ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07745101ROADMAPSUpdated Aug 4, 2026

Research On Advanced Diagnostics and Management of All Pregnancies to Prevent Stillbirth (ROADMAPS)

An observational study in Stillbirth, sponsored by RTI International. Not yet recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-04.

Sponsored by RTI International · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
7,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the Stillbirth Research Consortium (SBRC) longitudinal cohort study is to develop and evaluate a robust multivariable prediction model to identify pregnancies at \<14 weeks gestation that are at increased risk of stillbirth or fetal growth restriction (FGR), often reflecting underlying placental dysfunction.

Secondary objectives include:

  • To evaluate placental pathology among cases and selected controls using standardized Amsterdam criteria.
  • To identify key aspects of perinatal nutrition contributing to placental dysfunction
  • To determine relationships between maternal biomarkers, placental pathology and energetics, with the goal of identifying biomarkers predictive of placental dysfunction
  • To develop a risk stratification model for pregnancies complicated by decreased fetal movements (DFM)
Read the detailed description

In the United States, stillbirth defined as fetal death at or beyond 20 weeks' gestation affects approximately 5.48/1,000 births, or 1 in 180 pregnancies, a rate that surpasses many other high-resource countries, highlighting major opportunities for improvement and prevention. Prevention of stillbirth in the United States requires improved risk stratification to identify pregnancies at highest risk. Unfortunately, commonly used pre-pregnancy risk factors such as parity, advanced maternal age, and body mass index are poor predictors of stillbirth and explain only a small proportion of stillbirth risk. Critical gaps in stillbirth risk stratification hamper efforts to accurately identify at-risk pregnancies early enough to enable effective interventions and ultimately reduce stillbirth and those on the path to stillbirth.

FGR is frequently a manifestation of underlying placental dysfunction and one of the strongest known risk factors for stillbirth, with a stillbirth rate of 1.5% (two-fold increased risk). FGR, defined as a fetus that fails to reach its growth potential, is difficult to diagnose. The term small for gestational age, defined as estimated or actual birthweight below the 10th percentile, is often used interchangeably with FGR, although it does not distinguish between constitutionally small fetuses and those affected by pathologic growth restriction.

Early onset FGR is well recognized as a major risk factor for stillbirth, yet nearly half of FGR fetuses are not detected antenatally. The development of abnormal fetal umbilical artery (UA) Doppler indices differentiates between constitutionally small fetuses and those with increased risk of stillbirth. Estimated fetal weight below the 3rd percentile has been associated with a further increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome irrespective of Doppler indices (3-fold risk over 3rd to 5th percentile, and 4- to 7-fold risk over 5th to 10th percentile).

To address the need for more timely identification of pregnancies at risk for stillbirth or FGR, we will conduct a longitudinal prospective cohort study to develop a prediction model to identify pregnancies at \<14 weeks gestation with increased risk of stillbirth or severe FGR. We will use the Hadlock nomogram to define birthweight percentile since we seek to identify at-risk pregnancies prenatally.

Placental Dysfunction

Placental dysfunction is a central biological pathway underlying both FGR and many stillbirths. It reflects the inability of the placenta to meet the metabolic demands of a growing fetus. However, placental dysfunction is heterogenous and difficult to diagnose during an ongoing pregnancy. Post delivery, placental dysfunction can be identified following a complete pathologic evaluation, using standardized pathologic criteria, including maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM), inflammatory villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) or acute chorioamnionitis (ACA) patterns of injury, or as Massive Perivillous Fibrin Deposition/Maternal Floor Infarction (MPVFD/MFI) as defined by the Amsterdam Workshop Guidelines.

Despite advances in placental pathology, there are currently no validated biomarkers that can reliably identify placental dysfunction during pregnancy. The placenta generates and utilizes considerable energy to support its own function consuming half of the oxygen and nutrients supplied to the pregnant uterus. Measurement of trophoblast energetics in vitro post-delivery allows assessment into placental "health" and ability to support the fetus.

To address the need for more timely identification of pregnancies at risk for stillbirth and FGR, we will utilize innovative placental imaging and biomarkers to examine early indicators of placental dysfunction before 14 weeks' gestation and their association with stillbirth and severe FGR (Secondary Objective).

Perinatal Nutrition

Perinatal nutrition is a potentially modifiable factor that influences placental function and pregnancy outcomes. Higher diet quality has been associated with lower allostatic load, while suboptimal perinatal nutrition is associated with stillbirth and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nutritional status is critical for the health of the pregnant individual, placental function, and developing offspring. By understanding the role of nutrition in pregnancy outcomes, we will be able to better identify high-risk individuals and potential interventions.

Decreased Fetal Movements

DFM are generally assessed as part of standard care; however, assessment and management vary widely, and evidence regarding their predictive value is inconsistent. Within this cohort, we will collect standardized data on fetal movements and evaluate their association with adverse outcomes. These data will be used to develop a risk stratification framework and inform best practices for the clinical management of DFM.

Together, achieving these objectives will provide a better understanding of these factors will provide robust information to inform clinical practice to improve birth outcomes in the United States.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stillbirth

Keywords

  • Stillbirth
  • Fetal growth restriction
03

In context

Stillbirth

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Stillbirth; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 7,000 is above the median of 480 across 55 observational studies indexed under Stillbirth.

Browse Stillbirth studies →

Lead sponsor

RTI International is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population for the primary objective will include pregnant individuals who are screened and enrolled between 12.0 and 13.6 weeks of gestation at participating clinical sites ("Early Pregnancy Cohort"). Individuals may also be screened and enrolled at later gestational ages greater than or equal to 28 weeks gestation to address the secondary objectives of the project, including DFM, and FGR and relationship to perinatal nutrition and allostatic load ("Late Pregnancy Cohort").

This study will collect discarded neonatal cord blood post-delivery and will request access to neonatal medical record charts using appropriate HIPAA Authorization. We will also collect paternal saliva samples, when possible, after obtaining consent from the father.

Eligibility criteria

Early Pregnancy Cohort Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 years of age
  • Gestational age at enrollment: Between 12.0 and 13.6 weeks of gestation
  • Pregnant individuals receiving care at participating clinical sites with intent of delivering at study hospital
  • Consent to participate in study procedures through 6 weeks postpartum

Late Pregnancy Cohort

  • 18 years or older
  • Gestational age at enrollment: greater than or equal to 28.0 weeks gestational age
  • Clinical indications of risk FGR \<10th percentile or report of decreased fetal movement)
  • Pregnant individual receiving care at participating clinical sites with intent of delivering at study hospital
  • Consent to participate in study procedures through 6 weeks postpartum

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of fetal genetic anomaly or major structural malformation
  • Known fetal aneuploidy based on chorionic villus sampling
  • Positive cell-free fetal DNA screening for aneuploidy
  • Multifetal gestation
  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Not fluent in either English or Spanish
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
7,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Early Pregnancy Cohort

    * 18 years or older * Gestational age at enrollment: Between 12.0 and 13.6 weeks of gestation * Pregnant individuals receiving care at participating clinical sites with intent of delivering at study hospital * Consent to participate in study procedures through 6 weeks postpartum

  • Late Pregnancy Cohort

    * 18 years or older * Gestational age at enrollment: greater than or equal to 28.0 weeks gestational age * Clinical indications of risk (FGR \<10th percentile or report of decreased fetal movement) * Pregnant individual receiving care at participating clinical sites with intent of delivering at study hospital * Consent to participate in study procedures through 6 weeks postpartum

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome is a composite outcome of stillbirth or severe placental dysfunction, defined as the occurrence of birth at or beyond 20.0 weeks of gestation.

    Stillbirth, Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) or Neonatal Mortality \<7 days among births at ≥20.0 weeks' gestation meeting one or more of the following: * Stillbirth among births at \>20.0 weeks' gestation * FGR defined as: FGR \< 3rd percentile FGR 3 - \<10th percentile with at least one of the following criteria: Umbilical artery Doppler \> 95th percentile for either systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D), pulsatility index (PI), or resistance index (RI) Oligohydramnios Non-reassuring fetal heart rate or biophysical profile \- Neonatal death less than or equal to 7 days, excluding non-medical causes Primary outcome Time Frame: Birth through 7-days post delivery

    Time frame: 7 days post delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stillbirth

    Stillbirth among all births

    Time frame: Delivery

  2. Fetal growth restriction (FGR)

    Fetal growth restriction \<10%ile with at least one of the following criteria: * Umbilical artery Doppler \> 95th percentile for either systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D), pulsatility index (PI), or resistance index (RI) * Oligohydramnios * Non-reassuring fetal heart rate or biophysical profile

    Time frame: Delivery

  3. Neonatal mortality

    Early neonatal mortality among live births

    Time frame: Up to 7 days after delivery

  4. Placental dysfunction among stillbirths, fetal growth restriction and neonatal deaths

    Placental dysfunction will be defined using the Amsterdam Criteria including the following characteristics: Maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM), VUE, or MPVFD/MFI; other important findings associated with placental insufficiency; and/or cord abnormalities associated with placental insufficiency

    Time frame: Delivery

  5. Cause of stillbirth

    Classification of cause of stillbirth using published classification system

    Time frame: Delivery

  6. Apgar score

    Among fetal growth restriction (\<10th%ile) infants, 5-minute Apgar score

    Time frame: Delivery

  7. Neurologic injury

    Evidence of neurologic injury among infants with severe FGR

    Time frame: Birth to 7 days

  8. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)

    HIE based on the Sarnat examination among infants with severe fetal growth restriction.

    Time frame: Birth to 7 days

  9. Intraventricular hemorrhage

    Diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage among infants with severe fetal growth restricition.

    Time frame: delivery

  10. Hypotension

    Hypotension requiring vasopressor or inotrope for cardiovascular support among infants with severe fetal growth restriction

    Time frame: Birth to 7 days

  11. Cord arterial blood gas

    Cord arterial blood gas demonstrating pH \<7.0 or base excess \> 12 mEq/L among infants with severe fetal growth restriction

    Time frame: Birth to 7 days

  12. Seizures

    Neonatal seizures among infants with severe fetal growth restriction

    Time frame: Birth to 7 days

  13. Gestational age at delivery

    Estimated gestational age at delivery based on early ultrasound among infants with severe fetal growth restriction.

    Time frame: Delivery

  14. Days admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

    Number days admitted to the NICU among infants with severe fetal growth restriction

    Time frame: Birth to day 28

  15. Neonatal mortality

    Neonaal death (\<=28 days) among infants with severe fetal growth restriction.

    Time frame: Birth to 28 days post-delivery

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • University of California Center for Stillbirth Prevention
    San Diego, California 92093, United States
    • Mana Parast, MD, PhD · Contactmparast@health.ucsd.edu · 858-534-8631
    • Mana Parast, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • The Collaborative Action for Research to End Stillbirth (CARES) Research Center at Columbia University
    New York, New York 10027, United States
    • Uma Reddy, MD, MPH · Contactuma.reddy@yale.edu · 240-401-3605
    • Uma Reddy, MD, MPH · Principal investigator
    • Xiao Xu, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
    • Karen Gibbins, MD, MSCI · Contactgibbins@ohsu.edu · 503-494-2101
    • Karen Gibbins, MD, MSCI · Principal investigator
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
  • Old Dominion University
    Norfolk, Virginia 23529, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G. & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41.
  • Zhou MS, Hasson RE, Baylin A, Leung CW. Associations between Diet Quality and Allostatic Load in US Adults: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2018. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Dec;122(12):2207-2217. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 6. PubMed 35533873 ↗
  • Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr. Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:245-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 18. No abstract available. PubMed 25981519 ↗
  • Silver RM, Reddy U. Stillbirth: we can do better. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):152-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.042. Epub 2024 May 23. PubMed 38789073 ↗
  • Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, Harrell FE Jr, Martin GP, Reitsma JB, Moons KGM, Collins G, van Smeden M. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441. No abstract available. PubMed 32188600 ↗
  • Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org; Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):B2-B17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 12. PubMed 32407785 ↗
  • Marshall NE, Abrams B, Barbour LA, Catalano P, Christian P, Friedman JE, Hay WW Jr, Hernandez TL, Krebs NF, Oken E, Purnell JQ, Roberts JM, Soltani H, Wallace J, Thornburg KL. The importance of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation: lifelong consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):607-632. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.035. Epub 2021 Dec 27. PubMed 34968458 ↗
  • Khong TY, Mooney EE, Ariel I, Balmus NC, Boyd TK, Brundler MA, Derricott H, Evans MJ, Faye-Petersen OM, Gillan JE, Heazell AE, Heller DS, Jacques SM, Keating S, Kelehan P, Maes A, McKay EM, Morgan TK, Nikkels PG, Parks WT, Redline RW, Scheimberg I, Schoots MH, Sebire NJ, Timmer A, Turowski G, van der Voorn JP, van Lijnschoten I, Gordijn SJ. Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Jul;140(7):698-713. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0225-CC. Epub 2016 May 25. PubMed 27223167 ↗
  • Kawakita T, Diab YH, Onishi K, Saade G. Nutrition Pattern and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Nulliparous Individuals: A Cluster Analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2026 May;43(7):955-962. doi: 10.1055/a-2712-5518. Epub 2025 Sep 29. PubMed 41022129 ↗
  • Jack-Roberts C, Maples P, Kalkan B, Edwards K, Gilboa E, Djuraev I, Zou S, Hoepner L, Fordjour L, Lee WC, Kral J, Dalloul M, Jiang X. Gestational diabetes status and dietary intake modify maternal and cord blood allostatic load markers. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Oct;8(1):e001468. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001468. PubMed 33093129 ↗
  • International Stillbirth Alliance Collaborative for Improving Classification of Perinatal Deaths; Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Ellwood D, Leisher SH, Erwich JJHM, Draper ES, McClure EM, Reinebrant HE, Oats J, McCowan L, Kent AL, Gardener G, Gordon A, Tudehope D, Siassakos D, Storey C, Zuccollo J, Dahlstrom JE, Gold KJ, Gordijn S, Pettersson K, Masson V, Pattinson R, Gardosi J, Khong TY, Froen JF, Silver RM. Classification of causes and associated conditions for stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):176-185. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 9. PubMed 28285990 ↗
  • Howell A, Thilaganathan B, Margelyte R, Burden C, Cheng V, Sandall J, Viner M, Brigante L, Anumba D, Winter C, Harlev-Lam B, Draycott T, Judge A, Lenguerrand E; Tommy's National Centre for Maternity Improvement. Why current risk factor-based approaches fall short in predicting stillbirth: a national cohort study of nulliparous women in England. BMC Med. 2026 Jan 22;24(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04598-7. PubMed 41572249 ↗
  • Ego A, Monier I, Skaare K, Zeitlin J. Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and risk of stillbirth: population-based case-control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):613-620. doi: 10.1002/uog.20414. PubMed 31364201 ↗
  • Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782. PubMed 3651732 ↗
  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available. PubMed 6668417 ↗
  • Committee on Genetics. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 383: Evaluation of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;110(4):963-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263934.51252.e0. PubMed 17906047 ↗
  • Caradeux J, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Basuki TR, Kiserud T, Figueras F. Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S774-S782.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.566. Epub 2017 Dec 9. PubMed 29233550 ↗
  • Billioux, A., Verlander, K., Anthony, S., & Alley, D. (2017). Standardized screening for health-related social needs in clinical settings: The Accountable Health Communities Screening Tool. National Academy of Medicine Perspectives, 1-9.
  • Azpurua H, Funai EF, Coraluzzi LM, Doherty LF, Sasson IE, Kliman M, Kliman HJ. Determination of placental weight using two-dimensional sonography and volumetric mathematic modeling. Am J Perinatol. 2010 Feb;27(2):151-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1234034. Epub 2009 Aug 3. PubMed 19653142 ↗
  • Arleo EK, Troiano RN, da Silva R, Greenbaum D, Kliman HJ. Utilizing two-dimensional ultrasound to develop normative curves for estimated placental volume. Am J Perinatol. 2014 Sep;31(8):683-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357265. Epub 2013 Oct 9. PubMed 24108663 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07745101
Lead sponsor
RTI International
Responsible party
Elizabeth McClure (Senior Research Epidemiologist, RTI International) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 4, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 4, 2026

Study contacts

Elizabeth McClure, PhD
Contact
mcclure@rti.org
919-316-3773
Carla Bann, PhD
Contact
cmb@rti.org
919-485-2773
Elizabeth McClure, PhD
principal investigator · RTI International

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion