An interventional study of Main Group in Pain, sponsored by The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 130 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-15.
Sponsored by The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility
Chronic abdominal pain is a common disorder that can have significant impact on the lives of patients. Treatment options include medication which can have limited effectiveness, be associated with side effects and may lead to tolerance and dependency. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive, therapeutic option for managing chronic abdominal pain. This involves implanting a device that delivers mild electrical signals to the spinal cord to reduce pain. Conventional SCS has been shown to improve abdominal pain caused by different disorders, but it causes feelings of unpleasant tingling in the tummy area. This feasibility study aims to explore relief from chronic abdominal pain symptoms when using a device that does not cause uncomfortable tingling feelings in the tummy area.
Up to 20 patients with chronic abdominal pain will be recruited to participate in this study. They will attend an initial visit prior to having the device implanted and they will be asked to complete a number of questionnaires. Participants will then attend the hospital to have the device implanted and the treatment settings of the stimulation adjusted. Once the stimulation is started, participants will be continuously monitored for their well-being through a series of in-person visits at the pain clinic on a regular basis. These will happen at 1 week and 3, 6 and 12 months after having the device implanted.
10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.
Browse Pain studies →The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Relapsed and refractory
Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
All participants will undergo a single-stage SCS implantation procedure with 2 leads inserted in the posterior epidural space according to standard clinical practice. For ventral column stimulation SCS electrodes will be placed ventrally at T9/10 for upper abdominal pain and at T10/11 to T11/12 for lower abdominal pain.
Device: Main Group
Thoracolumbar spine AP, Thoracolumbar spine LAT
To evaluate the safety and feasibility of ECAP-controlled closed-loop SCS in treating patients with CAP.treating patients with CAP
To evaluate the safety and feasibility of ECAP-controlled closed-loop SCS in treating patients with CAP.Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the last week. • Incidence rates of study related adverse events will be collected and characterized.
Time frame: 12 MONTHS
• Changes in average pain intensity, in the primary region of pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the last week.
• Changes in average pain intensity, in the primary region of pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the last week.
Time frame: 12 MONTHS
• Incidence rates of study related adverse events will be collected and characterized.
• Incidence rates of study related adverse events will be collected and characterized.
Time frame: 12 MONTHS
Started Jan 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 16 months after the start.
Of 3,731 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 16 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 3,830 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust →