ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07908355Updated Nov 2, 2026

Society of Thoracic Surgeons and American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry (STS/ACC TVT Registry™): Registry Purpose and Research Objective

An observational study in Aortic Valve Stenosis, sponsored by American College of Cardiology. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by American College of Cardiology · Observational

Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 189 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in United States — 44 open to participants now, 68 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Aortic Valve Stenosis · United States.

Planned enrollment
Largest of 64
50,000 · median 102
Started
2026
with 9 others
Observational
64 of 189
16 open now
Primary completion
2036-01
later than 67 of 67 live
Registered
189th of 189
by date

Among the 189 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in United States, this one has the largest planned enrollment of the 64 observational ones that give a count, is one of 10 that started in 2026, is one of 64 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 67 of the 67 other live ones, and was the 189th registered.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

1,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 293 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50,000 is above the median of 200 across 435 observational studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Open to participants now

44 of the 189 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in United States are open now, in 12 countries. Each count lists the studies.

All 44 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 209 Aortic Valve Stenosis studies recruiting now, 163 (78%) set no upper age limit and 9 (4%) stop at 75 or younger; 25 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 189 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The STS/ACC TVT Registry™ (TVT Registry), created by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), is a benchmarking tool designed to assess the prevalence, demographics, management, and outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure. Patient-level data will be submitted by participating hospitals to the TVT Registry via the American College of Cardiology Foundation's National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). The primary aims of the TVT Registry, are to optimize the outcomes and management of patients through the implementation of evidence-based guideline recommendations in clinical practice, facilitate efforts to improve the quality and safety for patients undergoing TAVR procedures, investigate novel quality improvement methods and provide risk-adjusted assessment of patients for comparison with nationwide NCDR data. The secondary purpose of the TVT Registry is to serve as a rich source of clinical data to support assessments of short- and long-term safety, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and as a scalable data infrastructure for pre and post market studies.

Read the detailed description

The STS/ACC TVT Registry™ (TVT Registry) was designed to support a national surveillance system to assess the prevalence, demographics, management, and outcomes of patients receiving transcutaneous valve therapies. The purposes of the TVT Registry include: (i) collecting pertinent and standardized data elements from participating hospitals, health care providers and others that measure and assess the quality of care for patients receiving TVT; (ii) providing confidential periodic reports to participating hospitals, health care providers and others, to evaluate and improve the quality of care in these areas; (iii) permitting and fostering appropriate research based upon the data collected by means of the TVT Registry; and (iv) to serve as a scalable data infrastructure for pre and post market studies.

The TVT Registry was created under the leadership of cardiovascular experts using available ACC-AHA and STS guidelines, data elements and definitions, previous trial data elements, Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) and other evidentiary sources and with critical input from participating sites regarding the feasibility of implementation and the burden of data collection. The process for developing the core registry dataset follows an established methodology for creating clinical data standards. In short, experts constitute a multi-disciplinary committee charged with initially outlining a set of key quality metrics to measure and describe the quality of care, using existing clinical practice guidelines as a blueprint. Through the measure/metric development process of specifying numerators and denominators, inclusion and exclusion criteria, a comprehensive set of data elements and definitions are created to capture the clinical characteristics, indications, procedural aspects and adverse outcomes of patients undergoing transcutaneous valve therapies. These data elements and definitions were then subjected to several phases of review and refinement, including public comment period, to gain consensus on the final data elements and definitions. Datasets are periodically revised to reflect current clinical practice and on-going scientific relevance.

Hospitals join the TVT Registry by agreeing to the terms of a specific contract that outlines the obligations of each party and the annual fees for participation. In addition, participating sites sign a Business Associate Agreement/Data Use Agreement with the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) as per the requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 as amended (HIPAA). Patient-level data are submitted by participating hospitals to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and American College of Cardiology Foundation's (ACCF) joint TVT Registry.

The data are collected retrospectively from existing medical records or concurrently in the normal course of treatment on patients who meet the inclusion criteria as outlined in the registry. Additional testing and contact with the patient outside the hospital episode of care is required for this registry at 30 days and optional at one year for follow up interview and physical examination. The physical examination is a routine portion of the care for these patients; the interview will consist of optional survey questions from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) as a Quality of Life (QOL) survey.

All registry data (in-hospital and follow-up) is captured by participating sites using an electronic data collection tool provided by the TVT Registry or using a certified software application that has been reviewed and certified as compliant with the transmission specifications established by the ACCF for the TVT Registry.

Protected Health Information (PHI), such as social security number, is collected. Registry sites can opt out of transmitting direct identifiers to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR), so inclusion of direct identifiers in the registry is at the discretion of the registry site. When using the NCDR web-based data collection tool, direct identifiers are entered but a partition between the data collection process and the data warehouse maintains the direct identifiers separate from the analysis datasets. The minimum level of PHI transmitted to the ACCF when a participant opts out of submitting direct identifiers meets the definition of a Limited Dataset as such term is defined by HIPAA.

In recognition of the importance of data quality to all of its registry products, and to ensure that data submitted to the NCDR are complete, consistent, and accurate, a Data Quality Program was formally established by the NCDR in 2004. Upon receipt of the TVT Registry data submission, the ACCF reviews the data electronically and reports back coding errors. Such electronic checks verify consistency and completeness and allow participants to have ample opportunity to submit data until it satisfies consistency and completion thresholds. The report produced from these data checks is called a Data Quality Report (DQR).

The DQR provides the participant with a confidential analysis of their data submission's completeness and is used by the participant to help prioritize data cleaning efforts and to assess the necessity for re-submission. Once the data meets the data quality thresholds, it may be included in aggregation for the participant's data and national comparison.

The NCDR understands the need to ensure the data submitted to the TVT Registry is accurate and has a national audit program whereas a random set of participants are selected for an audit to confirm the data submitted to the registry is consistent with data in the medical record or source documentation.

03

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

  • STS/ACC TVT Registry™
  • TVT Registry
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients 18 years or over on arrival at the facility undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Study Population:

All facilities performing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the appropriate infrastructure that includes but is not limited to:

  1. On-site structural heart interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery programs.
  2. A post-procedure intensive care unit with personnel experienced in managing patients who have undergone open-heart valve procedures.
  3. A continuous quality improvement process that assesses procedural outcomes and makes necessary programmatic adjustments to assure patient safety.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years or over on arrival at the facility undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients

    TAVR Patients Will include all patients 18 years or over who undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) including patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The sample size will include all patients entered into the TVT Registry.

    Procedure: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Interventions

  • ProcedureTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Procedure: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement • Minimal invasive implantation of a biological prothesis in Aortic Position

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 30 Day Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events

    30 day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events captured by the TVT registry.

    Time frame: 30 days post procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. 30 Day Outcomes

    Proportion of patients who are alive at 30 days year without adverse events including stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), major vascular complications, valve related dysfunction requiring re-intervention, incident renal replacement therapy, life-threatening bleeding, and high-degree aortic valve (AV) block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation as captured by the TVT Registry

    Time frame: 30 days post procedure

Other outcomes

  1. 5 year Outcomes

    Outcomes beyond 30 days will be assessed up to five years following TAVR using administrative claims data that will capture the following events: stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), major vascular complications, valve related dysfunction requiring re-intervention, incident renal replacement therapy, life-threatening bleeding, and high-degree aortic valve (AV) block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation

    Time frame: 5 years post procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • American College of Cardiology / National Cardiovascular Data Registry
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
    Recruiting
    • NCDR Product Support · Contactncdr@acc.org · 1-800-257-4737
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — ACCF has a request for research proposal application process. Requests are reviewed by a member led committee. Approved applications are assigned an analytic center to conduct the research. Researchers only receive aggregate deidentified results based on the analysis completed by the analytic center.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Jan 2036, 112 months later.

Of 205 non-industry observational studies under Aortic Valve Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 120. This study's planned 112 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 242 studies reached it within 42 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 86.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2036
CompletionEst.
Jan 2036
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07908355
Lead sponsor
American College of Cardiology
Collaborators
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2036 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2036 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion