ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07872930COMBAT-HUpdated Oct 14, 2026

Clinical Performance of ComBatic™ Antimicrobial Wound Care Products in Hard-to-Heal Wounds

A Phase 2 interventional study of Irrigation Solution for wounds and Hydrogel for wound care in Chronic Wound of the Lower Limb (Leg Ulcer or Foot Ulcer) and Chronic Wound Care, sponsored by University of Calgary. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-14.

Sponsored by University of Calgary · Phase 2, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Oct 14, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is To assess the feasibility of delivering the study protocol in adults with chronic, hard-to-heal lower leg wounds. as measured by recruitment rate, retention, adherence to the assigned treatment schedule, and completeness of outcome data, in each of Study A (CAWL versus standard of care) and Study B (CAWH versus standard of care). The main outcomes it aims to answer are

  • assessing the impact of treatment on patient-reported health-related quality of life, as measured by the global score and subscores of the validated Wound-QoL questionnaire, from baseline to end of study.
  • conduct an exploratory within-trial economic evaluation by estimating healthcare resource use, associated costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L in the intervention and usual care groups over the study period.
  • evaluate the safety and tolerability of the investigational products including the incidence, nature, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events and adverse device reactions.
  • generate preliminary estimates of clinical effect in each of Study A and Study B, including change in wound surface area from baseline to end of study, change in wound appearance characteristics, and the proportion of participants achieving greater than or equal to 50% reduction in wound surface area Researchers will compare Study A (CAWL) to the control which is the site's routine wound cleansing or irrigation product, selected by the treating clinician as clinically indicated for the wound presentation. This may include an antimicrobial or antiseptic product (e.g., a silver, PHMB, iodine, or honey-based formulation) where clinically appropriate, or a non-antimicrobial solution such as normal saline where it is not. Researchers will compare Study B (CAWH) to the control which is the standard-of-care comparator is the site's routine moisture-donating dressing, selected by the treating clinician as clinically indicated. This may include a dressing with its own antimicrobial barrier claim where clinically appropriate, or a moisture-donation-only dressing where it is not.

Participants will in Study A, be given Combatic Lavage (CAWL) as the wound cleansing product. Participants will in Study B, be given Combatic Hydrogel (CAWH) as the wound moisture balancing product.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Wound of the Lower Limb (Leg Ulcer or Foot Ulcer)
  • Chronic Wound Care
03

In context

Leg Ulcer

302 studies on the registry are indexed under Leg Ulcer; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is above the median of 60 across 245 interventional studies indexed under Leg Ulcer.

Browse Leg Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary is the lead sponsor of 699 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older at time of enrollment.
  • Wound located below the knee.
  • Wound surface area greater than or equal to 2 cm² and less than or equal to 50 cm² at screening.
  • Wound present for at least 4 weeks prior to screening.
  • Chronic wound status: failure to achieve greater than 50% wound closure after a minimum four-week lead-in period of standard of care treatment.
  • Patient deemed competent to provide informed consent and able to comply with study procedures.
  • No prior treatment with ComBatic™ products.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ischaemic wounds with inadequate blood perfusion as assessed by the investigator.
  • Underlying osteomyelitis.
  • Active participation in another interventional clinical study.
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would place the patient at undue risk or confound study results.
  • Patients identified as unlikely to comply with study procedures or required follow-up visits
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ComBatic™ Antimicrobial Wound Lavage (CAWL): Wound Cleansing

    CAWL is indicated for the cleansing and irrigation of acute and chronic wounds, and its indication is not restricted by wound type, etiology, infection status, or moisture level. This arm enrolls participants whose wounds show signs of active infection or suspected biofilm burden. This is an enrichment strategy adopted for the purposes of this pilot, selecting participants with an elevated cleansing and debridement requirement in whom any difference relative to standard of care cleansing is most likely to be observable.

    Device: Irrigation Solution for wounds

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care: Wound Cleansing

    The standard-of-care comparator is the site's routine wound cleansing or irrigation product, selected by the treating clinician as clinically indicated for the wound presentation. This may include an antimicrobial or antiseptic product (e.g., a silver, PHMB, iodine, or honey-based formulation) where clinically appropriate, or a non-antimicrobial solution such as normal saline where it is not. This arm enrolls participants whose wounds require cleansing and irrigation; enriched for signs of active infection or suspected biofilm burden.

  • Experimental
    ComBatic™ Antimicrobial Wound Hydrogel (CAWH): Wound Moisture Dressing

    CAWH is indicated as a wound dressing that provides an antimicrobial barrier and maintains a moist wound environment. This arm enrolls participants with dry or semi-dry wounds with or without active infection/biofilm requiring moisture balance, as these are the wounds in which the moisture-maintaining function of the product is indicated.

    Device: Hydrogel for wound care

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care: Wound Moisture Dressing

    The standard-of-care comparator is the site's routine moisture-donating dressing, selected by the treating clinician as clinically indicated. This may include a dressing with its own antimicrobial barrier claim where clinically appropriate, or a moisture-donation-only dressing where it is not. This arm enrolls participants with dry or semi-dry wounds requiring moisture balance, with or without active infection or suspected biofilm burden.

Interventions

  • DeviceIrrigation Solution for wounds

    This wound care product is a next-generation, non-antibiotic antimicrobial wound cleansing and irrigation solution designed for rapid infection control, biofilm disruption, and wound bed preparation, composed of medical/food grade all-natural ingredients with a natural preservative system.

  • DeviceHydrogel for wound care

    The hydrogel wound-care device is a next-generation, non-antibiotic wound gel developed to rapidly control infection and support accelerated wound healing while remaining safe for repeated and long-term use. It is designed to support natural wound healing and reduce inflammation and infection burden in complex wounds by providing an antimicrobial barrier and maintaining a moist wound environment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participant Recruitment Rate

    Recruitment rate reported as the number of participants enrolled per site per month

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks.

  2. Participant Retention Rate

    Retention rate reported as the proportion of randomized participants completing the week 5 end-of-study visit across all sites.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks

  3. Treatment Adherence Documentation

    Treatment adherence reported as the proportion of scheduled treatment applications completed as recorded on the Diary Card and Case Report Forms at the end of the 5 week study

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 weeks

  4. Wound Imaging Documentation

    Proportion of participants who received scheduled wound imaging

    Time frame: week 1, week 2, and week 5

  5. Quality of Life Documentation

    Proportion of participants who completed the quality of life assessments (Wound QoL and EQ-5D-5L) during each week of the 5-week study

    Time frame: week 1 to week 5

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Feb 2028, 13 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 29, 2026
First posted
Oct 14, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 31, 2028
Last update
Oct 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 14, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 14, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07872930
Collaborators
Genome Alberta, MHCombiotic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 14, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 14, 2026

Study contacts

Vanessa Adams
Contact
vanessa.pederson@ucalgary.ca
4038990464

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion