ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07932912Updated Nov 12, 2026

Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid Gel and Concentrated Growth Factor in Periodontal Therapy

An interventional study of Minimally invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST) and 0.8% High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid Gel in Periodontitis, sponsored by Amina Fouad Farag. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-12.

Sponsored by Amina Fouad Farag · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2023, registered Nov 2026).
Updated Nov 12, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 119 studies in Periodontitis with a site in Egypt — 28 open to participants now, 37 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Periodontitis · Egypt.

Enrollment
9th of 101
66 · median 30
Started
2023
with 19 others
No phase
61 of 119
18 open now
Registered
119th of 119
by date

Among the 119 studies in Periodontitis with a site in Egypt, this one is the 9th largest by enrollment of the 101 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 20 that started in 2023, is one of 61 with no phase, and was the 119th registered.

Periodontitis

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Periodontitis; 295 are open to participants now.

Browse Periodontitis studies →

Open to participants now

28 of the 119 studies in Periodontitis with a site in Egypt are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

23 more — sign in →

All 28 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Egypt have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Egypt →

Who these studies take

Of the 158 Periodontitis studies recruiting now, 78 (49%) set no upper age limit and 60 (38%) stop at 75 or younger; 12 take children under 18; 76 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 20 Years to 40 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 119 studies in Periodontitis with a site in Egypt, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Background: Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the tooth-supporting tissues, resulting from an imbalance between the host immune response and periodontopathogenic bacteria. Minimally invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST) reduces soft-tissue trauma and preserves clot stability. Healing may be further enhanced by two adjuncts: high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HA), which has anti-inflammatory and mucoadhesive properties, and concentrated growth factor (CGF), an autologous platelet concentrate. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) serves as a marker of inflammation, angiogenesis and healing.

Aim: This study evaluated the clinical and biochemical outcomes of 0.8% HA gel and liquid CGF as adjuncts to MINST in stage II-III periodontitis. The primary outcome was clinical attachment level (CAL) gain at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI) and GCF VEGF levels at 1, 3 and 6 months.

Subjects and Methods: This three-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial included 66 systemically healthy non-smokers aged 20-40 years with stage II-III periodontitis and pockets of at least 5 mm. Patients were recruited at the Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, under ethics approval RECO6U/34-2023. A sample size of 22 per group was calculated with G*Power (α = 0.05, power 80%, effect size 0.4). After an initial hygiene phase, patients whose full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores fell below 20% were randomized by computer-generated sequence into three groups. Group I received MINST alone. Group II received MINST plus 0.8% HA gel injected subgingivally and repeated after 4 weeks. Group III received MINST plus liquid CGF, prepared from about 9 mL of the patient's venous blood, injected subgingivally and repeated after 4 weeks. MINST was performed under local anesthesia with 5× loupes and Gracey Mini Five curettes, without irrigation. The deepest interproximal site in each patient served as the experimental site. A single calibrated, blinded examiner recorded the clinical parameters at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months. GCF was collected with paper points, and VEGF was measured by ELISA. CAL, PD and VEGF were analyzed by mixed MANOVA with Bonferroni correction. PI and GI were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests, and BoP with the chi-square, Cochran's Q and McNemar tests.

Results: All 66 patients completed follow-up. The groups were comparable at baseline (p > 0.05), and all improved significantly over time (p \< 0.001).

Mean baseline CAL was similar in Groups I, II and III (5.36, 5.41 and 5.32 mm). At 6 months it had fallen to 3.86, 3.36 and 3.05 mm, giving mean gains of 1.50, 2.05 and 2.27 mm respectively. Both adjunct groups gained more attachment than the control from the first month onward, and CGF gained more than HA at 3 and 6 months (p = 0.03).

Mean PD fell from 5.50, 5.36 and 5.41 mm at baseline to 3.82, 3.41 and 2.95 mm at 6 months, reductions of 1.68, 1.95 and 2.46 mm. CGF gave a greater PD reduction than HA at 3 months (p = 0.01) and 6 months (p = 0.002).

GCF VEGF started at similar levels in all groups (about 1790-1820 pg/mL) and fell significantly at every interval. At 6 months it was 1341.40 pg/mL in Group I, 1264.82 pg/mL in Group II and 1182.66 pg/mL in Group III. The CGF group had the lowest levels at 3 and 6 months compared with HA (p = 0.01) and control (p = 0.001).

PI and GI improved in all groups; PI was significantly better with CGF at 3 and 6 months, and GI with CGF at 3 months (p = 0.001), with no GI difference between groups at 6 months.

BoP was present in 20 of 22 patients (90.9%) in each group at baseline. At 1 month it was present in 54.5%, 31.8% and 13.6% of patients in Groups I, II and III (p = 0.016), and in no patient at 3 and 6 months.

Limitations: The study was carried out at a single centre, with a 6-month follow-up and one experimental site per patient. No radiographic or histological assessment was performed, so CAL gain reflects clinical repair through a long junctional epithelium rather than proven regeneration. The control group received no placebo, so the greater PI improvement in the adjunct groups may reflect performance bias. VEGF was first resampled at 1 month, after the early growth-factor release from CGF. Only healthy non-smokers aged 20-40 years were included.

Conclusion: Adding HA gel or liquid CGF to MINST produced greater clinical and biochemical improvement than MINST alone over 6 months in stage II-III periodontitis. CGF was the most effective adjunct for CAL gain, PD reduction and lowering GCF VEGF.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the tooth-supporting tissues that leads to destruction of the connective tissue attachment and alveolar bone. It results from an imbalance between the host immune response and periodontopathogenic bacteria. The 2017 AAP/EFP World Workshop introduced a new classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases, published in 2018.

Diagnosis still relies mainly on clinical and radiographic examination, which cannot detect early disease activity or predict prognosis. Biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), are therefore of growing interest as objective indicators of inflammation, angiogenesis and healing.

Non-surgical periodontal therapy is the cornerstone of treatment. Minimally invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST) refines this approach by minimizing soft-tissue trauma and preserving clot stability. Adjunctive agents may further enhance healing: high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HA) has anti-inflammatory, mucoadhesive and wound-healing properties, while concentrated growth factor (CGF) is an autologous platelet concentrate rich in growth factors.

Aim of the Study The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and biochemical outcomes of high-molecular-weight HA gel and liquid CGF as adjuncts to MINST in the treatment of stage II and III periodontitis. The primary outcome was clinical attachment level (CAL) gain at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI) and GCF VEGF levels at 1, 3 and 6 months.

Subjects and Methods This prospective, three-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial included 66 systemically healthy, non-smoking patients aged 20-40 years with stage II-III periodontitis and pockets ≥ 5 mm. Patients were recruited from the Periodontology Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, and the study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (RECO6U/34-2023). The sample size (22 per group) was calculated with G*Power (α = 0.05, power = 80%, effect size = 0.4).

After an initial hygiene phase, only patients achieving FMPS and FMBS below 20% were randomized by computer-generated sequence into three groups:

  • Group I (control): MINST alone (n = 22).
  • Group II: MINST + 0.8% high-molecular-weight HA gel, applied subgingivally and repeated after 4 weeks (n = 22).
  • Group III: MINST + liquid CGF prepared from about 9 mL of autologous venous blood and injected subgingivally, repeated likewise (n = 22).

MINST was performed under local anesthesia with 5x loupes and Gracey Mini Five curettes, without subgingival irrigation. The deepest interproximal site in each patient served as the experimental site. A single calibrated, blinded examiner recorded CAL, PD, BoP, GI and PI with a UNC-15 probe at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months. GCF was collected with #40 paper points at the same intervals, and VEGF was measured by ELISA.

Data were analyzed with SPSS v25 using mixed MANOVA with Bonferroni correction (CAL, PD, VEGF), Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman and Wilcoxon tests (PI, GI), and chi-square, Cochran's Q and McNemar tests (BoP). Significance was set at p \< 0.05.

Results All 66 patients completed the 6-month follow-up. The groups did not differ significantly at baseline in any parameter (p > 0.05), and all groups improved significantly over time (p \< 0.001). At 3 and 6 months, Group III (CGF) showed the best outcomes, followed by Group II (HA), then the control group.

Parameter (mean ± SD) Time Group I (MINST) Group II (MINST + HA) Group III (MINST + CGF) CAL (mm) Baseline 5.36 ± 0.49 5.41 ± 0.50 5.32 ± 0.48 CAL (mm) 6 months 3.86 ± 0.47 3.36 ± 0.49 3.05 ± 0.21 PD (mm) Baseline 5.50 ± 0.51 5.36 ± 0.49 5.41 ± 0.50 PD (mm) 6 months 3.82 ± 0.40 3.41 ± 0.50 2.95 ± 0.38 VEGF (pg/mL) Baseline 1795.40 ± 84.40 1818.53 ± 80.61 1788.96 ± 64.21 VEGF (pg/mL) 6 months 1341.40 ± 100.02 1264.82 ± 92.76 1182.66 ± 82.73

  • CAL: Mean gain at 6 months was 1.50 mm (Group I), 2.05 mm (Group II) and 2.27 mm (Group III). Both adjunct groups exceeded the control from 1 month onward, and CGF exceeded HA at 3 and 6 months (p = 0.03).
  • PD: Mean reduction at 6 months was 1.68, 1.95 and 2.46 mm, respectively. CGF exceeded HA at 3 months (p = 0.01) and 6 months (p = 0.002).
  • VEGF: Levels fell significantly between every interval in all groups. Group III had the lowest levels at 3 and 6 months versus Group II (p = 0.01) and Group I (p = 0.001).
  • PI: Median PI at 6 months was 1 in the control group and 0 in both adjunct groups, with CGF significantly better at 3 and 6 months.
  • GI: Group III was significantly better than both other groups at 3 months (p = 0.001); no between-group difference remained at 6 months (median 0 in all groups).
  • BoP: Present in 100% of patients at baseline, it fell at 1 month to 54.5% (Group I), 31.8% (Group II) and 13.6% (Group III) (p = 0.01), and was absent in all groups at 3 and 6 months.

Conclusion and Recommendations Adjunctive use of HA gel or liquid CGF with MINST produced greater clinical and biochemical improvement than MINST alone over 6 months in stage II-III periodontitis. CGF was the most effective adjunct for CAL gain, PD reduction and lowering GCF VEGF levels.

Recommendations:

  • Conduct larger trials with longer follow-up periods.
  • Add radiographic, re-entry or histological evaluation to confirm whether periodontal regeneration occurs.
  • Use a placebo in the control group to reduce performance bias.
  • Measure VEGF at earlier time points (first week), together with hypoxia markers and other biomarkers.
03

Conditions studied

  • Periodontitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • MINST
  • Hyalronic acid
  • Periodontitis
  • Concentrated growth factor
  • Vascular endothelial growth factor
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients aged 20 to 40 years.
  • Diagnosis of stage II or stage III periodontitis according to the 2018 AAP/EFP classification.
  • At least one interproximal site with probing depth ≥ 5 mm.
  • Systemically healthy.
  • Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) below 20% at re-evaluation 4 weeks after the initial hygiene phase.
  • Willing to undergo non-surgical periodontal treatment and attend all follow-up visits for 6 months.
  • Able to give written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic diseases or conditions that contraindicate periodontal treatment or affect healing.
  • Current smokers.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Use of medications known to interfere with healing or to cause gingival enlargement.
  • Antibiotic or anti-inflammatory therapy within the [3/6] months before the study.
  • Periodontal therapy within the 6 months before the study, or periodontal surgery at the experimental site within the previous year.
  • Experimental teeth that are non-vital, carious or restored.
  • Gingival recession at the experimental site.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group I: MINST

    Subgingival debridement under local anesthesia with 5× loupes and Gracey Mini Five curettes, using a subpapillary approach, without irrigation.

    Procedure: Minimally invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST)

  • Experimental
    Group II: MINST + HA gel

    MINST followed by subgingival injection of 0.8% HA gel until overflow, repeated after 4 weeks.

    Procedure: Minimally invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST) · Device: 0.8% High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid Gel

  • Experimental
    Group III: MINST + CGF

    MINST followed by subgingival injection of CGF prepared from about 9 mL of venous blood (Medifuge, Silfradent), repeated after 4 weeks.

    Procedure: Minimally invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST) · Biological: Concentrated Growth Factor (CGF), autologous

Interventions

  • ProcedureMinimally invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST)

    Description: Subgingival debridement following the MINST protocol (Nibali et al.), done under local anesthesia with 5× magnification loupes and Gracey Mini Five curettes (Hu-Friedy). A subpapillary approach preserves the papillae. Roots are cleaned to the base of the pocket without excessive root planing or gingival curettage, and the pocket is not irrigated, to keep the blood clot stable. All pockets deeper than 3 mm are treated in a single session, after a 4-week initial hygiene phase.

    Also known as: MINST; minimally invasive subgingival instrumentation

  • Device0.8% High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid Gel

    Immediately after MINST, 0.8% high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid gel is injected into the pocket at the experimental site with a sterile syringe and blunt plastic needle until it overflows the gingival margin. The application is repeated 4 weeks later. Patients avoid eating and drinking for 1 hour and brushing the treated site for 24 hours.

    Also known as: HA gel

  • BiologicalConcentrated Growth Factor (CGF), autologous

    About 9 mL of the patient's venous blood is collected into sterile plastic tubes without anticoagulant or clot activator. The tubes are centrifuged in a Medifuge (Silfradent) with the alternating-speed CGF program (2700, 2400, 2700 and 3000 rpm; 692-855 × g). The upper liquid fraction is aspirated and, immediately after MINST and before it clots, injected into the pocket at the experimental site with a blunt needle until it overflows the gingival margin. The application is repeated 4 weeks later. No periodontal dressing is used.

    Also known as: CGF, autologous platelet concentrate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)

    Distance in millimetres from the cemento-enamel junction to the base of the pocket, measured at the experimental site (the deepest interproximal pocket) with a UNC-15 probe by a calibrated examiner. CAL gain = baseline CAL minus CAL at each follow-up. The 6-month CAL gain is the main end-point; the 1- and 3-month values describe the course of attachment gain.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Probing Depth (PD)

    Distance in millimetres from the gingival margin to the base of the pocket at the experimental site, measured with a UNC-15 probe.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months

  2. Bleeding on Probing (BoP)

    Presence or absence of bleeding within 30 seconds after gentle probing of the experimental site, reported as the number and percentage of patients with BoP.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months

  3. Gingival Index (GI)

    Löe \& Silness index scored 0-3 (0 = normal gingiva; 3 = severe inflammation with spontaneous bleeding) at the experimental tooth.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months

  4. Plaque Index (PI)

    Silness \& Löe index scored 0-3 (0 = no plaque; 3 = abundant soft deposits) at the experimental tooth.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months

  5. Gingival Crevicular Fluid VEGF Level

    Vascular endothelial growth factor in GCF collected with a sterile #40 paper point placed for 30 seconds at the experimental site, measured by human VEGF sandwich ELISA (pg/mL).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University
    Giza, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly, in accordance with the data protection policy of the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University. Aggregate results are available in the published article. De-identified data may be made available by the corresponding author on reasonable request, subject to approval by the Research Ethics Committee.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 12 months.

Of 481 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Periodontitis, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 31. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 495 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2026
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
StartActual
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Nov 30, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 30, 2024
Last update
Nov 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 12, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 12, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07932912
Lead sponsor
Amina Fouad Farag
Responsible party
Amina Fouad Farag (Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, October 6 University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2024
Completion
Nov 30, 2024
Last update
Nov 12, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion