ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07909954Updated Nov 2, 2026

Accelerated Theta-Burst Stimulation for Refractory Central Post-Stroke Pain

An interventional study of High-dose accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) and Low-dose accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) in Central Post-Stroke Pain, Stroke and Ischemic Stroke and Hemorrhagic Stroke, sponsored by Duke University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) as a noninvasive neuromodulation treatment for individuals with severe, refractory central post-stroke pain (CPSP). Participants will be randomized to receive either a high-dose or low-dose aiTBS protocol, and outcomes will include pain intensity and imaging biomarkers to assess treatment response.

02

Conditions studied

  • Central Post-Stroke Pain
  • Stroke
  • Ischemic Stroke and Hemorrhagic Stroke

Keywords

  • Central Post-Stroke Pain
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Neuromodulation
  • stroke
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 21 years old of any sex and race
  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke affecting the thalamus ≥6 months from symptom onset
  • Development of neuropathic pain (biologically plausible pain with confirmed stroke lesion, ≥6 months symptom duration, visual analogue scale [VAS] ≥5, failed 2 medication trials of at least 3 months each
  • The ability to provide consent
  • Presence of CPSP as defined by pain distribution in a neuroanatomically plausible distribution, a history suggestive of stroke, an MRI confirming the stroke lesion, as well as negative or positive sensory signs. PAIN-DETECT score must be ≥13.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of a co-morbid pain syndrome
  • Documented seizure disorder before or after stroke
  • Scalp wound or bone defect (i.e., craniotomy)
  • to MRI or rTMS (i.e., implanted metallic devices in the head, neck or chest)
  • No changes in pain medications during the prior 4 weeks, and no intention to change pain medications during the study
  • Significant change (1.2) in VAS between the two baseline visits to suggest instability of the CPSP
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-dose aiTBS

    Participants receive high-dose accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation consisting of 10 sessions per day (18,000 pulses/day) over 5 consecutive days targeting the ipsilesional motor cortex.

    Device: High-dose accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS)

  • Experimental
    Low-dose aiTBS

    Participants receive low-dose accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation consisting of 5 sessions per day (9,000 pulses/day) over 5 consecutive days targeting the ipsilesional motor cortex.

    Device: Low-dose accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS)

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh-dose accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS)

    Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation delivered using transcranial magnetic stimulation to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex. Each session delivers 1,800 pulses, with participants receiving 10 sessions per day over a 5-day treatment period.

  • DeviceLow-dose accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS)

    Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation delivered using transcranial magnetic stimulation to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex. Each session delivers 1,800 pulses, with participants receiving 5 sessions per day over a 5-day treatment period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility, as measured by the proportion of participants who can complete 80% of stimulation sessions

    Time frame: From the time of stimulation (day 1) until end of stimulation (day 5)

  2. Feasibility, as measured by proportion of participants who complete 80% of stimulation days

    Time frame: From the time of stimulation (day 1) until end of stimulation (day 5)

  3. Feasibility, as measured by consent rate of those screened

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Safety, as measured by the number of adverse events

    Time frame: Day 90

  5. Pain as measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS consists of a scale from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain").

    Time frame: Baseline, 7 days, and 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Thalamo-cortical disconnection index (TCDI), derived from MRI

    Measuring thalamo-cortical disconnection index (TCDI) as a potential biomarker to predict treatment response.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07909954
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
American Heart Association
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Duke Stroke Research Team
Contact
strokeresearch@duke.edu
919-660-4131
Salman Ikramuddin
Contact
salman.ikramuddin@duke.edu
Salman Ikramuddin
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion