CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06580158Updated Mar 4, 2026

AI in Outpatient Practice for Diagnosing Aortic Stenosis and Diastolic Dysfunction

An observational study in Aortic Stenosis and Diastolic Dysfunction, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-04.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Two recently developed artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) models have been developed to detect aortic stenosis (AS) and diastolic dysfunction (DD). AI-ECG for AS has a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 74%, and AI-ECG for DD has a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 80%. However, these models have never been prospectively applied to diagnose AS or DD, which may be useful for patients and providers from a diagnostic and prognostic perspective and especially in settings where access to higher- level medical care is limited. In this study, we aim to determine the clinical utility of these AI-ECG models by prospectively applying them to an outpatient cohort and then completing a focused point-of-care ultrasound to evaluate those who are AI-ECG positive for AS and DD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Stenosis
  • Diastolic Dysfunction

Browse trials for

03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 200 across 424 observational studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who are completing an outpatient electrocardiogram (ECG) at the Mayo Clinic.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 60 years of age must have a clinical scheduled ECG performed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \< 59 years of age
  • Is not scheduled for a clinical ECG
  • Unable to provide consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients who are completing an outpatient electrocardiogram (ECG) at the Mayo Clinic.

    Device: AI-ECG Dashboard · Diagnostic Test: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS)

Interventions

  • DeviceAI-ECG Dashboard

    Patients standard of care ECG's will be processed through the AI-ECG Dashboard

  • Diagnostic testPoint of care ultrasound (POCUS)

    Patients will undergo a ultrasound to confirm diagnosis of atrial stenosis or diastolic dysfunction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with positive AI-ECG

    Positive AI-ECG will be determined by the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Number of studies with reasonable image quality in patients with positive AI-ECG

    Image quality will be determined by sonographers at the time of imaging and will be scored on a scale from 1-4: 1. Excellent , sufficient for publication 2. Good, sufficient for data analysis 3. Fair, just enough for data analysis without complete views 4. Poor, not usable for data analysis

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of times the AI ECG and TTE (transthoracic echocardiogram) are statistically comparative

    Will be compared using parametric (2-sample t-test) and non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon rank sum test) for continuous variables, and the χ2 test or Fisher exact test for nominal variables. A p-value of \< 0.05 will be categorized as significant for the statistical analysis

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06580158
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Jae K. Oh, M.D. (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 30, 2024
Start date
Nov 8, 2024
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 4, 2026

Study contacts

Brian Rudquist
Contact
Rudquist.Brian@mayo.edu
(507) 538-5146
Jae Oh, M.D.
Contact
oh.jae@mayo.edu
Jae Oh, M.D.
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion