ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07912047Updated Nov 3, 2026

Effects of Spinal Mobilization With and Without Clinical Pilates in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniationc Herniation

An interventional study of SPINAL MOBILIZATION and SPINAL MOBILIZATION + CLINICAL PILATES in Disc Herniation, sponsored by University of Management and Technology Lahore. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by University of Management and Technology Lahore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lumbar disc herniation is described by The North American Spine Society (NASS) as the confined movement of the disc material like nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosis outside the limitations of the intervertebral disc space causing low back pain among adults. Low back pain become the most prevalent and common in adult generation. Lumbar disc herniation is the most common reason of low back pain in grown-ups of age saturation of 30 to 50 years. Lumbar disc herniation is affection almost 1 to 3% of the population per annum. There are many risk factors including alcohol, smoking, high intensity activities causing high load on your back or lifting high weight objects and genetic and environmental factors. The most affected and endorsed first line intervention protocol for lumbar disc herniation comprise of physical therapy management, life style adjustments and epidural steroid shots. This first line conservative management is used to avoid the risks of surgery and further complications. Spinal mobilization is used as the most effective and suggested option to help increase the mobility of the lumbar spine and reduce pain and disability chances in lumbar disc herniation patients. Clinical Pilates Exercise is used to upsurge core firmness and functional activity as well as boost the neuromuscular re-education in patients with disc herniation. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of spinal mobilization with or without Clinical Pilates on pain, lumbar mobility and disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Evaluation will be done by using NPRS, RODQ and Bubble Inclinometer. Non-probability convenient sampling will be used and the subjects will be allocated to two groups by random allocation. Group A will receive spinal mobilization and Group B will receive spinal mobilization along with Pilates. Both groups will receive hot pack and TENS for 10 minutes as baseline treatment of herniated disc back pain before techniques application. Both groups will receive 12 sessions for the period of 4 weeks. Measurements of all the outcome variables will be taken at baseline, 2nd and 4th week. Results will be analyzed by using SPSS 24.

02

Conditions studied

  • Disc Herniation

Keywords

  • Lumbar disc herniation
  • Spinal Mobilization
  • Low Back Pain
  • Pilates
  • Range of Motion
03

In context

Intervertebral Disc Displacement

493 studies on the registry are indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement; 103 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 64 across 356 interventional studies indexed under Intervertebral Disc Displacement.

Browse Intervertebral Disc Displacement studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Management and Technology Lahore is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Clinically diagnosed patients with lumbar disc herniation. Both genders. Age ranging from 30 to 50 years. Unilateral radiating pain. low back pain for at least more than 3 weeks ranges from 4-6 on NPRS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of systemic metabolic and/or neurological disorder. Neuropathic pain due to damage of the nervous system Red flags conditions like infection, cauda equina syndrome and fractures Participants who had undergone surgery for LBP. Pregnancy

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HOT PACK+ TENS + SPINAL MOBILIZATION

    Group A will receive spinal mobilization along hot pack for 10 minutes and TENS for 10 minutes. In this group, participants will receive graded posteroanterior (PA) mobilizations on the affected lumbar segment L1-L5. The therapist will use oscillatory mobilizations of grade 1 and 2 within the pain free range depending on the patient's response and clinical evidences. To apply spinal mobilization the members will be placed in an appropriate prone lying position on a couch and with hands on their respective sides. The therapist will place the hypothenar (ulnar) surface of the hand on the spinous process of the symptomatic lumbar vertebrae (L1-L5) while the other hand will be placed over the first hand to increase the force. Mobilization will be applied for 4 times with a 30-60 second of PA pressure and a resting interval of 20 sec. Apply 2 to 3 oscillations per sec. We'll start with the grade 1 and check the patient's response and gradually increase the grade of oscillations from 1 to 2

    Other: SPINAL MOBILIZATION

  • Active comparator
    HOT PACK+ TENS+ SPINAL MOBILIZATION + CLINICAL PILATES

    For spinal mobilization, the participants will receive the same protocol just like the members of group A. However, the participants of this group will receive a session of Clinical Pilates Exercises. The exercises will be given to all the members of group B 3 days per week and the study continues for 4 weeks. The exercise session will be divided into 4 weeks

    Other: SPINAL MOBILIZATION + CLINICAL PILATES

Interventions

  • OtherSPINAL MOBILIZATION

    Group A will receive spinal mobilization along hot pack for 10 minutes and TENS for 10 minutes. In this group, participants will receive graded posteroanterior (PA) mobilizations on the affected lumbar segment L1-L5. The therapist will use oscillatory mobilizations of grade 1 and 2 within the pain free range depending on the patient's response and clinical evidences. To apply spinal mobilization the members will be placed in an appropriate prone lying position on a couch and with hands on their respective sides. The therapist will place the hypothenar (ulnar) surface of the hand on the spinous process of the symptomatic lumbar vertebrae (L1-L5) while the other hand will be placed over the first hand to increase the force. Mobilization will be applied for 4 times with a 30-60 second of PA pressure and a resting interval of 20 sec. Apply 2 to 3 oscillations per sec. We'll start with the grade 1 and check the patient's response and gradually increase the grade of oscillations from 1 to 2

  • OtherSPINAL MOBILIZATION + CLINICAL PILATES

    For spinal mobilization, the participants will receive the same protocol just like the members of group A. However, the participants of this group will receive a session of Clinical Pilates Exercises. The exercises will be given to all the members of group B 3 days per week and the study continues for 4 weeks. The exercise session will be divided into 4 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. NUMERIC PAIN RATING SCALE

    Numeric Rating Scale (NPRS) is most frequently used instruments to measure pain intensity in musculoskeletal pain. The 11-point numeric with 0 representing No pain, 1-3 representing Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 representing Moderate Pains (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 representing Sever Pain (disabling, unable to perform ADLs). It is evident that the NPRS are practical to use, yield accurate scores, and correspond to multi-item patient-reported outcome measures. More work is needed to improve the scales' responsiveness (meaningful change) and how change scores are interpreted. In neck pain research and management, the NPRS can be a helpful single-item evaluation to support more thorough multi-item patient-reported outcome measures

    Time frame: BASELINE AND 4 WEEKS

  2. REVISED OSWESTERY DISABILITY INDEX

    The Oswestry Disability Index (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools. This scale contain question related to functional activities of pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life and travelling. For patients understanding, URDU version is used. Interpretation of scale are 0% to 20% for minimal disability, 21% to 40% for moderate disability, 41 % to 60 % for severe disability 61% to 80 % for crippled and 81 % to 100 %. Bed-bound

    Time frame: BASELINE AND 4 WEEKS

  3. BUBBLE INCLINOMETER

    The spinous process of the 1st sacral vertebra and the 12th thoracic vertebra were considered as reference points for measuring the range of motion in bending forward and backward. The spinous process of the 12th thoracic vertebra was considered as reference point for measuring the range of motion of lumbar side flexion. Two bubble inclinometers were used simultaneously for measuring the lumbar range of motion when bending forward (in the standing position), and one bubble inclinometer for measuring the lumbar range of motion for back extension (in the standing) and side flexion (in the standing position). The actual ranges of motion of lumbar area when bending forward and backward were calculated by subtracting the number (degree) obtained by the lower inclinometer from the number (degree) obtained by the upper inclinometer

    Time frame: BASELINE AND 4 WEEKS

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UMT
    Lahore, Punjab Province 54000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 2 months later.

Of 183 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Intervertebral Disc Displacement, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 25. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 199 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2026
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 28, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07912047
Lead sponsor
University of Management and Technology Lahore
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Oct 28, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion