ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07901478PLANE-DFUUpdated Oct 28, 2026

Plantar Load Analysis of Neuropathic and Neuroischaemic Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

An observational study in Foot Ulcers, Diabetic, Plantar Foot Pressure and Fat Pad Atrophy, sponsored by The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
16
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This single-centre observational case-control study investigates how peripheral arterial disease influences plantar load in people with diabetes who have recently healed a plantar foot ulcer. Using in-shoe pressure mapping (Pedar™) and 3D digital image correlation of a plasticine deformable insole (STAMPS system), we will quantify vertical pressure and strain magnitude. Weight-bearing ultrasound will assess plantar fat-pad thickness as a potential corollary for forefoot peak pressure and shear. All procedures are non-invasive and completed in a single \~90-minute visit at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.

Read the detailed description

Diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU) is associated with a high risk of recurrence following healing. Although peripheral neuropathy and abnormal plantar loading are established contributors to ulceration, the extent to which concomitant peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with differences in plantar pressure and shear-related deformation remains poorly understood. Structural changes in the plantar fat pad may contribute to altered load distribution, although this relationship has not been established.

The PLANE-DFU study is a single-centre observational case-control investigation comparing plantar loading characteristics between individuals with recently healed neuropathic and neuroischaemic DFU. Participants are classified according to neurological assessment, pedal vascular examination, toe pressure measurements and previous revascularisation history. The study aims to characterise associations between vascular phenotype, plantar loading and plantar fat-pad structure.

Plantar pressure is measured during walking using the Pedar™ in-shoe pressure measurement system. Plantar strain is assessed using the STAMPS3D system, which employs a plastically deformable insole with an applied speckle pattern. Stereoscopic images obtained before and after walking are processed using three-dimensional digital image correlation to reconstruct displacement and strain fields, including components associated with tangential loading. Repeated walking assessments are performed using both systems.

Plantar fat-pad thickness is assessed under weight-bearing conditions using sagittal ultrasonography through a custom ultrasound-compatible platform. Measurements are obtained in triplicate beneath each metatarsal head. These structural measurements are examined in relation to regional plantar loading characteristics to explore whether differences in fat-pad thickness are associated with pressure and strain distribution across the neuropathic and neuroischaemic groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Foot Ulcers, Diabetic
  • Plantar Foot Pressure
  • Fat Pad Atrophy
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease

Keywords

  • Plantar fat pad
03

In context

Foot Ulcer

196 studies on the registry are indexed under Foot Ulcer; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 84 across 26 observational studies indexed under Foot Ulcer.

Browse Foot Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Individuals with diabetes who have recently healed (\<3 months) a diabetes-related foot ulcer.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Confirmed diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2)
  • Recently healed plantar DFU (forefoot, \<3months)
  • Able to walk 10m unaided
  • Able to provide written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active ulceration or infection
  • Hindfoot or non-plantar ulcer location
  • Non-diabetic aetiology
  • Previous ipsilateral minor amputation or contralateral major lower limb amputation
  • Need for a walking aid
  • Inability to understand English instructions
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Neuropathic Diabetes-related Foot Ulcer (DFU) Cohort

    Participants with diabetes and a recently healed plantar forefoot (\<3 months) ulcer caused by neuropathic ulceration in the presence of preserved perfusion. Sensory neuropathy is confirmed by insensitivity to the 10 g monofilament (Ipswich Touch Test). Participants have at least one palpable pedal pulse and at least one multiphasic pedal Doppler signal, with opening toe pressure ≥ 60 mmHg. No history of lower-limb revascularisation.

    Diagnostic Test: Pedar™ In-Shoe Plantar Pressure Measurement System · Diagnostic Test: STAMPS 3D Digital Image Correlation System · Diagnostic Test: Weight-Bearing Ultrasound of the Plantar Fat Pad

  • Neuroischaemic Diabetes-related Foot Ulcer (DFU) Cohort

    Participants with diabetes and a recently healed plantar forefoot (\<3 months) of neuroischaemic aetiology, showing both sensory neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease. PAD is defined as a prior revascularisation procedure or by the absence of pedal pulses and monophasic or absent Doppler signal with an opening toe pressure ≤ 50 mmHg.

    Diagnostic Test: Pedar™ In-Shoe Plantar Pressure Measurement System · Diagnostic Test: STAMPS 3D Digital Image Correlation System · Diagnostic Test: Weight-Bearing Ultrasound of the Plantar Fat Pad

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPedar™ In-Shoe Plantar Pressure Measurement System

    The Pedar™ system (Novel GmbH, Munich, Germany) is a validated in-shoe pressure mapping platform comprising thin flexible insoles embedded with capacitive sensors. It measures vertical plantar pressure distribution during walking. In this study, participants wear the insoles inside standardised footwear while walking 10 steps at a self-selected pace to quantify peak pressure and pressure-time integrals across defined foot regions.

    Also known as: Pedar; Novel Pedar System; In-shoe pressure analysis

  • Diagnostic testSTAMPS 3D Digital Image Correlation System

    The STAMPS (Strain Analysis and Mapping of the Plantar Surface) platform uses 3D Digital Image Correlation to quantify deformation of a plastically deformable speckled insole during walking. Participants wear a soft boot containing the STAMPS insole and walk approximately ten steps at normal speed. This technique captures both vertical and tangential (shear) strain, providing spatial maps of plantar shear during gait.

    Also known as: STAMPS; Strain Analysis and Mapping of the Plantar Surface; 3D DIC plantar shear measurement

  • Diagnostic testWeight-Bearing Ultrasound of the Plantar Fat Pad

    High-frequency ultrasound is used to measure the thickness of the plantar fat pad under weight-bearing conditions. Participants stand barefoot on a transparent polymethyl methacrylate (Plexiglass) platform while the transducer is applied from beneath to obtain cross-sectional images of the forefoot at the level of each metatarsal head. The measurement provides structural information about plantar soft-tissue thickness as a proxy measure for plantar fat pad thickness.

    Also known as: Plantar ultrasound; Ultrasound fat-pad assessment; Weight-bearing plantar imaging

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in mean peak plantar pressure and peak shear strain between neuropathic and neuroischaemic cohorts

    Quantitative comparison of plantar load between neuropathic and neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcer groups. Mean peak plantar pressure (kPa) will be derived from in-shoe Pedar™ measurements, and mean peak plantar shear strain (SMag) will be obtained from 3D Digital Image Correlation (STAMPS) analysis. Data will be collected during a single walking trial at the study visit and expressed as regional and whole-foot means. The primary analysis will evaluate between-group differences in these parameters using linear regression to determine the effect of peripheral arterial disease on plantar loading.

    Time frame: Baseline (single 90-minute assessment visit)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals Nhs Trust
    Leeds, England - Midlands and East LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sairally F, Turnbull RP, Siddle HJ, Russell DA, Brockett C, Culmer PR. Development and evaluation of a novel 3D in-shoe plantar strain measurement system: STAMPS3D. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2025 May;239(5):472-484. doi: 10.1177/09544119251330738. Epub 2025 Apr 12. PubMed 40219920 ↗
  • Crossland SR, Siddle HJ, Brockett CL, Culmer P. Evaluating the use of a novel low-cost measurement insole to characterise plantar foot strain during gait loading regimes. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 17;11:1187710. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1187710. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37662427 ↗
  • Jones AD, Crossland SR, Nixon JE, Siddle HJ, Russell DA, Culmer PR. STrain Analysis and Mapping of the Plantar Surface (STAMPS): A novel technique of plantar load analysis during gait. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2023 Jul;237(7):841-854. doi: 10.1177/09544119231181797. Epub 2023 Jun 24. PubMed 37353979 ↗
  • Pitei DL, Lord M, Foster A, Wilson S, Watkins PJ, Edmonds ME. Plantar pressures are elevated in the neuroischemic and the neuropathic diabetic foot. Diabetes Care. 1999 Dec;22(12):1966-70. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.12.1966. PubMed 10587827 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The decision regarding IPD sharing will be made after study completion in consultation with the University of Leeds (sponsor) and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Anonymised datasets may be deposited in the University's Research Data Repository if deemed appropriate and compliant with data governance and participant consent provisions.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2025 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 19, 2026
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
StartActual
Oct 25, 2025
Primary completionActual
Apr 1, 2026
CompletionActual
Apr 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07901478
Collaborators
University of Leeds
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Oct 25, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026
Completion
Apr 1, 2026
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion