An interventional study of Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in Spinal Cord Injuries, sponsored by TryAbility LLC. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.
Sponsored by TryAbility LLC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 968 studies in Spinal Cord Injuries with a site in United States — 250 open to participants now, 308 under way, 7 of them phase 3. Spinal Cord Injuries · United States.
Among the 968 studies in Spinal Cord Injuries with a site in United States, this one is the 699th largest by planned enrollment of the 836 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 71 that started in 2026, is one of 601 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 161 of the 307 other live ones, and was the 968th registered.
2,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 537 are open to participants now.
Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →250 of the 968 studies in Spinal Cord Injuries with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Johns Hopkins University · Sites in United States
University of Miami · Sites in United States
Neuralink Corp · Sites in United States
Rahul Sachdeva · Sites in United States
Northwell Health · Sites in United States
A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →
Of the 375 Spinal Cord Injuries studies recruiting now, 166 (44%) set no upper age limit and 158 (42%) stop at 75 or younger; 41 take children under 18; 52 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
968 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
A study in two phases is counted once above. Listed by phase, each with its combined phases: Phase 1 94 · Phase 2 132 · Phase 3 39 · Phase 4 27
First in 1986; this study’s year is marked. 71 started in 2026.
This study's planned enrollment of 8 is below the median of 24 across 1,633 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.
Median enrollment 24 across the 836 interventional studies, 58 across the 128 observational. Of the 576 that completed or were terminated, 223 (39%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
75 of 968 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
This is the only study on the registry with TryAbility LLC as lead sponsor.
TryAbility LLC has 1 study filed under Spinal Cord Injuries — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
120 of the studies in Spinal Cord Injuries with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 2 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT05903859Phase 3University of MiamiImprovement of Reproductive Function in Men With Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) | 2027-05-31 |
| NCT07625332Phase 3Northwell HealthPilot Study of Galantamine to Treat Metabolic Syndrome in People With Chronic Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) | 2027-08 |
| NCT03930056Shirley Ryan AbilityLabC-Brace II Spinal Cord Injury | 2026-11 |
| NCT04077346University of LouisvilleNeuromodulation of Spinal Locomotor Circuitry to Elicit Stepping After Pediatric Spinal Cord Injury | 2026-11 |
| NCT05423600Virginia Commonwealth UniversityTransspinal Stimulation With and Without Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Via Telehealth in Persons With Tetraplegia | 2026-11 |
Among the 968 studies in Spinal Cord Injuries with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The purpose of this prospective, single-arm pilot feasibility study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary functional outcomes of combining transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSS), dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine), and intensive rehabilitation in adults with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).
The primary research question is whether this combined treatment approach can be safely and feasibly implemented in an outpatient neurorehabilitation setting. The study will also explore whether participants demonstrate improvements in upper and lower extremity motor function, muscle strength, walking ability, balance, and functional mobility following the intervention.
Eight adults with chronic spinal cord injury will participate in a 12-week rehabilitation program at TRYAbility NeuroRecovery Center. Participants will attend approximately three treatment sessions per week, consisting of 60 minutes of physical therapy and 60 minutes of occupational therapy combined with noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation using the ANEUVO ExaStim Stimulation System. All participants will be receiving dalfampridine prescribed by their treating physicians as part of routine medical care. The research team will not prescribe, administer, or adjust medication dosages.
The primary outcomes will focus on participant recruitment, treatment attendance, intervention tolerability, and adverse events to assess the feasibility and safety of the combined approach. Secondary exploratory outcomes will examine changes in upper extremity motor function, hand dexterity, walking speed, walking endurance, balance, and functional mobility.
Participants will undergo standardized clinical assessments at baseline, week 6, and week 12 to evaluate changes in functional performance over time.
The findings will provide preliminary evidence regarding the feasibility, safety, and potential functional benefits of integrating spinal cord stimulation, physician-prescribed dalfampridine, and intensive rehabilitation. Results will help inform the design of larger controlled clinical trials investigating combined treatment approaches for motor recovery following chronic spinal cord injury.
Background and Rationale
Spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in long-term impairments in voluntary motor control, muscle strength, mobility, balance, and functional independence. Although neurological recovery may be limited following chronic SCI, emerging research suggests that spinal neural networks below the level of injury may retain the capacity for functional activation through neuromodulation and activity-dependent rehabilitation.
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that delivers electrical stimulation through electrodes placed on the skin overlying the spinal cord. This approach is intended to increase spinal network excitability and facilitate voluntary motor activation during functional rehabilitation.
Dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine or 4-AP) is a potassium channel blocker that may enhance neural conduction by prolonging action potentials. Dalfampridine is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to improve walking in individuals with multiple sclerosis and has also been investigated for potential motor function benefits following spinal cord injury.
Combining spinal neuromodulation, pharmacologic augmentation, and intensive task-specific rehabilitation may support motor activation and activity-dependent neuroplasticity. However, the feasibility, safety, and preliminary functional outcomes of this combined approach in individuals with chronic SCI require further investigation.
Study Objectives
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of combining transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, physician-prescribed dalfampridine, and intensive rehabilitation in adults with chronic spinal cord injury.
Feasibility will be assessed through participant recruitment, treatment attendance, intervention tolerability, and completion of the rehabilitation program. Safety will be evaluated through monitoring and documentation of adverse events.
Secondary exploratory objectives will assess preliminary changes in upper extremity motor function, hand dexterity, lower extremity function, walking ability, balance, and functional mobility.
Study Design and Participants
This study is a prospective, single-arm pilot feasibility study conducted at TRYAbility NeuroRecovery Center in Downers Grove, Illinois.
Eight adults between 18 and 75 years of age with chronic spinal cord injury, defined as at least 12 months following injury, will be recruited.
Eligible participants must be medically stable, capable of providing informed consent, and receiving dalfampridine prescribed by their treating physician as part of routine medical care.
All enrolled participants will undergo a 12-week intervention program consisting of approximately three rehabilitation visits per week.
The study does not include randomization, a control group, or blinding. Outcomes will be evaluated using repeated assessments within participants over the intervention period.
Intervention Protocol
The intervention combines noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation using the ANEUVO ExaStim Stimulation System with intensive, task-specific physical and occupational therapy.
Participants will complete approximately three treatment visits per week for 12 weeks. Each visit will include 60 minutes of occupational therapy and 60 minutes of physical therapy.
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation
Transcutaneous spinal stimulation will be administered during rehabilitation sessions using the ANEUVO ExaStim Stimulation System.
Stimulation electrodes will be positioned over cervical spinal segments C5-C7 and thoracic/lumbar segments T11-L1, with abdominal reference electrodes.
Stimulation parameters will be individualized according to motor responses and participant tolerance. The protocol specifies biphasic rectangular pulses, pulse widths of 500-2000 microseconds, and frequencies ranging from 0-100 Hz.
Stimulation intensity will be adjusted to produce visible motor activation without discomfort. Stimulation will be delivered during physical and occupational therapy activities to facilitate motor engagement during functional training.
Pharmacologic Component
Participants will be receiving dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine) prescribed by their treating physicians as part of routine clinical care.
When applicable, rehabilitation sessions will be scheduled approximately 60 minutes after participants self-administer their prescribed medication.
The research team will not prescribe, dispense, administer, or modify dalfampridine dosing. Medication management will remain under the supervision of each participant's treating physician.
Medication timing relative to rehabilitation sessions will be documented.
Occupational Therapy
Occupational therapy will focus on upper extremity motor function, strengthening, coordination, and fine motor performance.
Treatment activities will include upper extremity aerobic priming using cycling or ergometry, progressive resistance exercises targeting the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand, and task-specific training involving grasp, pinch, object manipulation, and dexterity.
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy will focus on lower extremity strength, postural control, balance, mobility, and gait-related function.
Interventions will include lower extremity aerobic priming, cycling or stepping activities, progressive resistance exercises, sit-to-stand training, transfer practice, postural control activities, and individualized gait and balance training.
Treatment activities will be modified according to each participant's neurological impairment, functional capacity, and rehabilitation goals.
Outcome Assessments
Standardized clinical assessments will be performed at three time points:
Baseline, before beginning the intervention
Week 6, at the midpoint of the intervention
Week 12, following completion of the intervention
The primary study outcomes will focus on feasibility and safety, including recruitment, attendance, tolerability, and adverse events.
Secondary exploratory outcomes will evaluate changes in neurological and functional performance using standardized assessments, including:
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T)
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI)
These measures will be used to examine preliminary changes in upper extremity motor performance, walking speed, walking endurance, functional mobility, and walking ability.
Safety Monitoring
Participants will be monitored throughout the study for adverse events associated with spinal stimulation, physical activity, and prescribed medication use.
Potential stimulation-related adverse events include skin irritation, discomfort, and temporary muscle fatigue. Rehabilitation-related risks may include muscle soreness, fatigue, and musculoskeletal strain.
Potential medication-related adverse events include dizziness, headache, insomnia, nausea, and seizure activity.
Trained clinicians will monitor participant tolerance and adjust stimulation parameters and exercise intensity as needed. Skin integrity and vital signs will be assessed before and after treatment sessions.
All adverse events will be documented and categorized according to severity and potential relationship to study procedures. Serious adverse events will be reported to the Institutional Review Board according to the study protocol.
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics will summarize participant characteristics, treatment attendance, feasibility measures, and adverse events.
Changes in functional outcomes will be examined across baseline, week 6, and week 12 using repeated-measures analyses.
Mean change scores, standard deviations, and estimated effect sizes will be calculated to characterize preliminary treatment responses.
Given the small sample size and absence of a control group, findings will be considered exploratory and will not be used to establish definitive treatment efficacy.
Expected Contribution
This pilot study is intended to generate preliminary information regarding the safety, feasibility, and potential functional benefits of combining transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, physician-prescribed dalfampridine, and intensive rehabilitation in adults with chronic spinal cord injury.
The findings may help inform the design of future larger-scale controlled clinical trials investigating combined neuromodulation and rehabilitation strategies for motor recovery following spinal cord injury.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Diagnosis of chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), at least 12 months post-injury.
Medically stable and able to participate in intensive rehabilitation therapy.
Able to provide .
Currently receiving 4-aminopyridine (dalfampridine) prescribed by their treating physician as part of routine medical care. Criteria:
-
Exclusion Criteria:
to 4-aminopyridine (dalfampridine).
Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease.
Presence of implanted electrical medical devices, including pacemakers or neurostimulators.
Pregnancy.
Severe pressure injuries that prevent safe electrode placement.
Known or suspected significant cognitive impairment, dementia, intellectual disability, or other neurological or psychiatric conditions that interfere with comprehension of study requirements or the ability to complete study assessments.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Intervention Type Intervention Name Device ANEUVO ExaStim Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Other Intensive Task-Specific Rehabilitation (Physical and Occupational Therapy)
Device: Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
The intervention consists of noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSS) delivered using the ANEUVO ExaStim Stimulation System in combination with intensive, task-specific physical and occupational therapy in adults with chronic spinal cord injury who are receiving physician-prescribed dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine). Stimulation will be delivered through surface electrodes positioned over the cervical (C5-C7) and thoracolumbar (T11-L1) spinal regions, with abdominal reference electrodes. The stimulation waveform will consist of biphasic rectangular pulses, with pulse widths ranging from 500 to 2000 microseconds and frequencies of 0-100 Hz. Stimulation intensity will be individualized to produce visible motor activation without discomfort. Participants will receive approximately three treatment visits per week for 12 weeks. Each visit will include 60 minutes of occupational therapy and 60 minutes of physical therapy, including device setup. Transcutaneous spinal stimulat
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T)
10MWT looks at gait speed
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12
6 minute walk test
6MWT looks at gait endurance
Time frame: baseline, week 6, and week 12
Berg Balance Scale
Static and dynamic balance
Time frame: Baseline, week 6, and week 12
Upper Extremity Motor score UEMS
Upper extremity strength
Time frame: Baseline, week 6, week 12
Comprehensive Upper extremity Score ( Cue-T)
Upper extremity functional strength score
Time frame: Baseline, week 6 and week 12
Neuromuscular Recovery Scale
Recovery of trunk musculature strength
Time frame: Baseline, week 6 , week 12
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. Due to the small sample size and the need to protect participant confidentiality, de-identified individual-level data will be maintained securely and accessed only by authorized study personnel. Aggregate study findings may be shared through scientific publications and conference presentations.
Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 13 months after the start.
Of 790 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 13 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 839 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 64.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.