CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07116642PROM-SUpdated Aug 11, 2025

Comparing Patient Reported Outcomes and Clinical Outcomes Based on Different Scar Placement in Patients Undergoing Standard Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer: The PROM-S Study.

An observational study in Breast Cancer - Female and Surgery of Breast Cancer, sponsored by The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-11.

Sponsored by The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is for patients with breast cancer and the objective is to compare patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) based on scar placement in patients undergoing standard breast-conserving surgery (sBCS). BCS has become the standard of care for eligible patients with breast cancer (current UK national BCS rate is 60%).

Scar placement for sBCS can be divided into two groups: those directly over the cancer, or those in remote locations (e.g. around the nipple, near the armpit, the lower part of the breast, where the breast and the chest meet etc.) with the aim of hiding the scar in more visually acceptable locations on the breast. Multiple factors determine where the scar is placed such as aesthetics, other health conditions, location of the cancer, etc. However, it is currently unclear whether the location of scar placement for sBCS affects patient reported outcomes.

The growing importance on breast cosmesis has led to more attention from clinicians and patients with regards to the selection of surgical incision placement for sBCS. By using a validated questionnaire (BREAST-Q), we wish to assess if there is any difference in PROMs based on scar placement (over the lesion vs. remote) in patients undergoing sBCS.

It is anticipated that the study results will help champion and guide care for future breast cancer patients, as well as providing an insight into how patient satisfaction may vary between different sBCS approaches.

This questionnaire study will include consecutive patients undergoing sBCS at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.

Participation in this non-randomised study will not impact on routine clinical care or decision making for the type of surgery planned or scar placement choice. Patients will be asked to complete the BREAST-Q questionnaire prior to surgery, after 2 weeks, as well as 3 and 12 months after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Advances in surgical techniques, has led to a growing importance on breast appearance (cosmesis). Presently, scar placement for standard breast conserving surgery (sBCS) can vary from either directly over the cancer or be in remote locations with the aim of hiding the scar in more aesthetically acceptable locations on the breast.

A number of factors dictate the outcome of scar placement such as aesthetics, comorbidities, location of the cancer, etc. However, it is currently unclear whether the location of scar placement for sBCS affects patient reported outcomes in short- or long- term post-surgery as we do not have sufficient information from the patient's point of view of their experience and satisfaction.

We will use a validated patient outcomes questionnaire for breast surgery (BREAST-Q) to compare patient satisfaction with scar placement (over the lesion vs. remote) for patients undergoing sBCS. We hope that the results will provide valuable additional information when future patients are counselled with regards to scar placement.

The principle research objective is to assess the impact of scar placement location on patient reported and clinical outcomes utilising the BREAST-Q questionnaire in patients undergoing standard breast conserving surgery (sBCS).

Secondary objectives include:

  • comparing aesthetic outcome (appearance) and functional outcome of standard breast conserving surgery based on scar placement using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) from the patients' point of view.
  • comparing clinical outcomes between over the lesion vs. remote scar placement in patients undergoing standard breast conserving surgery
  • explore potential factors that influence the locations of scar placement for standard breast conserving surgery (surgeon / clinical factors).
  • explore the extent of patient involvement in decision-making process This is a single-centre, non-randomised observational study that aims to recruit a minimum of 75 participants. The surgery could be for invasive or non-invasive breast cancer, with or without axilla surgery. All patients will be invited to complete the BREAST-Q patient reported outcome questionnaire on four occasions. The four time points are: before surgery, 2 weeks after surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery.The BREAST-Q is a standardised and validated questionnaire that covers symptoms and issues such as physical, sexual and psychosocial well-being, satisfaction with breasts, the impact of radiotherapy and satisfaction with the treating medical team and the level of information provided.

The patient will receive instructions for completing the questionnaires from the study team. These can be completed either in paper forms or electronically. Additionally, socio-demographic and routine clinical data collected as part of standard care (including but not limited to complications and other treatments required, such as radiotherapy) will be recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer - Female
  • Surgery of Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • surgery
  • patient reported outcomes
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Breast cancer patients been treated with surgery at a single site in Leeds, UK

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients ≥18 years of age
  • Able to provide written informed consent
  • Invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) suitable for sBCS (including multifocal cancers requiring x2 wires or magseeds)
  • Able to understand and complete the questionnaire

Scar over the lesion defined as radial, transverse, vertical, oblique scar over the tumour lesion location in the breast Remote incisions defined as lateral perimeter/periareolar/infra-mammary fold/ benelli/hemi-batwing

  • No restrictions on tumour size (decision on suitability for sBCS will be based on clinical assessment)
  • Any axillary nodal staging status
  • Bilateral cancers allowed
  • Post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) allowed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients (BCS not proven as standard of care) or transgender
  • Patients undergoing oBCS (such as wise pattern, vertical scar mastopexy incision pattern or volume replacement chest wall perforator flap)
  • Patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate autologous or implant reconstruction
  • Patients requiring nipple excision (central wide local excision)
  • Patients undergoing wide local excision under local anaesthetic
  • Women not able or willing to give informed consent
  • Where close tumour proximity to skin or skin involvement necessitates skin excision over the tumour
  • Patients diagnosed with locoregional recurrence
  • Patients diagnosed with associated distant metastasis
  • Patients undergoing diagnostic excision surgery for atypical breast lesions or benign lesions
  • Patients diagnosed with phyllodes lesion
  • Patients who have had previous ipsilateral breast surgery (any type)
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The BREAST-Q - Breast Conserving Therapy Module

    The BREAST-Q is a validated PROM that has been developed for the use in a breast cancer population (Pusic et al. 2009). It can be used to assess the PROMs at pre-operative baseline and at multiple time points after surgery. In particular, the Breast Conserving Therapy Module is able to assess multiple domains including physical, sexual and psychosocial well-being, satisfaction with breasts, the impact of radiotherapy and satisfaction with the treating medical team and level of information provided (Klassen et al. 2020). The module uses an independent Rasch 'scales' with overarching themes of psychosocial and physical quality of life. The scores are converted to a Rasch scale 0-100 with higher scores meaning better satisfaction.

    Time frame: from enrolment to 12 months

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • St James's University Hospital
    Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07116642
Lead sponsor
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2025
Start date
Feb 20, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2025

Study contacts

Sue M Dr Hartup, PhD, RGN
Contact
s.hartup@nhs.net
+44 0113 2068628
Baek Mr Kim, FRCS, MD, MA
Contact
b.kim@nhs.net
+44 0113 2068628
Sue Dr Hartup, PhD, RN
principal investigator · Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion