ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07927127DESAL-HEARTUpdated Nov 10, 2026

DESAL-HEART: Hypertonic Saline Added to a Pre-declared Furosemide Dose in Acute Heart Failure

A Phase 4 interventional study of Hypertonic Saline (3% Sodium Chloride) and Furosemide (Diuretic) in Acute Heart Failure (AHF) and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, sponsored by University of Alberta. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by University of Alberta · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

DESAL-HEART is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, mechanistic proof-of-concept trial conducted within the Heart Failure Efficacy and Research Trial (HEART) Platform. The study will evaluate whether adding a single infusion of 3% hypertonic saline solution (HSS) to a pre-declared intravenous furosemide dose improves decongestion in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale

Congestion is a major cause of hospitalization in patients with acute heart failure. Intravenous loop diuretics, such as furosemide, are the standard treatment for removing excess fluid, but treatment responses vary and residual congestion remains common.

Hypertonic saline may temporarily increase effective circulating blood volume, improve kidney perfusion, and enhance the delivery and effectiveness of furosemide. Although previous studies have suggested potential benefits, limitations in study quality and differences in treatment regimens have prevented definitive conclusions.

DESAL-HEART is designed to isolate the effect of hypertonic saline by ensuring that the furosemide dose is determined before randomization and administered in both treatment groups.

Study Design

A total of 60 adults hospitalized with acute heart failure and persistent congestion will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either:

A single 150 mL infusion of 3% hypertonic saline administered over 30 minutes together with a pre-declared intravenous furosemide dose; or

The same pre-declared intravenous furosemide dose alone.

Randomization will be performed centrally using REDCap, with stratification by chronic kidney disease status. The study is open-label because the control group will not receive a placebo infusion. Laboratory endpoints will be assessed objectively.

The treating clinician will determine and document the intravenous furosemide dose before randomization. Subsequent heart failure management will remain at the discretion of the treating physician.

Study Objectives and Assessments

The primary objective is to estimate the effect of hypertonic saline on NT-proBNP, a biomarker of heart failure, measured 24 ± 6 hours after randomization.

The key mechanistic secondary endpoint is spot urine sodium concentration measured 90-150 minutes after randomization, providing an early measure of the kidneys' response to diuretic treatment.

Additional assessments include:

NT-proBNP at 48 ± 6 hours after randomization.

Spot urine sodium from the first urine sample collected more than 6 hours after randomization.

Changes in body weight, hemoglobin, hematocrit, serum electrolytes, and creatinine at 24 hours.

Urine output, net fluid balance, and additional decongestive treatments during the first 24 hours.

Treatment delivery, recruitment feasibility, and completeness of outcome assessments.

Safety assessments will include infusion intolerance, clinically important electrolyte abnormalities, changes in kidney function, symptomatic hypotension, worsening respiratory status, and serious adverse events. A serum sodium increase of at least 5 mmol/L from baseline or any sodium value of at least 150 mmol/L is a prespecified adverse event of special interest.

Exploratory outcomes include major adverse kidney events and days alive and out of hospital at 30 days. Additional clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be collected through the HEART Platform.

Statistical Analysis and Study Purpose

The primary analysis will use a mixed model for repeated measures to compare log-transformed NT-proBNP at 24 and 48 hours between treatment groups, adjusting for baseline NT-proBNP, site, chronic kidney disease status, age, and sex. The treatment effect will be reported as a geometric mean ratio with a 95% confidence interval.

This 60-participant study is intended to estimate the magnitude and precision of the biological treatment effect rather than establish clinical efficacy. A prespecified Green/Yellow/Red decision framework will integrate the biological signal, urine sodium response, safety, and feasibility to determine whether further investigation in a definitive clinical outcomes trial is warranted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Heart Failure (AHF)
  • Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • DESAL-HEART
  • Hypertonic Saline
  • 3% Sodium Chloride
  • Furosemide
  • Loop Diuretics
  • Acute Heart Failure
  • Decongestion
  • Diuretic Response
  • HEART Platform
  • NT-proBNP
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alberta is the lead sponsor of 823 studies on the registry; 169 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Primary diagnosis of acute heart failure with dyspnea and at least two of the following signs of congestion:

    • Pulmonary congestion on chest radiograph.
    • Rales on chest auscultation.
    • peripheral edema.
    • Elevated jugular venous pressure.
  • Randomization within 24 hours of the hospital admission order or admitted status, with admission to a hospital ward or intensive care unit, including patients remaining in the emergency department awaiting transfer.
  • Persistent congestion with a clinical plan for another intravenous furosemide dose.
  • NT-proBNP ≥1000 pg/mL, regardless of the presence of atrial fibrillation.
  • Estimated (eGFR) >15 mL/min/1.73 m².
  • Serum sodium ≥125 mmol/L and \<145 mmol/L.
  • Meets the eligibility requirements of the HEART Platform Master Protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypertonic saline already administered during the current presentation.
  • A clinical indication for therapeutic hypertonic saline.
  • to either study treatment, including known allergy, , or intolerance to hypertonic saline or furosemide.
  • Requirement for mechanical circulatory support.
  • Dialysis-dependent kidney failure or anuria (absence of urine production).
  • Treating physician's judgment that either treatment strategy is inappropriate, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation unsafe or interfere with interpretation of study results.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hypertonic Saline Plus Furosemide

    Participants will receive a single 150 mL intravenous infusion of 3% hypertonic saline over 30 minutes, administered concurrently with a pre-declared intravenous furosemide dose. The furosemide dose will be determined by the treating clinician before randomization. Subsequent treatment will follow standard clinical care.

    Drug: Hypertonic Saline (3% Sodium Chloride) · Drug: Furosemide (Diuretic)

  • Active comparator
    Furosemide Alone

    Participants will receive a pre-declared intravenous furosemide dose without hypertonic saline. The furosemide dose will be determined by the treating clinician before randomization using the same dosing approach as the intervention group. Subsequent treatment will follow standard clinical care.

    Drug: Furosemide (Diuretic)

Interventions

  • DrugHypertonic Saline (3% Sodium Chloride)

    A single 150 mL intravenous infusion of 3% sodium chloride (hypertonic saline solution) administered over 30 minutes, initiated at the same time as the pre-declared intravenous furosemide dose.

  • A single intravenous dose of furosemide determined and documented by the treating clinician before randomization. The same pre-declared dosing approach applies to both treatment groups. Subsequent diuretic treatment is determined by the treating physician according to standard clinical care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in NT-proBNP at 24 Hours

    Change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to 24 hours after randomization. NT-proBNP is a blood biomarker of heart failure.

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 hours after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Spot Urine Sodium Concentration at 90-150 Minutes

    Spot urine sodium concentration measured 90-150 minutes after randomization to assess the early natriuretic response to intravenous furosemide with or without hypertonic saline.

    Time frame: 90-150 minutes after randomization

  2. Change From Baseline in NT-proBNP at 48 Hours

    Change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to 48 hours after randomization to assess the persistence of the treatment effect on this heart failure biomarker

    Time frame: Baseline to 48 hours after randomization

  3. Spot Urine Sodium Concentration at 6 Hours

    Spot urine sodium concentration measured from the first urine sample collected more than 6 hours after randomization to assess the sustained natriuretic response to treatment. The actual sample collection time will be recorded.

    Time frame: First urine void more than 6 hours after randomization

  4. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at 24 Hours

    Change in blood hemoglobin concentration from baseline to 24 hours after randomization, measured using routine complete blood count testing.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours after randomization

  5. Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at 24 Hours

    Change in hematocrit from baseline to 24 hours after randomization, measured using routine complete blood count testing

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours after randomization

  6. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 24 Hours

    Change in body weight from baseline to 24 hours after randomization to assess fluid removal and decongestion.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours after randomization

  7. Total Urine Output Through 24 Hours

    Total recorded urine output during the first 24 hours after randomization to assess the diuretic response to treatment.

    Time frame: Randomization through 24 hours

  8. Net Fluid Balance Through 24 Hours

    Net fluid balance, calculated as total recorded fluid intake minus total recorded fluid output during the first 24 hours after randomization.

    Time frame: Randomization through 24 hours

  9. Total Furosemide-Equivalent Dose Through 24 Hours

    Total furosemide-equivalent diuretic dose administered during the first 24 hours after randomization, including the pre-declared study dose and subsequent diuretic treatments.

    Time frame: Randomization through 24 hours

  10. Other Decongestive Therapies Through 24 Hours

    Use of additional decongestive therapies during the first 24 hours after randomization, including treatments administered at the discretion of the treating physician.

    Time frame: Randomization through 24 hours

  11. Change From Baseline in Serum Sodium

    Change in serum sodium concentration from baseline to 24 hours after randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours

  12. Change From Baseline in Serum Chloride

    Change in serum chloride concentration from baseline to 24 hours after randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours

  13. Change From Baseline in Serum Potassium

    Change in serum potassium concentration from baseline to 24 hours after randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours

  14. Change From Baseline in Serum Bicarbonate

    Change in serum bicarbonate concentration from baseline to 24 hours after randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours

  15. Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine

    Change in serum creatinine concentration from baseline to 24 hours after randomization to assess kidney function.

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07927127
Collaborators
Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University Hospital Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Fernando G Zampieri, MD,PhD
Contact
fzampier@ualberta.ca
587-588-6151
Justin Ezekowitz, MD
Contact
jae2@ualberta.ca
780-492-0712

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion