ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07909317Updated Nov 5, 2026

Influence of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Arm and Hand Function After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) + FTP and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) + FTP in Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this pilot study is to find out how four different types of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) affect brain activity, the process of acquiring new skills (also called motor learning), and hand function after cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI).

Participants will complete 5 study sessions: one sign-up session and four testing \& intervention sessions. Total participation will take about 18 hours. During the sign-up session, researchers will: discuss study details, review the participant's health history to make sure that it is safe for them to participate, perform tests to ensure that the participant meets the study criteria, and collect the participant's demographic information. During each testing \& intervention session, the participant will receive a different type of tES. Before and after getting tES, they will take part in tests that measure their brain activity and the strength, sensation, and function of their right hand.

Read the detailed description

Improved use of the upper extremities (UEs) is a paramount concern for most individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI). The majority of people with SCI have some remaining pathways connecting the cortical and spinal circuitry. Strengthening descending corticospinal circuits, which drive volitional control, has potential to have a significant impact on UE function. Therapeutic modalities that enhance descending drive via direct excitation of the cortical circuitry may be valuable adjuncts to neurorehabilitation training for people with SCI.

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) modulates cortical excitability via low intensity electrical stimulation applied to the scalp. It is an attractive candidate for use as an adjunct to standard neurorehabilitation training given its clinical accessibility; tES devices are cost effective, highly portable, require minimal training, and have short set-up times. Further, tES has been shown to improve implicit motor learning, a cornerstone of neurorehabilitation training. While the use of tES as a neuromodulatory intervention has been studied extensively in people with stroke, these modalities have received little attention in the realm of SCI neurorehabilitation research.

Multiple types of tES exist, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS), and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS). These modalities vary based on the applied waveform. Continuous, patterned, and variable waveforms are applied during tDCS, tPCS and tRNS, respectively. In addition to modulating cortical excitability, tDCS has been shown to improve implicit learning processes which are impaired after SCI. Preliminary evidence in neurologically intact individuals suggests that tPCS and tRNS may be more efficacious modulators of cortical excitability than tDCS. However, it is unknown whether these effects on cortical excitability carry over to improvements in implicit motor learning. Further, the type of tES that has the largest effect on motor learning and UE function in people with cSCI has yet to be determined. For this pilot project, the investigators will employ a sham-controlled, randomized crossover study designed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of four different types of tES (tDCS, tPCS, tRNS, and sham) in 12 participants with chronic cSCI via the following Specific Aims:

Aim 1. Quantify the effects of tDCS, tPCS, tRNS, and sham tES on implicit motor learning.

Aim 2. Quantify the effects of tDCS, tPCS, tRNS, and sham tES on UE function, strength and sensation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

  • transcranial electrical stimulation
  • electroencephalography
  • motor learning
  • upper extremity function
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

2,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 537 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 24 across 1,633 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • cervical spinal cord injury (neurological level C1-C8) that occurred at least one year ago
  • International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI/ASIA Impairment Scale (ISNCSCI/AIS) severity classification C or D
  • self-reported limitations in right hand function
  • volitional muscle activity in the right hand, as determined by a score ≥ 2 in at least one intrinsic hand muscle group evaluated in the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension version 2 (GRASSP v2) strength subtest
  • ability to follow instructions
  • ability to communicate pain or discomfort
  • ability and willingness to consent to participate in the study and authorize use of protected health information

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • spinal cord issues that are getting worse, such as degenerative or progressive vascular disorders of the spinal and/or spinal cord
  • metal implant in the head
  • history of uncontrolled seizures
  • history of frequent or severe headaches
  • damage to the nerves of the right arm/hand (lower motor neuron damage) as documented in the medical record, per participant report, or during in-person screening
  • prior tendon or nerve transfer surgery in the right arm/hand
  • severe pain, , or contractures of the right arm/hand that would limit participation in arm and hand training
  • broken skin or wounds on your head/scalp where stimulation will be applied
  • if you're a woman, and you are pregnant, think you might be, or are actively trying to become pregnant
  • you have any other health issue that the lead investigators think could make it unsafe for you to join the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) + functional task practice (FTP)

    Participants will participate in a single session of each of the three tES types being evaluated combined with upper extremity FTP.

    Other: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) + FTP · Other: transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) + FTP · Other: transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) + FTP

  • Active comparator
    sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) + functional task practice (FTP)

    Participants will participate in a single session of sham tES combined with upper extremity FTP.

    Other: sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) + FTP

Interventions

  • Othertranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) + FTP

    tDCS (waveform: monophasic and continuous) will be delivered for a duration of 20 minutes and intensity of 2 mA using two saline-soaked reusable sponge electrodes (35 cm2 each). The active electrode will be placed over the hand representation of the motor cortex controlling the right upper extremity (C3, 10-20 EEG system) and the reference electrode will be placed over the contralateral supraorbital area (FP2, 10-20 EEG system). The FTP component of intervention will occur concurrently with tDCS application and will consist primarily of task-oriented arm and hand activities.

  • Othertranscranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) + FTP

    tPCS (waveform: monophasic square waves with 500 ms pulse duration and 50 ms inter-pulse interval) will be delivered for a duration of 20 minutes and intensity of 2 mA using two saline-soaked reusable sponge electrodes (35 cm2 each). The active electrode will be placed over the hand representation of the motor cortex controlling the right upper extremity (C3, 10-20 EEG system) and the reference electrode will be placed over the contralateral supraorbital area (FP2, 10-20 EEG system). The FTP component of intervention will occur concurrently with tPCS application and will consist primarily of task-oriented arm and hand activities.

  • Othertranscranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) + FTP

    tRNS (waveform: 0-500 Hz random frequency and Gaussian white noise random intensity) will be delivered for a duration of 20 minutes and intensity range of +/-1 mA using two saline-soaked reusable sponge electrodes (35 cm2 each). The active electrode will be placed over the hand representation of the motor cortex controlling the right upper extremity (C3, 10-20 EEG system) and the reference electrode will be placed over the contralateral supraorbital area (FP2, 10-20 EEG system). The FTP component of intervention will occur concurrently with tRNS application and will consist primarily of task-oriented arm and hand activities.

  • Othersham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) + FTP

    Sham tES will be delivered for a duration of 20 minutes and intensity of 0 mA using two saline-soaked reusable sponge electrodes (35 cm2 each). The active electrode will be placed over the hand representation of the motor cortex controlling the right upper extremity (C3, 10-20 EEG system) and the reference electrode will be placed over the contralateral supraorbital area (FP2, 10-20 EEG system). The FTP component of intervention will occur concurrently with sham tESapplication and will consist primarily of task-oriented arm and hand activities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in brain activity

    Electroencephalography (EEG) event-related potential (ERP) amplitude will be recorded in the left parietofrontal network during performance of a modified serial reaction time task (mSRTT).

    Time frame: Twice during each of the four testing & intervention sessions through study completion, an average of two weeks.

  2. Change in brain connectivity

    Electroencephalography (EEG) alpha band parietofrontal connectivity will be recorded under two conditions: 1) resting state and 2) during performance of a modified serial reaction time task (mSRTT).

    Time frame: Twice during each of the four testing & intervention sessions through study completion, an average of two weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in upper extremity (UE) function

    Function will be measured in the right UE using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension version 2 (GRASSP v2) quantitative prehension subtest. Participants will complete four tasks: pouring water from a bottle to a cup, moving nine pegs from one side of a board to the other, inserting a key into a lock and rotating, and fastening four nuts onto screws. Each task will be scored on a 0-5 scale (0: task cannot be conducted at all - 5: task conducted without difficulty using the expected grasp pattern) and timed (maximum of 75 seconds will be allowed per task). The number of drops during each task will also be recorded. The total score, time and number of drops for all four tasks will then be calculated. The maximum score is 20 with higher scores denoting better UE function.

    Time frame: Twice during each of the four testing & intervention sessions through study completion, an average of two weeks.

  2. Change in upper extremity (UE) strength

    Strength will be measured in the right UE using key pinch force. The participant will be positioned with the shoulder in neutral, elbow flexed at approximately 90º, and forearm and wrist in neutral. Force will be quantified with an electronic pinchmeter positioned between the middle phalanx of the index finger and thumb pad. The participant will be given a command of "ready, set, go" upon which they will be instructed to pinch as hard as possible for 3 seconds. Three trials will be completed with a 60 second rest period between trials, and the mean force will be calculated.

    Time frame: Twice during each of the four testing & intervention sessions through study completion, an average of two weeks.

  3. Change in upper extremity (UE) sensation

    Sensation will be measured in the right UE using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension version 2 (GRASSP v2) sensation subtest. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments ranging in size from 3.61 to 6.65 will be used in three locations on the palmar surface of the hand while the participant's vision is occluded with a blindfold. The smallest monofilament (3.61) will be tested 3 times per location with 2/3 accurate responses indicating intact sensation. If the participant cannot detect the 3.61 filament at all locations, testing will continue with the next heaviest filament until the participant detects a filament at all three test locations or until testing with the heaviest filament is complete. In contrast to the 3.61 filament, the three other filaments will be tested once per location. The total score will be calculated by summing the scores for each test location. The maximum score is 12 with higher scores denoting better UE sensation.

    Time frame: Twice during each of the four testing & intervention sessions through study completion, an average of two weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 8 months later.

Of 790 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 839 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 64.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2027
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Secondary outcomes
2 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionChange in upper extremity (UE) function: how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionChange in upper extremity (UE) sensation: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 5, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 2 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionChange in upper extremity (UE) function: how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionChange in upper extremity (UE) sensation: how it is measured was reworded
    + 2 other changes: verification date and description
  2. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07909317
Lead sponsor
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Collaborators
Georgia Institute of Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion