ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07930156Updated Nov 10, 2026

Disability and Psychological Symptoms After Injection or Conservative Care for Lumbar Disc Herniation

An observational study in Lumbar Disc Herniation and Lumbar Radiculopathy, sponsored by Hebei Medical University Third Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Hebei Medical University Third Hospital · Observational

Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lumbar disc herniation can cause leg pain, difficulty with daily activities, and symptoms of depression or anxiety. This completed study compared disability and psychological symptom scores in patients who chose an image-guided injection with those who continued conservative care. Sixty-four patients at Tiemenguan People's Hospital were included in the analytical cohort, with 32 in each group. Treatment was chosen through patient preference and discussion with clinicians. Disability, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms were assessed before treatment and at a nominal three-month follow-up. Pain was recorded before and immediately after the first treatment session. The study examined whether the two treatment groups had different three-month scores. The comparison is observational and cannot establish that treatment caused the differences. This record is prepared after data collection; outcome ordering was determined after data collection.

Read the detailed description

This was an exploratory, single-center, prospective, nonrandomized observational cohort at Tiemenguan People's Hospital, Tiemenguan, Xinjiang, China. The manuscript reports a study period from January 2021 to August 2024. Participants had single-level lumbar disc herniation with corresponding unilateral radicular symptoms, persistent symptoms despite at least three months of conservative treatment, and baseline PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores of 5 to 14 each.

Treatment selection followed patient preference and shared decision-making rather than protocol-assigned allocation. The initial exposures were a fluoroscopy-guided periradicular/epidural injection package using reverse geometric planning, lidocaine, and compound betamethasone, or continued conservative care with celecoxib, infrared physical therapy, and home rehabilitation guidance. Subsequent adherence, treatment crossover, rescue analgesia, and other care were not quantified.

The analytical cohort comprised 64 unique patients with paired baseline and nominal three-month disability and psychological symptom scores. The screening denominator, individual exclusion counts, and attrition before inclusion in this dataset were unavailable. The source sampling procedure was not sufficiently documented to establish random or consecutive sampling. Three-month outcome assessors were blinded to treatment group; patients and treating clinicians were not blinded.

The principal analysis compared three-month ODI, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 totals using separate linear models adjusted for the corresponding baseline score, age, and sex. HC3 robust standard errors and Holm correction across the three outcomes were used. Immediate VAS pain scores and injection procedural records were descriptive. Threshold-response and pain-psychological-change association analyses were exploratory.

This completed study is being registered after data collection. A prospectively dated protocol and analysis plan were unavailable. Outcome ordering and statistical specifications were defined after data collection. ODI is placed in the primary-outcome field and PHQ-9 and GAD-7 in secondary-outcome fields to describe the manuscript's post hoc ordering, without implying prospective prespecification. Follow-up was nominally three months; exact assessment dates and a verified visit window were unavailable. Pain was not measured at three months. Structured adverse-event surveillance was unavailable, so adverse-event rates and comparative safety were not estimated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Disc Herniation
  • Lumbar Radiculopathy

Keywords

  • Image-guided injection
  • Periradicular injection
  • Epidural injection
  • Reverse geometric planning
  • Oswestry Disability Index
  • PHQ-9
  • GAD-7
  • Conservative care
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Displacement

474 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement; 100 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 100 across 117 observational studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Displacement studies →

Lead sponsor

Hebei Medical University Third Hospital is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with MRI-confirmed single-level lumbar disc herniation and corresponding unilateral radicular symptoms treated at Tiemenguan People's Hospital, Tiemenguan, Xinjiang, China. The analytical cohort included 64 patients who selected injection or continued conservative care. The full screened population was not reported.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral lower-extremity radicular symptoms corresponding to MRI evidence of single-level lumbar disc herniation.
  • Failure of conservative treatment for at least three months.
  • Baseline PHQ-9 total score from 5 to 14 and baseline GAD-7 total score from 5 to 14.
  • Written to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe spinal stenosis.
  • Lumbar instability.
  • Previous lumbar surgery.
  • Severe psychiatric illness.
  • Coagulation disorders.
  • Local infection at the injection site.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Image-guided injection group

    Patients with lumbar disc herniation who selected a fluoroscopy-guided periradicular/epidural injection package using reverse geometric planning, lidocaine, and compound betamethasone through shared decision-making. The analytical cohort included 32 patients in this group.

    Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided periradicular/epidural injection with reverse geometric planning · Drug: Lidocaine · Drug: Compound betamethasone

  • Continued conservative care group

    Patients with lumbar disc herniation who selected continued conservative care through shared decision-making. Initial care comprised celecoxib, local infrared physical therapy, and subsequent home rehabilitation guidance. The analytical cohort included 32 patients in this group.

    Drug: Celecoxib · Other: Infrared physical therapy · Behavioral: Home rehabilitation guidance

Interventions

  • ProcedureFluoroscopy-guided periradicular/epidural injection with reverse geometric planning

    Anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy were used for surface projection and trajectory planning. A 22-gauge spinal needle was advanced toward the affected periradicular/epidural target under intermittent fluoroscopy and contrast observation. Iohexol 300 mg iodine/mL, 0.5 to 1.3 mL, was used to assess contrast spread before therapeutic injection.

  • One mL of 1% lidocaine, equivalent to 10 mg, was included in the 2 mL therapeutic injectate. Local infiltration with 1% lidocaine preceded needle advancement; its volume was not recorded in the analytical dataset.

  • DrugCompound betamethasone

    Drug pages: Betamethasone sodium phosphate · Betamethasone dipropionate

    One mL of compound betamethasone was included in the therapeutic injectate, containing 5 mg betamethasone as dipropionate and 2 mg betamethasone as sodium phosphate, totaling 7 mg betamethasone equivalents according to the product label.

  • Celecoxib 200 mg orally once daily was prescribed as part of initial conservative care. The duration of subsequent medication use and actual adherence during follow-up were not quantified.

  • OtherInfrared physical therapy

    Local infrared physical therapy was prescribed once daily for two weeks.

  • BehavioralHome rehabilitation guidance

    Home rehabilitation guidance followed initial conservative care. Exercise dose and actual rehabilitation adherence were not quantified.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index score at 3 months

    Total Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at the nominal three-month follow-up, recorded as a percentage from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater disability. The registered metric is the absolute three-month total score. Baseline ODI was recorded for adjustment. Only final percentages were retained; item-level scores and the original scoring denominator were unavailable. The primary-outcome designation was assigned after data collection.

    Time frame: 3 months after initial treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score at 3 months

    Total Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score at the nominal three-month follow-up, ranging from 0 to 27; higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom burden. The registered metric is the absolute three-month total score. Baseline PHQ-9 was recorded for adjustment. Total scores do not establish a psychiatric diagnosis or remission. The secondary-outcome designation was assigned after data collection.

    Time frame: 3 months after initial treatment

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score at 3 months

    Total Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score at the nominal three-month follow-up, ranging from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom burden. The registered metric is the absolute three-month total score. Baseline GAD-7 was recorded for adjustment. Total scores do not establish a psychiatric diagnosis or remission. The secondary-outcome designation was assigned after data collection.

    Time frame: 3 months after initial treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Immediate visual analog scale pain score

    Self-rated pain score on a 0 to 10 visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable. The registered metric is the absolute immediate post-treatment total score. Pretreatment pain was also recorded as a reference. Immediate ratings followed the injection or the first conservative-care session and were descriptive. Exact elapsed minutes were unavailable. Pain was not measured at three months.

    Time frame: Immediately after the initial injection or initial conservative-care session

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
    Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning immediately following article publication and ending 5 years following article publication.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07930156
Lead sponsor
Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
Responsible party
Yapeng Sun (Chief Physician, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024
Completion
Aug 31, 2024
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion