabalin capsules (75 mg for 1w titration period , 150 mg for 12w fixed dose period ,75 mg for 1w drug withdraw period), BID.

    Drug: Pregabalin

Interventions

  • DrugY-4 tables

    combination of pregabalin and riluzole

  • only use pregabalin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the efficacy of Y-4 in patients with PHN by Change from baseline in Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) for each group at week 13.

    The average daily pain score is a commonly used clinical method for pain assessment. It converts the intensity of pain into numerical values (generally 0-10 points) based on patient self-reports or standardized scales. After recording multiple pain scores each day, an average is calculated to monitor changes in pain and treatment effects dynamically. The core function of pain scoring is to quantify the subjective experience of pain, helping doctors understand the degree of pain and adjust treatment plans. Commonly used scales include: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): 0 points (no pain) to 10 points (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: week 13

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the efficacy of Y-4 in patients with PHN by ADPS response rate (i.e., proportion of patients with a ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% decrease in ADPS from baseline) at week 13

    The average daily pain score is a commonly used clinical method for pain assessment. It converts the intensity of pain into numerical values (generally 0-10 points) based on patient self-reports or standardized scales. After recording multiple pain scores each day, an average is calculated to monitor changes in pain and treatment effects dynamically. The core function of pain scoring is to quantify the subjective experience of pain, helping doctors understand the degree of pain and adjust treatment plans. Commonly used scales include: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): 0 points (no pain) to 10 points (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: week 13

  2. Evaluate the efficacy of Y-4 in patients with PHN by Change from baseline in Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) for each group at week 1-12 and 14.

    The average daily pain score is a commonly used clinical method for pain assessment. It converts the intensity of pain into numerical values (generally 0-10 points) based on patient self-reports or standardized scales. After recording multiple pain scores each day, an average is calculated to monitor changes in pain and treatment effects dynamically. The core function of pain scoring is to quantify the subjective experience of pain, helping doctors understand the degree of pain and adjust treatment plans. Commonly used scales include: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): 0 points (no pain) to 10 points (worst pain imaginable).

    Time frame: week 1-12 and 14

  3. Evaluate the efficacy of Y-4 in patients with PHN by Change from baseline in Score of Average Daily Sleep Interference Score (ADSIS) in each group at week 1-14;

    The subject will select the number that best describes his or her sleep interference experience during the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (pain did not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interfered with sleep)

    Time frame: week 1-14

  4. Evaluate the efficacy of Y-4 in patients with PHN by The proportion of patients grading ≤2 and ≤3 in each group using Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC) at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 14.

    The items of PGIC are listed as follows Score PGIC 1. Very much improved 2. Much improved 3. Minimally improved 4. No change 5. Worse 6. Much worse 7. Very much worse

    Time frame: week 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 14

  5. Evaluate the efficacy of Y-4 in patients with PHN by Change from baseline in Simplified McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) in each group at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14 (single score and total score);

    The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors.(Throbbing, Shooting, Stabbing, Sharp, Cramping, Gnawing, Hot-burning, Aching, Heavy, Tender, Splitting, Tiring-exhausting, sickening, Fearful, Punishing-cruel)

    Time frame: week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14

  6. Evaluate the efficacy of Y-4 in patients with PHN by Change from baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a psychological assessment tool used to screen for anxiety and depression in patients at general hospitals. It was first developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983. The scale contains 14 items, divided into two subscales: anxiety (A) and depression (D), each consisting of 7 questions. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, with the total score for each subscale ranging from 0 to 21. Scores of 0-7 indicate no symptoms, 8-10 suggest possible symptoms, and 11-21 indicate definite symptoms. HADS was designed to avoid the use of indicators affected by physical illnesses and is suitable for screening psychological issues in patients with chronic diseases.

    Time frame: week 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14

  7. Evaluate the efficacy of Y-4 in patients with PHN by The amount of rescue medication acetaminophen tablets used by each group during the trial

    4-6 h per time, The maximum daily dose should not exceed 2.0 g, and continuous use should not exceed 5 days.

    Time frame: the whole study(16 week)

  8. Evaluate the safety of Y-4 in patients with PHN by The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in each group.

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical event that occurs after receiving a drug or treatment or any deterioration of a disease or symptom that existed before receiving the investigational product or treatment (excluding the disease studied in this trial) in a subject or a clinical investigation subject, whether or not considered related to the investigational product or treatment. Therefore, an AE can be a discomfort sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or transient disease beyond any indication, whether or not related to the investigational product or treatment. The investigator will name each AE reported during the study by MedDRA PT and evaluate their severity using the criteria of CTCAE 5.0. The relevance evaluation is divided into 5 grades: 1-certainly related; 2-probably/likely related; 3-possibly related; 4-unlikely related; 5 not related.

    Time frame: the whole study(16 week)

  9. Evaluate the safety of Y-4 in patients with PHN by rates of Significant Adverse Events.

    Significant Adverse Events refers to any adverse event, other than a serious adverse event, that leads to the implementation of targeted medical measures (such as drug withdrawal, dose reduction, and symptomatic treatment) and is significant in blood or other laboratory tests.

    Time frame: the whole study(16 week)

  10. Evaluate the safety of Y-4 in patients with PHN by rates of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) after treatment.

    Serious Adverse Events (SAE) refers to adverse medical events that occur after a subject receives the investigational products, including death, life-threatening conditions, permanent or severe disability or functional loss, the subject requiring hospitalization or an extension of hospital stay, as well as congenital anomalies or birth defects.

    Time frame: the whole study(16 week)

  11. Evaluate the safety of Y-4 in patients with PHN by incidence of subject getting abnormal results of vital signs after treatment.

    Record changes from baseline to post-treatment, listing deviations from normal ranges post-treatment. Vital signs(blood pressure, respiration, pulse, body temperature will be assessed by according equipments.(electronic sphygmomanometer thermometer).

    Time frame: the whole study(16 week)

  12. Evaluate the safety of Y-4 in patients with PHN by incidence of subject getting abnormal results of physical examinations after treatment.

    Record changes from baseline to post-treatment, listing deviations from normal ranges post-treatment. Physical examinations will be conduct by the investigator through observation

    Time frame: the whole study(16 week)

  13. Evaluate the safety of Y-4 in patients with PHN by incidence of subject getting abnormal results of 12-lead ECG after treatment.

    Record changes from baseline to post-treatment, listing deviations from normal ranges post-treatment. 12-lead ECG will be analyzed by single RR Heart Rate, aggregate PR Interval, aggregate QRS Duration, aggregate RR Interval, aggregate QT Interval, aggregate QTC Interval. Normal range is provided by the site.

    Time frame: the whole study(16 week)

  14. Evaluate the safety of Y-4 in patients with PHN by incidence of subject getting abnormal results of laboratory tests after treatment.

    Record changes from baseline to post-treatment, listing deviations from normal ranges post-treatment. Laboratory tests are composed of hematology, urinalysis, serum chemistry, coagulation test. Normal range is provided by the site.

    Time frame: the whole study (16 week)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2026, 5 months after the start.

Of 12 phase 2 interventional studies under Neuralgia, Postherpetic, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 17. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2025
First posted
Dec 10, 2025
StartActual
Feb 2, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2026
Last update
May 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07275762
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 10, 2025
Start date
Feb 2, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 13, 2026

Study contacts

Qianjin Lu
Contact
qianlu5860@gmail.com
025-85478105

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion