ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07909551COVILEVUpdated Nov 2, 2026

Long Covid: Study of Quality of Life, Clinical Evolution and Use of Care. Cohort in General Practice and General Population in Metropolitan France COVILEV Study

An interventional study of No Interventions in Long COVID Syndrome, sponsored by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2023, registered Jun 2026).
Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
618
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 16 studies in Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome with a site in France — 5 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome · France.

Started
2023
with 2 others
No phase
6 of 16
3 open now
Registered
14th of 16
by date

Among the 16 studies in Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome with a site in France, this one is one of 3 that started in 2023, is one of 6 with no phase, and was the 14th registered.

Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome

605 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome; 201 are open to participants now.

Browse Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 16 studies in Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 5 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 145 Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome studies recruiting now, 70 (48%) set no upper age limit and 53 (37%) stop at 75 or younger; 15 take children under 18; 39 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 16 studies in Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The term "long COVID" refers to persistent, recurrent, or newly emerging symptoms following a biologically confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19 that are still present three months after the acute episode or positive test result, and that cannot be explained by a complication of the acute phase, a flare-up of a comorbid condition, or any cause other than COVID-19. The incidence of long Covid has primarily been estimated through the follow-up of cohorts of patients initially treated in the hospital, sometimes based on cohorts of patients who consulted a primary care physician, and rarely based on cohorts of individuals from an unselected source population who tested positive for Covid-19. Currently, there is little data available to estimate its overall burden in primary care and the general population (prevalence, incidence, healthcare utilization, symptom progression, and impact on quality of life). This study will consist of two arms: "general practice" and "general population." For each arm, an initial phase will involve simply counting cases, and a second phase will involve describing and monitoring cases over the course of one year, focusing on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and the patient care experience. The "general practice" arm will also include a study of the care experience from the perspective of general practitioners. Statistical analysis. For each arm of the study, the included patients will be described in terms of the various aspects under investigation: sociodemographic characteristics, history of COVID-19 infection, clinical presentation, quality of life, and psychological, professional, and family impact. The incidence and prevalence of cases seen in general practice will be estimated. Expected results and implications. The study will provide a better understanding of the disease and its impact, including for people who do not seek care for this reason. It will provide information to guide public policies regarding the care and treatment pathways for people suffering from long COVID.

03

Conditions studied

  • Long COVID Syndrome
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • be seen during a consultation (at the doctor's office or during a home visit) by a general practitioner participating in the study, during the recruitment period;
  • have symptoms that meet the study's definition of long COVID;
  • have given consent to participate;
  • be 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subject to a legal protection order (court-ordered guardianship, conservatorship, or guardianship);
  • subject who is not capable of receiving information or giving consent to participate.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
618 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    General practice arm

    People with long COVID seen in general practice

    Other: No Interventions

  • Other
    General population arm

    Individuals with long Covid in the general population

    Other: No Interventions

Interventions

  • OtherNo Interventions

    No Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence or absence of symptoms

    Time frame: At enrollment and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of the disease's impact on quality of life based on EQ-5D index (EuroQoL-5 Dimensions)

    It generally ranges from less than 0 to 1 (perfect health). Higher scores indicate a better quality of life

    Time frame: At enrollment and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

  2. Assessment of a patient's health status using PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)

    Clinical interpretation of scores : \> 60 Excellent / high-performing (well above the norm) 55 - 60 above the average 45 - 55 population average (Normal range) 40 - 45 below the average \< 40 Deficient / Problematic (Often requires clinical attention)

    Time frame: At enrollment and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

  3. Measurement of the severity of generalized anxiety : GAD-7 (Generlized Anxiety Disorder-7) questionnaire

    Scores and interpretation : 0-4 very low level of anxiety, 5-9 mild level of anxiety (monitoring or relaxation technique), 10-14 moderate level of anxiety (Complete clinical evaluation is required), 15-21 severe level of anxiety (needs intervention-therapy or treatment)

    Time frame: At enrollment and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

  4. Assessment of depression by Patient's Health Questionnaire PHQ-9

    Used to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 27. 0-4 : minimal or no deprssive symptoms, 5-9 : mild depression, 10-14 : moderate depression, 15-19 : moderately severe depression, 20-27 : severe depression

    Time frame: At enrollment and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

  5. Assessment of social support using SSD-12 (Social Support Distress Scale)

    SSD-12 focuses on distress resulting from a lack of support or from ineffective support Low score : the patient has sufficient support, limited risk of social distress Moderate score : areas of vulnerability identified High score : high risk of psychological distress, isolation and health complications.

    Time frame: At enrollment and after 6 and 12 months

  6. Identification of individuals who may be suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) using PC-PTSD-5 (Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5)

    Used to identify individuals who may be suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after experiencing traumatic event 0 - 2 No suspicion of PTSD. 3 or more warning, requires a futher diagnostic evaluation by a specialist (psychologist or psychiastrist

    Time frame: At enrollment

  7. Assessment of the impact of the illnesson Patient Social Support

    0 : the patient is exactly average of the general population +1 : The patient has significantly above-average social support * 1 : The patient has significantly less social support than average * 2 : The patient is in a position of critical social vulnerability (vry little support compared to the standard)

    Time frame: At enrollment and after 6 and 12 months

  8. Assessment of quality of life using EQS-C (European Quality of Life Questionnaire - Cancer)

    Designd to assess the quality of life of patients with cancer. Excellent quality of life, low impact of the illess (T \>80 ) Quality of life within the normal range (T between 40 and 60) Significant deterioration in quality of life (T\< 40)

    Time frame: At enrollment and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sorbonne University
    Paris, France
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2023 to primary completion in Jul 2024, 13 months.

Of 233 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 28. This study's 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 244 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 3, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartActual
Jun 6, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2024
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07909551
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Jun 6, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2024
Completion
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Thierry Blanchon
principal investigator · Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion