ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07881575Updated Oct 19, 2026

Testing a Multi-Level Approach to Reduce Stigma for Women Living With HIV

An interventional study of Labda Siku Moja and Total Facility Approach in HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), sponsored by RTI International. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Tanzania. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-19.

Sponsored by RTI International · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 19, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
680
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study will test two approaches to reduce HIV-related stigma and improve quality of life and viral suppression among women living with HIV in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Twenty health facilities will take part. One approach will help facility staff reduce stigma, while the other will use group sessions to help women manage internalized stigma. The study will include 680 women living with HIV who have missed clinic visits or attended the most recent clinic visit 14 or more days late and will follow them for 12 months. Researchers will assess quality of life and viral suppression as well as how well the approaches are delivered, what supports or limits their success, and their initial costs. A study advisory group-including women living with HIV, community partners, health care providers, and Ministry of Health representatives-will help refine the approaches, interpret the findings, and guide recommendations for wider use.

Read the detailed description

This study will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a multilevel HIV stigma reduction intervention that integrates two evidence-based, culturally tailored components previously adapted for Tanzania: the Total Facility Approach (TFA) to reduce health care facility (HCF) stigma among clinical and nonclinical staff, and Labda Siku Moja (LSM) to reduce internalized stigma among WLWH through ethnodrama-based group sessions guided by motivational interviewing techniques.

Using a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design, we will conduct a hierarchical 2×2 factorial cluster-randomized controlled trial in 20 Ministry of Health and non-profit faith-based HCF offering ART in Dar es Salaam region. Facilities will be randomized to TFA or standard of care (SOC). Within each facility, 34 WLWH who have missed clinic visits or attended the most recent clinic visit 14 or more days late (N=680) will be individually randomized to receive LSM or SOC. Primary outcomes are QoL (WHOQOL-BREF) and viral suppression (\<50 copies/ml) measured over 12 months.

A prospective mixed methods process evaluation will assess implementation fidelity, mechanisms and mediators of change (including stigma and psychosocial constructs), contextual influences on outcomes, and preliminary intervention costs using programmatic data, surveys, qualitative focus groups, and micro-costing methods. A Study Advisory Group (SAG) comprising WLWH, community partners, providers, and Ministry of Health representatives will guide intervention refinement, interpret findings, and develop recommendations to optimize the study for broader implementation. If effective, the study will provide scalable evidence to improve QoL and viral suppression among WLWH and advance Tanzania's and global goals for ending the HIV epidemic.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Stigma
  • Women
  • Tanzania
  • Quality of Life
  • Viral Suppression
  • Multilevel intervention
03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

2,099 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 680 is above the median of 104 across 1,590 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

RTI International is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female, living with HIV and receiving services at one of the 20 selected HCF/CTCs
  • Age 18 years old and above
  • Evidence of care engagement challenge, defined as either:
  • Missed a scheduled clinic visit in the past 12 months, or
  • Attended the most recent clinic visit 14 or more days late
  • Routinely receiving services at the HCF where recruited
  • Not anticipating changing HCF in the next 12 months
  • Willing to provide whole-blood samples for viral load testing (baseline and 12 months)
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to visit the facility during recruitment period
  • Too medically unwell at recruitment to safely complete study procedures (e.g., severe weakness, high fever, severe pain, vomiting/dehydration, shortness of breath, confusion).
  • Severe mental health condition, acute distress, intoxication, or cognitive impairment that prevents informed consent or reliable participation. (This criterion is applied observationally by the research assistant at the point of contact and does not involve a screening instrument, a standardized assessment or a review of the client's mental health diagnoses. It is a judgement about capacity to engage with the consent conversation on that day, not a judgement about whether the woman has a mental health condition.)
  • Psychiatric emergency at recruitment (e.g., active suicidal intent/plan, severe agitation/psychosis) requiring urgent care.
  • Communication barrier that makes consent or data collection not feasible with available accommodations.
  • Refuses to provide minimum locator/tracing information needed for follow-up.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
680 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care (SOC)

    Standard of care HIV (usual) HIV treatment and care services only

  • Experimental
    SOC + Labda Siku Moja Intervention (LSM)

    Standard of care HIV (usual) HIV treatment and care services only + internalized stigma reduction intervention for women living with HIV

    Behavioral: Labda Siku Moja

  • Experimental
    SOC + Total Facility Approach (TFA)

    Standard of care HIV (usual) HIV treatment and care services only + facility-level stigma reduction intervention

    Behavioral: Total Facility Approach

  • Experimental
    TFA + LSM

    Facility-level stigma reduction intervention + internalized stigma reduction intervention for women living with HIV

    Behavioral: Labda Siku Moja · Behavioral: Total Facility Approach

Interventions

  • BehavioralLabda Siku Moja

    An internalized stigma reduction intervention using ethnodrama videos and guided group discussion with motivational interviewing techniques.

  • BehavioralTotal Facility Approach

    Facility-level stigma reduction intervention using participatory training plus follow-on action planning led by facility champions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life among women living with HIV (participants), measured using the WHO Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL-BREF).

    The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item self-report questionnaire assessing four domains: Physical Health (7 items; e.g., pain, energy, sleep, mobility), Psychological Health (6 items; e.g., positive/negative feelings, self-esteem, thinking), Social Relationships (3 items; personal relationships, social support, sexual activity), and Environment (8 items; e.g., financial resources, safety, health access, physical environment). Two additional items assess overall quality of life and general health. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5). Domain scores are calculated by summing item scores and transforming them to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better perceived quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after intervention

  2. HIV Viral Load Suppression

    Percentage of participants with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in self-esteem, as measured by the Swahili version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

    Scores range from 10 to 40, with lower scores indicating lower self-esteem and higher scores indicating higher self-esteem

    Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention

  2. Change in depressive symptoms, as measured by the Swahili version of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

    Scores range from 0 to 27, with lower scores indicating less depressive symptoms and higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention

  3. Intermediate Quality of Life (QoL) among women living with HIV (participants), measured using the WHO Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL-BREF).

    The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item self-report questionnaire assessing four domains: Physical Health (7 items; e.g., pain, energy, sleep, mobility), Psychological Health (6 items; e.g., positive/negative feelings, self-esteem, thinking), Social Relationships (3 items; personal relationships, social support, sexual activity), and Environment (8 items; e.g., financial resources, safety, health access, physical environment). Two additional items assess overall quality of life and general health. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5). Domain scores are calculated by summing item scores and transforming them to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better perceived quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline to 3 and 6 months after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • RTI International Study Office
    Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 19, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 19, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07881575
Lead sponsor
RTI International
Responsible party
Laura Nyblade (Fellow, Health Policy, RTI International) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
Start date
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2026

Study contacts

Laura Nyblade Nyblade, PhD
Contact
lynblade@rti.org
+1 202 641 2388
Jacqueline Ndirangu, MSc
Contact
jndirangu@rti.org
+254-791-814-973
Laura W Nyblade, PhD
principal investigator · RTI International
Jessie K Mwambo, MD
principal investigator · Muhimbili National Hospital/MUHAS/RTI

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion