ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07921758Aging-REHABUpdated Nov 6, 2026

The Role of Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) in the Assessment of Elderly Patients underGoING Cardiac REHABilitation

An observational study in Heart Failure, Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) and Cardiac Surgery, sponsored by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA. Completed at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA · Observational

Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
202
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiac rehabilitation is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary intervention aimed at reducing disability and improving functional recovery in patients following a cardiovascular event. In older patients, comprehensive multidimensional assessment using the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) provides a standardized approach to prognostic risk stratification.

The primary aim of this study is to determine whether an inpatient cardiac rehabilitation program implemented following a cardiovascular event can reduce the proportion of patients classified as being at high prognostic risk according to the MPI.

The study will also assess whether the benefits achieved through cardiac rehabilitation are maintained at the three-month follow-up. Finally, the study will evaluate the prognostic significance of changes in MPI score in response to the cardiac rehabilitation intervention.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to assess frailty status, measured using the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), in patients admitted to an inpatient cardiac rehabilitation program following an acute cardiovascular event.

Eligible patients who meet the inclusion criteria and provide written informed consent will undergo frailty assessment using the MPI within 48 hours of admission to the cardiac rehabilitation unit (baseline visit). The MPI assessment will be repeated at hospital discharge (Discharge Day). Finally, 90 days after discharge (Day 90), frailty status will be reassessed by telephone using the validated TELE-MPI version adapted for remote administration.

MPI Assessment

The MPI is based on the following eight domains:

Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Exton-Smith Scale (ESS) Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) Mini Nutritional Assessment, Short Form (MNA-SF) Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, Comorbidity Index (CIRS-CI) Number of medications Living status

The final MPI score is calculated according to the following procedure:

Each domain is classified into one of three risk categories. Each category is assigned a value (0, 0.5, or 1). The values from all completed domains are summed. The MPI score is considered valid only when at least six domains have been completed.

The sum of the assigned values is divided by the number of completed domains.

The resulting score is interpreted as follows:

MPI-1 (0.00-0.33): Low risk of adverse clinical outcomes; the individual is not considered frail.

MPI-2 (0.34-0.66): Moderate risk of adverse clinical outcomes; the individual is considered pre-frail.

MPI-3 (0.67-1.00): High risk of adverse clinical outcomes; the individual is considered frail.

TELE-MPI Assessment

The TELE-MPI includes the following domains:

Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Barthel Mobility Index (Barthel MOB) Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) Mini Nutritional Assessment, Short Form (MNA-SF) Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, Comorbidity Index (CIRS-CI) Number of medications Living status

The TELE-MPI score is calculated using the same procedure described for the standard MPI assessment, with classification into MPI-1, MPI-2, and MPI-3 categories.

Primary Objective

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether participation in an inpatient cardiac rehabilitation program is associated with an improvement in frailty status, assessed by MPI, from admission to discharge. Frailty status will be evaluated at the following time points:

Admission to the rehabilitation unit (Baseline) Hospital discharge (Discharge Day) Day 90 after discharge Secondary Objectives

A one-year follow-up will be conducted to evaluate the association between frailty status at discharge and subsequent clinical outcomes, including:

All-cause mortality Cardiovascular mortality Hospital readmissions

The predictive value of MPI and TELE-MPI scores for adverse clinical outcomes during follow-up will also be investigated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
  • Cardiac Surgery

Keywords

  • Multidimensional prognostic index
  • Cardiac Rehabilitation
  • frailty
  • heart failure
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 202 is close to the median of 200 across 1,983 observational studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will enroll consecutive patients admitted to the Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit of ICS Maugeri for an intensive inpatient cardiac rehabilitation program following an acute cardiovascular event.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥65 years;
  • Admission to an inpatient intensive cardiac rehabilitation program following an acute cardiovascular event (index event)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complete inability or unwillingness of the patient to cooperate, in the absence of a caregiver;
  • Presence of clinical conditions associated with a limited , defined as an estimated 1-year mortality risk ≥50%.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
202 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients classified as being at high risk according to Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI)

    The primary endpoint is the prevalence of frailty, defined as an MPI score between 0.67 and 1.00, assessed at: Baseline (admission to the cardiac rehabilitation unit); Hospital discharge; Three months after discharge. Patients with an MPI score ranging from 0.67 to 1.00 will be classified as frail. Frailty prevalence at each time point will be calculated as the proportion of patients with an MPI score between 0.67 and 1.00 divided by the total number of evaluated patients, and will be expressed as a percentage: Frailty prevalence (%) = (Number of patients with MPI 0.67-1.00 / Total number of assessed patients) × 100.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), discharge (up to five days), and 3 months (Day 90)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prognostic value of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) score at discharge for 1-year all-cause mortality.

    The association between discharge MPI score and one-year event-free survival (free from all-cause mortality and hospital readmission) will be investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated to quantify the increase in the risk of death or hospitalization associated with each 0.1-point increment in MPI score. Higher MPI values are expected to reflect a greater degree of frailty and a correspondingly higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • ICS Maugeri, IRCCS Lumezzane institute
    Lumezzane, BS 25065, Italy
  • ICS Maugeri, IRCCS Bari institute
    Bari, 70023, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07921758
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Apr 19, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025
Completion
Oct 1, 2026
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Andrea Passantino, MD
principal investigator · ICS Maugeri, IRCCS, Bari

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion