ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07817199Updated Oct 9, 2026

Time Comparison of Interventions on Bowel Programs in Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of Suppository and Enemeez in Spinal Cord Injury and Neurogenic Bowel, sponsored by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Oct 9, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in United States+4 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of the study is to find out which of three different options (a suppository, a mini enema, or a transanal irrigation device) takes the least amount of time for completing bowel program amongst those who have spinal cord injuries with a neurogenic bowel. The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • Does one of these tools meaningfully reduce the amount of time people with spinal cord injury need to complete their bowel programs?
  • Does one of these tools meaningfully reduce the number of times someone might experience incontinence or constipation?
  • Are participants satisfied in using these devices, and would they prefer to use the same tool at home? Researchers will compare the answers to these questions between the three different tools to improve quality of life for patients while improving the efficiency of the care provided.

Participants in this study will:

  • Be enrolled in one of these options depending on when they are admitted to Casa Colina Hospital
  • Will receive the same tool for their bowel program for the majority or entirety of their stay
  • Will have a tracking sheet placed in their rooms for nursing to record when bowel program started and when it was completed
  • Will receive questionnaires when they enroll and when they finish the study on their experience with the tool and how likely they would be to use it at home
Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to guide clinical practice with the goal of reducing burden of care and improving patient experience with bowel program. The study specifically aims to determine the difference in time spent on bowel programs with either Suppository, Enemeez or Peristeen. This study aims to advance the process of bowel programs, which currently is a large time cost for our staff. By making bowel programs more efficient, we will allow our nursing staff to devote more time to other aspects of care while improving both patient and staff satisfaction. Ultimately, determining the most efficient bowel management for patients with diagnosis of spinal cord injury and neurogenic bowel will improve the continuum of care.

All patients admitted to inpatient rehab unit will be reviewed for diagnosis of spinal cord injury with reflexic neurogenic bowel. From this population we will exclude according to our exclusion criteria. Participants will then be recruited from these patients.

The primary goal of this study is to determine which intervention produces the most time effective bowel program: suppository, Enemeez or Peristeen. The study will consist of 3 cohorts of participants. Participants will be placed in a cohort based on the date of bowel program initiation. Each month will be assigned a different intervention type, and all participants with bowel program initiated during that month will be using the assigned intervention. During the bowel program nursing staff will document time suppository or Enemeez is given. In the case of Pertisteen, the nurse will document the time out of bed instead. The staff will also document the time bowel evacuation is complete and if there has been any need for intervention to treat constipation in the last 24 hours. If a participant is on a program at the time of cohort transition, that participant will remain on their established program.

Our secondary outcome is effectiveness of treatment which will be assessed by episodes of bowel incontinence and constipation. This will be evaluated by a chart review. We will note episodes of bowel incontinence and episodes of additional orders to address constipation (e.g. abdominal xray with indication of constipation, Relistor, additional oral medications, etc.)

The tertiary outcome of the study is to assess patient satisfaction and anticipated feasibility for home use. This will be assessed via questionnaire made for this study utilizing the Theoretical Domain Framework and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Questionnaires will be distributed upon enrollment and after the intervention period, which may differ to discharge or several days prior to discharge depending on the bowel program chosen.

Following participation in treatment, patients will be transitioned to a bowel program that is accessible at home as prescribed by their physician.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Neurogenic Bowel
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

2,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 537 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is above the median of 24 across 1,633 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • admission to acute rehab inpatient unit
  • diagnosis of spinal cord injury
  • reflexive type neurogenic bowel requiring bowel program with suppository and digital stimulation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anal or rectal stenosis
  • active inflammatory bowel disease
  • acute diverticulitis
  • colorectal cancer
  • ischemic colitis
  • rectal surgery within the last 3 months
  • endoscopic polypectomy within the last 4 weeks
  • areflexic bowel
  • severe autonomic dysreflexia
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Suppository

    Bowel Program managed via Suppository (current standard of care at Casa Colina Hospital)

    Device: Suppository

  • Active comparator
    Enemeez

    Bowel Program via use of the Enemeez mini enema device

    Device: Enemeez

  • Active comparator
    Peristeen

    Bowel Program via the Peristeen Transanal Irrigation tool

    Device: Peristeen

Interventions

  • DeviceSuppository

    The patient will receive a suppository 15-20 minutes prior to being transferred to toilet. Then while on the toilet patient will receive multiple digital stimulations 5-10 minutes apart to trigger the bowel reflex until bowel program is completed.

  • DeviceEnemeez

    The patient will receive the 5mL enema then be transferred onto the toilet. If no evacuation occurs within 15 minutes, then while on the toilet patient will receive multiple digital stimulations 5-10 minutes apart to trigger the bowel reflex until bowel program is completed.

  • DevicePeristeen

    The Peristeen device will be prepared prior to sitting the participant on the toilet. The lubricated rectal catheter will be inserted, and the retention balloon will be gently inflated to ensure a rectal seal. The irrigation pump will then pump water into the rectum. The balloon will be deflated and the catheter removed to allow for emptying of the water and stool. The catheter will be discarded.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time required to complete bowel program

    During the bowel program nursing staff will document time suppository or Enemeez is given. In the case of Pertisteen, the nurse will document the time out of bed instead. This will be done manually via a paper chart that is placed in the patient's room. The staff will also document the time bowel evacuation is complete and if there has been any need for intervention to treat constipation in the last 24 hours.

    Time frame: Every morning for approximately two hours, from enrollment and lasting 21 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness of treatment intervention

    Assessed by episodes of bowel incontinence and constipation. This will be evaluated by a chart review. We will note episodes of bowel incontinence and episodes of additional orders to address constipation (e.g. abdominal xray with indication of constipation, Relistor, additional oral medications, etc.)

    Time frame: Assessed every morning via chart review from enrollment and lasting 21 days

Other outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction and anticipated feasibility for home use

    Assessed via questionnaire made for this study utilizing the Theoretical Domain Framework and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The questionnaire will assess domains of patient satisfaction and feasibility for home use utilizing a 5-point Likert Scale from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree." Higher scores will indicate higher satisfaction and feasibility.

    Time frame: Upon enrollment and again at 3 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Johns J, Krogh K, Rodriguez GM, Eng J, Haller E, Heinen M, Laredo R, Longo W, Montero-Colon W, Wilson C, Korsten M. Management of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Adults after Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Providers. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Spring;27(2):75-151. doi: 10.46292/sci2702-75. Epub 2021 May 24. No abstract available. PubMed 34108835 ↗
  • Wincentak J, Xu Y, Rudden L, Kassam-Lallani D, Mullin A, Truong C, Krog K, Kingsnorth S. Current State of Knowledge on Digital Rectal Stimulation in Individuals With Traumatic and Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Sep;102(9):1816-1825. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Jan 30. PubMed 33529613 ↗
  • House JG, Stiens SA. Pharmacologically initiated defecation for persons with spinal cord injury: effectiveness of three agents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Oct;78(10):1062-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90128-3. PubMed 9339153 ↗
  • Dunn KL, Galka ML. A comparison of the effectiveness of Therevac SB and bisacodyl suppositories in SCI patients' bowel programs. Rehabil Nurs. 1994 Nov-Dec;19(6):334-8. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1994.tb01336.x. PubMed 7531868 ↗
  • Christensen P, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, Abel R, Hultling C, Krogh K, Media S, Laurberg S. A randomized, controlled trial of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management in spinal cord-injured patients. Gastroenterology. 2006 Sep;131(3):738-47. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.06.004. PubMed 16952543 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 9 months after the start.

Of 790 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 839 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 64.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Oct 2026, on Oct 9, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2026
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
StartActual
Oct 1, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2027
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 9, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in United States
Show site
  • Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare · Pomona, United States
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Sep 4, 2026→Oct 1, 2026 (actual)
Oct 9, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 4, 2027→Jul 1, 2027
Oct 9, 2026
Study completion
Aug 4, 2027→Aug 1, 2027
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in United States
    Show site
    • Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare · Pomona, United States
    Start date Sep 4, 2026→Oct 1, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Jul 4, 2027→Jul 1, 2027
    Study completion Aug 4, 2027→Aug 1, 2027
    + 3 other changes: verification date, oversight details and references

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07817199
Lead sponsor
Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Megan Narintarangkool
Contact
mnarintarangkool@casacolina.org
(909)596-7733 ext. 5233
Emily Rosario, PhD
study director · Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion